The cunt-pass saves another woman from proper justice


25 November 2006

Woman jailed for killing partner

Well hurrah for that! At last, a woman actually imprisoned for killing a man during an act of savage and homicidal domestic violence.

A woman who killed her partner during an argument has been jailed for 40 months at the High Court in Glasgow.


Forty-months. Strange how the fembots at the Beeb insist on measuring the sentence in months rather than years. It’s as if they were trying to disguise a short sentence. Hang on whilst I grab my calculator.

Forty-months appears to be three-years-and-four-months.

So less than three-and-a-half-years handed to this woman, who had previous convictions for violence, for inflicting more than 120 injuries on an elderly man, a bitch who:

…repeatedly punched and kicked Mr Simpson on the head and body, compressed his neck and struck him on the body with a shoe and on the head and body with a hairbrush.”

Less than three-and-a-half-years for that.

And the judge just about admitted he was being tough on her!

Why not just issue a fucking Licence To Kill (Men) to females when they hit 16?

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:25 PM


At 5:47 PM, Anonymous said…

Why not just issue a fucking Licence To Kill (Men) to females when they hit 16?

Shhhhhhhh, Duncan, don’t give them any ideas!!!!!!


At 12:28 AM, MarkyMark said…

At least she got some jail time for doing a crime, though it wasn’t enough. We need to push for tougher sentences when women commit crimes; they need to get the same any man would. At least women are getting punished now, which was more than would have happened a few years ago. That’s a step in the right direction anyway…


At 1:33 AM, Ashiest Ashes said…

I just stumbled upon your blog, and the first thing I thought was, Woah, Duncan Idaho? I’M from IDAHO!

Anyways, I’m female but definitely not feminist. Feminism doesn’t “empower” women, whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean. Instead of equipping women with anything vaguely resembling power, it just gives them something to whine about and lays ridiculous amounts of guilt on men.

I’ve been thinking about this stuff a lot lately, and I wonder what you think: Do you define yourself, first and foremost, as a “man,” or as a “human?” I ask this because I wonder which is more sensible: am I a “woman” or a “human?”

I’d love to know what you think.


At 1:52 AM, Duncan Idaho said…

Do you define yourself, first and foremost, as a “man,” or as a “human?”

With all due respect, this is a typically female question.

Men look out on the world, women look in a mirror.

I don’t define myself as anything, nor do I have any need to. If pressed, I’d define myself as a carbon-based biped mammal, or, more specifically, as Some Guy. This is in contrast to a lot of modern women, who spend their lives trying to define who they are, invariably – and ironically – on the advice of other people.

You really shouldn’t worry about what other people would define you as.


At 9:56 AM, Anonymous said…

To be fair, that’s a somewhat philosophical question (not deeply so), and philosophy has been practised by men for millennia. Philosophy includes looking inward.

I like your blog, but you make too many sweeping generalizations about what “us guys” would, could or should do about this or that. A person’s behavior is determined by more than just their gender.


At 1:40 PM, Raymond said…

Good point, I don’t think Duncan intends to generalize though. Much of the change in society he observes are pretty big large movements and even in the most united social groups there are exceptions anyhow.

Awesome blog by the way.


At 3:11 PM, Schpengle Carrot-Tripe said…

mmmm, interesting, also I couldn’t help but notice that in that report there it says that she hit the guy with a hair brush and a shoe………

The guy died from a ruptured spleen (as well as the compressed neck and the total of 120 injuries)


just how big….

WERE HER FUCKING FEET? and was she still wearing them at the time of impact?

and hairbrush? does she brush her mangey mane with an effing

bloody hell, can you imagine

“Violent Man (with previous convictions) gets a couple of weeks community service for accidentally tapping wifes skull to bits whilst carrying his steel toe cap work boots past her at the top of the stairs……”

wot bollux.

ps, I quite like it here¬!


At 8:56 PM, julie said…

Ah, sweet feminism. “Babylon the great”, is her name. “The mother of the harlots and of the disgusting things of the earth” . Revelations 17:5

She will fall and she will burn. And she will take with her the leaders and merchants that made money off her.

Sorry guys. couldn’t help myself.

These unbalanced gender issues disgust me. Our prime minister in NZ is one of the radical femenist and she has her click group in power with her. This is their third term. Our social workers climbing the ladders are brainwashed and our people are blinded while our country is falling apart. But the funny thing is that the male politicians and some women are not blind to it. They are just sitting and waiting. It looks like we will get another Government in the next elections and then you watch it all come out.

Until they get stung by it.


At 10:16 PM, mfsob said…

I’m surprised she got more than what we here in the USA call “hone confinement,” where you have to wear one of those silly ankle bracelets. Maybe she will become more fully acquainted with her feminine bull dyke side while in prison.


At 4:47 PM, byrdeye said…

Do you define yourself, first and foremost, as a “man,” or as a “human?”

Well, our feminized society now defines us as HUMANS when we do something GOOD, but MEN when we do something BAD.

That way, credit can be shared with women, but blame only carried by men.


%d bloggers like this: