“McCartney was violent” claims ex-porn star and shoplifter


——————————————————-

18 October 2006

heatherlovekillsslowly.jpg

Goodbye to violent McCartney, says Heather Mills

Former Beatle Paul McCartney’s estranged wife Heather Mills has reportedly accused the iconic musician of violence, murderous excess, sexual chauvinism, alcoholism and drug-taking throughout the course of their brief and ill-starred marriage, in the latest, ugliest twist in their divorce battle.

In a series of extraordinary allegations filed in the divorce papers, which quickly found their way into a British tabloid newspaper, Mills, a former model half McCartney’s age, accused McCartney of attacking her four times, trying to choke her and behaving in an altogether “vindictive, punitive manner”.

Mills, who has retained the late Princess Diana’s expensive divorce lawyer to try and claim the largest chunk possible of the former Beatle’s estimated one-billion-pound fortune, claimed the singer was “physically violent” and tried to stab her with a broken wine glass, refused to let her breast-feed their daughter and forced the one-legged anti-landmine campaigner her to cancel an operation since it conflicted with his vacation plans.

And who’s going to believe all these allegations that lack evidence, that suspiciously were not reported at the time, and which would coincidentally ensure an even bigger share of a divorce settlement? Oh right, a divorce court would believe them.

Divorce lawyers generally advise women to automatically make allegations of violence (or threats of it, which are even more difficult to disprove) against their husbands. It’s fair to assume the bulk of such claims are false.

It’s obvious to everyone that this accomplished thief and ex-porn star only married him with the intention of popping out a kid before filing for divorce and ensuring she would never have to work again. Shame McCartney didn’t figure that out. Oh well, at least, once he’s lost tens or even hundreds of millions of pounds, it’ll ensure the ever dwindling number of men – certainly rich ones – willing to marry will dwindle yet further.

(On an unrelated note, many thanks to Tyrael for creating the smart looking banner at the top of the page.)

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:24 PM
——————————————————-

At 7:58 PM, fetching jen said…

The Mills-McCartney show is just beginning with the divorce lawyer as the Producer. Sadly, Sir Paul will turn out to be a good investment for Heather Mills. So what’s a few bruises for a few million?

She’s a skank, and about to become a rich skank. I only hope that some guy does to her, exactly what she did to Paul McCartney after she’s rich.

——————————————————-

At 8:17 PM, Anonymous said…

This is round one. If he doesn’t settle then here come the child molestation charges.

Part of Paul’s problem is that he believes his own songs and that he can find a replacement for Linda:

Good Luck

She was a different person from a different era. Modern females are quite mercenary.

——————————————————-

At 8:43 PM, nevo said…

I am not surprised of her allegations. In fact a woman can say whatever she likes in the knowledge that the courts will accept anything she said without any evidence or proof or any cross examination to give the man/father a chance to defend himself.
She could have even said the father was abusing her litle daughter, which is also unproveable, but the rule solicitors apply is to keep to the essential minimum those allegations.
This biasedism will now be expose to the world through the media causing men to scorn marriage even further.
Oddly enough, Heather, may have cause untold damage to the feminist movement by exposing to the world what women are really up to.

NEVO

——————————————————-

At 9:55 PM, Anonymous said…

Dear Mr Idaho,

I am writing you this note to give you a link to the NY times here in America. This newspaper has a very liberal slant to it, but the comments section that I am linking you to is very interesting. It is about how marriage in the US is on the decline, and how people feel about it. Most of the comments seem to fall into lock step with our feelings about it.
Best Regards,
-M

http://news.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=64

——————————————————-

At 9:58 PM, Plauboy said…

McCartney is a famous and wealthy man. He could sepend summers at the Playboy mansion banging 20-year-old centerfold models and winters at the French Riviera… banging pretentious golddiggers. Hell, he could swing by any London club and go home with a different women every night.

With so much too lose why would he get married? It’s simply stupid for any man to get married but for a wealthy man who can shag a new chick whenver he wants… getting married is moronic.

——————————————————-

At 10:21 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

fetching jen said…”I only hope that some guy does to her, exactly what she did to Paul McCartney after she’s rich.”

A nice sentiment Jen but I think we all know this will never happen.

——————————————————-

At 10:29 PM, Anonymous said…

This is a great opportunity for all of us to learn from Sir Paul’s costly mistake. His multi-million dollar mistake can be learned by us vicariously. The best part is that it won’t cost us a dime.

——————————————————-

At 11:13 PM, Paul Parmenter said…

“Oddly enough, Heather, may have cause untold damage to the feminist movement by exposing to the world what women are really up to.”

Good point nevo. I have come to realise that feminism has actually done one good thing for the human race: it has torn away, once and for all, the myth of female “niceness”.

Feminism has encouraged women to act like men; but women can’t act like men, so instead they have just aped the worst aspects of male behaviour, in the deluded belief that this makes them the equal of men.

The result is that we have now been blessed with the edifying spectacle of women destroying the myth of their own sweetness. We now see that women can lie, cheat and manipulate with a complete absence of shame. I might add that they have proved they can also booze, fart, belch, sweat, vomit, fight and swear pretty much in the same way as the worst of men. For centuries women strove to hide all this from the gaze of men and maintain the image that they were superior beings who were above all that. Now by embracing feminism they can’t sustain the pretence any longer.

The dark side of the character of modern (and ancient) woman is now well and truly stripped bare for all the world to see.

Why do I actually think this is a good thing? Because it is high time we took women off their pedestals and stopped building myths around them. They really are not superior at all, and never were.

The only way to build anything worthwhile is to start with the truth. Marriage and divorce are prime examples. Base your approach to both on the false assumption that women are always innocent oppressed victims who have sacrificed themselves to improve the lives of their selfish husbands, and therefore need to be compensated for their suffering, and you inevitably end up with the horrific results you see every day.

To get back to the thread: Heather McCartney could be the flag-bearer for this truth. All pretence has gone, and here come the lies to accompany the thieving, immorality and greed that have already been exposed in her life.

——————————————————-

At 1:29 AM, Anonymous said…

Nervo made a good point about Heather Wright Mills showing feminism for what it is————extortion.

Mills is an evil woman who played poor, lonely, widowed Paul McCartney after his beloved-wife’s death. He is the victim in this.

The people who are making the laws in Britain are clearly evil.

Next election over there guys, vote AGAINST any incumbent, regardless of political party. Try to do whatever possible to see judgeships change hands often also. Resist the elite, and the corporations with your purchasing decisions. Explain what is happening in Britan as best you can to willing ears. Go to war against the powers that be that are trying to do this to Britan.

Lastly, cheat…………….Im tired of being the good peaceful Christian about this. Take the lug-nuts off the cars of any feminist professor you can get away with. Phuck em’.

——————————————————-

At 3:51 AM, HAWKEYE said…

to sir paul
stick it to her paul ,on behalf of every man on the planet ,on behalf of the last thread of truth that remains.
we are with you all the way brother

——————————————————-

At 10:58 AM, Mamonaku187 said…

Suuuuure she was abused. Umm hmm.

The boy cried wolf too many times, and in the end, he got eaten.

Claims like these make all women look bad, to the point where no one believes them when bad things really do happen.

Shame shame.

——————————————————-

At 11:58 AM, FredXblog said…

Mills: I want more money

Lawyer: Cry abuse

And the corruption continues…

——————————————————-

At 1:09 PM, Anonymous said…

McCartney is a nice guy. I do not know him of course, but you never really get the impression that he is hard, brutal, suspicious or bad in any way.
Of course he has no reason to be, but other famous people have probles with th elaw etc.
He is a nice guy. Does it tell us something? Yes, the typical nice guy.

A judge should reverse all Mill said:
She should get a prison term, if she does not prove what she said,
he should get custody of the child, because for financial and personal reasons he can take care better. This women is not fit to take care of children.
She should get no money at all.
She earned enough, she is not poor, she wants to be divorced.

This would be a fair judgement. We know it won’t happen, but it would be so good.

——————————————————-

At 3:47 PM, Anonymous said…

Some good prosthetic leg jokes on the British Army Rumour Service (ARRSE) forum here.

——————————————————-

At 4:32 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

All very good points, but my mind is straying to another related issue. Paul McCartney is rich by anyone’s standards, and could pretty much have any woman he wanted. Any woman is available for the right price. So, he picks Heather. Heather, from what I heard, was once a model. Supposedly very beautiful. Buuuuut, what I see when I look at her picture is a aging skank. I’m not saying this to be cruel; she is simply an example of what happens to virtually all women when they hit their middle thirties. Their looks go to hell in a handbasket, as the saying goes. I certainly wouldn’t want such an ugly old woman lying in MY bed. Picture her in five or ten years. Twenty. Sheep start to look pretty good at that point….

If that’s the best that a BILLIONAIRE can get, what about the rest of us mere mortals?

——————————————————-

At 9:41 PM, mfsob said…

Heather Mills is just another washed up, used up, past-her-prime-oh-shit-what-do-I-do-now-that-my-looks-are-gone Western female who just happened to snag a very rich but nonetheless stupid man with a bit of enthusiastic on her knees and swallow it action … other than the fact that LOTS of money is involved in this one, the same thing happens every day in our so-called civilized societies.

——————————————————-

At 12:25 AM, Pete Patriarch said…

Hi EB, here are some of my own thoughts on the issue.

While I don’t really think anything will come of these abuse allegations both in the courtroom or in the real world, since people are so likely to believe a woman, especially a beautiful one at that (sure she’s losing her looks but she’s still going to get a lot of sympathy). She cries abuse, the whole world will swoop in to take her in their arms and say, “Did the big bad man hurt you darling?”

Pah.

——————————————————-

At 7:20 AM, Anonymous said…

I have no sympathy for this guy, if anything, I feel it’s more justified when one of these richer men lose in a divorce. The rest of us have no power, but these rich bastards just stand around and laugh as the common joe gets screwed over and over in the family courts. Only those with money could do something about it, and they seem to have refused. When enough of these rich men get angry about it, then, and only then, will we see a change.

——————————————————-

At 9:45 PM, Anonymous said…

Paul McCartney Winning Publicity War

Gets 75 Percent Of Vote In British Poll On Who’s Believed In Divorce Battle

From comments section:

where is your self respect Ms Mills?, you don’t deserve anything that was Pauls before you were married and only deserve what you both have accumulated whilst being married. Both of you know exactly what should be divided and you should uphold that for your own self esteem. Shame on you for being a gold digger. Get your own stuff, don’t you know that it is the only way to know that you are an individual and honorable. Remember God does not look kindly on this kind of ugly behavior and sometimes things have a way of coming back at you. Take care of your kid and family and help them through this tough time. All the money in the world won’t fix loss of respect from your loved ones. Think about the SCARS. Posted by babydreds at 03:10 PM : Oct 20, 2006

——————————————————-

At 8:48 AM, Anonymous said…

Looks like Sir Paul is going to be donating half of his $1.5 billion to the Marriage Strike.

This donation will help lots of men avoid this trauma. We should all thank him.

——————————————————-

At 5:31 PM, Anonymous said…

Heather is taking some really poor advice. She will end up being a Rich, lonely Skank. Devoid of an obviously Decent Man. Her behavior and lies will mark her for life as an amoral, Predatory piece of crap. She made Porn. She was a Prostitute. She had a chance at a lifestyle with a decent caring Man. She is doing the Men of the UK a favor. Showing them what Western Women are truly all about.

They only care about themselves. That we are in a Moral Freefall in the West is due to our Amoral Women. Older Women are coming to this realization. My 81 year old Father who supported Feminism is now seeing it for what it is. A Scam, a lie that exploits Men and is destroying Families.

Khankrumthebulgar

——————————————————-

At 7:55 PM, Anonymous said…

Nows the time for MRAs to approach Paul McCartney and get him on their side.

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: