25 January 2007
This article (PDF) (which I found courtesy of Cool Tools 4 Men) is by Erin Pizzey and points out the anti-male and anti-family nature of feminism. What is rather cool is that I see a regular commenter at my humble blog, Field Marshall Watkins, got a comment published on the Daily Mail’s page:
There are different forms of feminism. These ‘radical’ feminists are gender feminists. I am not surprised by this record of their behaviour. Feminists want to criminalize men and masculinity at all costs. Marginalize men and render them nothing more than sperm donors and wallets. Which are the disposed of when not needed.
The number of refuges available for women as opposed to men is ridiculously disproportionate. Especially considering the fact that at least 50 percent of domestic violence is initiated by women. But it’s just another example of the feminist idea that all women are always victims and never perpetrators. They shouldn’t be held accountable for their actions, indeed, men should pay for women’s actions.
With the Men’s Movement, this is beginning to change.
– Field Marshall Watkins, London
In fact he has an anti-feminist blog himself:
posted by Duncan Idaho @ 11:02 PM
At 3:14 AM, Pete Patriarch said…
Its a serious achievement to get posted on that site’s comments section if you have the “wrong” opinion.
At 6:42 AM, julie said…
I am so pleased the skank word is not being used over the last posts that I had read.
Duncan and others that have blogs, I just want to say that you write very well. And I know it takes time to write these posts.
I just want to add something that my Grandfather said to me. “Never hate, for hate is evil in itself”
Another thing to think of is that HATE opens you up to the devil. Yes, even buddists will tell you this and they are a very old and real philosophy and unpaid. When you hate, evil can enter into you.
Dislike is a far better way to be. And safer.
Some of your sites tell you how to get the better of women. If you learn how to manipulate women then you cannot call them names for manipulating them. You cannot call the woman you successfully take advantage of a SKANK. You are a winner for you got what you wanted. And enjoy your success. But don’t abuse the loser. That isn’t fair.
At 3:49 PM, ncf said…
I love your blog though it focuses on society at large. My concern has always been on the churches – where feminism has created huge numbers of single women who have even more demands of men than secular women.
It is amazing how often I meet women in the church who were highly promiscuous until age 30, then come back to the churches to try and win a good man. It is so wrong!
I think your blog has a lot to teach Christian men. They need to be aware just how bad things are with women.
At 6:34 PM, Paul Parmenter said…
Yes, F M Watkins got a good post in. I tried doing the same myself, but the site closed very quickly and I was too late. These articles that invite comments are only open for a very short time, so you have to move fast. That’s why sometimes very controversial articles seem to draw just a few posts. But I don’t think comments are being unduly censored. There are often some very powerful anti-feminist messages getting posted, which any form of censorship would most certainly not allow. I think you just have to avoid being abusive or libelous.
There are some tips for you. Now get posting!
At 7:35 PM, Anonymous said…
LOL – look at the womyn already making demands on what is and is not “reasonable and fair.”
The trap men fall into is precisely in having a sense of fairness (and acting on it), where this Julie person has none; she merely repeats the mantra, in the hopes of shaming a sufficient number of men along the way.
Used to work in the past – so why not rinse it for all it’s worth, eh?
At 8:03 PM, Anonymous said…
Bugger off, SKANK!
At 8:25 PM, Duncan Idaho said…
I managed to get a comment posted at a Daily Mail article once before, and once on the BBC’s “Have Your Say” bit. I can’t recall what the topics were but nonetheless I had my say, which was pretty cool. Shame it’s almost impossible to sneak a URL in there though, but I do recall Darren Blacksmith of Cool Tools 4 Men managing to get a comment of his published at a local newspaper’s website’s comments page with a link to his own site. That’d be fantastic if I could manage to sneak a link to my blog in the comments of a national paper, like The Times or something.
At 8:35 PM, byrdeye said…
julie – What on earth does your rant on skanks have to do with this post?
And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with calling a woman a skank if she is one.
If you don’t want to be called a skank, then don’t be one.
At 8:45 PM, Anonymous said…
Your blog is very entertaining as well as providing good social commentary. You could turn this blog into a very good book deal if you shop it around.
/just a thought
At 8:50 PM, other said…
Duncan, I’ve got about 20 comments posted on the Daily Mail’s website but not ever with one containing a URL. It helps that I can post from work when most of the articles are appearing as well.
You may have a better chance slipping in that people should google “eternal batchelor”, “marriage strike” or something.
At 9:33 PM, Field Marshall Watkins said…
Thanks for the kudos Duncan. Hopefully people will use their initiative and google Men’s Movement to find out about it. I noticed the Mail has a ‘femail’ section devoted to the minutiae that women seem to find so interesting and important, but no men’s section. Typical. Next thing, like you say, is to get into the hard copy press…
Some of your sites tell you how to get the better of women. (Who? Duncan? Or are you saying all sites run by men are somehow connected? No man is responsible for the content of another site.) If you learn how to manipulate women then you cannot call them names for manipulating them. (Men can do whatever they like.) You cannot call the woman you successfully take advantage of a SKANK. (Men don’t care anymore, don’t you get it.) You are a winner for you got what you wanted. And enjoy your success. But don’t abuse the loser. That isn’t fair. (What does this have to do with Duncan’s blog?)
At 11:27 PM, Mr. Misogynist said…
What is a woman but hate? Who are you, Julie, to offer advice to your enemies? Clean up your own backyard before you give advice to men. By that, I mean try and correct the hatred coming from your feminist/lesbian sisters, before you advise men on the issue.
You’re just another judgemental skank.
Woops. I said it. I meant slut. Pardon me.
At 3:10 AM, Anonymous said…
You may also enjoy these blogs
It’s a shame what the feminists have done to the church. What’s worse is these woman that are promiscuous through there 20’s end up finding a sucker at church so they are essentially having there cake and eating it too. It doesn’t help that the average Christian man is often completely emasculated.
At 4:50 AM, rudy said…
It’s astonishing that over 50 percent of domestic violence is at the hands of women. My wife gets smacked for making dinner too late or not making it right. Men need to rule with an iron fist like our fathers and grandfathers did. Not cry about women hitting us. Stop acting like a defenseless woman and be a man. Victim.
At 10:01 AM, Christian J said…
“Some of your sites tell you how to get the better of women. If you learn how to manipulate women then you cannot call them names for manipulating them. You cannot call the woman you successfully take advantage of a SKANK.”
Iam always interested in a woman’s versions of the truth and how they see it. Here’s another version about the victimhood of women. Straight out of “feminism and how to blame men for your screwed up life”.
Hi Duncan, Good to see we are getting more and more exposure. F.M.W did a great job, we should all follow his fine example.
At 10:31 PM, am i a bodyfascist? said…
have to admit learned bout erin pizzey only recently, but like e.g. esther vilar to me she’s just another fine example of a female having the ovaries to act up to what she considers as real and fair instead of just repeating ideological slogans.
as pizzey writes, she was one of the originators of the domestic violence movement that later got hijacked by the ‘special rights’ feminists. plus as i understand it, like e.g. vilar too, she said a lot of things more than a decade before mra’s came up with pretty the same arguments, and not to mention imho she’s a bit more differentiated about it than plenty of the latter. and like plenty other women i know of, still considering themselves feminists or not, just for being honest she took and still takes considerable flak from the ‘special rights’ faction but still stands her ground, which in my book translates to ‘massive respect’ and ‘credit where credit’s due’.
and frankly imho deserving a lot more of it than e.g. people calling themselves mra while blanket blaming women and ‘feminism’, being proud of calling themselves ‘misogynists’ but complaining about ‘feminist misandry’. it’s the ‘special rights faction’ feminists that stopped me labeling myself ‘pro feminist’ quite a while ago, and it’s domineering double standard ‘mras’ and their erm, ‘thoughtful and balanced’ comments and views that keep me thinking ‘mra — no thanks either’.
At 10:55 AM, Anonymous said…
Julie are you high on Crack? To hate is to think emotionally, which women should understand thoroughly. To quote Morrissey “I don’t hate Pakistani’s, I only dislike them immensely”.
I dislike entitlement skanks immensely. In the US we use the term ‘whore’ in place of ‘skank’. Consider yourselves lucky.
Most females have no class, are fat, unattractive, bitter and would make terrible mothers.
Here is a current example of this in the US. A woman was just sentenced to life in prison for having her ex-husband murdered by her cousins. Before the marriage she bragged to her friends that she intented to marry this guy, get pregnant and divorce the guy to collect alimony. She did this but was unable to collect the amount of alimony she wanted so she had him killed.
I fear that if this happened in England, she would have walked free. I also can see that the female problem in England is made especially acute by the fact that most british women are terrible looking, fat or not. In the US the women are usually just fat. Not marriage material either way though.
Julie, don’t attempt to patronize Duncan by commenting about how well he writes or that he spends time on this blog. He probably writes this between urinations and playing video games.
Female bashing comes that naturally these days.
At 5:10 PM, pimphand said…
Men need to rule with an iron fist like our fathers and grandfathers did. Not cry about women hitting us. Stop acting like a defenseless woman and be a man. Victim.
We can’t…due to our feminist legal system now…or we will get hauled off to jail and she will get everything you own.
Meanwhile, a woman can beat you as much as she wants…because the authorities will never believe she did or just find it laughable even if they do.
At 5:12 PM, pimphand said…
If you learn how to manipulate women then you cannot call them names for manipulating them.
Thing is, we’re not learning how to manipulate women, just how to unmanipulate their manipulation of US.
At 6:57 PM, Anonymous said…
Is this Rudy guy a troll like martha or what?
At 11:50 PM, julie said…
Yes, my comment was speaking at and not to. My apology.
So where are these feminists and lesbians that HATE men? I would like to talk to them.
At 3:43 PM, Anonymous said…
So where are these feminists and lesbians that HATE men?
Why don’t you ask men what their specific experiences are? Though if you were genuninely interested in what men’s experiences are you would at least take the trouble to go through all the MRA blogs where the horrors and outrages are documented in excruciating detail every day.
In any event we are familiar with you.
For every outrage or abuse committed against men you will have an excuse or make a twisted, hypocritical justification. We see it over and over again from millions of women every day. You benefit from the status quo so you will never see a problem. And then you wonder where all the good men have gone…
At 8:17 AM, julie said…
I wish I hadn’t commented. My first comment was from reading another site. I was throw by it. Not wanting to judge here. Be what you want, do what you want. It is none of my business.
I don’t care what the other side is up to. This will get sorted out somehow. I have my own opinion on what the future holds for both genders and I personally don’t think either side is going to like it very much. Yet generations will pass and it will be normal to them. Life will go on.
At 5:37 AM, julie said…
Actually changed my mind. I will look further into this. I am not easily offended. Just want the truth. It has my attention.
Men hate because they are hurt. Women hate because they are hurt. Never mind my learning of the power or should I say the consequence of hate itself. No point talking to these people. Radical feminists want to break the whole family up. And then there are bigger players who want this to happen. I can’t help but think that the MRA is infact wanting the same as radical feminism. You both seem to be wanting to be equal. But I can’t help but wonder if you really understand the consequences of this?
At 1:37 PM, Anonymous said…
Females base their very lives around hate. A female lives, breathes, and shits hate every waking minute of her life. Don’t even TRY this “Women hate because they are hurt” manure. Women can’t begin to get enough hate into their insipid lives.
Femmies love to hate PURELY for sport. Every english speaking female is on an empowerment trip over men with every breath they take. Hate is responsible for 75% of their lust for drama. Females have to constantly BRING MEN DOWN with every word out of their mouths!
Keep the hell off the moral high ground, Julie. You, being a femmie, of course, are in COMPLETE delirium.