15 July 2006
In the week gay women got the go-ahead to have IVF on the NHS, one couple who paid for treatment insist their son won’t miss not having a father…
Oh well, if they insist their son won’t miss having a father, then it must be the case, right? Why don’t they try asking their son when he’s older whether he likes not having a dad and instead being raised by two selfish fucking rug-munching men-hating scumbags.
Certainly Ruth and Jude, 37, a detective constable with the Met, believe that their son Ben doesn’t need a father — as long as he has two loving parents.
Ruth says: “I feel the most important thing for any baby is that it is born into a loving family, not that it has a mum and a dad. If a child has such a loving and caring upbringing, the typical father figure is not required.”
Your son has not been born in to a family, loving or otherwise!
How many fucking times does it have to be said; a family is a mum, dad and children. Not one woman and her bastard or two women and their bastard.
Note the first couple of words this Ruth says: “I feel…”
She feels that the kid doesn’t need a dad, so therefore it must be true.
If a woman feeeh-ulls that 1 + 1 = 3 then that means 1 + 1 = 3. QED.
So where once children had ‘mums’ and ‘dads’, they now have ‘parents’ and judging by the widespread support Jude and Ruth claim to have received from family, friends and work colleagues, British society today is far more accepting than it has ever been.
Probably because the only family and and friends they have contact with them anymore are those that support them; everyone else has no doubt shunned them. I would. Pair of selfish child abusers; that’s what they are, child abusers, because they are inflicting illegitimacy on a child and depriving him of a father, which is abuse.
Note this comment:
“There will be plenty of male role models in his [the baby’s] life because it’s not a case of our hating men…”
Yet a few paragraphs later:
“There have been no problems with my kids at all because I think women are naturally more caring.”
So they don’t hate men, but they regard men as uncaring and not necessary in a child’s life?
If someone said “I don’t hate black people” then explained that “white people are more caring than blacks” and insisted black people aren’t necessary in any part of society, I think most people could safely conclude that such a person, in fact, does hate black people and is therefore a racist git. The same goes for these women; they claim they don’t hate men…they just regard them as uncaring and unnecessary. That sounds pretty misandrist to me.
Then they explain why they used an anonymous donor:
“We just didn’t want a complication of a dad in our children’s lives. We worried that any man would want access to his child or to be a father to it. At worst, he could even make a claim on his child or want to interfere in the way it’s brought up.”
This seems to be the attitude of an increasing number of women, not just lesbians or single women who go to sperm banks, but divorced women or those splitting up from a boyfriend they have kids with; they’re worried the man might actually be a father to his child or might – “at worst” – make a claim on his child. That above paragraph makes it clear these two hopeless “parents” see their child as nothing more than a pet or a toy, especially the way they refer to their son as “it” in the last sentence! “…the way it’s bought up.” Charming.
This is a call to all men; do not ever ever donate sperm ever. Let’s stop scum like this from inflicting illegitimacy on children.
The couple are planning to go through a civil partnership ceremony next year, which will give Ruth the same parental rights as any father…
So absolutely fuck all rights then?
I can barely finish this article. I can’t stand to read any more of the sickening drivel spouted forth by these two shitbags, especially in the knowledge that the British government is encouraging this.
I hate this stinking society.
posted by Duncan Idaho @ 10:30 AM
At 11:56 AM, Anonymous said…
Thanks a lot for posting this one … spewed my morning coffee all over the keyboard!
At 4:35 PM, The 2nd Nin said…
I find this interesting, how exactly does IVF help two lesbians, by default (and unless they have made advances I am not aware of) there has to be a man involved somewhere in this process.
Considering some of the nasty things that have happened to sperm doners (presumably these women aren’t using husbands / boyfriends) the sperm doners may still have rights to this “it”… I think the words that fit are “be afraid, very afraid”.
At 4:36 PM, Captain Zarmband said…
When the kids in therapy in a few years time these too will blame society for the problem.
This is another example of female consumerism… “I want so therefore I’ll have it and everyone else will have to accept it….Me…me…me..meeeeee.”
So what happens if these two split up which is highly likely in their kind of relationship? Who looks after the kid then? Who has financial responsibility?
I must go now I think I’m about to throw up.
At 5:05 PM, Duncan Idaho said…
I must go now I think I’m about to throw up.
Here, borrow my bucket.
At 5:21 PM, Anonymous said…
I feel sorry for their kid, born and raised by two dikes instead of a normal couple. Fucking selfish bitches
At 4:03 AM, HAWKEYE said…
this is sick and wrong on so many levels.
my compassion is for the child ,poor thing ,
At 8:22 AM, Anonymous said…
Are you upset that we don’t let you watch our sex, or are you upset that two women make a better father than an asshole like you?
Fuck off and die.
At 10:03 AM, Anonymous said…
Yo anon @ 8:22 am, no we ain’t upset. Seeing two old, fugly, stanky skanks going at it ain’t my idea of a good time. Get a grip. The world ain’t as bad as your crew “frame the worldview”. Bitter and ugly straight women are even worse.
Icepick the Mad!
At 6:24 AM, HAWKEYE said…
i would have more to say on this issue, but i know these cruel, venomous retards will make the man child suffer for it down the track.