Slut feminism on camera


——————————————————————————–

21 September 2006

cheap-slut-shop.jpg

An orgasm coach on TV and a film about sex toys – if that’s progress i’m Queen Victoria

Channel 4, scraping the bottom of its favourite barrel in an effort to titillate its jaded viewers, has come up with a wheeze that makes the rest of reality television look like high culture.

It is preparing to screen a programme called Masturbation For Girls that features — I kid you not — an ‘orgasm coach’ who teaches three ladies all her tricks, which they will demonstrate, live, to camera.

Should you seek to escape for a night out at the pictures instead, you may find you fare little better. The eagerly anticipated high point of the up-coming London Film Festival is Shortbus, a movie that has astounded many by getting a standard 18 certificate in the first place, and which has as its central character a female sex therapist who is in pursuit of achieving climax for herself.

..

Whichever the excuse, it just doesn’t wash. Because however high-minded your justification for exposing your private parts to public scrutiny, you still wouldn’t be doing it unless either you enjoyed it or you were paid for it.

So call it anything you like, but that makes the women complicit in these latest offerings at heart no different from either exhibitionists or porn stars. Or both.

And if they thought for a moment that their antics make them liberated women — the product and achievement of the years during which many of us fought for newer, brighter freedoms — then, my deluded little darlings, you can take it from me: it doesn’t.

What women fought for was to become the equals of men, not to become exactly like them — which is just what this current vogue appears to invite them to try to be.

..

All [women] have done is turned themselves into sex objects, there for the salacious pleasure of priapic men, to be exploited and gawped at and belittled by those who get their kicks from peeping at women’s naughty bits.


This article is all a bit women-firster, with claims of women being oh so nurturing, not to mention the old double-standard that women being in touch with their sexuality (the nurturing, intimate style) is fine but us men being in touch with our sexuality (the humping loads of women and boasting about it style) makes us awful oafs who Must Change.

She also seems to think that women being brazen slappers – slut-feminism – appeals to us men, as if we’re all reveling in the monstrous slappers so many women seem to have transformed into, when in fact it largely disgusts us. It may appeal to teenage boys perhaps, but many guys are turned off by women the more outrageously slutty they are. You never know what you might catch off them and they sure as hell wouldn’t make good wives.

However, at least the article writer has gasped the basic point that women make crap men.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:19 PM
——————————————————————————–

At 6:17 PM, ChicagoMan said…

It doesn’t surprise me at all.

This just proves that women don’t understand really anything

“Women’s liberation” has done nothing for women but make them very expensive whores.

Sluts and whorish behavior is so rampant it makes me sick.

College only adds to this. Masturbation clinics you name it. It was so bad that I was turning women down to sleep with them on our first dates.

Wow those are some winners.

If you give everything to random joes what special do you have to offer to a potential partner?

Women were happy about hooking up left and right, wow that makes you a star.

Their response was always, “why not you men do it”.

Right honey, because the 5% of men that are players and shown on the gay media represent 100% of all men.

Women today are like shopping for a new car, spending all this time and money to only then find out you actually have a pinto with a 2006 exterior.

——————————————————————————–

At 1:05 AM, Anonymous said…

What gets me is this bit:

[All [women] have done is turned themselves into sex objects, there for the salacious pleasure of priapic men, to be exploited and gawped at and belittled by those who get their kicks from peeping at women’s naughty bits.]

Why is it that the natural male attraction to naked female form always ridiculed as unhealthy or perverted in some way –

while womens more obviously unhealthy interest in the dark side of human relationships as portrayed in soaps and tv films with “a female in peril” theme, is merely considered entertainment?

What about the women who want to display themselves in all their gynecological glory to millions of unseen strangers? Are they perverted too?

How come the men have the problem for wanting to look but, women who want to show don’t?

By that reasoning – I’d say that if women who like to display themselves naked for people to gawk are not perverts, then they are actually inciting “perversion”.

Jokers.

How I hate these bastards.

=TiReDOfIT

——————————————————————————–

At 4:21 AM, Anonymous said…

I like to think of modern women as analogous to rental cars. Everyone’s been in ’em, and they’ve all been driven hard.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:25 AM, Anonymous said…

RE your rants about women in the workplace.

I thought of a great idea: the all female workplace. It may sound discriminatory towards men, but I think we should trial them just to prove how useless women are in the workplace.

Think about it… at any one time:
-one quarter of the staff would be off on maternity leave
-one quarter of the staff would be on a sick day / child sickness day / menstrual leave* / other BS day off
-one quarter of the staff would not be at work that day because they work part time
-The remaining quarter would be at work

Think of how inefficient this workplace would be. It might prove to women how they are supported by men’s work in the workplace.

*menstrual leave – a serious proposal I heard about, it gives women a certain number of days off per month.

——————————————————————————–

At 5:49 AM, phoenix said…

It makes women just like men? I don’t know very many men that go around masturbating in public and showing off their privates. We still wear decent clothing, and at work a lot of us wear suits. It’s women that demand to be half naked, and then want to complain about being looked at. I don’t see anything similar between the two sexes. I see women far surpassing men in terms of vulgar and obscene behavior. It’s not like a man can display his privates or masturbate in a clinic, that’d be considered sexual harassment and some dumb broad would sue, and the cops and judges would fall all over themselves to throw the poor sod in jail. The politicians would quickly pander to the fembats and put a new law on the books to further harass men. What SHOULD be done, is some guy reads all the cases where women have complained and won, and turns around and sues out of being “threatened” by female sexuality, and forces the courts to give him a huge award. I’d love to see these dumbass judges get around the precedent, it’s ultimately what won a few guys the cases against Girls Night at clubs, and the female only gyms and swimming pools. It’s time men fought back and showed women a taste of their own medicine.

——————————————————————————–

At 11:00 AM, Anonymous said…

What’s a girl to do? Have a wank or make love to you lot here? Hand jobs all round, methinks!

——————————————————————————–

At 8:11 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

I figured out how to wank when I was about 12 with no help or instructions from anyone.

Only our “empowered” western wimmin would need “special” masturbation lessons in their 20’s and 30’s. Because those little entitlement princesses are so “special” aren’t they?

(special as in “special needs”)

——————————————————————————–

At 8:22 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

That was my thought too; if us guys can become experts at onanism at 12 on our own whilst grown women need lessons, that kind of challenges women’s claim to be as intelligent as us.

Furthermore, why are women always banging on about us men not being able to find the clitoris? Evidently they can’t either.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:32 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

Oh yeah, I meant to add this rather old joke:

Q: How do you give a woman an orgasm?

A: WHO CARES !!!

——————————————————————————–

At 6:58 PM, Anonymous said…

I thought of a great idea: the all female workplace. It may sound discriminatory towards men, but I think we should trial them just to prove how useless women are in the workplace.

It wouldn’t work. The U.S. Navy tried an all female destroyer in the 1990s (I don’t have the source). It was a disaster. Stuff wasn’t getting done, couldn’t function during the exercise, and the women spent half their time fighting with one another.

The fact that firms are mostly all male (personnel depts are female-heavy) gives ANOTHER lie to the idea that women are these superior beings. If females were they could start their own firms and wash up the competition. Businesses would only want to hire these superstar women! They don’t.

Another lie down the drain.

Much like the 75 cents (or whatever lie it was) on a dollar that women earn compared to a man. Again, if true then firms would ONLY hire women (i.e., get same production at a 25% or whatever discount to labor cost, labor being the biggest overhead component to a firm). Firms don’t. And most firms are rational. They are constantly looking for ways to cut costs + increase profits.

Another lie down the drain.

——————————————————————————–

%d bloggers like this: