“I want big tits so I can land a rich drug dealer!”


——————————————————————————–

03 September 2006

Fortune-seeking women swell with desire for drug barons

More and more young office workers, who earn an average of £120 a month, are paying £800 for breast augmentation. Five years ago 30,000 Colombians had implants; this year more than 100,000 procedures are expected to be carried out..

Gustavo Bolivar Moreno, an investigative reporter and author of a bestselling book about would-be molls that inspired the series, has been praised for revealing the bleak truths about many young women’s ambitions. “All adolescent girls are self-conscious about their bodies,” he said. “But I have met 13-year-olds saving up surgery money specifically to reach their ultimate goal — a cocaine smuggler.

Stupid goldiggers.

Predictably at the end there’s an interview with some woman moaning about how it’s awful these women have such “pressure.” Yes, it’s not their fault it seems. It’s the Patriarchy forcing them to be stupid shallow goldiggers who want to get a rich bad boy.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:35 PM

——————————————————————————–

At 3:01 AM, Anonymous said…

You’re kidding right? Well, who am I to stand in their way then. I sure as hell won’t want them after they marry the rich drug dealer and get saddled with three kids.

——————————————————————————–

At 8:10 AM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Well, it just confirms what I have always said about women- they’re evil. If the word “evil” has too strong a religious flavor to it, substitute any word that is most appropriate for your purposes. Corrupt. Selfish. Psychotic. All of the above.

I would recommend reading “The Predatory Female” by Shannon, available from Amazon.com, or at least until it is forced off the market. It will illuminate you as to just how wacky women really are.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:50 AM, nevo said…

Could it be that their genes are overcoming prejudice?

Let me explain:
Since prehistoric times when human beings began to gather in social groups (very much like chimpanzees today), the females of the group normally wouldn’t join the hunt as they were nursing their youngs. That was men business (hence patriarchy). The female will live off the kill brought into the group. In return the female will have sex with the male who feeds them.
Many scientists tell us, that is the factual truth and is programmed in our genes to secure the survival of the species.
We all know we are still quite primeval beasts. And we reproduced the same way as our ancestors did in the caves.
Modern civilization has not even dented this fact. Patriarchy is still in our genes and the superiority of the male is shown in his ability to provide. Modern laws in modern society will not change this fact but merely address it cosmetically, to make it more palatable to the she-male amongst us.
Naturally, this fact makes matriarchy an utopia sought by the she-males (VIXENS).
For the rest of the females of the group is still business as usual. Therefore, their enhancement of their natural attractions to secure the best available male.
So, in spite of feminism, or, feminist prejudice, genes still rules the roost.
The feminist achievement has made obvious this fact and the sad delusions of feminist grandeur and dominance.
Genetically speaking, men still carry the big club as a means of seducing their mates.

!!And don’t you ever forget it!!

NEVO

——————————————————————————–

At 1:26 PM, mfsob said…

Oh FFS … I thought it was just Western women who were fucked in the head, but apparently it’s ALL females. How much plainer can we say what this story says so well? Women are shallow, materialistic and utterly ruthless at separating a man from any of his worthwhile assets.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:23 PM, Youngbuck said…

This shit is pervasive. All women think this way. Just the other day, some guy was talking about how great Colombian women are. I suppose there are gold nuggets in every group, but whenever you give women choices, it seems they always choose the wrong one. Now they are choosing cocaine smugglers. How typical, how female.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:27 PM, Anonymous said…

This authoritative web site records plastic surgery statistics.

From 2000 – 2005:

Breast augmentations increased by 37%. (Average fee $3,406.)
Breast lifts increased 76%. (Ave. fee $3,576.)
Buttock lifts increased an amazing 283%. (Ave. fee $3,790. Yes both cheeks.)
Lip augmentations up 39%. (Ave. fee a modest $1,182 — thanks Angelina Jolie!)
Thigh lifts increased 80%. (Ave. fee $4,181. Proving that getting the ass just right is indeed expensive.)
Tummy tuck 115% (Ave. fee $4,402. More than ass? Can’t she just flip over after the ass redesign?)
Upper arm lift 3,414%. (Ave. fee $3,261. That’s more reasonable… for all the guys with an upper arm fetish.)

Botox 388%. (Ave. fee a mere $363.)

Breast REDUCTIONS are also up.
(Ave. fee $2,981.)

Moral of the story: marrying an alien species with no fixed sense of identity and a fetish for self-mutilation is expensive.

PS- 85% of all cosmetic surgeons are male. Surely fellow MRA’s just waiting to be recruited to the cause!

Who’s being pimped?

——————————————————————————–

At 7:24 PM, Anonymous said…

Plastic tits on a woman look stupid anyway, as seen here:

www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives.html

——————————————————————————–

At 10:05 PM, Anonymous said…

Feminism tries to pervert Nature, hence it is bound to fail.

Anyways, it’s sad how instead of using self-discipline to stay in shape, these lazy women are spending thousands of dollars to get the fugliness sucked out of them.

——————————————————————————–

At 12:28 PM, Anonymous said…

Its in reality putting lip stick on a pig. Too bad idiot Women cannot get a personality implant. Get some Morals, values, and loyalty. That would go a long way. No matter how much you put lipstick on a pig it is still a pig.

Women in the West are now good for Sport Sex and little else. Unless they come from a very traditional Family and even then the Laws work against you.

Khankrumthebulgar

——————————————————————————–

At 6:27 PM, Anonymous said…

Its in reality putting lip stick on a pig.

A pig is a more noble (and useful) animal than a WW.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:32 AM, Anonymous said…

I have alluded to the fact that female material bias is just a mercenary strategy(reprinted below for reference).

All women equate money with behavioral(and by extension, sexual) license.

This is why females(sometimes secretly) conspire to marriage – it bends their spouse to their material provision, while abrogating themselves of all reciprocal obligation(ex. sexual service) in exchange(again, freeing them to indulge their behavioral/sexual license with males who are more consonant with their sensory biases, and leaving discontented/spurned husbands with no favorable/legal recourse).

The relative measure of inert sexual valence deemed in a female’s quarry is directly proportional to her insistence on marriage – they simply see them as gates of material indulgence.

None of the females cited in the article aspire merely to be the disposable sex-toys of drug-dealers(though they may enlist such tactics in their mercenary quest for matrimony), but rather his wife(which is a rather optimistic assessment of male gullibility and explains a female’s incredulous rage at a mans artful vacillation in forestalling marriage).

They can do this by unconsciously projecting a heady, romantic image onto any given prospect, divested of all pragmatic consideration.

They are further encouraged in their delusions by unconditional state sponsorship(no matter how grievous their errors in judgement) and chivalrous male dupes who both act as compound safety-nets for female foolishness.

Nature selects against such reckless/unreasoned behavior in males through uncompromising pressures that females are simply not exposed to under the aegis of the aforementioned chivalrous dupes, and fosters in these females the arrested reasoning of a spoiled child.

– nSCOURGE

——————————————————————————–

At 2:54 AM, Anonymous said…

Like I promised, I can encapsulate the organ of feminism quite succintly.

Feminism(the end of the pole which aligns the axis of fem interest and agenda) is nothing more than an observable artifact of the tacit female contra-sex selection strategy which antagonises for material provision and license, freeing them to indulge their sensory bias* in mate selection with impunity via defacto codified polyandry**(which conflicts with/stresses male sex/reproductive interest along determined skews in dimorphic sex-biology).

(* – ask me to expand on this if you wish to be educated in detail, beyond spurious academic treatment where data is culled selectively and divulged equivocally; rather then endeavoring to the critical examination of phenomenon, institutions are instead endeavoring to the positive affirmation of politic bias through correlation, where they can anthropomorphically infer an emasculate design in emergent mechanics at the ruinous epistemological vanguard of west civs manifold social vectors)

(** inextricably linked to civ, where it has married the fem promiscuity of polyandrous tribalism with the male sublimation and codified treaty which derived from neolithic energy investment paradigms – for as long as such a dissonant synergy can sustain itself)

The only males who condone this paradigm are cowardly gamma-drones who shrink from the visceral determination of open contest, unmediated by the flaccid aegis of proxy arbitration/accord and it’s simpering constructs(‘nerfed’ impliments and kiddie training-wheels).

– nSCOURGE

——————————————————————————–

%d bloggers like this: