Feminist gets very cross at something that doesn’t effect her in anyway


——————————————————————————–

06 October 2006

fembot.jpg

Fortysomething and home with parents
by Julie Bindel (above)

Cheers to Maximus at Kitten News for e-mailing me this link.

That’s right; my younger brother, Michael, 41, has rarely cooked himself a meal and never operated a washing machine, because he still lives at home.

What the fuck is it to you?

Currently in Britain, 58% of men between the ages of 20 and 24 still live with their parents, the numbers having doubled in the past 15 years. There are far fewer fortysomethings, however, living with their parents. My brother is a rare breed

..

Men are a third more likely than women to stay at home until they get a mortgage. Almost one third of young people return to live at home at least once after initially moving away, and one in 10 go back four times before finally leaving for good. It seems that British men are more reluctant to leave their mothers than women are.

That’s because we can’t get pregnant and get an instant house. The only single women I know who live on their own are single mothers. Furthermore, what’s so bad about living with our mums? They cook, clean and do our ironing in return for us paying some board, unlike most of today’s women who do fuck all but expect you to be the primary (if not, the only) breadwinner.

Finally, the main reason men flee the nest and build up a home and assets is to attract and keep a woman and subsequent children. With women and relationships with them of little or no value to them, why bother? We’ll kick back and relax.

I left home at 22 but I’d live at home and save a lot of rent money if it weren’t for the fact that my parents live in some cottage a billion miles from anywhere.

As a feminist who is critical of any man “freeloading” from women, I have managed occasionally to get the odd dig in at Michael, asking if he knew where the cooker was or if he could boil an egg.

Strange how feminists are never critical of women freeloading from men, like in the form of alimony, child (mummy) support, huge divorce settlements, etc.

I remind him that most single parents are women, and that many of them have full-time jobs, as well as doing the household chores.

Most single mothers don’t work, and in any case they’re not exactly domesticated. Have you seen the average single mother’s home? Filthy shitholes most of them. Even those that don’t work don’t bother with housework either.

She told me, when I was 12, that I should never get married, “because all it will do is take your independence away.”

Strange how women continue to love having their “independence” (i.e. responsibilities and obligation to support themselves) taken away. “Men on a marriage strike? Grrrr! How dare they refuse to oppress us with the patriarchal institution of marriage! Bloody men!”

Neil Blacklock, an expert on issues of men and masculinity…

You don’t even have to read this guy’s opinions to know he’s an utter mangina, ready to denounce men in the hope of being quoted in a Guardian article. Fucking wankstain. Us men don’t have “experts” on our issues, we’re not that narcissistic.

Although Michael is living a very comfortable and privileged life at home, where he wants for nothing and does even less, there are things he is missing out on. I have always suspected that one of the reasons he does not have a partner (although lots of casual girlfriends) is because all his domestic needs are met by Mum. Or perhaps Michael is fundamentally lazy and does not wish to put any energy into an intimate relationship.

Good for him. He lives at home, his mum does all the domestic stuff and he has casual relationships but none of that co-habitation or marriage crap and all it’s horrors. No wonder women are pissed off at guys like this, they’ve gone their own way and refuse to put themselves out to appeal to women.

Note, naturally, that she’ll suggest he’s too lazy for an “intimate relationship”, but could never consider guys like this as having a jolly good reason for not bothering to get serious with women.

Many women deride men who still live with their mother, and they can get a bad press.

Of course they do. A man who lives with his mother is one less man with his own home who a woman can freeload off. God forbid these independent feminists actually have to be the primary breadwinner and pay the mortgage whilst supporting a househusband.

Ignore all this shaming crap guys. If you live at home and are happy, and your parents don’t mind, stick with it and ignore any cunt who denounces you as a loser.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:23 PM
——————————————————————————–

At 6:37 PM, Anonymous said…

Someone pointed me towards the following URL and I might just as well stick it to this topic:

“Debt Facts and Figures – Compiled 2nd October 2006 Total UK personal debt”
http://www.creditaction.org.uk/debtstats.htm

“Average household debt in the UK is approximately £8,575 (excluding mortgages) and £50,494 including mortgages.

Average owed by every UK adult is approximately £26,525 (including mortgages). This grew by ~ £200 last month.

Average interest paid by each household on their total debt is approximately £3,123 each year.”

Ugh! As a young British bachelor you would be insane _not_ not live with your parents and share the costs.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:57 PM, Anonymous said…

A home that a woman can’t take off a man ….. his parents.
Well god thats won me over. Why the hell did i buy a property. If i had rented and handed over my savings to my parents i wouldn’t have got screwed.
I always think in these cases that someone should track down the other side (her brother) and get his side.
I bet he just loves his sister. Possibly thinks if all women are like her then i might as well give up !!! Give him a medal.

——————————————————————————–

At 8:02 PM, Anonymous said…

You said ‘The only single women I know who live on their own are single mothers.’

I’m a 39-year-old woman, I’ve always lived by myself, don’t have children, and have always supported myself in a job where I earn good money. I know lots of women in similar positions, so please don’t assume every single woman is a single mum.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:22 PM, Anonymous said…

“As a feminist who is critical of any man “freeloading” from women, I have managed occasionally to get the odd dig in at Michael, asking if he knew where the cooker was or if he could boil an egg.”

This comment unequivocally proves that feminists are literally batshit insane. If it is true that men freeload off of women, then why the heck do women get 1/2 of HIS assets in a divorce???

And a feminist asking a man where the cooker is or how to boil an egg is like a deaf-mute with an IQ below 30 calling another person a retard. Like she would know the answer to either of those things.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:45 PM, pete said…

How come there’s always an empowered woman to make empowered comments about how much she bucks the trend whenever you talk about something in a general way?

Oh yeah, because on the internet no one can prove your comments wrong.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:48 PM, Anonymous said…

Isn’t this typical. Yet another so called independant female that can’t stand it when a man stays at home. I can’t think of anything that irks the shit out of females more than this. You have to laugh.

——————————————————————————–

At 10:47 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

I had to laugh when I read this. I’m 45, and never left home. My parents ultimately turned the house over to me, and it’s long since paid for. I could sell it for $600,000+ in a heart-beat. It’s quite large and heavily remodeled and is being redecorated inside. The same house in a similar nice neighborhood in L.A. or the Bay area would sell for well over $2,000,000. In a sense, I’m rich in terms of real estate.

I love the look on a woman’s face as she raises her eye brows when I tell her that I never moved away from home, and had always lived with my parents. Then I tactfully mention that because of this lifestyle choice, I’ve had eight new Harley’s in the last five years, plus a Beemer, and a Goldwing…..

Plus, I remind them, I have never had to pay child-support or alimony. A few of them have seen my home, and it drives them absolutely batty. I’m in the process of having the place completely redone inside by an “interior artist” or some-such weird-ass title, and the women I know are astounded that a mere bachelor has such “incredibly good taste when it comes to colors” as one broad put it.

You get the point.

So do they.

Christopher

——————————————————————————–

At 11:48 PM, Patricia C. Deyton-Knox said…

(1)
Main Entry: effect
Function: transitive verb
1 : to cause to come into being
(source: http://www.m-w.com)

(2)
Main Entry: anyway
Function: adverb
1 : ANYWISE
2 : in any case : ANYHOW
(source: ibid)

(3)
I suggest you read this.

(4)
Shrillness can perhaps be forgiven if it is well-written. Your fallen comrade Sixteen Volts, his gross brand of anecdotal overgeneralization notwithstanding, is redeemed in part by his comparably erudite prose. You, on the other hand, commit the unpardonable sin of combining written clumsiness with logical fallacy.

And for that, I salute you! For what better way of lending illegitimacy to your “arguments” than by convincing the layman that you are too obtuse to be taken seriously? And by extension, that those who run with you are likewise dolts? (While such conclusions are clearly fallacious as well, you cannot expect the bulk of your readers to be much more intelligent than you are.)

——————————————————————————–

At 2:24 AM, Anonymous said…

HAHA Patricia…what a typical feminist name.

Funny how you try to come across as intelligent when your views are so stupid.

EB the fact that this bitch posted only means one thing…you pissed her (or it) off. Good job.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:36 AM, Anonymous said…

This is from Patricias profile

——————————–
A few things you ought to know.
(1) I am a first year Ph.D. candidate at an estimable North American university.
(2) I have an irrational, love-hate obsession with John Derbyshire. Otherwise, I am seldomly irrational.
(3) I never watch television, and reserve much disdain for those who do.
(4) I have come across few men who do not find me irresistably attractive. And I have come across fewer still who are worth a minute of my time.
(5) I can drink more cognac than any man I know.
(6) Were I a religious woman, I would believe there was a special lockbox in hell reserved for people who confuse “your” and “you’re.”
(7) I can trace my ancestry back to two of this nation’s founding fathers.
(8) Among my greatest peeves are sports, vegans, and poor grammar.
(9) My father is a Marxist and my mother was a radical feminist, but I am a classical liberal.
(10) I am quite fond of cheese, but would sooner die than eat the bleu variety
——————————

LOL! What a fruitcake.

——————————————————————————–

At 2:47 AM, Anonymous said…

Hey patricia, I think you should read the link that you gave instead of just posting it. Look to the “ad hominem” entry. There are a couple of other fallacies you are guilty of, but that will be the best one for someone as intellectually challenged as you are to start with.

I think you and nScourge would go great together. Neither of you understands the basic principles of effective writing. Writing is a tool for communication. The goal is to get your ideas across, such that they are understood by your reader, and such that your reader wants to read it. This is best done by concise statements organized into logical paragraphs etc.

Oh yeah, I think I’d know a thing or two about argument and writing, considering I am a lawyer. Not an academic that hides in my own world. Not a random internet poster. I am someone who depends on being a good communicator, and on tightly, logically reasoned arguments. Unless you’re in the same profession as me, I do not think you are qualified to give Duncan any advice on how to argue or write.

——————————————————————————–

At 3:01 AM, MS said…

@ Patricia

“And by extension, that those who run with you are likewise dolts?”

Do you include yourself in that, wannabe-doctor? If not, then on what basis do you so denigrate other visitors? Further, how can you possibly reconcile your claim to be a classical liberal interested in rationalism and empiricism, with any tendency whatsoever toward radical (or even relatively moderate) feminism? …unless of course you are employing a few logical fallacies of your own. Finally, are you perhaps engaging anti-feminist sites because deconstructing feminist arguments is too easy for you?

——————————————————————————–

At 3:23 AM, Anonymous said…

1)
Main Entry: patty knox

Function: grammar feminazi

1 : a pompous, conceited bint whose prose flows with all the elan of a crate of thesauri falling through the floor of an abandoned warehouse.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:48 AM, Egghead said…

Hmm…intellectual snobbery from a woman with a hyphen in her name. Why am I not surprised?

In polite society, it is considered poor manners – indeed, an overt display a lack of tact, grace, and class – to point out such trivial inadequacies such as minor spelling errors. Thus, a gentleman or a lady could be forgiven for thinking that the one doing so is nothing but a boorish, loutish peasant.

In other words, to put it in a vernacular that would be more familiar to Ms. Deyton-Knox, “just ’cause she done got herself a dee-gree in that thar ‘wimmenz studdeez’ she thinks she’s edumacated and now she’s actin’ all uppity and puttin’ on airs, n’ all.”

——————————————————————————–

At 4:48 AM, Anonymous said…

Sure patty. Run along now, someone’s missing a sandwich and a blowjob somewhere, which, after you strip off all the titles and the Mrs degrees, is all you’re good for.

——————————————————————————–

At 5:40 AM, inkraven said…

@Patty-the-hyphenated-manhater:

Wow, let’s look at your profile:

(2) I have an irrational, love-hate obsession with John Derbyshire. Otherwise, I am seldomly irrational.

{You’d think a doctoral student would be sufficiently literate to know there is no such word as “seldomly”.}

(4) I have come across few men who do not find me irresistably attractive. And I have come across fewer still who are worth a minute of my time.

{What an ego we have. Real beauty is 90% character, 10% looks. I’ve seen some physically beautiful women that completely ruin it when they open their mouth. You’re probably one of them. Think on that.}

(5) I can drink more cognac than any man I know.

{So you’re an alcoholic, or do you just pride yourself on being unladylike?}

(7) I can trace my ancestry back to two of this nation’s founding fathers.

{I can trace mine to three different families that came over on the bloody Mayflower. So what?}

(9) My father is a Marxist and my mother was a radical feminist, but I am a classical liberal.

{Apple didn’t fall far, did it?}

A divorce waiting to happen, you are.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:00 AM, Masculist Man said…

Some feminist cunt has to show up and try her best to piss us off and derail the topic. Yeah bitch I read your profile and I’ll tell you a couple of MY pet peeves: feminists and feminism.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:20 AM, Anonymous said…

Patricia:

glib /gl?b/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[glib] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective, glib?ber, glib?best.
1. readily fluent, often thoughtlessly, superficially, or insincerely so: a glib talker; glib answers.
2. easy or unconstrained, as actions or manners.
3. Archaic. agile; spry.
[Origin: 1585–95; cf. obs. glibbery slippery (c. D glibberig)]

smug /sm?g/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[smuhg] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective, smug?ger, smug?gest.
1. contentedly confident of one’s ability, superiority, or correctness; complacent.
2. trim; spruce; smooth; sleek.

Haha! We too have immediate access to free dictionaries on the Web.

Fortunately, the majority of us are not so fucked up and banal that we can’t see past simple flaws in grammar, especially on a fucking blog. (Good lord, cunt, we’re not at university, here.)

Note about the article: I still think it’s funny that a woman is so pissed off over freeloading men, when women are the biggest freeloaders of all.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:40 AM, Sir_Chancealot said…

In regards to what Patricia C. Deyton-Knox said…..

You see, that’s the kind of nagging bitchiness that men are refusing to put up with. Oh, are you upset that I ended my sentence on a preposition? Tough! That “rule” was invented by a 15th century monk who didn’t like sentences ending in prepositions.

I see that you do not even have the capacity to make a firm decision, even when it comes to your last name.

Me doth think you protest too much.

——————————————————————————–

At 8:01 AM, Paul Parmenter said…

I note that Julie Bindel praises her mother for being a feminist and teaching her sons to respect women. What a pity it never entered her feminist head to teach her daughter to respect men.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:20 AM, deepak said…

patricia: I just read that five times, and I still have no idea what the fuck you just said.

Don’t major in philosophy, kids, this is what it does to people.

——————————————————————————–

At 9:36 AM, deepak said…

Anyway! Hello Duncan;

Good posting, as always. I’m going to stick my neck out and disagree with a couple of things here.

I do think that the primary reason young men move away from home is indeed because women simply won’t tolerate a fellow who still lives with his parents, and that a lot of them are shamed into it. If you are the kind of man that really does want to start a family and have a nice woman around to help you with the house, then it is a sensible option.

I was very interested by Christopher in Oregon’s comment, and perhaps that’s an option for some of the more fortunate among us, but I’m afraid not all of us can hope for such stable families. I have had to virtually start afresh because my father (divorced) could no longer support me and asked (not forced) me to leave. I am coping, unpleasant though it is.

I favour moving out to let your parents have their hard-earned retirement, and to strengthen yourself and grow as a person, but like Duncan I do not think you should cohabit or marry with a woman in this political climate. It is very, very sad. I love a good many women dearly, both platonically and romantically, and at one stage seriously considered proposing to one, the full deal. Unfortunately, marriage is just a bum deal for men. End of story, bottom line. My father has been divorced twice and each time the woman took him for all he was worth, taking his children into the bargain. I’m not saying there’s nothing wrong with my father and it’s the women’s fault; I’m just saying men simply have too much to lose.

So, do move out, but live cheaply and efficiently on your own. Work for yourself. Grow, and become stronger. Learn to take care of yourself. Date friends. Advance in the world and achieve status, and use it to your advantage, pushing for the things you believe in. Don’t marry young. If you’re one of the lucky ones you’ll find one of the good women left. They are out there, but they’re getting rarer.

It helps to look in more logical places if you want to find sane women. High-quality women do not hang out in bars, unless they’re bored and want the attention of a lot of men chatting them up and buying them drinks. They’re in colleges, taking real courses like physics or computer science (and usually bored out of their minds, poor things), or making art, or caring for their families, or participating in cultural groups.

A few men have taken the more extreme step of finding women from another sociopolitical climate where women still venerate men, but even these are dwindling. I personally suggest avoiding South America; Russia seems to be where it’s at at the moment.

Sad, isn’t it?

——————————————————————————–

At 10:19 AM, Fred S. said…

I’ve just visited your blogger profile, Pattie; what an arch little twat you are! Do you write everything in point form? I suppose it’s easier than actually linking ideas but your thesis adviser won’t like it.

Regards,

p.s. Keep on correcting spelling mistakes. It’ll be good practice for your future adventures in community college instruction.

——————————————————————————–

At 10:26 AM, HAWKEYE said…

i bet it took her weeks to compose that.hahahahahhahaha

——————————————————————————–

At 11:13 AM, Duncan Idaho said…

Patricia, I suggest you read this.

——————————————————————————–

At 12:32 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

I checked out your blog Patsy dear.

Here’s a little quote:

“I hardly ever knew my mother. She died giving birth to my witless brother when I was a little girl, and all throughout my youth Daddy nursed me on tales of this strong, winsome, intelligent lass who had birthed me, and whose sterling genes I carried.

Understandably, Daddy felt terrible guilt for having killed my mother by implanting her with his pernicious spawn. One way in which he atoned was by bringing me up in much the same way that my dear mother would have wanted, or–more accurately, I suspect–by attempting to mould me in my mother’s own lovely image. As you may have guessed, my dear departed mother was a liberal feminist.”

What a steaming pile of inward looking, self absorbed, pretentious crapolla. Everything revolves around you, you, you and your oh so important “feeehhhwwings” doesn’t it.

You strike me as being very similar to that other pseudo-intellectual attention whore who uses the blogoshpere to trawl for male attention, Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passey. Does it feed your narcissistic little ego to have cyber wankers like P.D. “Bo” Steed chasing after you?

What a spaz.

——————————————————————————–

At 12:32 PM, Anonymous said…

This reminds me of a conversation I overheard in the local library once between a (Nepalese) security guard (male), and library assistant (female), were the security guard remarked that his son (early twenties) lived at home with him, much to the assistants surprise. She added it was odd that a son still live at home with his father. To which the guard replied that it was quite normal were he came from.

Is the need for young folk to supposedly ‘strike out on their own’ a predominantly Western or Anglophile cultural tendency?

——————————————————————————–

At 3:13 PM, Brazilian Bachelor said…

I used to like the idea of moving out, mostly because of women. I remember when I said to my GF at that time that I was planning on this, her eyes got huge and she said: WOW! LET’S LIVE TOGETHER!

You know where this would go…

But I didn’t move out, and do not plan to anymore. I said to my mother I’ll be here for a loooong time and she said that’s great. Why not? I could easily invest the money I would be paying on mortgage and end up with two new properties… that I can rent and buy some more! Isn’t that great?

——————————————————————————–

At 4:15 PM, hitanshu said…

Hi,

I am a fan of duncan idaho blog. I am from India. I too would like to point out that in India it is normal for the sons to live with their parents. The daughters are married off. It is primarily the son’s duty to support his parents when they are old. A son who forsakes his parents is considered worthy of disrespect. The relationship is mutual. When you are young and unable to fend for yourself, parents support you and when the parents are old, you support the parents even if you are married and with children.

I hate these feminists as they are out to destroy the traditional Indian family.

The likes of Duncan, Angry Harry, Captain zarmband etc etc are doing a good job in exposing them.

——————————————————————————–

At 4:59 PM, mfsob said…

Let me tell you a little story about men living at home … My ex’s family had 4 kids, born girl, boy, girl, boy.

The oldest girl dropped out of college to run off with an Army deserter and is currently on her second (or third, I can’t keep track) husband living in a trailer somewhere in bumfuck, Arkansas.

The oldest son’s a doctor, his wife was a Class-A gold digger and all around witch/bitch who was managing to spend them towards poverty at a high rate of speed, among other things. He finally wised up after the upteenth time he tried to clamp down on her spending, and an “accidental” house fire started looking more and more like arson/attempted murder. He dumped her, but is financially screwed, seldom sees his kids and now lives in a crackerbox. She, of course, needs $3,000+ a month to “maintain her standard of living.”

Second daughter has dumped husband No. 2 after spending their way into bankruptcy in less than 2 years and is constantly going back to court to try and get ex (that would be me) to finance her life. Let’s see, I can only afford to live in a dump, seldom see the kids and will have to work until I die because my retirement was wiped out in the divorce. Yeah, I’m rolling in it.

Youngest son lived at home until he was in his mid-30s. Has nothing whatsoever to do with women because he’s waiting for June Cleaver to reappear.

Of course, the two girls were always calling him a loser and worthless and stupid for living at home, always giving him shit about it – and now he owns a really nice house in a upscale development, has a nice retirement nest egg, and no one telling him what to do or how to live his life.

I admire him, and am more than a little envious. I did what men are “supposed” to do, get married and settle down, etc., … and am totally fucked financially for the rest of my life.

He has had nothing to do with women, is free as a bird, and can do what he wants, when he wants, regardless of cost. LEARN FROM THIS, MEN!!!!!

——————————————————————————–

At 7:01 PM, phoenix said…

Good to see the pretentious twit put in her place. I remember a time when I used to write like that, I think it was back in high school. Then I actually grew up. It’s not like people don’t understand what is written, or can’t write like that themselves, as obviously shown by the comments, it’s that it’s a pompous, un-flowing piece of garbage. She’ll probably get a job as a HS English teacher and nit-pick against the male students, while ignoring her own and her female student’s copious amounts of errors.

——————————————————————————–

At 8:22 PM, Anonymous said…

All I got to say is, “Enjoy your independent feminist lifestyle and get bent you old hag.”

Panzer

——————————————————————————–

At 8:54 PM, Anonymous said…

I have only one response to Patricia C. Deyton-Knox’s post, Ahhhh, looks like someone needs a husband. Well how about it guys? Guys? Anyone? Hello? Yea I did’nt think so.

Panzer

——————————————————————————–

At 9:45 PM, voodoojock said…

Yep, women seem to find glee in poking fun at the man who can’t boil an egg, yet, I find it laughable that they can’t change tires, overhaul engines, or unscrew the license plate from the ass-end of the car.

They justify this with the excuse that it’s easier to pay someone for it. Well, that’s what this guy has done.

I also find it laughable that the first thing these women do is ridicule the lack of domestic ability with these men, while possessing the same ineptness themselves. After all, housework’s oppressive, right ladies?

——————————————————————————–

At 5:45 PM, Anonymous said…

pete said…
How come there’s always an empowered woman to make empowered comments about how much she bucks the trend whenever you talk about something in a general way?

Oh yeah, because on the internet no one can prove your comments wrong.’

Because not everyone’s the same, and generalisations only serve to hurt a lot of people, Pete. Would you want everyone to say ‘all anti-feminists are scum?’That’s not true, so please try to be fair to those of us – men and women – who are trying to be moderate and respect each other’s views.

——————————————————————————–

At 7:14 AM, Misogynic_Gent said…

Your fallen comrade Sixteen Volts, his gross brand of anecdotal overgeneralization notwithstanding, is redeemed in part by his comparably erudite prose. You, on the other hand, commit the unpardonable sin of combining written clumsiness with logical fallacy.

And for that, I salute you! For what better way of lending illegitimacy to your “arguments” than by convincing the layman that you are too obtuse to be taken seriously? And by extension, that those who run with you are likewise dolts? (While such conclusions are clearly fallacious as well, you cannot expect the bulk of your readers to be much more intelligent than you are.)

Thanks for the link Patricia. Your assertion that, “those who ‘run with’ Duncan are dolts” is a striking example of the self-explanatory Guilt by Association fallacy.

Your conclusions are clearly fallacious by your own admission so, on what grounds should anyone take you seriously? E.g., you said, “While such conclusions are clearly fallacious as well . . .

What better way to totally debunk your own premise than by admitting that it is fallacious? Brilliant! Hehe!?

Moreover, you should have specifically named and defined the logical fallacies, and overgeneralizations that you claim were executed by those you obviously slandered.

Until you present specific examples and prove how those fallacies(?) and overgeneralizations(?) support your premise, your paragraphs stand ironically as logically fallacious and utterly unsupported poppeycock! As you should know, lack of proof is not proof and the burden of proof is on you.

Your reputation is on the line so, you should back your accusations as soon as possible. Nonetheless, your rep can in part be redeemed by simply supporting and proving your charges.

I guess start digging through the archives until you think you’ve found some supportive evidence. Present that evidence and give these guys an opportunity to defend themselves.

-John

——————————————————————————–

At 6:19 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Fellows;

I am luckier than most guys in many respects. Probably the biggest thing in my favor is that both of my parents warned me about marriage and women. My mother was very vocal about women and their nasty ways. For this I will always be grateful. She told me in no uncertain terms that women were pretty much all whores and liars, and that for all practical purposes, there were no exceptions. This view is echoed by the Bible as well, as shown by verses in Proverbs and Ecclesiaistes, for those of you silly boys who still embrace Christianity.

Probably the most important bit of information she gave me was that women do NOT age well. She kept telling me that if I could just get to the age of thirty, I “would be home free”, as she put it. At the time, I didn’t fully understand it. I do now. It’s not just a matter of your sex drive diminishing as you get older, but something far more important. A woman’s looks almost always head for the gutter as she ages. The more kids she has, the faster her looks deteriorate. I’m not talking when she hits fifty, or even forty.

Thirty. Maybe sooner.

This isn’t just an issue of her face loosing that “youthful glow”. I recall visiting a Christian relationship site recently that was tactfully talking about how a woman loses her beauty by forty. It said that she wouldn’t turn many heads anymore. I thought, “Yeah; she won’t turn any heads at forty. Maybe a few stomachs- but no heads.”

This is one of the greatest secrets that few people talk about, and young men are almost never warned about. Women get ugly. BUTT UGLY. Even if she doesn’t grow obese, as most women do, they develop cellulite.

Cellulite.

Oh, God. Have you ever walked down the aisle in a store and observed the women waddling along in short pants? Have you ever looked at their legs? Their thighs? A ghastly sight. Cellulite jiggling in every direction. It’s like the old fifties sci-fi movie “The Blob”. Sometimes I’m afraid it’s going to jump out and envelope me.

Ick.

Ponder her buttocks. More cellulite. Lots more fat. You could set up a table for six on some of the female bums out there.

Her belly could handle the overflow. I was watching a show on one of the Discovery channels the other day and they were talking about how a woman’s belly can grow and stretch to accommodate pregnancy. Yes, indeed. A woman’s belly can grow to resemble a beached whale in short order. (It rarely shrinks back)

Contemplate her breasts. Ah, yes. The twin orbs of pleasure that young men so foolishly lust after.

Why?

They’re a couple of sacks of fat with oozing nipples on the end. Very few women’s breasts look like the one’s you see in the movies. Normally, most breasts are NOT attractive at all. They droop. Sometimes they’re not identical. Some look like gourds. When children come along, they sag badly. Very badly. Sometimes down to their belly, which by this time is also sagging in a race to hit the floor. In a woman, everything heads south, my friends. NEVER forget this.

I’m going to be blunt. Have you ever smelled a vagina? Seriously. I mean in it’s natural, unwashed state? Really stuck your nose right down there and taken a deep breath?

I did.

Once.

My G-d. The stench could have knocked a buzzard off a shit wagon at fifty paces. To this day I swear there was a cloud of flies buzzing around that portal of doom. Sometimes when riding my Harley-Beasties around the rural roads here in Oregon, I encounter dead skunks. Road kill. We have a lot of them here, and when they’ve been baking in the summer sun, you can smell them a long way off even at sixty miles per hour.

Vaginas tend to be even nastier.

I have long said that a vagina is a cesspool of filth and disease, and that I will never place any part of my anatomy into such a sewer. With the odds that a woman has herpes or HPV, this statement is even more true today.

Nature has a clever trick to warn us of danger. Smell. If you encounter something that smells bad, or rancid, Nature is telling you to get away.

(Danger, danger Will Robinson!)

You are being warned that something is probably carrying disease, and is filthy. Definatley not fit for human consumption.

Consider what comes out of a woman’s vagina when she has a period. It’s not just blood, boys. Other nasty stuff sloughes off. If she has HPV, then dead warts (if she’s being treated) come oozing out. Or dead pre-cancerous lesions. Scabs. Brown slime that reeks.

Doubt me? Visit any HPV forum and read the stories. It’s enough to make a Billy-Goat puke.

And they wonder why so many men don’t want to perform oral sex……

Think about her rectum. Yep. Her butt-hole. Think about how close it is to her vagina. Do you REALLY want your gonads slapping up against her poop-shute?

Really?

How carefully does she wipe after she uses the toilet? Do you know? Of course not. You’re taking it on faith that she is very sanitary, and we all know we can trust women.

Look at her pretty face. Think about her mouth. Can you say gingivitus? Tooth decay? Mucous? Plaque? The human mouth is FILTHY, and a woman’s mouth is no exception, bucko. She can also carry Herpes and HPV in her mouth from all those blow jobs she’s been giving out to every guy in town. Blow jobs that mysteriously disappear once married, I might add.

Look at her beady little eyes. Will they look so pretty when she is squinting through glasses that are as thick as coke bottle bottoms? When they’re oozing? When they are dull and lifeless as she hits middle age?

Have you ever watched how a woman’s skin sags? Their skin ages much faster than a man’s. Loss of collagen you know. They soon look like a mummy. Surely you’ve seen a middle-aged couple walking along. The man is fifty. In shape. Pleasantly greying on the sides of his head. A bounce in his step.

Jaunty.

Then look at his wife.

She looks like an open-casket funeral. The stench of death is about her. He’s just hitting his prime in looks, while she’s flying towards death. Yes, she may outlive him. If you can call occupying a rotting carcass living.

Deconstruct the female.

This is a common theme by celibate males who seek to warn men about the realities of women.

Deconstruct the female.

I’m sure sometimes women wonder why I’m smiling as I go about my business. It’s not just that I’m friendly. I’m deconstructing in my mind. Many times this has saved me.

Women produce the same filth and excretions as men. They require deodrants both for underarms, and even worse, for down below. What happens when a woman uses the toilet? Do you think it comes out smelling like roses? Think again.

Understand that your sex drive is irrational. It’s designed by nature to get you to breed. Once the breeding is done, your sex drive diminishes and her looks disappear. Nature doesn’t want her being desirable to other men. She needs to take care of the little children, so nature makes her ugly. The more children, the uglier she gets. It’s a normal biological result of breeding.

Stop and analyze why you feel desire for a woman. You’re being manipulated by nature to do something that is NOT in your personal best interest. It will not be advantageous in any way to breed with a woman. You will be drained physically, emotionally, spiritually and financially. Consider the other examples in nature of males being used and cast aside after breeding. Once they have served their purpose, they are useless to the female.

Do you think you will be treated any differently when the female has used you for breeding? You will only be around as long as she feels she need you financially. No longer.

Deconstruct the female.

Understand what she is physically. Understand the forces that drive her to breed, and the part you play. Is this what you want? To spend your short life in this fashion? Are you destined to be a slave to your desires? Can you rise above nature? Can you use your mind to control your actions?

Are you better and stronger than the other creatures in the world, or are you a slave to your passions just as surely as a dog?

The choice is yours.

Clear your mind of lust. Avoid looking at women. Avoid porn. Masturbate if needed when younger- or older. Don’t date. Don’t socialize with women. Concentrate on your hobbies. Your work. Your exercising.

Buy a motorcycle if you can swing it. Ride. Commune with nature. Contemplate your naval. Read the classics. Take up bicycling. Hiking.

Anything.

Use your energies in ways that benefit YOU, not some oozing gash. You don’t have to be just another cog in the Matriarchy. Live for yourself.

Whew.

I must end this now, as nature is calling. I’m going to take a much-deserved dump in my newly redecorated bachelor bathroom that no Vagina-Beasty has ever fouled.

Christopher

——————————————————————————–

At 11:09 PM, Anonymous said…

Christopher, I feel very sorry for you. You’ve obviously had a very tough time with women and it’s a shame that your mother – one of these mummified, stinky, shitty, diseased creatures – has placed such ideas in your head.

But I suppose your mother is the perfect exception?

——————————————————————————–

At 6:57 AM, Verlch said…

Patricia C. Deyton-Knox said…
(1)
Main Entry: effect
Function: transitive verb
1 : to cause to come into being
(source: http://www.m-w.com)

Let her go work like men, and when her last egg gets flushed out of her ovaries in a bloody mess short of needing a tranfusion, we can all get her a cat with the name Pussy for it! Here, pussy pussy pussy. lol

My cat had a name, but my dad always called it here Pussy Pussy….lol.. Don’t know why.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:58 AM, Verlch said…

Speaking of blow jobs that disappear, I can’t even make out with my wife anymore!

Blow jobs disappear, the house gets dirtier and dirtier, I’m thinking I might move to the middle east, they know how to keep women women!!!!

——————————————————————————–

At 5:14 PM, Fem Hater said…

So what if a man lives withs he parents under the age of 25, the best age to get married is above 25 according to the stats, living with your parents saves up a lot of money for the future, sounds like men are more sensible then women as usual.

——————————————————————————–

At 1:36 AM, phoenix said…

anonymous 11:09-

Nice use of shaming language there, you’re a real pro!

Why do you feel sorry for him? Is it of the kindness of your heart? It’s great that you’re so altruistic. Oh wait, generally, people insulting others don’t do it out of kindness, they do it to make themselves feel better at someone else’s expense. In that case, you’re just an asshole, so why would your opinion be of any merit? Your goal is to hurt him, not help him. Not that it’s worked, but it’s rather pointless to waste space posting that comment.

I mean it’s obvious that you’re a lonely single working woman right? Obvious…from you posting on an anti-feminism board. “Obvious” is such a funny word.

——————————————————————————–

At 6:50 AM, Misogynic_Gent said…

Shrillness can perhaps be forgiven if it is well-written. . .

You, on the other hand, commit the unpardonable sin of combining written clumsiness with logical fallacy.

Oops! Patricia, I misspelled the word “poppycock” in my previous post. What must I do to atone for this sin? By the way, who made you arbiter of unpardonable sins?

Where have you run off to, Patricia? Are you another hit & run troll – too inept to back your accusations?

The absurdity of your misplaced grammar correction is further highlighted by the good lawyer here.

Anonymous Lawyer:Neither of you understands the basic principles of effective writing. Writing is a tool for communication. The goal is to get your ideas across, such that they are understood by your reader, and such that your reader wants to read it. This is best done by concise statements organized into logical paragraphs etc.

Well-said lawyer. I would also add, that the validity of a statement has no relevance to how well-written it is.

I tend to keep my posts somewhat formal but I’m not trying to write a book. Bookish language would obviously be too formal for this informal setting. That’s why grammatical errors are easily overlooked, hence the absurdity of Patricia’s trollish little diatribe.

I’m probably beating a dead horse, but let this be a lesson to others inclined to follow Patricia’s steps. Like children, these poor fembots and fembot gurus seem to lack knowledge of even the most elementary concepts.

The likes of Patricia give credence to the adage; A boy expands into a man; a girl contracts into a woman.

Anonymous Lawyer:I think you and nScourge would go great together.

Well, nSCOURGE actually has some good points that can be discovered after re-reading his posts a few times.

NSCOURGE, I mean you no disrespect but we are not contestants in a decoding contest. I wish you’d aim more for clarity than complexity. Don’t pack too many uncommon or irregular words in the same sentence or paragraph. My advice, which I hope you take, is not out of spite and I wish you the best.

-John

——————————————————————————–

At 7:19 AM, Misogynic_Gent said…

I see absolutely nothing wrong with someone living with their parents at any age.

If you’re insecure about living at home then do more than your parents require of you. If you’re an asset to your family then it’s nobody’s business. There is nothing immoral or shameful about living with your parents unless you’re behaving like a leech and they want you to leave.

It’s foolish and childish to move out before you’re ready merely to fulfill some fantastical illusion of independence or to impress silly girls trapped in women’s bodies.

If you truly want to be independent then I suggest growing your own food where possible and perhaps invest in a greenhouse, etc. That’s a good start toward independence.

I say live with your parents, save money, invest wisely and move out when you’re ready unless your family needs you. Don’t stab your family in the back using feminist arguments to justify leaving in their time of need. . .

In addition, one can refuse marriage without becoming selfish. An unwillingness to move out and get married isn’t an indication of laziness or selfishness. You don’t have to live for yourself but for others and work hard to get ahead.

Go to college if you like but I predict colleges will become nothing more than diploma-mills for women with delusions of goddesshood.

Feminism has successfully broken families apart and made living with parents past 18 or so(if you’re male) a shameful move. It’s quite evident that many women think they’re superior for moving out on their own. Like others said, pay no attention to superficial women who hypocritically look down their noses at you for the lifestyle choice you’ve made.

——————————————————————————–

At 3:15 PM, Anonymous said…

Pat appears ot be another man-hating dyke?

——————————————————————————–

At 4:40 PM, Anonymous said…

phoenix said…
anonymous 11:09-

‘Nice use of shaming language there, you’re a real pro!

Why do you feel sorry for him? Is it of the kindness of your heart? It’s great that you’re so altruistic. Oh wait, generally, people insulting others don’t do it out of kindness, they do it to make themselves feel better at someone else’s expense. In that case, you’re just an asshole, so why would your opinion be of any merit? Your goal is to hurt him, not help him. Not that it’s worked, but it’s rather pointless to waste space posting that comment.

I mean it’s obvious that you’re a lonely single working woman right? Obvious…from you posting on an anti-feminism board. “Obvious” is such a funny word.’

Well duh, Phoenix! (and incidentally, I’m happily married to a man who hasn’t got a fear of vaginas, and we have separate bank accounts). I’m more interested that Christopher hasn’t replied with some guff about his old sainted Mum. The words ‘Norman’ and ‘Bates’ are ringing around my head for some reason…and ‘Master’ and ‘Bates’ too.

——————————————————————————–

At 1:11 PM, Anonymous said…

As long as you dont move her into your parents place. There has been the occassional case of a cohab/wife suing for a piece of a house that she made some sort of ‘contribution’ too. Like a few dollars here and there, accepted as rent, but claimed to be towards a mortgage. That plus some house chores being accepted as proof of equity interest.

——————————————————————————–

At 1:21 PM, Anonymous said…

Patricia,

what are you doing using patriarchal constricts like LOGICAL THEORY to make your point?

hahahahahahahaha.

silly chicken.

——————————————————————————–

At 1:33 PM, Anonymous said…

Getting away from crazy, nutty, wildly argumentative females was the primary reason l moved outta home as soon as l could.

——————————————————————————–

%d bloggers like this: