From the Comments III


13 November 2006

Wow, yet another dumb woman (this one an anonymous coward) spewing forth a tedious pile of drivel at the comments page here. It’s getting a bit unoriginal, all this shaming language, but it’s worth putting it up here anyway to remind us of how fantastic it is to not have to put up with one of these infernal Western Women in our lives.

Wow…clearly no one in this exchange has gotten any in years!

Right off, accusations of “You can’t get laid!”

Anyone fancy a game of fembot bingo whilst reading this?

Bravo. Way to misconstrue the facts and the law … but hey at least you have your angry man hate to keep you warm at night!

Man hate? We don’t hate men, feminist do.

Unless you’re trying to imply criticising women is equal to us hating women, which is, according to dumb cunts like you, is Bad, whilst hating men is Good.

These men may have been fucked (or not — so it would seem by their wives) having some other poor bastards kid and stead of his. At least we can all be thankful it wasn’t any of yours! Here’s a fun thought… men cheat because they can.Women cheat because they aren’t getting what they need. Maybe if the guy wasn’t such a prat, and likely unable and/or unwilling to take the time to bang his wife right — there’d be no problem at all. Oh but that is just crazy talk … clearly, nothing could be a man’s fault!

Too…much…hypocrisy! Cannae take anymore cap’n!

Seriously, this is what we always hear; when men cheat they are rat bastards who are at fault, when women cheat their husband is a rat bastard (and apparantly a ‘prat’ and probably impotent) who is not giving them what they need.

More to the point, men can’t cheat. Women can. This judgement – and many others – prove it. If a man cheats, his wife can divorce him and get his house, assets, alimony, child support, the kids, etc. If a woman cheats, her husband can divorce her and she gets his house, assets, alimony, etc. So women can cheat because, hey, what’s hubby gonna do? He has to put up with the whore because divorcing her means he’ll be as badly fucked over as if he cheated.

As for the law and fairness. You are all clearly misguided if you really think these judges had any choice in their decisions. There are these crazy things called Statutes. What you mental giants might understand as the law. Well, many state statutes say there is an irrebuttable presumption(that means it can’t be refuted DNA testing or not) that any child born of the married is a child of the husband. End of story.

Strangely enough, being mental giants, we actually are aware that laws change (and have done, repeatedly, to suit women in recent decades) and there is nothing to stop the judge from realising that women are no longer loyal and, more to the point, are (so they claim) able to support themselves and “their” children, and so he could have ruled a thingie called a “legal precedent” and ruled that when an adulterous whore wife has a child by someone other than her husband then he is not obliged to pay any child support and is entitled to a refund from her for any support he paid. But evidently the judge is a fucking mangina, and the only thing worse than a fembot like you is a mangina.

Still, as for the bit I bolded, you are indeed right; if a guy marries a woman, any kid she has – regardless of whether it’s some other man’s – is his, and he has to pay for the bastard.

And yet, knowing this stupid piece of outdated law back from when women were understandably kept on a short leash and punished for adultery, you accuse us of being angry for not wanting to get married in this day and age? Only a man with shit for brains would get married in the West these days.

It was your legislature put that law in the Statutes, and the judge must follow the law. If he didn’t, it would be overturned on appeal. If you have a problem with it, go write your legislature and try to change things.

Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t realise I had a legislature to put anything into.

Typical fembot, assuming that contemporary men somehow have any influence over the legal system, especially as it evolved over centuries. As for writing to anyone, who the fuck will listen to us men? They only care about you women. Besides, some men prefer a more effective approach. Ever heard of Darren Mack?

Or hey better yet, maybe appointed judges can just decide the law all willy nilly based on their feelings because that is way better than following the law set forth by the legislature who were elected by the people to represent the people. Checks and Balances who needs them!!

This is what we have. Why do you think women who kill their children often get light sentences or no prison at all whilst men who do the same get life? Judges have a lot more sway than you obviously realise. Think about it, if you can actually think rather than just “feel” like most women; if every ruling was based solely on what was written in the legal system, there wouldn’t be a need for judges, they could be replaced with computers. Judges use their judgement, and unfortunately most are too senile or thick, or women-firsters or women themselves, to actually apply any law fairly, but instead to ensure it favours women at every opportunity. Even lying whorebags like the one in this case.

Brillant, just brillant. But, I’m not angry at you.

Well, I think you’re a cunt for what it’s worth.

It’s kind of cute that you guys are all angry.

Why do you women seem to think that accusing guys of being angry is an insult? Do you think you can shame us into saying “We’re not angry, but…”? Fuck that. We’re angry. We’re fucking pissed off. Think there was a backlash against feminist cunts like you in the 1980s? That’s nothing compared to what’s coming. I dare say a load of women who aren’t feminists (but enjoy the fruits of feminism) will get caught up in it. Too bad.

Those big bad women…. grrrr so mean. hahaha. Hilarious. This page is great for laugh! Thanks for the giggle!

If you proclaim to be so amused by this page, why did it piss you off so much that you had to write a long blithering comment (aside from the fact that you probably live alone with a load of cats and so have very little else to do)? It’s always fun to see women insist they’re not bothered and even amused by anti-feminist sites and blogs, but then prove otherwise by commenting and e-mailing with all their might.

Once again, reading this sort of nonsense proves how wise it is to remain a bachelor.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:08 AM

At 10:37 AM, unpleasant bitter git said…

Women and especially feminists always seem to be claiming that they are emotionally more mature and stable then men, right?

So if a wife plays around behind her husbands back (ADULTERY) and gets pregnant and fools him into thinking he’s the father (DECEPTION) when he finds out the truth and they break up what happens? She gets rewarded with child support (EXTORTION) that’s what!

There are stories in the news all the time of women getting payouts in the hundreds of thousands from corporations or the government because someone told a sexist joke and she felt intimidated and threatened. Ever hear of a man successfully suing his partner after finding out the children who he thought he had fathered were not his because it caused extreme emotional distress? I mean if men are emotionally less capable than women shouldn’t being the victim of adultery, deception and extortion cause more suffering in men and give them reasonable cause to sue for compensation?

Guess not because men and their feelings don’t count do they? Only womens feelings when hurt are reasons for compensation.

Without a doubt the legal system is now unequal and skewed in womens favour big time. And The feminists and politicians who try to appease them are still trying to make things even more unequal against men.


At 11:13 AM, khankrumthebulgar said…

Yes some old tired script. We got some idiot FemBot over at using the same insults. Rather than addressing the substance of the issues. Not a thing learned by these Man Hating idiots. Very predictable actually.


At 1:19 PM, border patrol said…

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.


At 2:02 PM, darkbhudda said…

Wow…clearly no one in this exchange has gotten any in years!

Great timing, I’m a 31 year old white male reading this while cooling down after a bout of lovemaking with a 22 year old hottie, that looks 18.

My question to you is when is the last time you got laid that lasted more than 2 minutes. The penis can pick up negative signals such as those generated by male hating feminists. Premature ejaculation is a defense mechanism. The old pump, dump and run away is nature’s way of satisfying the female’s biological urges without the male investing much genetic material.


At 2:48 PM, Javier said…

Wow. It’s ironic that I was going to start my own blog regarding the biased treatment of males in American (and other Western cultured) societies, but I found this blog first.

Unfortunately, I am too late to live life unmarried as I have ensnarled myself in the feminist web of marriage. Going one step further, I also fathered several children from this bitch. It’s amazing how a woman can put on a facade to get what she wants, and I fell for it hook, line, and sinker and am now paying the price – literally.

I do love my children dearly (it’s the ONLY thing in this marriage I can say I love with 100% honesty), but I now realize that I can never be the father to them I had hoped – “she” will always be in the picture to do what she can to use them to her advantage and fuck me (not literally) in the process. We have already had so many arguments on the matter and she understands clearly the law and courts are on her side no matter what I try to do (or not do).

A word to the wise for any man looking to get married – DON’T. Plain and simple. What looks like an image of an angel before marriage, becomes your worst nightmare afterwards. DON’T get taken in by good looks and promises of a beautiful “happily ever after.” It’s like winning the lottery – someone will win, but it won;t be you.


At 4:24 PM, Anonymous said…

Women always project their feelings on others. When she says your angry it means she is angry because more and more men are becoming aware of the scam that marriage is and running away from it.


At 6:45 PM, byrdeye said…

A word to the wise for any man looking to get married – DON’T. Plain and simple.

Yup, as everyone here has pointed out, everything in our Matriarx system today ENCOURAGES and ENABLES women to cheat and divorce.

So, why should men get married anymore? Cuz the only way to beat the system and maintain some fair leverage in your relationship is by saying I DON’T.

As soon as you say I DO, you are AGREEING to all the feminist BS legislation that will enslave you like an indentured servant with NO WAY OUT. You are basically inviting BIG MAMA into your bedroom to have a 3sum with you and your woman. You really want to invite a 300-ton man-hating lesbian in to sit on your face?


At 6:58 PM, Voodoojock said…

On average, how many men tell younger men to not get married compared to how many women tell younger men to not get married?

I reckon the former is a lot greater than the latter.

The question still remains: If we’re the unwashed peasants that this woman claims we are, why does she take offense at what is posted here? Surely the concerns of the plebeians are not worthy of concern by self-anointed goddesses.


At 8:13 PM, Anonymous said…

One way the human body kills disease is through intense heating. That’s why your body gets a fever. Sick/diseased/parasitic cells just cannot survive as long as healthy cells under those conditions.

Time to turn up the heat on these diseased, parasitic beings.

If they were so strong they wouldn’t need massive amounts of support and special consideration (like children) from the State.

Time to turn our backs on these well-dressed jackals and leave them to the wolves.

– Don’t Marry (mate/support them)
– Don’t Carry (help them)
– Stay Wary (avoid like a disease)

Time to cull the herd.


At 8:28 PM, Anonymous said…

I’ve been thinking, and the more I think about it, the mores it seems that modern western women are the Great Harlot described in the Biblical book of revelation.

“4 The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls.”

We all know how the gold and precious stones correlate directly to modern women. As for the purple and scarlet, this color scheme is synonymous with representing feminism and girl power.

She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries.

The abominable things could easily represent the infanticide of abortion and the mothers who murder their young children as well as accusing innocent men of heinous crimes like rape without any accountability. And the connection with the filth of her adultries is obvious.

There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.

Many scholars believe the beast represents the nations of the earth. And you will notice that she is RIDING on the beast. Riding represents that she is not pulling her own weight but being sustained by the beast, ie alimony, child support, and the rest. And a rider also exerts control over the ridden like the way people ride horses. This could be a representation of the power this Great Prostitute, the women of the west, have over law, specifically family law, and censoring our thoughts and speech by means of political correctness.

1One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the punishment of the great prostitute, who sits on many waters. 2With her the kings of the earth committed adultery and the inhabitants of the earth were intoxicated with the wine of her adulteries.”

“3Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a desert. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns. 4The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries. 5This title was written on her forehead:

Of course many ‘Christian Leaders’ will be scared to point this out because even the church has been infiltrated by feminist corruption and has to stand up against the most powerful and unelected branch of government – the media – which is infested with feminists.

full chapter


At 9:00 PM, Anonymous said…

but most important she hasn’t gotten laid by anything else than one of her various vibrators for a long time…..


At 10:36 PM, Anonymous said…

It seems to bother them more that men don’t have sex than it bothers the men themselves. I don’t see why if a man chooses not to pursue sex that women have a point. I’m sure the Pope hasn’t gotten laid in years too, but I don’t really think that means his views on things are invalid.


At 10:58 PM, Anonymous said…

“There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.”

I don’t know about other countries, but that scarlet beast sounds to me like a senior judge in the family court surrounded by his cronies. Not surprising then that the woman is sitting on top of him.

Examples here…


At 1:11 AM, R. Daneel Olivaw said…

Why is she so happy that men have to pay for children that aren’t his? Why do feminist and Other assorted Varieties of Women Firsters feel men who have been lied to should be forced to reward his unfaithful wife? If you truly believe the adulteress was unhappy in her relationship, why can’t she leave? I have NO problem with a skank cheating on her husband. No problem what so ever. The problem I have is the skank using the government to punish, harass and (in some cases) imprison an man because of her lies.

I’m sure she will be happy to know the Great State of Florida has passed a law that says fathers will not be liable for children that are not biologically their own. Great News. We are making head way. Fight on the State level, not the Federal and we could have tons of similar laws.


At 1:31 AM, Mark said…

Hey guys,

I followed a link earlier. The author sounds reasonable enough, but I had to chuckle at a comment I saw from a self-described ‘radfem’:

“Is there a way around the childish infighting with feminists? Is that even preferable (sic)? Would working together help further the cause(s), or is there simply no common ground?
I ask because while I do consider myself a “radfem” … I hate the in-fighting. Is it possible to build bridges?”

at 12:43 PM

Hmm. Childish infighting? Have you ever seen that among guys on men’s websites? I certainly haven’t. ‘speaks volumes if you ask me.


At 1:38 AM, Mark said…

“Without a doubt the legal system is now unequal and skewed in women’s favor big time.”

A large part of the problem is that due to the constant brainwashing women receive in the media, from advertising, from universities and from each other; many of them simply cannot conceive that the above even might be true. The worst of those women will likely always remain beyond the reach of reason, but for other ladies reading, I suggest you take a look at these few articles, written not by men’s rights groups but by attorneys and both of which appeared recently in respected law reviews. Note in particular that the discrimination to which they refer is not perpetrated by individual citizens or companies, each of which might be distressing but which one could avoid easily, but rather it is perpetrated by the government, and furthermore a government that shows not the faintest hint of contrition for blatantly discriminatory practices that not only offend the most basic principles of justice but which they would not dare apply to any other sub group.

The third article is by a journalist who, as you can see from the link to his bio, is hardly fixated on men’s rights and the final piece is an official review in the status of men by the government of New Hampshire, the only state government I know of to have conducted such a review to date.

The Innocent Third Party: Victims of Paternity Fraud
Ronald K. Henry, a partner in the law firm of Kaye Scholer LLP in Washington, D.C.
Family Law Quarterly, Spring 2006

The New Star Chamber: The New Jersey Family Court And The Prevention Of Domestic Violence Act
David N. Heleniak, an attorney with O’Donnell, McCord & DeMarzo, P.C., in Morristown, New Jersey
Rutgers Law Review September, 2005
Front page:
Full text:

Injustice by Default: How the effort to catch “deadbeat dads” ruins innocent men’s lives
Matt Welch
Reason Magazine, Feb 2004
Matt Welch’s bio

The Status of Men in New Hampshire
New Hampshire (State Government’s) Commission on the Status of Men
First biennial report, Nov 1, 2005


At 1:45 AM, khankrumthebulgar said…

Quite frankly the repugnant attitude of Western Women could inspire erectile dysfunction in an iron Bar. Their attitude is repellent.


At 4:47 AM, Anonymous said…

Havent gotten any in years? What has that got to do with anything? How about yourself? Let me guess, you sleep with a different guy every weekend. If thats true, thats disgusting. Oh and another thing on this subject, how many courses are out there for men to have orgasms? Listen to this sweetheart, when your in your mid-thirties, the dates from all those exciting guys/players dries up, and your biological clock is ticking away, expect to deal with it alone.
Im fastly approaching the Old Bitter Bastard stage, and guess what, I dont care! Havent gotten any in a while, I dont care, spend the rest of my life alone, I dont care, you dont like what is posted here, I dont care, no one wants to marry you, well guess what, I DONT CARE!
Now finally the most important thing that you should remember, you ladies started this and were damn well going to finish it!



At 5:41 AM, Anonymous said…

Aloha Duncan! I just got finished reading “from the comments III”. As usual, I was amused at the repartee’ between yourself and the angry feminist. Typical stuff. Sooner or later BOTH sides will have to do the required digging(research)and find out the truth as it stands. The truth actually is this: Feminism was “created” by and for the benefit of all the bankers/governments/corporations in order to further destroy the family by getting women away from the home and into the workforce. Once in the workforce, women have been quickly and rather easily relieved of their weekly paychecks by the GIGANTIC corporations that prey upon women’s emotions to get them to do one thing: SHOP. By creating- through all the media- an environment in which all women are made daily to feel(in no particular order)oppressed, invalidated, objectified, mentally and physically abused, taken for granted, unappreciated, insecure, manipulated, ugly, fat, flat-chested, thin-lipped, hippy, etc.,etc., ad nauseum………. the corporate leeches have exactly what they planned for: ANGRY Women running wild to the detriment of EVERYONE; men, women and especially CHILDREN. While men and women are sooooo busy fighting tooth and nail for custody, visitation, child support, etc., etc………. the GOVERNMENTS slowly but surely continue to erode all of our basic freedoms. If you have flown anywhere lately, you’ve seen what I mean. In fact, take away feminism, and there would be NO NEED for 99% of all these courts, lawyers, agencies, police officers, social workers, day-care centers, etc., etc. You see? These people get rich off the MISERY of others. Once women were DUPED by feminism and the family was divided, Government stepped in and TAXES SOARED. More people-women- are working, but shelling more money out of pocket all the time; with less peace of mind and no future. Who needs this shit?!! Without the traditional family to combat this virus of government intrusion into our lives, resistance has so far been feeble at best. A family based on love and service to one another can not be overcome by anything. Just ask one of those couples married 50, 60, 70 years who still love one another. They stayed together through thick and thin. Love does that to a person. Sooner or later we will have to all make nice with one another……….since we’ll all be on the same sinking ship. Wise up. You’re being used. Peace Duncan! Keep bloggin’! Aloha! Matthew in Honolulu.


At 9:54 AM, unpleasant bitter git said…

Anonymous 10:36 PM said… “It seems to bother them more that men don’t have sex than it bothers the men themselves.”

Well observed.

My take is that the only real powers women wield as a group is sex and reproductive rights. They think that suggesting that a man isn’t getting laid will cut him to the quick, and in a lot of the cases they’re right.

As stated by others, generally most men are in such awe of the “mighty” pussy that’s all a lot them can think or worry about. Yet perversely putting them up on a pedestal and trying to be “nice” hinders a mans chances of getting any action.

Who do women gravitate to when they want excitement and sex? The bad-boys, bikers, gangstas and thugs who couldn’t give a crap about them of course.

The more you look at it the more you can see why traditional religions evolved they way they did.


At 4:21 PM, Anonymous said…

This blog is brilliant. I love it when fembots get angry and post such nonsense.


At 9:18 PM, Anonymous said…


Renegade Evolution is deep in it with some stalwart MRA’s in her blog. I noticed she doesn’t claim to be much of a feminist and argues with them a lot. She’s a ruthless little bitch, but it is good to see she does know that men are shorted on many things like child custody, false rape allegations and child support scams and thinks ‘the poor women’ should get nailed to a wall for it.


At 4:38 AM, Mark said…

“Renegade Evolution is deep in it with some stalwart MRA’s in her blog. I noticed she doesn’t claim to be much of a feminist and argues with them a lot. She’s a ruthless little bitch, but it is good to see she does know that men are shorted on many things like child custody, false rape allegations and child support scams and thinks ‘the poor women’ should get nailed to a wall for it.”

This whole thing will only be resolved when men and women from the middle ground can discuss solutions in the calm and rational manner that I see Renegade Evolution trying to do. Both sides need to move away from/ignore those with extreme positions and try to seek common ground, and all credit to Renegade Evolution for trying to do that. To be honest I can’t say it surprises me that women trying to do this might hail from the sex industry. Why? Not only are such women exposed (no pun intended) to far more men than is the average woman, but with the potential for apoplectic rage and furious recrimination all but removed, I suspect guys are far more open and honest about their true feelings with them than they are with their wives/girlfriends.

As for Renegade Evolution specifically, in my view, the fact that she has a degree in history, a self-declared interest in politics, claims to be thick-skinned and lists 1984 and Lord of the Flies among her favourite books makes her, based on her bio and what little I have read of her blog at least, pretty much an ideal moderator.

…Now watch her prove me wrong! :o)


At 12:54 PM, khankrumthebulgar said…

What is amusing is to read the Fact that Women are not bemoaning the consequences of their Feminist inspired decisions. “I have no children and I regret that deeply.” – Germaine Greer. Too bad Skank you made your bed die in it alone with your Cats.

Women are slowly coming around to the conclusion that their Misandry has screwed up their lives. Amazing how Stupid our Women are to listen to their Lesbian Mentors who hate and despise Men.

It is so bad it has created the Urban Cougar culture. The latest unintended consequence of the Skank Culture.


At 11:27 PM, Peregrine John said…

khankrum, re: “erectile dysfunction in an iron bar”

ROFL Absolutely! A perfect quote from my all-time favorite Fred On Everything essay!


At 10:06 AM, Anonymous said…


Her blog is a fucking riot. She’s been kicking feminist ass for the last two days. Lord of the Flies indeed. Any second now I expect her to post a photo of some feminazis head on a pike.

She should have been born with a penis.


At 5:31 PM, Anonymous said…

“From the Comments III..”

This is a great plan, Duncan. Take every vile and insidious comment from these cunt femmies and headline them one by one for a justly verbal pummeling. They’re too ignorant to realize they are doing half your work for you by exposing themselves. All you have to worry about is having enough room for all of them.


%d bloggers like this: