How dare you retire after providing for me for decades?!


——————————————————-

14 November 2006

Retired husband syndrome

In Japan it is estimated that 60% of older women have a common problem – their husbands. Having spent years “married to their jobs”, retired men are having an extraordinary effect on the health of their partners.

Yet more victimhood, this time from the land of the Rising Sun. Or the Whining Daughters, as it is becoming, catching up with the West. These women are pissed off because hubby dare relax at home after retiring, having spent his life working hard.

It now seems that being an ungrateful fucking bitch is now a Syndrome! The poor wikkle women.

Women brought up during the 50s and 60s – the baby-boomer generation – are sometimes seen as a commodity by their husbands, someone to do the housework and look after the children.

And men bought up at all times are considered a commodity by their wives, someone to work hard and provide, to pay the mortgage and bills.

“When I thought about my husband being at home, I developed rashes on my body and had stomach ache,” admits Mrs Terakawa. “On occasions I would throw up after I had eaten.

“Sometimes just being in the same room as him made me physically sick.”

Look love, that isn’t a “syndrome”, that, once again, is simply being an ungrateful and hysterical bitch.

“If the husband doesn’t try to understand, the illness becomes incurable,” he says.

Fuck off Dr. Mangina. It’s not an illness.

In the West, of course, when relations have sunk to such a low, divorce would be a way out.

Rather; in the west, when a woman is this spiteful and ungrateful, she ditches her husband and takes him for all he is worth.

But in Japan, particularly among this generation, it is far less culturally acceptable.

Not only that, but a divorced wife has no rights to her husband’s pension and would usually be unable to survive financially should they decide to part ways.

As it fucking should be (although the law is changing I’ve heard, to give women access to hubby’s pension, and everything else he earned.)

And so what if she would be unable to survive financially? Why not? Aren’t women so superior to us men, independent and all that? And so what if they don’t survive. Fuck ’em. If these ungrateful bitches hate their husbands so much they’re suffering from some “illness”, they should surely leave anyway? Oh, wait, not unless they get his money!

They even have a pathetic story of a couple who have supposedly found a solution for all this without resorting to a divorce; the husband moved out and is allowed to visit his wife in his (now her’s) home once a month. Oh wow, great! That’s so fair for him, I don’t think.

It’s sickening to see the BBC predictably give such a sympathetic hearing to this nonsense. Imagine if Retired Husband Syndrome was the case of retired men getting sick of being around their wives and going on about how they feel physically sick at having to be at home with their wife. I dare say any husbands airing such opinions would be denounced as utter scum and any doctor daring to claim this was a legitimate syndrome or illness would be likewise condemned as vermin. Instead, though, it’s perfectly fine for women to bitch about their hard-working husbands actually wanting to relax after providing for his wife and family for more than four-decades.

The question is, now that we know the symptoms, how long will it be before Western women of a certain age start suffering from RHS too?

Well, I would say not long, because Western Women love victimhood, as we all know. Another syndrome to “suffer” from!

However, it’s not likely to turn up in the west. For starters, women can divorce hubby once she’s sick of him and get his cash, his house, his future earnings and – coming soon – half his pension.

Furthermore, how many women will have husbands in a few decades time? Not many. Precisely because of how ungrateful they are and how much money they can steal from us in divorce, men are abandoning marriage and even co-habiting.

Maybe they can get Retired Cat Syndrome. “Since Tiddles retired from catching mice when he got too old, he just lounges around the house in front of the television! Sob! That’s my job!”

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:34 PM
——————————————————-

At 7:21 PM, Anonymous said…

400 teddy bears? What a useless bitch. Like most women now. The cat probably gets treated better than the guy who paid for all the bears.

Notice how more and more of them are actually proud of their disgusting behavior. Like it’s some badge of honor to be a drunken, single mother slut with tramp stamps and belly rings.

It reminds me of this verse.

Their end is destruction, their god is their belly, and they glory in their shame, with minds set on earthly things.

——————————————————-

At 8:21 PM, Davout said…

So now women have managed to convert selfishness literally into various disease outbreaks. They can’t understand why their personal wage slave didn’t drop dead upon retiring.

It gives people a clue about how women are able to get away scotfree with outrageous behaviour when confronted by something not to their liking. It brings up interesting questions about legal defenses such as post-partum depression and battered wives syndrome.

How bout some sensitivity training for the gals or perhaps some Ritalin to calm them down?

Imagine if Western men in the 60s got random outbreaks of hives, piles and monkeypox when women began entering the workforce en masse! Wouldn’t Steinem and co. have been in a pickle?

Regardless, the Japanese government should be strongly chastising these women instead of kissing their collective ass.

——————————————————-

At 9:28 PM, VoodooJock said…

Those women are more than welcome to go out and get a job. You know, the thing your husband did that subsidized your ungrateful ass for all those years.

——————————————————-

At 9:46 PM, ChicagoMan said…

Once again women just aren’t happy with anything in life.

I don’t know how one can live with being so unhappy and angry at everything.

Spiteful, jealous about EVERYTHING and EVERYONE.

What a pathetic existence.

——————————————————-

At 11:00 PM, mfsob said…

I can see it now, as soon as the AmeriSkanks get wind of this latest women’s health “issue,” Orca Winfrey will start beating her WeGottaDoSomethingNOW!!!!! drum because Women Might Die.

Cry me a river.

Women never know what they want, and when they get it, they don’t want it anymore … oh, and if a few hundred thousand men die of prostate cancer, oh well, they’re just men, right?

——————————————————-

At 12:56 AM, byrdeye said…

I’ve realized marriage is just like Survivor now. Women could care less about love or family, just whoever is providing food in her belly or whatever else she wants/needs at the moment.

I guess that will eventually be Big Mama – which is the ultimate goal of all this activism – to make us all solely dependent on the taxpayer-funded NW0.

——————————————————-

At 1:52 AM, MarkyMark said…

Guys,

I have ONE question for these ungrateful bitches: who the fuck do you think PAID for that house you live in, at least in part (I say in part if she’d been working too & made some contribution towards the mortgage, taxes, etc.)? Yeah, your husband, that’s who! Since your husband helped pay for it by being a wage slave for 25-30 years, he’s entitled to LIVE there; he’s entitled to spend TIME there. Who the hell do you think you are, woman?! If you don’t like it, too fucking bad!

Seeing stuff like this makes me ill! I kid you not. It was seeing this type of attitude when I used to work with women that soured me on them. 99.999% of them are selfish, ungrateful bitches. TGIS!!!

MarkyMark

——————————————————-

At 1:54 AM, Ald said…

The more I read your blog, the more I wonder, how different you, and most of the readers, are different from the women you bash. For way too often you, just as women, add two and two together and get something in the range of sixteen thousands.

What are the facts?
1. A great number of older women suffer from diseases associated with old age.
Somehow, that does not surprise me.
2. Many, majority in fact, women are unhappy in marriage.
Again, this is well-known. As in any other developed country, percentage of happy people in Japan is rather low.
3. Husbands get a lot from their wives.
Again, this is well known. In the article a husband admits that. (ergo, mr Anonymous, please think before you make assumptions).
4. A doctor points at a number of reasons for such unhappiness. One of them is that husbands do not pay enough attention to wives.
To me, this is certainly a factor. Among many other ones.
5. New laws will make divorce financially viable. A number of people predict that the divorce rate will increase.
Seems to be perfectly legitimate cause-and-effect chain.

These are the facts presented in the article. You guys make more conclusions out of them than the actual author, so let me ask you this — do you believe that your demands and expectations are reasonable?

I do not. In fact, it seems to me that you are too preoccupied with bashing women to ever think on the subject of what are proper gender roles beyond “men should lead, women should follow”.

——————————————————-

At 4:41 AM, Anonymous said…

KankrumtheBulgar,

you wrote “In 2007 an New mandate will be enacted requiring Government permission to leave the US, even on Vacation or Business.”

10 years ago, 5 even, I’d have known you were joking. Now I’m not so sure. What’s the deal with this?

——————————————————-

At 7:50 PM, Anonymous said…

@ald
You are completely on the wrong side.
I cite and comment:

The more I read your blog, the more I wonder, how different you, and most of the readers, are different from the women you bash. For way too often you, just as women, add two and two together and get something in the range of sixteen thousands.

Some have such problems, some see women as inferior. Duncan does not say so in any post. Understand – not in any post?

What are the facts?

The facts you present are really important.

1. A great number of older women suffer from deseases associated with old age.
Somehow, that does not surprise me.

How does that relate to Duncans post? Not at all.
Men suffer also a lot, many have diseases associated with their job. Nearly no women have such diseases.
But again, that does not relate to duncans post.

2. Many, majority in fact, women are unhappy in marriage.

OK, but why is that important? Men, too, are unhappy.
But they decided to marry.
Women have no reason to be unhappy, because they have a much easier life than men.
Women have to be happy, because no man wants to give a woman money who whines and does not do her duty.

3. Husbands get a lot from their wives.
Again, this is well known. In the article a husband admits that. (ergo, mr Anonymous, please think before you make assumptions).

What does the husband get? An unhappy wife?
The fact that she does the household is nothing special, it is her duty, as work is his duty.
The problem: if she is allowed to divorce she gets his money and he gets nothing.

Again: do you understand that?

4. A doctor points at a number of reasons for such unhappiness. One of them is that husbands do not pay enough attention to wives.
To me, this is certainly a factor. Among many other ones.

What are the others?
Is it a valid reason for unhappiness?
No it is not. The husband pays enough attention if he provides well and is reasonably friendly.
You seem to forget, as so many do, that he has to work, he does not have so much time.

But again: why dont you ask the husband if he gets attention?
These women, especially the one with 400 bears do not seem to pay a lot of attention to their husband.
Women have the time to prepare a good dinner, be friendly etc.
If they are not, why do they expect much attention.
This is unhappiness, it is not a disease.
If they were unhappy they could very well get a job and earn money.
They did not, because they like to be provided. It is obvious.

5. New laws will make divorce financially viable. A number of people predict that the divorce rate will increase.
Seems to be perfectly legitimate cause-and-effect chain.

Absolutely. Take the money without having to work for it.

These are the facts presented in the article. You guys make more conclusions out of them than the actual author, so let me ask you this — do you believe that your demands and expectations are reasonable?

Yes they are. A man provides for a woman who benefits from his work.
He has the right to expect her to be happy and do her duty.

I do not. In fact, it seems to me that you are too preoccupied with bashing women to ever think on the subject of what are proper gender roles beyond “men should lead, women should follow”.

How does that relate to duncans post? Not at all.
You are too preoccupied with your “rights” to see, that these women led a wonderful life thanks to their husbands and they have to continue to do the household work for him. It is their duty. This only gives them the right to get money.

——————————————————-

At 9:23 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

Hello aid.

The facts as you have stated them are not facts at all. Just general misconceptions spread by women but more specifically feminists. Spread so often and without question by the mainstream media they are just accepted as facts now.

Some men are starting to wake up to how criminally unbalanced things are now. In many areas of the law habeas corpus (innocent until proven guilty) has now been completely removed but only if your a man and this is criminal, unfair, unjust and causing many miscarriages of justice. But this is what the feminists have campainged for and won. They want and have got an unequal society skewed in their favor and yet still they complain incessantly. In fact, for the sham to keep working it’s essential they keep complaining and demonizing men as much as possible.

The changes have crept up slowly and almost imperceptibly. This is why the situation is often referred to as a boiling frog situation.

Keep reading the MRA blogs for a while and keep an open mind. I would also recommend reading through the Scripturally Single blog to get a Christian perspective on general female hypocrisy. Even if like me, your not a Christian it’s still an eye-opener.

——————————————————-

At 11:23 PM, Ald said…

Yes they are. A man provides for a woman who benefits from his work.
He has the right to expect her to be happy and do her duty.

Your answer could not be better to confirm my point — the vagueness of your demands reveals that you have no idea whatsoever you want. Just as the women you criticize.

How does that relate to duncans post?

It does not, I just wanted to make sure in a few things, see below…
Btw, your assumptions are ridiculous.

Keep reading the MRA blogs for a while and keep an open mind.

I have been reading blogs for quite a while, and “open mind” is my middle name. And, as a stoic, which does not divide humanity into ‘men’ and ‘women’ any more than into ‘superior race’ and ‘inferior race’, I have to say that absolute majority of you fail to apply to yourselves the rigid standards you apply to women.
In short, you are all perfectly normal humans (that is not a compliment).

——————————————————-

At 12:49 AM, Anonymous said…

Ald, you seem to have a good head on your shoulders, you make some good points and ask some real questions, I respect that. Now pertaining to the post answer me this, why do these women wait until their husbands retire to become unhappy to the point of a health risk? So for forty or so years everything is fine, then all of the sudden their completely miserable? Im not buying it.

Panzer

P.S.: Calling me a perfectly normal human I will take as a compliment, thank you.

——————————————————-

At 4:12 AM, Anonymous said…

Well then Ald, propose to us how we can rectify these problems?

——————————————————-

At 8:22 AM, Anonymous said…

@ald
Your answer could not be better to confirm my point — the vagueness of your demands reveals that you have no idea whatsoever you want. Just as the women you criticize.

My demands are vague? Could you explain, because I found that really vague.
Actually demanding happiness of a woman who got everything is nothing vague, it is normal.
It seems to me, that you do not know anymore what happiness is.
You do not either what duty is, I assume. Duty is the household work, bearing children, be friendly, cooking.
This is not vague.

Btw, your assumptions are ridiculous.

Why? I find thats statement really vague.
It is obviously ridiculous to call constant whining of a woman a disease.

I have to say that absolute majority of you fail to apply to yourselves the rigid standards you apply to women.

We know that some men think stupid things, but again, how does that apply to the article and duncans comment? Not at all.
Could you simply stick to the topic? or is that so difficult for you?
The topic is the obvious exploitation of men. An exploitation you find totally justified because you are a woman.

Just look at your comment to which I replied: what you have written is in part so extremely biased and literally unreal.

——————————————————-

At 8:28 AM, Anonymous said…

@ald
See, we do not want an ungrateful greedy woman like you. I hope that you did not manage to make a man marry you and if you did, I hope that at least more men wake up and protect their assets against greedy women who nag, whine and do not do their duty despite a life without financial obligations, easy household cores (“It is soooo difficult to put some dishes into the dishwasher, it is sooo difficult to put some clothes into the washing machine – man do that for me!”) in part luxury and in most cases just a few children.

We stay alone. You try to tell us that is good for us to loose our assets, to loose our rights towards children and wife. Whom do you think will you persuade?

——————————————————-

At 8:30 AM, Anonymous said…

@ald
Feminism destroys itself, because they do not get children.
When we men do not marry, we do not get children either. But at least we protect ourselves and when we find a young good, caring, dutiful wife, we can very well get 10 children and more.

——————————————————-

At 4:17 AM, Verlch said…

Women should join the Complainathon network!!! In general that is all they go, bitch and moan about how tough it is trying to act like men!!!

lol

——————————————————-

At 6:53 AM, Anonymous said…

the vagueness of your demands reveals that you have no idea whatsoever you want.

Here’s what I want.

Women want equality.

Fine.

They should get their equality GOOD AND HARD.

No special laws. No special protections. No special considerations. No quotas or discrimination in their favor (just for having a vagina).

They want to act like men, pretend they’re men, then they should be treated like men.

If there’s a military draft they get to join in the fun in equal numbers too.

If they want to apply to be firemen or police they have to have the EXACT same strength requirements as men.

If they perjure themselves in court (e.g., false rape allegations) they should have felony perjury charges brought up against them (no more pussy pass). Or better yet be given the same sentence of the person they falsely accused (i.e., if a man was going to be sentenced to life in prison for rape then the woman who falsely accused him should be given life in prison).

No spousal support of any kind for women if divorced. The party with the best financial position gets to take care of the kids and has custody (divorce be like a widow/widower situation for the purposes of custody).

Unisex bathrooms.

Unisex locker rooms.

Unisex general prison populations.

Equal funding for research on male diseases vs. female diseases.

No more federal aid programs for women.

No more girls sports. Unisex sports. One football team. One basketball team. Etc… If girls want to try out for sports then they compete against boys based on merit.

If a man gets capital punishment for killing a child then so will a woman from now on (no more insanity defense bullshit — you can’t say on one hand child killers who are male are evil and should be disposed of, but child killers who are female need sympathy and understanding and an effort found to pin the blame for her actions on some man). If a guy hangs then so will the woman for the same act.

And on and on and on…

I have to say that absolute majority of you fail to apply to yourselves the rigid standards you apply to women.

Per the above list (only scratching the surface of female double-standards), you have it backwards ace…

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: