Women interested primarily in money, gasp shock etc


01 September 2006

Women think a man’s a catch on £50,000 a year

Men need to earn about £50,000 a year before women consider them wealthy and successful, a survey has found.

One in ten women have even higher expectations, looking for a salary of more than £100,000 before they are really impressed.

(£50,000 is about US$92,000 or AUS$124,000)

The average salary in the UK is £21,000 although for guys under 35 like me will obviously have an average salary lower than that.

And us men are denounced as being cynical or unromantic! Women complain about having to live up to “impossible standards” to attract men, like being slim, even though it requires far less effort to just stay slim than it does to earn more than twice the national average salary. Not to mention the billion other things women want in a future husband, like being slim, and sensitive, and, above all else, utterly gullible.

“There are no good men” = “There are no rich men”

It’s all about the money with women. Far too many men have realised that women aren’t attracted to men with money, they’re attracted to the money that men with money have. The man himself they can take or leave, so long as they have the money, and with divorce laws allowing them to do just that, plenty are opting to leave him.

Fuck ’em. Stay single, don’t let women have any access to your earnings or savings, and don’t be afraid to be a slacker either. Live to impress yourself, not women.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:35 PM


At 8:13 PM, nevo said…

It is all shamefully true, sadly. Women have prostituted themselves to the point where no reasonable man will have any respect for them. Hence, there are no good men anymore.
And there will never be any such men in the future, as long as they are looked up as walking wallets. So fellows, make your money and let them drool all over it.




At 8:37 PM, nevo said…

Hello America!!

When traveling through OHIO always remember this:

*MEN* can be sex offenders even if nothing is proved.

I keep my fingers crossed that sort of stupidity will not land on this shores.



At 10:29 PM, nevo said…

I just found this from a feminist blog:
Why is the symbol of justice a woman, when for the longest time she was not allowed to be in the legal profession.
Why, in the Western Christian religion is there no female counterpart to god, when in India they have shakti/shiva and Isis and Osiris in Egypt ?
And why in this 21st century is are girl babies still being killed in favour of boys
Why are young girls and women still being sold into the sex and slave trades ?
Could it be that the model for being human is male ? If so what would that mean to women, and the world as a whole. A race that tries to suppress and undermine the feminie aspect of itself, has no real hope of evolving in balance.

Well, the answer is obvious, isn’t it?
Women have no sense of justice. That is why *Lady Justice* is blindfolded while holding the scales of a balance justice, funnily enough, in the left hand.
As for *GOD* we live in a Jew religion with an asexual god. Not that I believe in all this nonsense. But those who do, questioning the lack of a female god, thus implying the inequality of the sexes, are against a patriarchal god.
And what about this:
!!A race that tries to suppress and undermine the feminie aspect of itself, has no real hope of evolving in balance.!!

That’s rich coming from a feminist. If they bother to look back on half a century of feminism and see what the monster of feminism has created, they’ll see a grotesquely deformed society with no pole to tie the boat of civilization to.



At 11:07 PM, Playboy said…

This is frightening. How is it any different than the ‘bill of attainder’ specifically prohibited by the US Constitution?


At 11:20 PM, Barney said…

The truth is that the laws made to help and protect women have indirectly hurt us all.

What reasonable man or woman with financial assets would allow themselves the heartbreak and pillage of divorce.

There are a lot of sadder and wiser single people these days.

Please visit: not your politically correct blog. blogspot.com sometime. Leave me a note.

Thanks for your input.



At 3:11 AM, Anonymous said…

Hmm, they’re mainly aborting female fetuses in India, that oh-so-enlightened goddess-worshiping country.


At 3:13 AM, Anonymous said…

I’ve been putting a lot of my discretionary income into precious metals (e.g., silver, gold). I keep just enough fiat money around to live on, but that’s it. Thankfully I don’t have a bloodsucker under my roof, but I have female family + female relatives that see me as a wallet (i.e., single + good income = so why not spend money on someone like them). I tell them most of my money is going into gold and it is VERY hard to get it converted back into cash. 😉 Anytime I cash in some gains on something I throw 5% at them (for charity) and let them fight over it like a pack of wild dogs. All that tends to shut them up.


At 3:23 AM, Anonymous said…

Why, in the Western christian religon is there no female counterpart to god, when in India they have shakti/shiva and Isis and Osiris in Egypt ?

Christianity is monotheistic. India and ancient Egypt practiced polytheism.


At 5:38 AM, Anonymous said…


I’m glad I’ve had two failed businesses. And am now broke. And am currently unemployed.

Freedom baby!

I rather like not having the distraction.


At 8:21 AM, Fem Hater said…

You don`t need to be rich to get action. Just don`t expect a relationship. According to some of my sources the easiest women to get action from is married women, they marry the men for money and then sleep with hot guys. Essentially the rich guys takes care of bad boys kids. I think its something like 25% of kids don`t belong to their supposed fathers. Essentially is means that every 3 times a women sleeps with her husband she sleeps with another guy.


At 10:03 AM, Anonymous said…

Can anyone tell me the only angel in Christendom to be portrayed as female?

…wait for it…

That’s right. The Angel of Death.


At 3:13 PM, mfsob said…

The Angel of Death, eh? I KNEW I’d seen my ex- somewhere before …


At 3:28 PM, Bryce said…

I’ve noticed how women gravitate toward rich guys, yet these women are willing to divorce them at the drop of a hat. These women complain that they “grew apart” from their husbands, who aren’t “supportive” of their “independence.” What gives?

Welllllllll, ladies, when you marry a rich guy, there are a few things you ought to know, based on what I know from people I know who fir this description:

1) Your guy most likely got to be rich by working much, much harder than the average Joe. That means he spends a lot of time working at whatever he does to earn money. Furthermore, your guy makes his work his number one priority; he was working when he could have been doing something else. In other words, don’t expect a lot of cuddle time on your terms, and don’t complain when he works long hours, goes on business trips, or comes home too tired to do anything but sleep.

2) If your guy inherited his bucks, you can reasonably expect that a) he has a bit of an entitlement complex; b) his family seems to have him by the short hairs, as in “Do this or you’re out of the will!” and c) he’ll have spending habits that may rival your own.

3) Your guy also became wealthy because he’s a very competitive, hard-driving person. In fact, he may be downright ruthless. And don’t expect your guy to be a tiger out there in big-bad world and a pussycat in the comforts of your home. Trouble is, it can be hard to turn that persona off once you get home.

4) Wealth can be a fleeting thing…ask anyone who lived through the Great Depression. When your guy loses his job, fails in business, makes some untimely investments, or if unexpected bills strike, will you still be interested in this guy?

5) Your guy may have a very different idea of what to do with all those greenbacks. To him, money is to be invested, saved, and used for the occasional luxury, like a Harley or a golf outing. Money is also for him to use to make more money. You, on the other hand, may want to use his wealth for shoes, spa trips, fancy resorts, and for being able not to work at all. These differences of opinion can ignite great marital discord.

In other words, ladies, the reality marrying a rich guy is different from the fantasy.


At 7:25 PM, Anonymous said…

I’ve noticed how women gravitate toward rich guys, yet these women are willing to divorce them at the drop of a hat. These women complain that they “grew apart” from their husbands, who aren’t “supportive” of their “independence.” What gives?

Well, DUH…that’s because divorce laws give women a financial INCENTIVE (HALF HIS NET WORTH) to divorce! So, OF COURSE they want to! Who the hell wouldn’t???

And until this law changes, I say NO TO MARRIAGE!


At 7:28 PM, Anonymous said…

I say if anything, they should REVERSE the incentive to keep couples TOGETHER.

In other words, if you legally GET HALF when you marry, you LOSE that half when you divorce. All you get is what you put in, and maybe with some formula compensation for any domestic labor as well.


At 12:40 AM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Did someone mention Harley? Let me illuminate you fellows. I’m not rich, yet I have a new (2006) Heritage Softail with serious bucks in customization. I also have a 2005 Electra Glide Standard, again, with some serious modifications cosmetically. These bikes are stunning to look at.

Again, I’m not rich.

I’m…..single. Never married, and I never date. Ever.

My next door neighbor who makes some serious change in the computer business, leaned over the fence the other day as I was puttering around the garden tending to my sunflowers (four varieties). I had just finished washing the Hawgs, as well as my Kymco People 250 scooter (a MANLY scooter, if there ever was one) and they were drying off in the driveway. He rather wistfully said that I was living the life every married man wishes he had. Coming from him, that was quite a complement, considering the disparity in our income.

My other neighbor’s wife, who lives across the street, came over on another day when my fleet was sitting in the driveway, and half-jokingly said that I was going to make all of the married men on the block jealous. True, but what she really meant was that I was driving the wives of those poor sods crazy with my constantly trading in my Harleys in every six months. Such freedom is unacceptable to American women, and what is most frustrating to them is the fact that they can do nothing to stop me. Absolutely nothing.

If you really and truly want to strike a blow against women, do two things:

1) Stay celibate, and stop chasing women and their diseases.

2) Buy a Harley, and refuse to take any women for a ride. Put on a solo- seat, and just tell them it only has room for one.

3) Don’t get married.

Okay, that’s three, but I thought of the other one at the last minute…


At 2:50 AM, Hailey said…

I am not a feminist.

Our culture has become increasingly materialistic. I don’t see that as a gender-specific problem.


At 2:15 PM, darkbhudda said…

True, true. When I dress up in a suit I get hit on by women and I’m an ugly guy.

My friend at work was promised by his wife that he could buy a motorbike (with his money) for his birthday.

Guess what, it came his birthday…

She needed a new car to drive the kids around, so that she could give her 2 year old car to her sister who had spent all her money on drugs.

And they suddenly needed a brand new house worth twice as much.

I’ve heard his story from every single married guy I’ve ever met.






At 2:46 AM, MarkyMark said…

Chiris in OR,

You have a fleet of bikes too, eh? I have two: a ZRX1100 and a W650. Like you, I’m single-yes! I had a better than expected bonus from work last year; the bikes were like new, and I got ’em both for $5.5K. I’m hoping to add to my fleet… 🙂

I do like the Kymco scooters. Given my size, I’d opt for the 500; for a big guy like me (I weigh 260#), a 250 would be too small. I also like the Suzuki Burgman 650.

Darkbhudda, you should tell your friend to grow a pair! She was going to ‘let’ him buy a bike with HIS money? Uh, what’s her name?! Who does she think she is?! If any bitch tried to pull that with me, she’d be G-O-N-E! No bitch is going to tell me whether or not I can have my bikes! And to think that she gave her two year old car to her druggie sister-sheesh! Tell him to grow a pair, or to dump the bitch! Why do men put up with this crap, anyhow?

You know, my first car was a 1966 Chevy Chevelle. It was cherried out, a nice car. You know, I had guys come up to me all the time saying that they’d had a classic car (a 1970 Barracuda, a 1967 Mustang, etc.), but that their wives made them sell them-ugghh! In some cases, I asked them why they put up with that? They just gave me a sheepish, defeated look. In some cases, they’d just say they did what they had to do. Did what they had to do? Why did they have to do that? I lost respect for them, cutting off their balls like that…

You know, my bikes are a part of me. I’ve loved them as long as I can remember. If I couldn’t ride, a part of me would die. I wouldn’t ask my woman to amputate her breast or any other part of her body. She shouldn’t ask me to amputate part of my soul, either; that’s EXACTLY what a woman would be doing if she tried to force me into giving up my bikes. You know, with all the bullshit women bring into our lives, it’s just easier to live without them.

You know, if I had money, I’d just get the chicks, bang ’em, then dump ’em. All they’re good for is sperm receptacles-if that! Unless I ever met a rare jewel, I’d just bang ’em & clang ’em.



At 6:03 AM, Anonymous said…

I heard a great quote about marriage recently:

“Cut out the middle man. Find someone you hate, and give them your house”


At 8:01 AM, Captain Zarmband said…

Haley sadi:
“Our culture has become increasingly materialistic. I don’t see that as a gender-specific problem.”

Yes the world is more materialistic but it is a gender problem. When was the last time you heard of a man marrying a wealthy woman only to divorce her and take most of her money and future income? It just doesn’t happen on anything like the scale that women do this to men. Men are still seen as being responsible for earning the lion’s share of the money. Women look for rich guys far more than men look for rich women. Men see these women for what they are…gold-diggers.


At 10:32 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…


Cool bikes, you’ve got there! It’s sad that they dropped the W650 from their line up some time back. A real classic machine.

The Kymco scooter is a hoot. I had never heard of it before, and just happened to come across the website for Columbia Scooters here in Portland, and the rest is history. My next door neighbor liked mine so well, he bought the people 150, as did a co-worker. The silly thing sells itself, as it looks unlike any scooter around, what with the motorcycle-sized tires and all.

Usually when I go to my local mega-Harley dealer to browse I ride my scooter, especially on the weekends when the place is crowded. I do it to irritate the Rich Urban Biker crowd (RUB’s). They act annoyed whenever I pull up, and don’t quite know what to make of it.

But, you’re right about the Kymco Exciting 500. It hasn’t arrived here in Portland, the last time I checked. At about $6000, it’s a much better deal than the Burgman, which goes for closer to $9000. I may buy it next spring if everything works out, but I’ll have to ask my wife for permission……Oops. Guess I won’t at that.

Hmm. I got side-tracked. To make this a valid post, I should add that –

I hate women.



At 11:13 PM, Anonymous said…

There is no escaping that men are slaves to pussy-power.

With few exceptions.

Or maybe most just want to be ruled?


Told what to believe and what to say?

That would explain (a) marriage (b) voting Republican (c) wage-slavery.


It’s time for Monday Night Football!

Freedom at last!


At 2:56 PM, Anonymous said…

I can encapsulate the nature of feminism quite succinctly.

Feminism(from the fem agenda) is nothing more than a female contra sex-selection strategy for securing female material provision, freeing them to indulge their sensory bias* in mate selection with impunity.

(* – ask me to expand on this if you wish to be educated in detail, beyond spurrious academic citation/enquiry where data is culled selectively and divulged equivocally; rather then endeavoring to the critical examination of phenomenon, institutions are instead endeavoring to the positive affirmation of politick bias through correlation, where they can anthropomorphically infer a univalent design in emergent mechanics at the ruinous epistemological vanguard of west civs manifold social vectors)

The only males who condone this paradigm are cowardly gamma-drones who shrink from the visceral determination of open contest, unmediated by the flaccid aegis of proxy arbitration/accord and it’s simpering fallout.

Educate yourselves…



At 7:16 PM, Anonymous said…

They look at the size of my wallet. I look at the size of their tits.


%d bloggers like this: