Some of the “incalculable good” feminism has done


——————————————————-

07 November 2006

cb.jpg

The breakdown in family life that threatens us all

This recent report that British teenagers are the randiest, booziest, ASBO-receivingist delinquents in the entire Universe has lead to lots of commentary, but as many have pointed out, most commentators and certainly all politicians skirt round the primary cause of all this, namely the absence of fathers in many children’s lives which was a direct goal – and a direct result – of feminism.

This article fortunately does get closer to the problem, although still not perfectly.

Next, look at schools. Why are millions of pupils — and I mean millions — bored out of their skulls? Why do so many teachers feel stifled by diktats and a narrowly prescriptive curriculum? What is there at most schools to hold the interest of non-academic children when the staff are so focused on cramming kids for meaningless exams? And why do thousands drop out of learning, and out of society, before they are 14?

It’s more likely to be boys dropping out, because most are tired of schoolteachers who are predominantly female and often feminists. Furthermore, us guys have been told we’re not needed by women, that we’re not needed as providers anymore; so why the fuck bother working hard to be a good provider? Furthermore, most young men want to get laid; that’s the main aim in their life as teenagers. Thanks to feminism, girls are now devoid of responsibility and restraint, with it being seen as patriarchal oppression to keep them on a leash, and a many only have a single slut-bag mother as a “role model” and no father in their lives. It’s no surprise they often go after bad-boy thugs. If you’ve got a hard-working straight-A boy of 15 who is already selecting which A-Levels to take and which University to go to, and another boy who is the same age and has been expelled, doesn’t go to school, hangs out on street corners drinking cider and hassling strangers for cash and has several convictions for car theft and public disorder, who do you think is more likely to have a gaggle of girls offering to suck his dick (I’ll give you a clue; it’s the same one who is more likely to have been raised by a single mum.) What’s the point in a teenage boy knuckling down and working hard when, thanks to feminism freeing their restraints, teenage girls will snub him and go to the drop-outs and thugs (until she’s been knocked up and needs a sucker)?

A lot of girls drop out to become single mums before they’ve left school, but again this is thanks to feminism, which pushed women into the workplace and fooled the silly dears into thinking work was great. These teenaged girls have looked at the legacy the previous generation of not-very-forward-thinking women has left them – working in offices and factories with any children they have being raised in daycare – and decided against it. They often see becoming a single mother as the quickest way to getting hitched to a great provider; the government. Feminism’s insistence on transferring more tax-breaks and benefits to single-mother households from proper (i.e. two-parent) families, and women’s rush into the workplace, has left few men capable of providing for women as well as the government. Which is, of course, what the government wants; nothing better than having women and children dependent on them, the government, rather than individual men.

The only problem is, that this leaves millions of young men with fuck all to do and no incentive to work hard, stay in line and behave. Oops! Didn’t quite plan that out too well, didja, fembots?

And lastly (though this should be first) you have to point the finger at British family life — or, rather, the colossal breakdown of it. Again, middle-class commentators completely misunderstand the problem. This isn’t about yummy Islington mummies moaning that their teenage kids are never in for family meals. It’s about kids who haven’t seen their father in months, who aren’t welcome in their own home because their mum’s new bloke hates the sight of them, who could disappear for days before anyone would raise the alarm, and who haven’t an adult in the world to whom they could turn if they get into trouble.

Feminism taught women that fathers are not necessary in children’s lives, and the removal of things like Married Man’s Tax Allowance – whereby a married woman’s tax benefits would be passed on to her working husband – and the increase in benefits to single mums, not to mention the cash payouts available to women when they divorce hubby on a whim, mean that there is little incentive for women to bother keeping the father around. They can just go through a succession of bad-boy thugs and squeal “You stupid old sexist caveman!” if anyone dares suggest she’s not being a terribly good mother by being so sluttish. Some could argue that there are men who get women pregnant and ditch them, but in such cases, mummy should’ve gotten pregnant to a guy more willing to stick around; or would such a nice-guy been too boring? Furthermore, most guys who fuck, impregnate and chuck women are more likely to have been raise by stupid slut-bag single mothers themselves.

The future is not measurably bright; it’s potentially appalling.

It already is appalling. But fuck it,why should I – or indeed other men – care? It’ll be women who’ll pay big time as the country descends into a feral matriarchy (for all matriarchies are feral, once the last of patriarchal civilization ebbs away.) With fewer men working – or doing so abroad – and less taxes there to pay for fembot schemes and single mother benefits, and few men marrying or dealing with women, it’ll be the silly sex that fell for feminism that’ll suffer the most, alone and broke and trying to survive on the dwindling crumbs the government can afford to spare as more men drop out of the workforce or move abroad.

Har har. Not my problem.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 10:07 AM
——————————————————-

At 2:23 PM, Anonymous said…

“Next, look at schools. Why are millions of pupils — and I mean millions — bored out of their skulls?”

Let’s consider history lessons. In mine, some monotonous beardy-wierdy droned from a textbook for three years or so – this king did this, that king did that, the other king did something else ….yawn – while I did my homework for other classes.

Now, had we had history lessons like this I’d probably have wet myself with excitement…

——————————————————-

At 4:57 PM, NYMOM said…

“These teenaged girls have looked at the legacy the previous generation of not-very-forward-thinking women has left them – working in offices and factories with any children they have being raised in daycare – and decided against it. They often see becoming a single mother as the quickest way to getting hitched to a great provider; the government.”

Well then women really haven’t changed very much have they? As my mother and her mother before her never finished high school and both were married and mothers by 17 or so…

So it’s not that womens’ behavior has changed, but men has.

Maybe expecting every woman to work until she’s 30 or so and then begin her family isn’t very realistic then. At least not for most women????

If it was realistic, then fertility wouldn’t start so early in a girl’s life.

So don’t blame women because men have changed their behavior.

——————————————————-

At 6:00 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

You’re observations are entirely correct but the big government has not done this by accident. The feminist movement has been used to promote the kind of society that those in high office and big-business always wanted. A society dominated by high spending, government-dependent females. Men are to be used as cannon fodder and to harvest tax revenue from. Women are ego driven, self-centred and lack any feelings of responsibility and are, therefore, easily manipulated by their own selfish stupidity. None of them can see what is happening to our children and our society because, as ever, females are focussed entirely on themselves. Big government and big-business have taken over our society and all our human rights have been undermined. A totalitarian, dictatorial elite now have complete control.

——————————————————-

At 6:47 PM, byrdeye said…

Maybe expecting every woman to work until she’s 30 or so and then begin her family isn’t very realistic then. At least not for most women????

If it was realistic, then fertility wouldn’t start so early in a girl’s life.

I agree, but that is exactly what feminism taught young women to do…until it was too late.

——————————————————-

At 6:52 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

nymom!

You are absolutely hilarious.

You seem incapable of seeing beyond your own narrow viewpoint and taking in the big picture(See Captain Zarmbands 5th sentence in the post below.

Just in case you weren’t aware feminists have been harping on for years about how much women have “changed” and berating men for not changing. There are even “men” (lol) like Hugo Schwyzer who slavishly agree with the feminazis that men need to transform themselves into pansies.

In my opinion neither of the sexes have changed perceptibly. Just that removing tradition, discipline and order at the behest of left-wingers has allowed the worst features of humanity take free reign.

——————————————————-

At 7:05 PM, Rob Fedders said…

NYMOM Said:
Well then women really haven’t changed very much have they? As my mother and her mother before her never finished high school and both were married and mothers by 17 or so…

So it’s not that womens’ behavior has changed, but men has.

Maybe expecting every woman to work until she’s 30 or so and then begin her family isn’t very realistic then. At least not for most women????

If it was realistic, then fertility wouldn’t start so early in a girl’s life.

So don’t blame women because men have changed their behavior.

Holy multi-tasking muddied thinking NYMOM! Could you please find a man to translate that drivel into some linear thinking please?

Lol! This is a good example NYMOM gives of how women’s thought process works: “Mumble, mumble, bullshit, mumble, crap, hate, mumble, revenge, bullshit, mumble, mumble. THEREFORE, it’s all men’s fault! Wah, wah, wah!”

Please NYMOM, find a man to translate this drivel into a language we can understand! That is, if you can find one who right away doesn’t scream for you to…

FUCK OFF, SKANK!

——————————————————-

At 9:02 PM, Anonymous said…

So it’s not that womens’ behavior has changed, but men has.

This is the kind of unbelievable, mind-numbing stupidity one encounters when trying to reason with a female. Objective reality is not what it is (i.e., marxist-feminism lead to a mass social change in female behavior in the 1960s-1970s which IN TURN led to a response in male behavior). No, objective reality is whatever women delude themselves to believe it is. No wonder everything they run or touch turns to crap. The phenomenon of cause-and-effect doesn’t work to their advantage so it doesn’t exist. I find it impossible to relate facts to them so direct questioning is necessary. Watch them squirm and start to sh*t their pants when the uncomfortable spotlight of reality shines on them.

To wit:

DINGBAT:
– Which sex changed their behavior en masse first, men or women?

– Who was the liberation movement directed at?

– Who started burning their bras?

– Who abandoned their families and demanded to go into the workplace full time?

– Which sex demanded that their traditional roles change in society?

– Was a book written entitled “The Masculine Mystique”?

– Was a new magazine called “Mr.” started?

EXTRA CREDIT
– Do you know what cause-and-effect is?

——————————————————-

At 10:30 PM, ditchthebitch said…

What is so deeply disturbing is that there is no real place to discuss these issues other than here and a handful of other blogs, meanwhile, WHAT COULD BE MORE IMPORTANT? The communication between men and women is completely shut down & no one can get on T.V. to talk about these issues without placing the blame on men squarely or blasting someone for being un-PC, ad nauseum.

——————————————————-

At 11:07 PM, HAWKEYE said…

i tend to agree with nymom (for once)
girls have not changed they still want the traditional things deep down.
it is just so sad that the feminist movement has taken that away from them.
with friends like feminists who needs enemys

——————————————————-

At 11:42 PM, Anonymous said…

Yesterday a woman admitted on a national radio program that she killed the man she had a one night stand with because he would not give her child support. What was amazing was how proud she was that she got away with it. She was laughing that she just told the cops that he killed himself and they believed her without question. Then another woman called in and said he deserved to die. Wow, if this is the attitude out there then I think things will get worse before they get better.

——————————————————-

At 11:57 PM, Anonymous said…

NYMOM works at Cornell University in NY. So she comes from Academia which is infected with Man Hating Lesbians and Radical Feminists. Funny thing the only Economics they spout is Marxist in nature.

She has been banned from a number of blogs for her bile she spews forth and vitriol, but little real substance. Pete Jensen banned her on Gonzo’s and she posts on Trash Wilson’s Blog the Countess of Entitlement.

——————————————————-

At 11:59 PM, Anonymous said…

How wonderful. Reality is as long as we subsidize the behavior of Single Mothers we will get more of it. Cut off the Government Teat to feed at and it will shrivel up and die. Human nature is to do more of that which you subsidize. Shut off the money, do it in graduated steps, and announce a cut off date. You will hear screaming by the Nags.

End the practice of Alimony and Child Support and Divorce will stop overnight. Then it will be the Women becoming more selective about their choices in Men. This will never happen. As there are huge industries that financially benefit from Divorce.

Khankrumthebulgar

——————————————————-

At 12:40 AM, Anonymous said…

Well being that this article is about education, here is my take on things. “What’s the point in a teenage boy knuckling down and working hard(?)” Thats simple, for yourself. Not necessarily in school but learn any subjects that interest you. Maintain good grades, study on your own, go to college ( or better yet, a trade school! ), and work at something that you love.

After all this, stand back and watch those dim-witted thugs and bad-boy playas to see just where they end up in life. If they are lucky, they will end up in some dead end low paying job, or worse jail, or even worse dead. So all you young guys out there, to hell with what women want, they dont give a fuck all about you, until your successful.
“As my mother and her mother before her never finished high school and both were married and mothers by 17 or so…”. Ok, so are you saying they were dumb? My Grandfather, who by the way was a great inspiration in my life only had a 9th grade education. He had to work, what with the great depression and all, so school was out of the question.

Despite this lack of school attendance, he was a brilliant man, he taught himself a wide variety of mechanical and construction skills. The man could rig up just about anything, so just because you find no interest in the education system, does not mean you have to be uneducated.

In closing, get educated, if it by school, or on your own do it. You owe it to yourself not to be a dim-witted fuckhead.

Panzer

——————————————————-

At 1:42 PM, Anonymous said…

@nymom

Women act like they did for centuries: they want a male who provide for them.
But one thing has changed: they do not do their duty like their mothers did. They like to get provided but not serving their provider. That is the problem.

Women like to have children and get nourished.

——————————————————-

At 1:44 PM, Anonymous said…

@nymom

Most feminists argue that men should change and that they have not.
Today the problem ist the lack of discipline and divorce, both abusing men.

——————————————————-

At 4:51 PM, Anonymous said…

Rob:

‘Tis a dirty, filthy job, but as a man, I’m compelled to do it. Someone’s gotta shovel the gravel, and it isn’t going to be a chick. Thus here’s my translation of the Walmart Walrus’ non-linear post:

“Everything I say is bullshit. Yet, it’s not my problem if the bullshit I say now contradicts the bullshit I said 10 minutes ago, because that supersedes the bullshit I said 15 minutes ago. It’s not my problem you don’t understand, obviously, you’re the one with the problem because I am a mother of 2 kids, which makes me the authority on everything and anything pertaining to females, mothers and motherhood. It’s not my fault I’m doomed to a life of filing bullshit documents and fixing coffee for those I work for, obviously, they’re the ones with the problem because they do not recognize my true brilliance and natural authority that comes from giving birth to two kids. Fuck men. Everything is their fault, and if the world were run by mothers (which would make me Queen/Emperess/Goddess because I am the ultimate authority on females, mothers, and motherhood as I have had 2 kids), the world would be a better place for us all, because all you men would be forced into lives of drudgery and forced to turn over all of your paycheck to support females, mothers, and motherhood. Yet, do not call me a feminist, even though my actions speak overwhelmingly prove that I am, because I say I am not I am not. Tomorrow I will say I am Wonder Woman, and you all must not question this, because I say I am Wonder Woman, I must be Wonder Woman. After all, there is nothing in this world with more credibility than a mother, and since I have 2 kids, I have double that credibility. Now where’s my twinkies?

——————————————————-

At 1:07 AM, Anonymous said…

What really bothers me about the current wave of single mothers, is that women tend to be shallow materialistic nightmares who only care about handbags and shoes, and don’t give a shit about objective reality outside their egos. So they pass this poverty of living onto the men. Perhaps this is a tactic of turning men into manginas.

It absolutely shocks me how women are today.

I can honestly say that I have to reduce the thought-level when I speak to women, and I find myself speaking only about the surface of things.

——————————————————-

At 5:41 AM, Anonymous said…

Panzer-

Going to a feminized institution of learning doesn’t make you “educated.” It just means you have an expensive piece of paper. Schools are designed for women to succeed at. Selection criteria are horribly favored towards women. The reason why women are outnumbering men nowadays in higher education is that they simply don’t allow as many men in, in the first place. Do you really think that every man that applies gets into college? Nope. Maybe more men than women are allowed into the lower ranked schools, but the higher ranked schools mostly take women.

You don’t really need to make that much money to be well off in life. Men don’t need to gather material possessions. We honestly don’t care about those types of things. If you cut women out of your life, exactly how much money do you need? You just need to pay for rent, food, occasional entertainment, a computer and a car. That’s pretty much it. Those things simply do not cost nearly as much money as a doctor or lawyer makes. Why bust your ass getting a high paying job when for a fraction of the effort and work hours you can live comfortably? Why go into the severe debt of going into a top ranked school? To provide for some shrieking harpy? No thanks.

——————————————————-

At 10:52 AM, Paul Parmenter said…

Interesting comments on education from Panzer and anonymous 5.41am, thanks for the ideas guys.

I fear we have now got to the stage where our state education system is beyond rescuing. It has become thoroughly feminised, run by females for females with boys just about tolerated because there is nowhere else for them to go, but they had better learn to behave like girls or else.

Boys’ exam performances are now permanently stuck about 10% behind that of girls, across all exams at all grades in all subjects. It has been like that for decades now, and it is not going to change any time soon – if ever. That 10% difference fluctuates a little up and down year by year, as each false dawn (boys have closed the gap by 0.01% this year; feminists start to get worried) is followed by another black night (boys have slipped back again; feminists relax – all is well) but it will never close all the while the same radical fems are in charge.

It is therefore entirely feasible to conclude that there is probably not a single boy in the entire country that is reaching his full potential under the yoke of the state system.

What a betrayal that represents. Then these idiots wonder why there are increasing gangs of feral, angry and disaffected young men loose in our society, looking for trouble.

Boys will never really get going in life until they leave school, unless they are fortunate enough to find a way to bypass the state system altogether. There are still good private schools that believe in boys – if you can afford the fees – and the gender gap miraculously disappears altogether among children educated at home (I wonder why? Explanations from feminists, please!) – but that’s an even tougher choice.

Otherwise, the position is bleak. Boys will not reach their full potential until they escape from the system that does not believe in them and won’t help them; and by then it is close to being too late.

But not entirely so. I believe the more false the world of academia becomes – top-heavy with average women toting increasingly bogus, overhyped and meaningless degrees – the less relevant it will be to the real world of business and commerce. That’s where young men come into their own – if given the chance.

Ever wonder why, in the workplace, young men with comparatively poor academic qualifications start overtaking young women with superior qualifications, about 5-10 years down the line? And often sooner? That’s because employers know the realities of life and recognise that quality lies in the performances, not the hype or the bits of paper that claim somebody is a genius when they are not. The effects of the education system have worn off by then and women are no longer propped up by it. And there is far less room for feminist bullshit in the hard competitive world of business, try as they might to make it otherwise.

So there is hope yet, guys.

——————————————————-

At 4:43 AM, Anonymous said…

“It just means you have an expensive piece of paper. Schools are designed for women to succeed at. Selection criteria are horribly favored towards women. The reason why women are outnumbering men nowadays in higher education is that they simply don’t allow as many men in, in the first place.”

Who ever wrote this, I have to say you are absolutely right. Paul Parmenter, thanks, you are also correct. There are subjects in higher education that men can get in to, math, engineering, science just to name a few. As I pointed out, Trade schools are a really good way to go. You get a education in something that you can use out here in the real world, not some lousy piece of paper from any diploma mill
in womens studies or other useless garbage.

A persons intelligence is not defined by what college they went to , or what degrees they acquired. I have run across many people in my life that were smart as a whip yet never went to collage for one day, and were average students in high school. They taught themselves, studied the subject on their own, hands on experience, and just plain old motivation and interest. Again, you are correct, college degrees dont really mean squat these days.

As far as working hard goes, remember, do it for yourself. Satisfaction, plain and simple. I work in construction, one of the last beacons of hope in employment where advancement is based on merit. Making more money for me also means more responsibility, hey if your going to pay a guy more your going to expect him to do more. It is nice to see that everything and everywhere I have gotten in life was due to my efforts, both personally and professionally. You have to admit that seeing these washed up skanks that in the past just passed you over without a thought are now dead broke, desperate for a good man, and got a few bastard kids in tow ( yea Im in my mid thirties and have a bit of a mean streak ).

Also, as far as living simple and cost effective, I do that. Like you, ( Im willing to go out on a limb here and say that what you wrote about is how you personally live. ) I too live modestly, nothing special or fancy. No use having a bunch of crap that you dont need.

Again, thanks for the opinions guys, and I agree with you completely.

Panzer

——————————————————-

At 7:15 PM, Verlch said…

Women in general are mean to us guys!!! And they know it!!!!

——————————————————-

At 7:17 PM, Verlch said…

The majority of women are easily led and turned into Marxist Liberals who believe anything they see on TV by somebody who is good looking. Sizzle, they will believe anything a Doctor tells them, or sells them, look at how many antidepressants women suck down daily to live!!! Horrible!!!

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: