Link


——————————————————————————–

20 September 2006

The Brazilian Bachelor

A fellow bachelor from South America and his thoughts on womynkind.

I don’t know if I speak only for myself on this, but the features that I find attractive in women are becoming despised by them. Long hair, modest attitude and clothes, nurturing, loving, quiet (yes, quiet!) — all of this and more are just labeled as weak and discarded. You now get cigarettes, drugs of all types, tattoos, reckless sex, revenge…

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 10:22 PM


——————————————————————————–

At 3:03 PM, Anonymous said…

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=4907

Good article!

——————————————————————————–

At 4:52 PM, jay c said…

That doesn’t bode well for looking overseas for good women.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:17 PM, christopher in oregon said…

Looking for a foreign woman is a very risky deal for western men. I have many friends who have done this, and there are a few success stories- so far. But, not most.

Every man should read “A Long Way To Go For A Date” by Makow. He does a lot of posting of articles on Jeffrense.com, as well. He had been through the meat-grinder with western women, and decided to marry a Filipino woman he met on the internet, if I recall. What a nightmare. She already knew the tricks of the trade before she ever left her homeland. He was jailed on false domestic violence charges, she was violent, and adulteress…..you name it.

The problem is the inherent NATURE of women. One’s nationality, race, religion, educational or social background doesn’t change some very basic characteristics that all women share. A woman does not operate within the same moral framework as a man. She simply has no moral or ethical restraints of any kind, other than the one’s that men have historically imposed upon them. Now that we no longer have any control over them, we are seeing why cultures throughout history have always attempted to deny women any “rights”. Women can not be trusted with freedom of any kind. Remember the wise words of Solomon in Ecclesiastes chapter seven when he says that there are NO GOOD WOMEN. He should have known; he was married to 1000 of the creatures.

——————————————————————————–

At 11:08 AM, Anonymous said…

Dudes, have you considered homosexuality? You can spend all day banging each other senseless without the inconvenience of a nasty vagina getting in the way!

——————————————————————————–

At 6:29 PM, Anonymous said…

Trust me sweetheart, if I didn’t find men physically repulsive, most queers personally defective and was prepared to give up any hope of breeding, I would’ve gone that way long since. Wouldn’t it be nice not to have to kowtow to some vapid bitch just to get one’s end away.

——————————————————————————–

At 12:01 AM, Anonymous said…

KJV Ecclesiastes 7 (Part 5):
27 Behold, this have I found, saith the preacher, counting one by one, to find out the account:
28 Which yet my soul seeketh, but I find not: one man among a thousand have I found; but a woman among all those have I not found.

NLT Ecclesiastes 7 (Part 5):
26 I discovered that a seductive woman is more bitter than death. Her passion is a trap, and her soft hands will bind you. Those who please God will escape from her, but sinners will be caught in her snare.
27 “This is my conclusion,” says the Teacher. “I came to this result after looking into the matter from every possible angle.
28 Just one out of every thousand men I interviewed can be said to be upright, but not one woman!

——————————————————————————–

At 1:02 PM, HAWKEYE said…

well said criss from Oregon

——————————————————————————–

At 5:20 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Fellows;

I left the Mormon church over its insane doctrines about marriage, and never really studied the Bible until I became a fundy-wacko Baptist. (The Mormons don’t really encourage independent Bible study.) And study, I did.

I was shocked at the number of verses in Proverbs and Ecclesiastes that renounced women for their evil and nasty behaviour. In the New Testament, Paul clearly tells men that they are far better off staying single. (1st Corinthians chapter 7) Remember Lot’s disobedient wife? Well, forget about her. What about his daughters? They got their father drunk, and then raped him. Also remember that the Bible blames Eve for the transgression in the garden. NOT ADAM! Then there was Samson and Delilah, she being a typically treacherous woman. Also Abraham’s wife Sarah and her disobedience which gave us the situation in the middle east. The Bible rarely paints women in a very positive light, and this fact is never preached from the pulpits.The only women in the Bible that are portrayed positively are those who are obedient and submissive.

Read Proverbs chapter 7 for a description of the adulterous woman. Christians like to point out Proverbs 31 and the description of the virtuous woman, but they deliberately ignore what the chapter really says. It clearly states that such a woman- a decent woman- is so rare that her price is exceedingly high, and asks in frustration “WHO CAN FIND HER?” It’s clearly saying, “Good luck. She’s sitting right next to that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow…”

Theologians down through the ages of most if not all religions have had a very low opinion of women. With good reason. As much as I dislike Islam, it may very well be the only hope for those of us in the west. Muslim men have the strength and willingness to knock women down to size. I really think we have gone too far downhill in the west to combat the problem on our own. There are too few men who have not been emasculated. Most are divorced and broke, or married and terrified. Virtually all men are slaves to their sexual desires, and are therefore under the control of women. The future is bleak indeed.

Christopher

——————————————————————————–

At 6:44 PM, Anonymous said…

Christopher in Oregon,

I was never one for the good book, but I’ve recently been looking at its views on women and darn if they didn’t have women pegged (thousands of years ago)as inherently being utter pieces of garbage (e.g., Proverbs). Even the first part of the Old Testament is a parable about how a woman fucked things up. As a sidebar, I’ve read that a closer analysis of the Genesis parable heavily suggests that Eve did not get the pain in childbirth penalty from eating from the Tree of Knowledge, but rather from consorting (sexually) with the serpent.

I mean right out of the gate the Bible pegs women as treacherous, dangerous sluts. Then there were Lot’s daughters…

If someone (knowledgeable) were to start a blog about Biblical reasons of why women should be controlled (i.e., women are inherently insane and destructive) I’d read it.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:34 AM, Anonymous said…

Dudes, have you considered homosexuality? You can spend all day banging each other senseless without the inconvenience of a nasty vagina getting in the way!

No thanks. You just dont get it do you? When men unite, we bond, its a common kinship built around a common goal.
i will make it clear for your small,politically corrected brain;
MALE BONDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX. Most if not all men reading these blogs and forums would be pissed if the queer eye crew showed up to make-over their lives. All we want is for women to be, well, women. We are men united to a cause, thats more powerful than the vagina monologues, queer eye for the straight guy, and all the other usless feminazi crap lumped together. Now stop the shaming language and pull your head out of the sand.

——————————————————————————–

At 11:25 AM, unpleasant bitter git said…

anonymous 6:44, if your interested in another very interesting view on the church and marriage check out this blog:

http://scripturallysingle.blogspot.com/

Start reading at the bottom of the page.

It sums up a lot of whats wrong with womens views (men are always wrong because they are men etc) on male/female relations and marriage in the west today.

——————————————————————————–

%d bloggers like this: