Rise of the single mothers, fall of decent society


——————————————————-

11 December 2006

We all know family breakdown is destroying us. Don’t talk, fix it

Not only do we have the objective evidence to show, beyond any possibility of rational doubt, that the decline of marriage has had disastrous consequences for the community, but we can demonstrate that successive governments have effectively bribed mothers to remain single and keep their children fatherless.

..

Marriage provides the best conditions for raising children – OK? It is better than lone parenting because two people can cope much more effectively with the staggeringly difficult business of raising children properly – OK? Marriage is better for children than cohabitation because it is more likely to be stable and long lasting: one in two cohabiting couples split up before their child’s fifth birthday, compared with only one in 12 married couples – OK? Seventy per cent of young offenders come from lone-parent families; children from broken homes are 70 per cent more likely to become drug addicts. OK, OK, OK. We know all this. We have heard it over and over and over again.

Labour are not just bribing women to become single mothers they’re fully encouraging it.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:20 PM

——————————————————-

At 9:55 PM, patriarchal-phoenix said…

Oh my God…

Words… Fail me…

“…child’s need to have a male role model in its life…”

One: It’s a child, it is a he or a she, not an “it” that can be discarded when the mood strikes! Get it right!

Two: No such thing thing as a “male role model”! The kid has a father, or he or she does not. Mommy’s current boyfriend doesn’t count! There is No middle ground!

“…discrimination against single and lesbian women…”

Ummm… what about the kid not growing up with a father?

From the article:

“”The people who engage in this sort of activity see children as an accessory and something they can have as a right….””

This is one of two LONE Voices of Sanity in this article!

You know… the midwest of the USA (Where I reside.) may be boring as hell sometimes, but at least we aren’t bat-shit insane!

——————————————————-

At 11:29 PM, Cowhead said…

Absolutely pathetic, just unbelievable how stupid your government is, Duncan. The good news, judging from every comment I read, is that a lot of people know Labour is crap, and they are tired of their shit policies. Whether this will lead to positive change remains to be seen

——————————————————-

At 11:43 PM, mfsob said…

Children as fashion accessories … only women would be deranged enough to think like that.

——————————————————-

At 2:18 AM, HAWKEYE said…

interesting that the comments to that story are all negative,i think the population is getting very over the new lezo dominated political landscape.
time for some serious BACKLASH

——————————————————-

At 2:56 AM, VoodooJock said…

Fuck these articles.

Never hear them talk about female role models in single father households. It’s generally assumed that there can only be one mother, and it’s generally assumed that person can only be the one whose uterus the baby dropped out of.

However, its implied that a ‘male role model’ can be any asshole around. Can be Mongo the biker thug of today, who will be gone next week. That’s a male role model. Can be the fool who marries a single mother because he feels a sense of duty to raise the kid. These authors never discriminate between those people and the real father.

But there’s only one mother. Never a ‘female role model’ in these articles.

——————————————————-

At 3:22 AM, Days of Broken Arrows said…

I disagree with the premise of this article. Because I like the idea that society is falling apart and the family is becoming a thing of the past.

Women wanted liberation. Give it to them. Have them go it alone, raise up their little criminals have to deal with the results of that. Have fun! I made my way in the world already and am happy to watch this from the outside in safe suburbia, USA.

——————————————————-

At 7:25 AM, Anonymous said…

I think the problems run deeper than just marriage declining and single mother encouragement, I think those are simply consequences of a morally decayed society. As soon as being a “player” became “cool” and PUAs became worthy of more respect than a man that worked hard to build a stable career we were all doomed. Most of that is feminism’s fault, so the proper source has been identified, but how can it possibly be fixed now? What is with the obsession with sex anyway? Watch television or a movie now and compare it with something from 30 years ago, it’s absolutely ridiculous. Why does nobody have any sense of decency anymore.

Giving women a license to sleep around harms them and in turn harms stable society. The only winners here are the immoral men, and I bet they’re the ones that pushed hardest for feminism in the first place. These men don’t care about society or other men or even women at all, they just want what is best for themselves. Well they’ve gotten it. Women will always be too stupid to know what is best for them, and will never listen to or be attracted to good men. When good men lose the power to control society this is what happens.

——————————————————-

At 1:27 PM, Anonymous said…

Excuse my ignorance of laws, but isn’t it a child’s right to have a mother and father?
Are we putting womens rights ahead of children’s rights?
Is there not a piece of land in this world where like-minded people can go and live without the intrusion of radical feminism, religious extremists or other idiots?

——————————————————-

At 2:01 PM, Anonymous said…

John Major warned everyone. He always asked, “Trust Labour?” as if to say “are you people fucking nuts?”

Blair was never new-Labour. Just like Bill Clinton, he was just a smiling leftist leading his group of social-engineering jackasses back to power.

——————————————————-

At 4:33 PM, Anonymous said…

I read an article where in Florida. A mother sought help when the child support agency mistakenly accused her son, age 16, of owing thousands of dollars in child support for several children, some older than he is.

The courts have the game rigged. It’s a win-win situation for them. Whether a person is guilty or innocent does not matter. They make money either way. If you think the lawyers and the judges are going to allow the government to change all that now your smoking crack.

——————————————————-

At 4:34 PM, Anonymous said…

YO Duncan!!
You know the feminist scene in the Borat film, here it is..

Funny as hell.

——————————————————-

At 7:29 PM, ditchthebitch said…

I hate to be a wet blanket, but if you go to Amazon and go to books, then put in ‘single mother,’ there are 24,000 titles. Looks like women are only too gleefully ready to raise children on their own.

Also as far as the ‘Marriage Strike,’I’ve been on a lot of message boards lately, and women don’t even care.. at all. Women don’t care about anything other than themselves, & this is clear because of the desire to be single mothers.

——————————————————-

At 8:58 PM, Jerkmenistan said…

“Women don’t care about anything other than themselves…” — DtB

When a man gets married, he is the first person his wife cares about until they have kids. After that, she cares about her kids and herself first, and her husband second. Some would say this is a good thing, since kids can’t take care of themselves, and she can’t care for them unless she makes herself a priority. Her husband can take care of himself, and in fact, should be doing everything he can to take care of her and the kids.

All of the foregoing sounds rational and reasonable according to human evolution and natural selection. The strong and protected survive, while the weak and the unprotected perish. That’s fine, as long as the husband is still part of the picture and is seen as having an essential role in the family unit. Today, fathers aren’t seen as essential anymore since the Government now serves the same purpose. The Government provides food, housing, clothing, education, medical care, etc… all things that a husband and father would normally provide absent the Government’s social services safety net. Now, many fathers would be fine with the idea of the Government taking care of their kids (especially if they didn’t want kids in the first place), but alas, this isn’t the case. At the end of the day, the Government ensures that it isn’t on the hook financially for very much, since it has the legal power to recoup its losses.

——————————————————-

At 9:59 PM, Pete Patriarch said…

The Government provides food, housing, clothing, education, medical care, etc… all things that a husband and father would normally provide absent the Government’s social services safety net.

Ain’t nothing wrong with a safety net, as long as its a safety net and not a fucking hammock on the beach.

——————————————————-

At 2:27 AM, Sammy said…

“Giving women a license to sleep around harms them and in turn harms stable society. The only winners here are the immoral men, and I bet they’re the ones that pushed hardest for feminism in the first place. These men don’t care about society or other men or even women at all, they just want what is best for themselves. Well they’ve gotten it. Women will always be too stupid to know what is best for them, and will never listen to or be attracted to good men. When good men lose the power to control society this is what happens.”

Absolutely spot on.

——————————————————-

At 9:53 AM, Anonymous said…

Anonymous wrote

Are we putting womens rights ahead of children’s rights?

Ummm… Isn’t it like that for at least the last cca 50 years?

——————————————————-

At 2:31 PM, Anonymous said…

I don’t know about in the UK, but in the USA 70% of offenders come from single MOTHER households.

Only 2% come from single FATHER households.

——————————————————-

At 7:02 PM, Anonymous said…

Also as far as the ‘Marriage Strike,’I’ve been on a lot of message boards lately, and women don’t even care.. at all. Women don’t care about anything other than themselves, & this is clear because of the desire to be single mothers.

Advance to a Mating Strike and they will start caring.

No amount of communist propaganda can drown out the shrieking of millions of empty wombs desperate to create children.

If women can’t have children they start going crazy. Hallucinating. Cry uncontrollably. Biology always triumphs.

Let these witches come crawling to us on their knees. Sign on the dotted line you shrew, relinquish your voting rights, and your horror will end.

MATING STRIKE the bitches into submission!

——————————————————-

At 7:29 PM, Jerkmenistan said…

There will never be a “mating strike”. Men will always want to get laid. That said, men can start an “impregnation strike” by refusing to have children. This can be accomplished by easy access to male birth control that doesn’t otherwise affect male enjoyment of sex and has no permanent side-effects. The holy-grail is, of course, the male birth control pill. Men will be able to have as much sex as they want, and avoid the unintended burden of conception (but not STDs, which are another issue altogether).

If you combine a refusal to marry with a refusal to impregnate, many women will be unable to achieve two of their life goals — marriage and children. Throw in mandatory DNA testing at birth and you’ll have a trifecta of true equality.

——————————————————-

At 8:30 PM, Schpengle Carrot-Tripe said…

mmmm,

you been enjoying the
The Moral Maze

today, where one guest actually mentioned the immortal line …
“where the paternal father has been replaced by the state…….”

and some mocked him for having his version of morals, but he also had some class replies

“So, you obviously have certain morals with regards the family and eating together and…….blah blah”

to which he replied
“Yes”

so they came back with
“ah well, in that case what do you think about families who send their children off to boarding schools at 7?”

“Well, 7 is a little young” came the reply ….. hee hee

and a further one was when tried twisting what he said to include the definition of Squalor as poor and another to mention the “undeserving” poor.

he shot them both to pieces.

class, Im enjoying this, Ill bog off and listen to it.

was, well worth a listen!

Radio 4 rocks,
I just wouldnt recommend long wave,
with the sunday service.

there are some damned good arguements going on there!
bye all

——————————————————-

At 12:28 AM, Mamonaku187 said…

At last, a politician, and I daresay, a major political party, gets it.

However, its a little too late to avoid the Iceberg now I’m afraid…

Over the past week or so, I’ve been battling it out with some peeps on my local daily’s webforum.

The ignorance and the “I don’t care” attitude is amazing!

These people really don’t give a damn. One lady told me that she “doesn’t read long posts” and she wonders if she doesn’t have Adult Attention Deficit disorder!

All the while, these insane women harp about how they are entitled to child support and other government assistance!!

Gentlemen, I am going to say something now that I really really believe in my heart to be true.

THIS CULTURE IS FINISHED. Save yourselves, save your closest loved ones, try to free those people from the Fe-matrix that still have sense.

The rest of these people are doomed, and they deserve every bit of the tribulation that is coming.

——————————————————-

At 2:55 AM, Anonymous said…

Men are too stupid to go on a mating strike. How do you think we got into this mess in the first place? We had a proper societal structure set up and everything, but then a couple of dorks pandering to women broke ranks in their desperate attempts to get women, and screwed the rest of us over. The same thing would happen on any other strike.

——————————————————-

At 1:55 PM, Anonymous said…

“Two: No such thing thing as a “male role model”! The kid has a father, or he or she does not. Mommy’s current boyfriend doesn’t count! There is No middle ground!”

What an ignorant comment. Sometimes mum’s new partner can be a better role model than the biological father.

I think you are very tunnel visioned on this issue. Grand fathers, uncles and friends and neighbours (on mums side of the family) are also role models to your children – whether you (or they)like it or not

——————————————————-

At 7:27 PM, byrdeye said…

The ignorance and the “I don’t care” attitude is amazing!

These people really don’t give a damn. One lady told me that she “doesn’t read long posts” and she wonders if she doesn’t have Adult Attention Deficit disorder!

All the while, these insane women harp about how they are entitled to child support and other government assistance!!

Of course these women don’t give a damn – they are benefiting from the status quo and so don’t give a shit if it’s fairly or not. Why do you think most modern women are so ignorant about politics and the world in general? BECAUSE IT IS GOING THEIR WAY and so they are blissfully ignorant! It’s not their problem – because they have no problem with it. As long as the system keeps working in their favor, they are NOT going to question their own gravy train!

Everything men have to bitch about…they experience the other side of the coin and REJOICE about!

CHOO-CHOO!!

——————————————————-

At 7:27 PM, Anonymous said…

A child has a mother and a father. Whether that sperm came from within a marriage or from a test tube.
There are single fathers out there bringing up children, there are children in care being brought up by local authorities.
Children can have good mothers and good step-mothers, similarly good dads and good step-dads.
Western society is going through a phase of anti-male policies. The oppression of any part of society is not good and things will change in time.
In the meantime, i avoid marriage and i avoid having more children. I tell women openly that i would be foolish to engage with them as it would be me who loses. If more men were brave enough to tell women to get lost until the law changes, things would improve more quickly.

——————————————————-

At 8:15 PM, ditchthebitch said…

‘Grandfathers, uncles, and friends’- now that’s REALLY stupid-sounds like Hillary Clinton in “It Takes A Village.’ Just more propaganda for men to foot the bill for single mothers.

——————————————————-

At 11:06 PM, Panzer said…

“What an ignorant comment. Sometimes mum’s new partner can be a better role model than the biological father.”

Yea and sometimes there not. Growing up my Grandfather was a hell of a role model, I will always have the highest amount of respect for him. But it still didn’t fill the want that I constantly had for a father. Maybe in your situation your mothers boyfriend(s) gave you the closure you needed, the ones my mother had were just plain shit.

Panzer

——————————————————-

At 2:35 AM, HAWKEYE said…

all the comments to this bottom link were anti single female,taxpayer funded whores.
no i see they have removed the comments altogether.
typical feminist censorship
free speach is dead

——————————————————-

At 10:28 AM, Anonymous said…

Why aren’t men given the option to keep the child? Women say it’s so hard and it’s a burden, so don’t force it onto them. Of course, this means they get no money out of it either, but think of the children would you? What’s that? It’s because the whole point is to use children as justification for robbing men? Well why didn’t you just say so and dispense with the formalities? Instead of requiring the woman to get pregnant, let women pick a random male and require he pay for her for the rest of his life.

——————————————————-

At 3:14 PM, khankrumthebulgar said…

Although I am a Nichiren Buddhist. I frequently read Breakpoint the Ministry of Chuck Colson. Former Watergate Malefactor. Who has spent decades in a Prison Ministry. He knows firsthand that 85% of the Men in US Prisons come from Single Mother homes.

Removal of Fathers threatens a tidal Wave of Crime in your future in the UK. This appears to be deliberate. Dump your Leaders who are promoting this crap before its too late. I truly feel for you, and the Engine for creation of a permanent criminal underclass.

——————————————————-

At 11:43 PM, General Pho said…

Hillary Clinton in “It Takes A Village.’

Hillaryous how liberals use AIDs-infested, poverty-stricken, chaotic sub-Saharan African culture as a “model” for an industrialized first-world country.

Sure, let’s follow their example if we want to end up just like them too!

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: