Selfish cunt


——————————————————-

17 November 2006

irresponsibleselfishwoman.jpg

Motherhood is my right

No, motherhood is NOT your fucking right. If you leave it too late, or your sex started a “liberation” movement like feminism that made fatherhood too risky for men, tough shit.

A growing generation of single career women are reaching their late 30s unmarried but still desperate to become mothers. Many are embarking on parenthood alone – and their quest will soon be made easier.

Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt wants the law changed to allow single women and lesbians to have fertility treatment without the need to prove there will be a father figure in the child’s life.

Here, Ruth Yahel, a 41-year-old TV production executive, explains why she decided from the outset to be a lone parent, and why – in her opinion – they should not be vilified:

Say what you want you whore, you will be vilified by all decent people.

Single mothers by choice are utterly selfish disgusting cunts. They are invariably parasites and a drain on the country. Even if they work they will use tax-subsidised child-care. Even if they do pay their way and don’t require any taxpayer support, they are still scum who are guilty of Child Abuse because they inflict illegitimacy on a child deliberately just because they want a baybeeeeh but can’t/won’t get a man.

They give the example of some old bitch who decided to have children when she hit 39! Naturally she refuses to take any blame for stupidly leaving it so late, and found a mangina to “father” her bastard.

I believe that modern motherhood is in crisis. Women have been told they can and should compete equally in the workplace. We invest a huge amount of our time, money and energy in the pursuit of this so we feel we’re achieving something.

But somewhere along the line we’ve all too often had to leave behind motherhood. As much as I hate to admit it, these two roles do not fit naturally together.

In your working life you have some control – you have a structure and, hopefully, you feel a sense of accomplishment and are rewarded both financially and emotionally.

As a mother, your day has little structure; you’re busy all the time, yet when asked: ‘What did you do today?’ you can hardly recall what filled that time and why you didn’t get out of the house.

When we think about returning to work, we worry we won’t be flexible enough to respond to the work environment and that we’ll have to compromise on material and personal pursuits. We worry about lack of money and free time.

Most of all, we feel like bad mothers for handing our babies over to childminders. And employers don’t always do all they can to dispel those fears.

Cry me a fucking river bitch.

Women chose to throw away the generous way men worked and provided for them so they, women, could stay at home to be full-time mothers.

Women chose to storm into the workplace.

Women chose to dump babies in childcare whilst they played career gal, and demanded (and obtained) taxpayer subsidised childcare so they could do this.

Women, in their millions, chose to to put off having children until it was too late.

Don’t like it? Tough. Or at least, that’s my attitude, but not the attitude of the government and manginas, who gallop in to give these women the right to whelp illegitimate bastards with (taxpayer subsidised) IVF treatment and even access to sperm donated by men who mostly originally donated to provide a couple with a child, not some selfish single career-gal who left it too late because she fell for feminism.

The main accusation levelled at woman who, like myself, have chosen to be single mothers, is that we are selfish.

She is selfish, clearly. Every word of her blithering justification for her actions smacks of selfishness to the point of amorality. Me me me! I want! I want! My right to motherhood!

Fuck off.

But there is nothing irresponsible about the thought processes and procedures a single woman has to go through to have her own child or adopt.

Adopting is not quite as irresponsible if there are no couples able or willing to adopt a child; an adopted single mother is probably better than an orphanage. However, such an adopted child is already in existence. A single woman creating a child who she knows will have little or no input from his/her father smacks of irresponsibility as much as it does selfishness.

As the son of a women who became a single mother by choice, at least Luca won’t have to go through the pain of his parents splitting up. He knows his parents’ relationship has clearly defined boundaries.

He will have access to his birth father and extended family, and will know as much of his own cultural heritage as he chooses, because I was lucky enough to have a suitable known donor. Even though Nico is now teaching in Rome, he sees Luca every few months.

Well that may be better than the father having no access to his child, but seeing his dad “every few months” is fuck all to what I was lucky to have had as a child; being able to see my father every day. (And what if Nico marries and has children and probably drifts away from this kid? Or if mummy decides she doesn’t like her baby giving attention to anyone else and cuts him off? She’s obviously selfish enough to do something like that.)

Furthermore, this is a rare case. Many single mothers by choice get pregnant by random guys and have no intention of letting the father see the child. They just want that lovely Child Support. Then, of course, there are the selfish bitches who, thanks to the anti-family anti-male British government, can go to sperm banks, where daddy will just be some anonymous donor (until the child turns 18) and a basting brush.

I still hope to find a great relationship in the future. Maybe Nico will have children of his own; maybe Luca will have a sibling via conception or adoption.

Holy shit, what a deluded cow. She’s a 41-year-old career woman and single mother. Who the fuck would want a relationship with her? Also note her wording; that she suggests Nico “will have children of his own” at some point in the future. In other words, the baby he had with her is her’s! Nevermind her token claims that Nico can see the baby; it very definately belongs to her! Miiiiine! Mine mine mine!

Last year, I took part in the Channel 4 series The Baby Race. It brought together a group of single, incredibly brave women, all united by our quest to be mothers.

Oh, right, “brave” are you? How? A bunch of selfish skanks wanting to get knocked up and have a pet baby but can’t be bothered establishing a relationship to ensure the child has a father. How the fuck is that brave? Jeez, women find ways to perceive themself as empowered and brave no matter what they do.

All I see from this bitch and others like her is utter, utter selfishness and disgusting entitlement. Still, that’s what we have to expect from a lot of women these days.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:18 PM
——————————————————-

At 8:36 PM, Anonymous said…

Duncan, when you say the truth, you say the truth. Your comment is completely to the point – what shall I comment myself any further?

It is so sad that this state has been reached: subsidising old unfertile women with tens of thousands of dollars to have one pet child.
At the same time subsidising abortions of young very fertile teenagers who could be so great mothers. My grand-grandmother was married at 17 and had a child at 17.
Today she would be pressured to have an abortion and never married.

So shocking was this:

Maybe Nico will have children of his own

This sentence about the father of the child says it all and reflects the attitude of todays media: the woman is the childs only parent.

Fertility treatment of unmarried women (and men) must be made illegal.

——————————————————-

At 9:12 PM, byrdeye said…

Psshht, who needs fathers?

Oh…

——————————————————-

At 9:34 PM, Anonymous said…

Wow! This site is AMAZING! I thought I was the only one who was having these kinds of thoughts!

Thoughts like: “You know, a kid isn’t a doll you can dress up… or a kid is not a pet, you know right?” Far too many women go into motherhood and parenting with that kind of attitude…

Keep up the great work! You have a brand new reader for life now in the USA!!

——————————————————-

At 9:38 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

Keep up the great work! You have a brand new reader for life now in the USA!!

Glad to hear it my friend!

——————————————————-

At 9:44 PM, Anonymous said…

Duncan for the 1 billionth time you have hit the nail on the head.

If women want the benefit of good hardworking men to provide for them financially and give them children, then they have to give those men their prime years.

Women have the right to neglect and let nice hardworking men rot all alone while they are in their late teens and early 20’s while they get to squander their prime year to the thugs and exciting bad boys.

In return once men get financially stable (mid 20’s-early 30’s) we got every fucking right to rebuke these western skanks for the worthless piece of shit they are. If women are in their 30’s crying that they can’t have children or can’t find a good man, that is their fucking problem not mine! They should thought about this when they were around 20 rather than in their mid 30’s. When they are 20 they could pick what ever guy they want. However, once we all hit 30 men like me will be the ones who will run the show not them! Since they threw away their prime years at bad boys and thugs, I for one will gladly let them feel the pain I went through in my late teens and early 20’s and will gladly rebuke them and let them feel what it is like being alone without any one showing them any affection.

In the meantime I am planing on visiting Latin American Countries and Asian Countries and meet gorgeous women in their prime years.

They had fun at my expense when I was in my late teens and early 20’s.

I will be having fun at their expense when they are in their 30′, 40’s, 50’s 60’s etc.

Once I get money to invest I for one will be buying stocks in the cat food and vibrator industries. With more men getting fed up with these Western Skanks and want nothing to do with them, I could only see my self getting great returns on my investments in those two industries.

——————————————————-

At 10:07 PM, VoodooJock said…

Holy fucking shit! Women finally figured out that the cost of working is not being able to spend time with your family, or even start one!

Wow! You figured out something men have known since the dawn of time. You go GRRL!

——————————————————-

At 11:13 PM, Days of Broken Arrows said…

Forget the women for a second. Has anyone ever been around a child raised in this situation?

Here is the states, this has been going on and we have a subculture of these kids, who have created their own lower class society. Mothers doom their kids to second class status when they do this. This happens because the kids are often distraught emotionally (“Who is my daddy?”) and often teased. They also have less money.

Why can’t women foresee the consequences of this behavior?

——————————————————-

At 12:23 AM, Anonymous said…

What a government we have!!! Only recently are they brave enough to admit 2 parents are better than one and now they are supporting the opposite.
Its not about parents, its about the children’s rights. The child has a right to have a mother and a father.
I would love it if these children grow up to be problem teenagers who sue their mother for breach of their human rights, kick the mother out her home and find their father. Sadly the tosser in this case has been an accomplice in abusing the child’s right.
Brave!!!my arse.

——————————————————-

At 12:34 AM, mfsob said…

And beyond anything else, damn, that woman is fugly … no wonder the “father” only drops by every few months.

——————————————————-

At 1:09 AM, loki on the run said…

The reality is that these women are expropriating resources from male taxpayers without offering anything in return.

Of course, another reality is that the quality of the eggs used most likely mean that their offspring are not going to be the brightest or best in the world (although with some talking about freezing eggs in their 20s …).

The way to deal with this is through the ballot box. That and the other thing that male coalitions are good at.

——————————————————-

At 1:40 AM, mfsob said…

What I would like to see is more of this “shaming language” turned around on these feminazis. They can’t stand it when you shove the truth under their nose. To wit:

I have continued my campaign of leaving selected articles in the common laundry room. This time it was a reprint from the dontgetmarried.com board about the guy who had a vasectomy, kept it quiet, and then had a 30-something Ameriskank attempt to reel him in with the old “the condom must have broke and now you have to marry me” scam. Quite hysterical in and of itself, but this is what was scrawled on it after a few days (page 1 first), all typos included:

No body
want’s to Read or
see this shit
You need a {the word vasectomy is underlined}
so you can’t re-produce
and so there won’t be any bastards
like you
running around

I can’t stand People
like you Fucking
fag!!

{page 2}
If this is all you
have to do is sit around
and bash women You need to find
Something else to do Where do
you think you came from. You
was squirted out of a woman
have some respect for them and
leave this shit at home.
M.F.
o u
t c
h k
e e
r r

Note the stock shaming language “you fag” and liberal use of phrases like “you bastard,” the demand for respect simply because she happens to have a vagina, the inability to respond to the article with anything other than simplistic venom, the creative sign off. Sigh … when are they going to get some new material?

——————————————————-

At 4:54 AM, HAWKEYE said…

WANK WANK
MONEY IN THE BANK.

THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION ,THIS FEMINISM “MUST” RUN ITS FULL COURSE TO ITS ONLY LOGICAL CONCLUSION,
SO I SAY DON’T FIGHT IT BUT PUSH IT ,
YES! INCREASE THE SPEED AT WHICH THIS “BULLSHIT” HAPPENS AND THE SOONER WE WILL SEE AN END TO IT .

——————————————————-

At 4:56 AM, HAWKEYE said…

AND I AGREE WITH THE OTHER POSTER DUNCAN SHOULD COMPILE A LIST OF HIS GREATEST HITS AND MAKE A BOOK

MAYBE HA CAN HIDE IN AFGANISTAN WITH OSAMA

——————————————————-

At 5:18 AM, HAWKEYE said…

DUNCAN FOR PM

AND ALL THE PEOPLE SAID

AMEN

——————————————————-

At 5:23 AM, Anonymous said…

Three cheers for the next generation of impoverished, psychologically warped children!

——————————————————-

At 6:29 AM, Anonymous said…

the do foresee it, day of broken arrows. but since they dont care about anyone but themselves what happens to “their” children is irrelevant.

——————————————————-

At 8:09 AM, Anonymous said…

Heh!

I’m 42. I’ve never been married. I’m retired because I made a fortune early via busting my ass.

I’ve had this experience a half a dozen times in the last few years:

Please have my baby. I just want your sperm. You won’t have any responsibility. Please, be my babies daddy! Whine, simper, blubber.

Ef off you lowsy skank! Is always my response. Pay for your own damn baby.

It’s good to be financially squared away and single. Untangled. In control.

Young men reading this. Take heed. Be like me. Live for yourself, not some skank ho. Or her spawn. Be in control of yourself.

Life gets better as you get older and you don’t have any annuities to pay off.

Stay single. Stay free.

——————————————————-

At 9:14 AM, Paul Parmenter said…

Take note, byrdeye. Your horrifying statistics on children of single mothers – which of course are very well known to governments, but conveniently ignored – are about to take an even more vicious downward twist in the UK, once Patricia Hew-sless gets her way.

——————————————————-

At 12:13 PM, anon said…

Donated sperm to give a couple a child? I donated for the money!

——————————————————-

At 12:14 PM, anon said…

and the free access to porn

——————————————————-

At 12:15 PM, Pumpkinhead said…

Damn good post!

I’ll just add some fuel to the fire.

http://www.singlepregnancy.com/

It is sick.

And I usually get a few laughs out of reading what’s here:

http://www.pregnancy-info.net/QA/questions-Single_and_Pregnant

——————————————————-

At 2:19 PM, Anonymous said…

In my country and in most countries of the western world there are programs who discourage and demonize teenage pregnancy.
It should be the other way round: teenage pregnancies of married girls should be promoted.
It is very beneficial for the girl. She has children early which in itself is good for her. It reduces breast cancer occurrences by four when she gets children early.
The children are very healthy, genetic diseases are very rare.
They are doing something sensible and the birth rate is going up.

At the same time they promote sex for young girls: they “educate” them to have protected sex etc.
The most disturbing are the people who vilify teenage pregnancies. It is really strange.
just a few days ago I saw a headline that said that mothers till the age of nineteen were teenage pregnancies.
That is stupid because at 18 and 19 they are adults and it is well known that they are the most fertile.
Actually girls should have children at 16 because most of them have reached there maximum height.

It is shocking that they treat 19 year olds as children themselves.

——————————————————-

At 5:24 PM, khankrumthebulgar said…

There has been a program on Discovery Science Channel recently called Most Evil. It is about Serial Killers and the Science of exploring brutality and murder. Until very recently no scientific studies have been done about the brains of these people. A scale has been developed. Google or use a search Engine “Most Evil”.

What it reveals is that they have fundamentally different brains, and emotive responses than the rest of us. Mental illness, Head injury, and sexual abuse as children are the factors that create them.

Our US Culture has removed millions of Fathers from the homes of US Children. We have seen our Prison populace grow from 250,000 to 2.3 Million Men in prison? Coincidence? Hardly Men mentor younger Males, teach them to be socially responsible, condition them to restrain their violent impulses, and protect them from harm.

We have an Engine now to create more Violent Offenders, more Prison inmates and more Serial Predators. This is a matter of Cause and Effect. And our tax dollars are subsidizing the growth of this. At the behest of Feminists. We have a huge Industry trying to deal with it. So we create the problem then fund a mechanism to deal with the problem we created.

——————————————————-

At 5:29 PM, Anonymous said…

Duncan pointed something out in the article that I found quite telling:

“I believe that modern motherhood is in crisis. Women have been told they can and should compete equally in the workplace. We invest a huge amount of our time, money and energy in the pursuit of this so we feel we’re achieving something.

But somewhere along the line we’ve all too often had to leave behind motherhood. As much as I hate to admit it, these two roles do not fit naturally together.”

Finally, a woman who sees the light. The problem is that she only saw it AFTER she had a child and is now a single parent. The government should take this woman’s story and hold it up as an example to all “career women” at the beginning of their careers so they can make a conscious, educated choice about their careers and being a mother.

——————————————————-

At 7:20 PM, Anonymous said…

I have observed many times boys turn out very screwed up and violent (watched a 10 yr old boy punch his mother in the face once and give her a black eye) when a father is not living in the same household.

Girls in that situation, especially when they hit preteen and early teen years, confuse sexual attraction to males with still wanting a father (i.e., drawn to older men).

I had a 12 yr old girl who used to live next door to me jump on me, hold my hand when we were outside, try to kiss me and flash me in the backyard and several times called me Dad. She also used to collect dead animals and keep them under her bed. Very screwed up…

——————————————————-

At 7:22 PM, Anonymous said…

Why can’t women foresee the consequences of this behavior?

That requires maturity, which many women ain’t.

Hence the accurate term of referring to women as ‘girls’.

——————————————————-

At 8:14 PM, Anonymous said…

Simple solution guys, keep your “juice” out of IVF clinics.

Panzer

——————————————————-

At 1:05 AM, Anonymous said…

If the father had even a modicum of your misogynistic selfishness, then I WOULDN’T WANT HIM TO HAVE A SAY IN THE UPBRINGING OF “HIS” CHILD. Yes, some wanton women make it hard for those of us who are decent because they cause feeble-minded men like you to generalize and assume that we are all subhuman, but the fact is that we are not all “cunts.”

And did it ever occur to you that working oneself into the grave is not the best way to live–for women OR for men? I realize that this is the “American Way,” but that doesn’t mean it’s the best way. I, for one, plan on retiring “early” because I believe there are better ways to spend my time than slaving away in an office all day. Does that make me a bitch? So be it! I hope you’re having fun in your office writing in your blog when I’m traveling the world with my kids! And what does sex have to do with this, anyway?

And FYI, I’m a law student at a top-tier school (which means I’m not looking for a man to pay my bills as I plan to pay them myself), I’ve worked since I was 15, I’m attractive (or so I’ve been told many, MANY times), and I’m not a “skank” (by ANY stretch of the word–trust me), “cunt,” “bitch,” or any other term of endearment you so liberally pepper throughout your tragic little blog. I know you will choose not to believe any of these things because they do not conform to your mildly amusing stereotype, but I just thought I’d put them out there for you to work with.

I’d be interested to see how you turn this comment into a diatribe about how selfish I am. I’m sure the law school bit has your knickers in a knot–how selfish of me to pursue a decent career. After all, I’m damned if I work to support myself and I’m damned if I don’t. Well, your cogent and well-researched arguments have convinced me that I should get back in the kitchen now. I’ve been wasting a lot of time learning about the law instead of learning how to cook meatloaf for a great catch like you.

::sigh:: I can only imagine how handsome you must be!!!

I don’t want this to be anonymous, so here’s my email address: pandorassoapbox at gmail dot com. FLAME AWAY!

——————————————————-

At 6:55 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

I’d be interested to see how you turn this comment into a diatribe about how selfish I am.

I don’t need too, you’ve managed to do that yourself with all your boasting of retiring early and pissing about having fun with your children instead of working all your life, something you could only do if supported by the government or a husband/ex-husband/sucker nailed for Child Support (or how else can you plan on retiring early, unless you plan on winning the lottery perhaps.)

Don’t worry about me slaving away at an office all my life. The very fact that I will not be a workhorse for a wife or ex-wife means I’ll be retiring long before the growing number of aging spinsters.

::sigh:: I can only imagine how handsome you must be!!!

Very. Thanks.

FLAME AWAY!

Can’t, I’m busy washing my hair tonight.

——————————————————-

At 9:35 PM, Anonymous said…

American lawyers make a lot of money–that’s how. Besides that, I’ve been working since I was 15. And yes, they will be MY kids to the extent that I will adopt and raise them myself (without support from a man or the government). Early retirement will allow me to do this. And because men no longer want to commit, women have no choice but to enter the workforce. And why should WOMEN commit to men who spend their time calling us skanks (apparently even those of us who don’t have sex or act like sex objects) on the Internet when we don’t act the way they want us to act (which is hard to figure out anyway, given that you want us to support ourselves AND stay at home raising kids)? I’d starve if I sat around waiting for a man to support me in today’s world. Now don’t get me wrong. If I met a kind, intelligent, interesting, attractive, funny, etc. man who didn’t go around calling all women selfish bitches and was actually willing to commit to a relationship, I would not turn him away. I’m not so blinded by stereotypes that I’d let a good thing slip away. I just don’t think I’m likely to find such a man. I’ve been searching for a while. THAT’S LIFE.

You know, I agree with many of the things you say in your blog (e.g., the sexualization of young girls is wrong, and it’s a shame that it is so pervasive now). But it’s hard to pick out those little kernels from among the whining about how all women are evil. And you throw sex into places where it doesn’t even belong. Who cares if a successful woman wants to marry a successful man? Doesn’t it work both ways? My male friends are all highly “successful” by western standards and will not give a woman the time of day if she is a waitress or a secretary. I don’t blame them! I hope they all find wonderful women who bring as much to the table as they do. Some of them already have. People are allowed to have preferences whether they are male or female. I’ve been on my fair share of dates with unemployed guys, and I’ve paid for a man’s meal many times. But in American culture, independence is really a virtue. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a man or a woman.

Besides all that, raising a family is expensive. So before you assume that a woman who wants a successful man simply wants to spend his money on clothes and shoes for herself, ask yourself whether (a) she is already happily buying those things for herself (i.e., isn’t simply looking for a way to support her fashion tastes) and (b) she is thinking long-term for purposes of raising a family that can live comfortably. If a woman is successful, why is it wrong for her to seek a successful man?

Oh, and if you were literate, you’d note that I wasn’t “boasting” as you say. I was simply defending myself against the imminent barrage of “selfish-cunt-whore-gold-digger-man-oppressor” comments. I put those facts out there “for you to work with,” I believe. Rather than working with them, you have simply circumvented any effort at reasoned discourse by crying “selfish!”

So yes, continue to think that I’m selfish for wanting to support myself and be a great mother. Continue to have your little Internet tantrum because women are not doing what you say they should be doing. This obviously makes it easier for you to face life.

And one more thing: If by your standards we’re selfish for working and gold diggers for being stay-at-home mothers, and assuming that we can’t all win the lottery, how do we get into the good graces of a brilliant man like you?

I won’t be checking back here anymore because I can see that you are not interested in hearing other viewpoints for the purpose of having a true dialogue. This clearly isn’t that kind of blog. But have fun repeating the word “selfish” in a vacuum!

——————————————————-

At 9:38 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

And yes, they will be MY kids to the extent that I will adopt and raise them myself (without support from a man or the government)

Your children will be bastards, fatherless and with nothing more than a stuck-up cunt of a mother like you.

This is typically selfish – in fact, utterly amoral – behaviour from Western Women like you; you’ll gladly nip to the sperm bank to have some pet children. Nevermind the natural requirement of a children (unless they are to be feral little miserable fuckers) for a father, you just want some children so you’ll inflict illegitimacy on them.

I feel sorry for any children you have, especially if you have sons.

Now go away. After all, if you really don’t care about any of us not wanting to marry annoying women like you, why bother hanging around moaning about it. Get back to work.

——————————————————-

At 9:40 PM, Anonymous said…

P.S. I AM open to debate because I don’t mind hearing other positions, so feel free to email me–if you deign to do so. I’m sure you find me repulsive (after all, I’m a woman who disagrees with much of what you say, which necessarily makes me a selfish cunt), but if you can overcome that repulsion, go ahead. Or just post a sarcastic and hateful response on your blog. 😀

——————————————————-

At 9:41 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

Well we’re not open to debate. Us proper men don’t debate with women, we only debate with equals.

——————————————————-

At 10:38 PM, Anonymous said…

Alright sweetheart, you want a fight, you found it.

“Yes, some wanton women make it hard for those of us who are decent because they cause feeble-minded men like you.”

Ah shaming language, the mark of a real dunce, yea thats right two can play that game. Problem is, I hate games.

“I, for one, plan on retiring “early” because I believe there are better ways to spend my time than slaving away in an office all day.”

Best of luck to you, seriously.

“Does that make me a bitch? So be it!”

Hey you said it not me.

“And what does sex have to do with this, anyway?”

Everything, its way people create children before they invented fertility clinics, remember?

“And FYI, I’m a law student at a top-tier school.”

So you want a fucking medal or something?

“And I’m not a “skank”.”

Although you could be lying, Ill take your word on that, for now.

“Your tragic little blog.”

Hate to burst your bubble (ok, I really dont care if I do), but this blog and many like it has helped many of people see what is wrong with society today.

“I’m sure the law school bit has your knickers in a knot–how selfish of me to pursue a decent career.”

actually, it doesn’t. I could really give a damn what you do for a living, thats womens hang-up not mens.

“I’ve been wasting a lot of time learning about the law instead of learning how to cook meatloaf for a great catch like you.”

Hey great! I love meatloaf. Oh yea, shaming language again, TSK! TSK! TSK!

“::sigh:: I can only imagine how handsome you must be!!!”

I consider myself average at best, thanks for asking. By the way, what the fuck has that got to do with anything? Once again, shaming language, TSK! TSK! TSK!

“I don’t want this to be anonymous, so here’s my email address.”

Yea well if you want your ass torn down again just come back here.

Panzer

“55 tons of bitch-resistant armor”

——————————————————-

At 10:54 AM, Pumpkinhead said…

“If I met a kind, intelligent, interesting, attractive, funny, etc. man who didn’t go around calling all women selfish bitches and was actually willing to commit to a relationship, I would not turn him away.”

I agree. And if I met a kind, intelligent, interesting, attractive, funny etc. woman who didn’t go around calling all men selfish arseholes and was actually willing to commit to a relationship and was not a single mother and was under the age of 25, I would not turn her away either.

“I’m not so blinded by stereotypes that I’d let a good thing slip away. I just don’t think I’m likely to find such a man. I’ve been searching for a while. THAT’S LIFE.”

I hope you don’t mean that you’ve just been waiting for such a man to find you. There are decent men out there who will commit. They may not be exciting, charming or “dress well” or earn more money than you. But they’re still decent and have to be found and earned.

——————————————————-

At 3:13 AM, Anonymous said…

Duncan,

Interesting how this bright, attentive, lawyer-to-be (…and I’m the Queen of Spain) can’t even address the thesis of this blog:

This is an anti-feminist blog for eternal bachelors, us sensible guys who have decided that marriage is a losing proposition here in the Matriarchal West, whereby saying “I do” means giving a woman the ability to strip you of your assets, children, home and future earnings.

Feminism has ruined the West, totally knackered in relationships between men and women, and made a lot of people – primarily women, ironically enough – thoroughly miserable. So make the best of things! Join the Marriage Strike, tell modern Western Women to get lost and live for yourself.

Even in high school I could have figured out the homework assignment to list out all the points raised in the above summary and then attempt to address them in turn (i.e., are the points in the thesis true or false and defend my arguments).

If I would have turned in a paper blathering on about this personal achievement or that personal achievement my professor would have given me an F- on my paper (and rightly so).

This is the state of our modern educational system. Cranking out an endless army self-absorbed, primadonnas who think the world revolves around them and can’t even carry off the most primitive analysis.

And pretending to be a poor imitation of a man (with endless govt subsidies and preferences to boot) makes them a super hero.

Mantra of the Modern Woman:

ME ME ME

——————————————————-

At 3:23 AM, Anonymous said…

o feel free to email me–if you deign to do so.

Check the condescending attitude. She has selfish entitlement princess complex and/or academia fembot stamped all over her. Like we’re supposed to run to her like she’s some queen or something. Females are mentally ill. This fembot probably thinks she shits gold bricks.

Dingbat, honestly you come across like 20 pounds of shit in a 10 pound bag.

You love to give your little speeches in nice, safe, protected environments, but on the street alone in a bad part of town you would be simultaneously losing control of both your bowels and your bladder and whining for the nearest man to help rescue you.

——————————————————-

At 3:53 AM, Anonymous said…

::sigh:: I can only imagine how handsome you must be!!!

This is old hat. Women are the most vain, image obsessed creatures on the planet.

Why?

Looks (which is just nature’s way of getting us to mate with them and lasts for a couple decades at most) are the ONLY card they can play. The ONLY card.

So, naturally, they think men are as vain and looks obsessed as they are.

Solution:
Just agree with them.

“Yea, you’re right. I’m ugly. That’s it.”

Now go play with your Barbie dolls or drown your children in a bathtub or whatever stupid, short-sighted, selfish behavior you have planned for today.

——————————————————-

At 12:12 AM, Paul Parmenter said…

I have taken up pandora’s offer, and emailed her as follows:

You said:

“If the father had even a modicum of your misogynistic selfishness, then I WOULDN’T WANT HIM TO HAVE A SAY IN THE UPBRINGING OF “HIS” CHILD.”

In this one statement you totally betray yourself, revealing a truly shocking picture of your nature. Selfish, spiteful and cruel! This statement tells me you have no qualms about depriving a child of its father, and that you are even prepared to use it as a weapon against him. Do you have any concept of decent parenthood? What gives you the right to decide that your child will go fatherless through its life? That’s precisely the egocentric attitude that so many guys detect and abhor in women. You have not made a very good start in your attempt to prove us wrong, have you? So far that is a big piece of evidence that we are dead right.

“Yes, some wanton women make it hard for those of us who are decent because they cause feeble-minded men like you to generalize and assume that we are all subhuman, but the fact is that we are not all “cunts.””

Decent? Are you sure? Read your above comment again: the one you were so proud of that you wrote it in CAPITALS. It is a sentiment we have got used to seeing in so many females: the concept that children are their own possessions, to be used in any way they see fit, even – or particularly – in order to punish their own fathers. And when such views are so common in the female population, can you seriously wonder why more and more men are concluding that many women are indeed subhuman? Not all women; but an alarming number.

“And did it ever occur to you that working oneself into the grave is not the best way to live–for women OR for men? I realize that this is the “American Way,” but that doesn’t mean it’s the best way.”

Give me strength. Of course it occurs to us – we are the sex that is cursed by the need to work our butts off because of the need to meet the demands of women and children who are dependent on us. There is no escape. Women and children are very much alike in their endless demands: for more, for bigger and for better. So please save your lectures, they are wasted here.

“I, for one, plan on retiring “early” because I believe there are better ways to spend my time than slaving away in an office all day. Does that make me a bitch? So be it! I hope you’re having fun in your office writing in your blog when I’m traveling the world with my kids! And what does sex have to do with this, anyway?”

What sex has to do with it is that females have that choice, males don’t. Read my comment above.

“And FYI, I’m a law student at a top-tier school (which means I’m not looking for a man to pay my bills as I plan to pay them myself)”

So you intend to join the ranks of the leeches and bloodsuckers who have spread so much misery through the world. It figures. It would be the icing on the cake if you told us that you are specialising in divorce law. Why don’t you get a decent job? I give you credit for deciding to work and pay your own way, but it is clear that you do not intend to make a real career of it; you are only doing it for the money, and only for as long as you need to earn enough to fund your selfish desires. That is not a “career”, it’s an indulgence.

“I’ve worked since I was 15”

So what do you want? A medal? How old are you now – 86?

“I’m attractive (or so I’ve been told many, MANY times)”

But not modest, obviously.

“and I’m not a “skank” (by ANY stretch of the word–trust me), “cunt,” “bitch,” or any other term of endearment you so liberally pepper throughout your tragic little blog.”

Perhaps we can be the judge of that. Do you understand what is meant by those terms?

“I know you will choose not to believe any of these things because they do not conform to your mildly amusing stereotype”

I am quite happy to believe what you say. I am being told them by a woman, and all women tell the complete truth all the time. In fact you are revealing more truths about yourself than you can ever imagine.

“but I just thought I’d put them out there for you to work with.”

I have enough work to do because of women, thank you very much; I don’t want any more. Don’t kid yourself you are that important.

“I’d be interested to see how you turn this comment into a diatribe about how selfish I am.”

I really don’t need to. You have been very eloquent on that point yourself.

“I’m sure the law school bit has your knickers in a knot–how selfish of me to pursue a decent career.”

You are perfectly entitled to pursue whatever career you want; my knickers will remain untwisted. And as I say, I give you credit for actually doing some work. But don’t pretend that it is either decent or a career: read above. And you are not pursuing it for the well-being of other members of the human race, only yourself.

“After all, I’m damned if I work to support myself and I’m damned if I don’t. Well, your cogent and well-researched arguments have convinced me that I should get back in the kitchen now. I’ve been wasting a lot of time learning about the law instead of learning how to cook meatloaf for a great catch like you.”

You are not damned if you adopt the work ethic of millions of men all around the world – working to support their family, with only a fraction of the fruit of their labours being spent on themselves.

“sigh:: I can only imagine how handsome you must be!!!”

Handsome is as handsome does.

“I don’t want this to be anonymous, so here’s my email address: pandorassoapbox at gmail dot com. FLAME AWAY!”

You are still anonymous, but no matter. I don’t need to flame, just to point out a few areas in which you have exposed yourself.

The only thing to add is that I have an instinctive dislike of people who are so full of themselves that it is a wonder their eyeballs don’t pop right out of their head; and an even greater dislike of people who are full of themselves with no apparent justification at all. Funny how many of them are women just like you.

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: