Apparantly it’s “blood-boilingly misogynistic” to not want to marry career women


——————————————————————————–

27 August 2006

Guy talk hits career women where it hurts

THEY are picky about who they will marry, tend to have flings, put off having children to the point of infertility, keep dirty homes and are miserable to boot. So why marry a career woman? The argument that working women make lousy wives was given a new lease of life last week by Forbes, a top American business magazine, prompting a slew of furious protests from women readers. One typical response was that the article was “blood-boilingly misogynistic”.

Written by Michael Noer, a senior editor with Forbes.com, it began: “Guys: A word of advice. Marry pretty women or ugly ones. Short ones or tall ones. Blondes or brunettes. Just, whatever you do, don’t marry a woman with a career.”

This Forbes article has been discussed on plenty of anti-feminist websites. It’s fantastic, it’s really pissed off a load of dim-witted femtards. The amusing thing is, the guy isn’t even revealing any stunning secrets to men, he’s simply saying what most of us knew already, that career women are of no use to men. We’re not “intimidated” or “afraid” of career women, as they themselves like to insist, we simply don’t want them. The only thing us men cannot do without women is make babies, so what on Earth is the point of hooking up with a woman who doesn’t want children? Or who doesn’t want them until she’s pretty much infertile anyway?

(I overheard a career girl at work the other month saying how she wants at least five kids, but not for a while yet, “at least until my thirties.” She’s 26, her fertility will start to decline in a year or two so she’ll probably just end up another whiney childless spinster moaning that men are afraid and intimidated by her old skanky hide.)

This times article is written by a woman so don’t expect her to be supportive of Noer (although to be fair she does point out that some of Noer’s claims were previously stated by women; it’s only sexist for a man to say such things it seems.) Whether women support or agree with things like this are of no consequence. It’s irrelevent that women support Noer and us other men unplugged from the Matriarchy. All that matters is that we call them on their bullshit and hypocrisy, make their blood boil then walk away and leave them.

Yet with women now making up 48% of the American workforce, men are going to have to live with career women, like it or not.

No, we don’t have to live with career women. We can cope on our own perfectly well thank you very much. It is career women who will have to live without men, like it or not.

Meow! Bzzzzzzzz! The sound of cats and vibrators. Get used to it, career girls.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:09 PM
——————————————————————————–

At 9:33 PM, Anonymous said…

Ha!

There’s some great debates going on over at the Forbes forums.

Notice how hardly any of the women will admit that feminism has had anything to do with men not wanting to get married any more or the sorry state of western nations.

It’s all mens fault (as usual).

——————————————————————————–

At 9:47 PM, Lord Boredom said…

The thing I find funny is that Noer was merely a “middle man” informing the readers about the recent studies, which indicate that there is a correlation between failed marriages and women’s careers. I have not looked into these studies (I don’t have the inclination to do so, because I don’t care that much). But the general public don’t seem to comprehend what statistical studies really are and what they really mean.

It’s funny yet in a way scary at the same time, when research bearing politically incorrect results are debunked by pointless accusations of racism, sexism, and, oh please, misogyny.

——————————————————————————–

At 10:02 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

Just because a woman has a job does not mean she has a career. Working in McDonalds isn’t a career, it’s a job and a pretty crap one at that. Women like to project the “career girl” image but it’s largely smoke and mirrors as most of them are waiting for Prince Charming to rescue them and whisk them away to a life of comfort paid for by him of course. When their darling prince doesn’t arrive on cue they whinge and whine about how unfair it all is. I get sick and tired of listening to women telling men what we should do. Why should we listen? Do they listen to us if we tell them what they should do? No, they just squeal that we’re sexist…. So I for one don’t give a flying toss what women want.

——————————————————————————–

At 10:10 PM, phoenix said…

There are plenty of men that want to marry career women, just these career women won’t have them. Sorry girls, if you want a stupid guy, you need to go get the stupid guy. You can’t just force a smart guy to marry you and allow himself to be treated as if he was stupid. There seem to be plenty of manginas around, why are you girls arguing with the rest of us instead of hooking up with them? You don’t even have to argue with them, they’re already house-trained for you!

——————————————————————————–

At 11:09 PM, Sunny Peter said…

The dingbat who responded to Noer (on the Forbes site) was quite femtarded. “My life [no input from her husband, of course] is going great! I don’t see what the problem is?. Men [who do all the dirty and dangerous jobs in this world] are lazy.”

And she is a top flight analyst at Forbes???

——————————————————————————–

At 11:13 PM, Anonymous said…

Curiously women (for the most part) didn’t have a problem finding men before feminism. Now they do — big time.

Again women cannot understand the Phenomenon Of Cause And Effect.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:27 AM, mfsob said…

Ye Gods some of that stuff on the Forbes forums was so funny I almost snorted coffee out my nose.

But it does prove a point – women aren’t capable of “arguing” in anything approaching a rational manner. Rather like the kildeer trying to lure predators away from its nest, they just keep screeching a flailing and flapping and making a spectacle of themselves, but none of it ever amounts to anything useful.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:55 AM, Lord Feverstone said…

> No, we don’t have to live with career women. We can cope on our own perfectly well thank you very much. It is career women who will have to live without men, like it or not.

Bravo, Duncan Idaho! Right on the money.

> There are plenty of men that want to marry career women, just these career women won’t have them.

Sounds right to me, Phoenix. In my very limited experience, career women do not seem to have any time for men; they are already married to their jobs.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:18 PM, Anonymous said…

You men don’t seem to get it. The best thing that ever happened to those of us who want to stay single are the working career women. They are the ones who raised the bench mark on what is required to be eligible and that gives us a great excuse to stay out of marriage. How many times have you heard that they want a highly educated man with at least a 6 figure income? All you have to do is say that you are uneducated and to poor to get married. It works every time. Feminism did not liberate women it liberated men from marriage and the jokes on them.

——————————————————————————–

At 7:02 PM, BR said…

We don’t need an excuse to stay single though, there are plenty of legitimate reasons. Why make excuses? Honesty works well enough; it’s like kryptonite to the typical western chick, heh.

Your points on that don’t make much sense, anonymous. We already have/had the ability to reject marriage-hungry women. It doesn’t matter what they raise the “bench mark” to, if I choose not to marry them in the first place.
They’re not in control of the situation, and it pisses them off.

Feminism hasn’t liberated us from anything, we’re liberating ourselves.

——————————————————————————–

At 5:25 AM, Anonymous said…

Notice how hardly any of the women will admit that feminism has had anything to do with men not wanting to get married any more

Yes, part of it is sheer stupidity on their part, but another part is a classic feminine tactic. Like a child. They wear you down with their arguments. It’s like a battering ram. They keep hitting you with stupidity after stupidity that you just give up after a while. It’s not very subtle, but it does work. Hammer anything enough times and it will get knocked down. Women of all ages do this. You can prove them 10 ways to Sunday with film at eleven that their position is without basis, but they’ll stick with it because it’s what they want. Like a stubborn, spoiled child. Those are great debates going on at the Forbes forum, but I don’t know if the men realize they are debating with insane retards (i.e., Western Women). They will NEVER get anywhere with them. It’s a complete waste of time to attempt to engage them in dialogue. In fact women count on it, they hope you will start talking with them (rather than action), because language (the art of manipulation) is their game. It’s like trying to get a straight answer out of a politician. It ain’t EVER going to happen. It’s not in their nature or character. Women learned to lie before they learned to walk. You’re up against a world, class pathological liar. Again, you can bring all the evidence in the world to the table they are the most outrageous liars and they will shuck and jive around the topic. They are bullshit artists extraordinaire. DO NOT engage them in debate. It will go nowhere and, in fact, play into their hands (i.e., it will allow them to control the game and hence the outcome). The thing they (and politicians for that matter) CANNOT deal with is decisive action. Like men stop having anything to do with them and meet women with a wall of silence. ONLY that will change women. They hate being shut out. Women have a BIOLOGICAL NEED to have children and a family. In fact, women start going crazy and hallucinating if they cannot fulfill their biological destiny. Men hold all the cards.

Shut women out and you will shut women down.

——————————————————————————–

At 8:58 AM, Doc Savage said…

Anonymous 5:25 said – Those are great debates going on at the Forbes forum, but I don’t know if the men realize they are debating with insane retards (i.e., Western Women). They will NEVER get anywhere with them. It’s a complete waste of time to attempt to engage them in dialogue.

I think it should be encouraged to take this debate into mainstream areas as has happened with the Forbes incident. Although arguing with women can seem totally pointless at times it helps if other men (especially young unmarried ones) can be exposed to the thinking and experiences behind MRA’s.

The feminist influenced politically correct brigade has had control of mainstream media for way too long now. Anything anti-male is highlighted. Anything anti-female is suppressed. Anything that HAS to be reported that may show women up in a poor light has a spin put on it (usually by blaming men in some way).

The amount of men joining the marriage strike will only increase by getting the message out there into the open.

Keep kicking up a fuss guy’s, that’s how the feminists got the upper hand.

——————————————————————————–

At 5:04 PM, Anonymous said…

It’s not a marriage strike anymore it’s a marriage bust. The price of admission is to high and it’s not worth the risk. Women will talk, talk and talk trying to convince you what a good deal it is. The best way to shut them down is to say you are to poor and uneducated for marriage. It works all the time. Don’t even waste your time trying to tell them the truth. They don’t care about anything except what they want.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:07 AM, Maximus said…

There are good and valid points in the arguments by anonymous.

Don’t argue with women – is wise and sound advice. He is correct, they always come back and have the last word. It is an exercise in futility.

Shut them out – again, this is an effective strategy and works. It’s true that it drives them to distraction.

doc savage offers a real alternative strategy which has much to commend it and is something I do practise – posting on forums to educate other men. The aggressive and abusive females often make obvious fools of themselves whilst a man’s reasoned arguments appeal to other male readers (manginas not included). I write for the benefit of other men to enlighten and inject truth, not to argue with the ratbag women.

More good advice from another source on this matter – Pook’s Mill (see the sidebar on this blog)- suggests taking the pee out of them. I agree. Feminists, politicians, any-ists, can’t stand being the brunt of humour or being laughed at. They all take themselves very seriously.

So, in conclusion, appear to be arguing with women on forums but write material to appeal to the logic of men and at the same time (if you can) make light of your enemies with humour.

It’s a difficult task. Not many of us have the skills to write that cleverly, but practice makes perfect, so do try. If the humour looks false or fake, leave it out and be careful – try to critise or attack you opponent’s argument or behaviour, but never, never, the individual, personally. But they will do that to you, call you all sorts of things aggressively. Don’t get sucked in! Write from your brain and not your heart. Do point out their cheap shots to other readers but do not reply in same. You’ll win the respect of third party readers who follow the posts and you’re more likely to influence their opinions.

Remember – mud thrown is ground lost.

Good contributions from all above.

——————————————————————————–

At 5:20 AM, Happy Bullet said…

I love that forum, maybe too much. Haven’t done much work this week because of it. Some hell funny guys there.

——————————————————————————–

At 3:28 AM, Viking said…

So, in conclusion, appear to be arguing with women on forums but write material to appeal to the logic of men and at the same time (if you can) make light of your enemies with humour.

Targeting our responses toward the other men at these sites is an excellent idea but I am not sure about even bothering to make it look like you are arguing with the women. Might I suggest that we comment on the feminist posts putting them in the third person. “We find in CrazyBitch’s response three classic fallicies…” Never responding directly to these feminist. It would really be a form of ignoring them and we all know that ignoring women drives them nuts. It would be, however, fantastically disrespectful so we must be careful that it is properly placed. Most feminuts deserve no better but if someone is arguing the feminist viewpoint logically and honorably it would be very important to treat them with respect. Fortunately those capable of rational argument and thinking are rarely feminists and are probably well on the way to recovery.

——————————————————————————–

At 3:57 AM, Swoggle said…

Hi Guys, I’ve been missing this whole debate. Thank you ! Funnyer than shit!

What’s going to be truly astounding to the women of the world is how this message will continue to grow among men, and all those women who have been controlling our society for so many years are suddenly going to find out that it don’t work no more. Then you will REALLY see some “blood boiling”.

By the way…I have heard all of this from all the men friends in my life for years. At least half of my buddies have been raped in divorce court, the other half are in miserable marriages. The “marriage strike” isn’t even slightly controversial to them. They are already thinking about it.

Women in this society are in for a hell of a shock.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:56 PM, Anonymous said…

Brothers that Forum has exposed many Men who would never be exposed to the Men’s Movement for the first time. And it also exposes them to the real thinking of Career Women. They have done more to help further our cause than they can possibly imagine. Due to this week’s events I have spent time over their posting as well. It will yield results.

Feminists are in a panic. Let them die alone with their Cats the miserable, dysfunctional, crazy, dishonest harpies that they are.

Khankrumthebulgar

——————————————————————————–

At 4:38 AM, Anonymous said…

Praytell, what exactly were we supposed to be doing, if not working, while we were waiting for princes of your kind to come along?

Now must go wipe monitor off – your blog got bitter all over it.

– Non panicking sort-of feminist

(ps: if it came down to dying alone or settling with the likes of your mindset? I’ll take dying alone every time. who wants to live with an unpleasant bitter git?)

——————————————————————————–

At 4:38 PM, Unpleasant Bitter Git said…

” Praytell, what exactly were we supposed to be doing, if not working, while we were waiting for princes of your kind to come along? “

Aside from working you were probably shagging the small group of “players” who, in turn were shagging all the rest of your ilk thus spreading herpes, genital warts and chlamydia. All the while leaving those “boring” nice guys on the sidelines where they belong until your 37 and want to buy a house and start a family.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:46 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

Unpleasant Bitter Git, that was pure genius! I laughed my nuts off at that response of yours. The sad thing is that you’re right though.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:13 AM, Anonymous said…

Unpleasant Bitter Git you really the nail on its swelled head, sagging breasts and expanding tramp-stamped ass with that one! Great response my good man.

Panzer

——————————————————————————–

%d bloggers like this: