Paternity fraudster and adulterer has no remorse


——————————————————-

19 January 2007

bitch.jpg

No tits, no arse and no morals

I seduced my future husband to hide my love child. But I have no regrets

To sum up this dreadful tale, this woman fell pregnant at 20 and because the father was a married man, she suckered another man into marrying her by telling him that the child was his. After the wedding she naturally continued fucking her adulterous lover. Her own marriage ended and her former husband has no idea that “his” daughter is not actually his, and the daughter, now 18, only learned the truth a few years ago.

And, naturally, being a Western Woman, she has no regrets.

No regrets at all that a man out there still wrongly thinks a girl is his.

No regrets that her daughter must have had a terrible shock a few years ago finding out her “dad” wasn’t actually her dad.

She says she’s “not proud” of all this, but she’s not remorseful either, and is not ashamed to admit she liked having an affair whilst married and loved all the danger of humping her lover in the back of his BMW. She even whines that her lover still hasn’t got round to ditching his own family to live with her.

Furthermore she justifies it by saying she did it to protect the people she loved! She doesn’t love anyone. Not even her daughter. She’s clearly incapable of loving anyone but herself and her own selfish desires, like so many Western Women these days.

On top of all that, just to really put an exclamation mark on how much of an evil cunt she is, she moans that she “resented” her husband thinking the child was his! She was actually pissed off that her husband had fallen for her outrageous lie!

What a fucking despicable lying disgusting sociopathic fucking whore.

And in the interests of fairness, I think the guy she had an affair with is an equally disgusting wretch for not only being an adulterer but also for being aware that another man was suckered into raising a child that wasn’t his.

Absolute arseholes, both of them. Shooting really is too good for them (although it would be a start.)

The only good thing that can come out of this story is that her ex-husband will read this article (or be shown it by a friend) and find out the truth; names may have been changed but the narcissistic bitch insisted on having her photo on the page. Hopefully the guy will go ballistic.

This is why a man should not be named as a father on a child’s birth certificate until a DNA test proves that he is the father, and if a married woman has a child by a man other than her husband the marriage should be considered annulled and the woman kicked out of the marital home with nothing but her clothes and her bastard baby. Of course, that’ll never happen. In fact some governments in the West (Germany for a start) are taking steps to make it illegal for a man to get a DNA test on their children they suspect not be their’s, lest poor wikkle adulterous whores be caught out.

(Most of the comments at the bottom of the Daily Mail’s article are people declaring her to be evil, amongst other things, but there are some exceptions. Read through them all and find the one by Raj Verma, Southampton; that’s either a piss-take or a totally deluded fuckwit.)

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:59 PM
——————————————————-

At 7:36 PM, Bruce Wayne said…

This is a wonderful example of why women should never be trusted.

The reason being is a simple one. Women have no character. Character is a result of an unwavering moral compass. It is firmly rooted in universal principles of what is right and what is wrong.

Women are emotionally driven. And their emotions can change at any given time for any given reason. Furthermore, a woman will justify her actions and the resulting consequences by completely validating her emotions. This is why its impossible for women to have character. Their moral compass changes based on their emotional state and thus their perception of right and wrong is constantly in a state of flux.

This is the very reason why this woman felt her deception (which at the very least impacted the real father, the assumed father, and the child herself) was to “protect the ones she loved.” This mentality and subsequent justification of her actions is not surprising given the emotional nature of women.

If human history has taught us anything, its that women should never be trusted.

——————————————————-

At 7:37 PM, Anonymous said…

I absolutely agree with paternity testing at birth. It would stop this kind of fraud very quickly.

Sadly, there are a lot of women who prefer affairs with married men. They simply aren’t interested in normal, decent guys. I’m 38 and about half the women I meet in the dating scene have slept with married guys. Nasty.

——————————————————-

At 8:15 PM, patriarchal-phoenix said…

“…if a married woman has a child by a man other than her husband the marriage should be considered annulled and the woman kicked out of the marital home with nothing but her clothes and her bastard baby.”

A-Fuckin’-Men!!! I’m 100% in agreement!

Let that adulterous spawn of an incestuous toad starve to death in the streets!!

(I’d be willing, only because feminism has totally beaten my humanity out of me, to have the new born baby removed from the mother and support by tax payer money until a suitable adoptive home can be found. The baby didn’t do anything wrong, and shouldn’t pay for the crimes of his or her mother.)

——————————————————-

At 8:20 PM, feminist_scum said…

That woman is a horrible sack of shit. She doesn’t give a crap about her ex husband, only about herself.

She said that she wants her daughter to have a relationship with her real Father. What about the man who has raised her as her Dad all of her life huh?? Is he just to be discarded?

Vile woman. The woman and Richard deserve each other. 2 sacks of shit together.

——————————————————-

At 8:43 PM, Anonymous said…

In the face of growing child support arrearages due to paternity fraud, one man decided to make it legal and provide direct financial incentives for adultery. His name is Senator Steve Johnson (R-15 Colorado). He can be reached at:

steve.johnson.senate@state.co.us

Senator Johnson sponsored a bill which is now law in Colorado that forbids the use of DNA testing after a separation or divorce has been filed. Adultery is grounds for divorce and having another man’s child is physical evidence of adultery!

This Senator some how figured making it legal to have someone other than your husband’s child legal is going to resolve this problem. Only a “Class A Blithering Idiot” could think this makes sense.

I urge everyone on earth to write to Senator Johnson and explain this simple fact of life to him.

If you are interested in seeing what a Class A Blithering Idiot looks like go here and see first hand the face of an absolute imbecile.

>From the Denver Post

“Another new law limits the use of genetic tests to determine paternity. The law forbids use of the test after a separation or divorce decree is legally entered. Legislators who sponsored the new law said it is intended to protect children.

In a case four years ago, a man had tried to use a genetic test to dodge child support. Lawmakers also worried that the paternity tests might be used in custody battles, said Sen. Steve Johnson, a Republican from Fort Collins who supported the bill.

‘The idea was to be less disruptive to the child,’ Johnson said. ”

Someone needs to explain to Senator Johnson the GOP’s own polls show that that MEN are losing faith in the Republican party and it is acts like this that are the primary reason.

Please forward this information to every clear thinking person you know.

——————————————————-

At 8:56 PM, VoodooJock said…

Wasn’t she that guy in that movie “Sorority Boys”?

——————————————————-

At 11:19 PM, Anonymous said…

This woman and the Raj Verma woman are perfect examples why some societies put extreme controls on women.

Muslims in many countries keep their women under house arrest and chop off the pleasure centers of their genitals. Way too extreme, I know, but why would they be motivated to come up with those policies?

Is it because without a rigid moral code that women will become amoral deviant tarts?

In a sane society, the cuckolded husband would get full compensation for the deception. He deserves all the assets of the married guy who was screwing his wife. The unfaithful woman should be burned alive in Trafalgar Square.

Maybe this would cool the enthusiasm for slutty behavior.

——————————————————-

At 11:31 PM, mfsob said…

Daymmnnnnnnnnnn … SKANK is wayyyy too nice a word for this human piece of garbage.

——————————————————-

At 11:44 PM, Anonymous said…

Duncan, good words again. That kind of narcissistic women is all too common.

Check this out
http//www. dontdatehimgirl.com

I wonder what kind of uproar there would be if someone set up
dontmarryherguy.com
but I guess that’s all part of the double standards these days.

I think it would help alot of guys like that bitch’s ex husband if this kind of women were exposed earlier.

Thing with this dontdatehimgirl site is I bet it will mainly be full of lies from ex girlfriends annoyed that they were either dumped, or that the bloke didn’t kiss their ass every minute of the day. Again another site of women bitching about man, hooray.

Thing is it won’t make one iota of difference,girls choose guys based on their emotions. They meet some guy who is supposedly a cheater, who knows how to charm them, and they’ll say ‘but with me he’ll be different’.

They choose husbands who they can both control and who have money, everyone knows that.

——————————————————-

At 2:23 AM, ?? said…

If you think that only western women will trick males into believing that the child they are presented with is theirs, then you are sadly deficient in the thinking department.

——————————————————-

At 6:18 AM, Bruce from Oz said…

Many thanks for your site, Duncan. Another MRA told me about it and I’ve been absorbing your blog archive for a couple of weeks. I’m from the younger crowd (24) but have “seen the light” and so have a good number of my mates (from early 20s to early 40s).

In any society other than this feminized western one, a woman like the one in this story would’ve faced terrible consequences (so would her lover). Here she’s (unsurprisingly) portrayed as a victim and to some extent, a loving mother/wife who doesn’t want her loved ones to be hurt. [big rolleyes]

That was a good post, bruce wayne. I like some of the things you said:

bruce wayne wrote:
Their moral compass changes based on their emotional state and thus their perception of right and wrong is constantly in a state of flux.

After reading that, I just had a light bulb moment. I’ve heard this a lot: “there’s no right or wrong” ever since I was a kid and always thought there’s something fishy about it. I’ve just realised that everyone who’s told me so, or who’s brought it up in a debate, has been a woman, especially those in the teaching profession. Women love it as much as they love themselves. It is the ultimate way for them to save face and self-empower. I think it’s also why there are few women who study maths, science or engineering as it’s very clear in those fields what’s right and what’s wrong.

bruce wayne wrote:
The reason being is a simple one. Women have no character. Character is a result of an unwavering moral compass. It is firmly rooted in universal principles of what is right and what is wrong.

I’m a fan of Stephen Covey’s “The seven habits of highly effective people” in which he states the clear differences between character and personality, with character being defined like you said and personality being defined as external techniques to portray oneself (which can be learnt or faked). In my limited experience (being a young adult) I’ve found out that only men value character whereas women only go for personality. This is most evident in personal ads, as personality is one of the top items in their shopping lists, only behind some other vague word that can be translated to “rich”. I believe this is why “nice guys” are often overlooked as women couldn’t care less for good character.

——————————————————-

At 2:05 PM, Male Rights Network said…

“Some governments in the West (Germany for a start) are taking steps to make it illegal for a man to get a DNA test on their children they suspect not be their’s, lest poor wikkle adulterous whores be caught out.”

What exactly are the grounds for denying men the ability to ascertain whether they are the biological father or not? Answer: there are no grounds.

Are women indisputably allowed to query paternity and their child’s DNA? Yes. So what do we have? Blatant and unadulterated discrimination. I.e. sexism.

Would it be because some men are refusing rights to their estate in their will (such as James Brown) if they find their partner’s children are not his? Very possibly. Can’t have anything get in the way of the systemised stealing/raping of wealth from men to women that is our divorce courts!

There is room here for a whopper of a legal case, Constitutional or not, stating that men, or a particular man, are not being treated equally and are having their rights removed. The whole of divorce law is also on shaky legal footing, and it’s up to us men to shoot holes in it. A Constitutional challenge to this paternity issue and divorce law in the Supreme Court. What man will do it first?

——————————————————-

At 2:37 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

What exactly are the grounds for denying men the ability to ascertain whether they are the biological father or not?

The answer given by feminists from various ravings I’ve seen of their’s is that revealing a child’s “father” is not actually his/her father (i.e. someone other than the child’s mother’s husband) would:

(a) make the child feel bad
(b) disrupt the marriage and maybe lead to its breakdown
(c) potentially provide a get-out clause for the husband from paying child support in the event of a marital breakdown.

Obviously, the first instance is true, but the child feeling bad and fucked up is solely down to their mother being an adulterous whore.

The second point is also true. Damn fucking right a marriage should be disrupted and ended if the wife has had a child by a man other than her husband.

And the third point…well, that just shows the disgusting entitlement mentality and greed of feminists. There are, of course numerous cases (mostly in the US and Australia; I’ve not yet heard of any in the UK) of men being told they cannot have refunds of child support paid for kids that turn out not to be their’s, and often are told to keep paying it.

Feminists also insist that a man asking for a DNA test on his wife’s child is a show of distrust. Well, of course it is! What else are we men meant to do? Trust women. HAH!

Paternity fraud is one of the most despicable things a woman can do, and they have a licence to do it apparently. After all, the ex-husband in this instance may not have ever bothered having any more children, thinking he at least had a daughter from his brief marriage. It may be too late now, his genetic line will end thanks to the deception of one bitch, who still thinks she was in the right.

——————————————————-

At 2:56 PM, Anonymous said…

Duncan,

I emailed Representative Johnson about the proposed paternity law in Colorado, This was his response (he denies it).:

“You have contacted my office regarding SB181 and misinformation about the bill which came as a result of an incorrect Denver Post story, which is partly my fault.

You have been mislead by some unmoderated message board or email subscription list that is forwarding incorrect information. They have been notified of their error.

Is not true, and the purveyors of this misinformation have been informed, but they’d rather keep you in the dark.

The bill doesn’t prohibit DNA information, in fact, We DID NOT change current law on the DNA–we only ADDED more opportunities to where men should be informed because once was insufficient. We want DNA testing to be used, and to be used early in the process, so innocent people aren’t abused by the process.

It is unfortunate your email group isn’t more informed before they spread lies, They are really hurting our case.

I hope you will contact them and ask them to stop spreading misinformation.

Here is a response I received from the State Dept. of Human Services:

Sen. Johnson,

Cindy asked me to forward the side-by-side the Department prepared for SB 05-181. This gentleman certainly has the bill all wrong,. Of course, it doesn’t help that the Post printed an article that is factually inaccurate. As you may recall, the bill was very carefully crafted to give advisements to the father with respect to genetic testing, but certainly did not outlaw genetic testing as both the Post and these people have asserted. The Post is merely wrong..

Please let us know if we can provide any further information.

Attached to this email is a comparison of the law before and after SB181 showing the additional opportunities for DNA testing notification to be given early in the process.

I think this is an improvement over current law, it may not be everything you would like to see (by the way, I supported Rep. Sinclair’s earlier bill requiring DNA testing to establish paternity).

If this clarifies things, can you help by forwarding this so the obscene emails I am receiving can at least contain informed responses..? Thanks!!

I welcome your constructive thoughts as always…..

Sen. Johnson”

——————————————————-

At 3:05 PM, Javier said…

That’s just a prime example of what’s wrong with our legal system these days: it’s heavily biased in favor of women, preconception, during pregnancy, and postconception. Until the law starts laying down the gavel to these types of women, they’ll keep on going unabated, whilst the men are left emotionally and financially in ruins. But who the fuck cares about the men, anyway, and what they feel or must endure?

This woman should not only be jailed for life for doing what she did, but should be forced to pay the father(s) and offspring every penny she earned in life (which I bet was nothing as she just mooched off the men in her life anyway). What a poster child for women these days. Bitch.

——————————————————-

At 3:09 PM, feminist_scum said…

Well said, Duncan. These feminist assholes don’t give a rats ass about the rights of men, and only care about theirselves and the children.

We men aren’t here to please you no matter what you selfish whores.

——————————————————-

At 3:52 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

These feminist assholes don’t give a rats ass about the rights of men, and only care about theirselves and the children.

I respectfully disagree with bit of that statement I’m afraid. Feminists only care about women. Not children.

Feminists hate children, they advocate killing them in the womb, using them as blackmail weapons in divorce cases, or as tools in the transfer of wealth from men to women.

Feminists hate children!

Every action they commit, every theory they put down, every legislation they submit, it all smacks of their hatred of children. They hate children as much as they hate men. They hate male children more than female ones, but feminists are still anti-children to an infinite-degree. Yet the fucking cunts insist they’re doing it “for the children.”

Children were better off before feminism. They had a father to provide for them and guide them through life, and a mother to care for them. Under feminism, if they’re lucky enough to not be killed in the womb, they are more often than not end up being bought up by some dumb slag of a single mother, or going through a divorce, or dumped in daycare centres because mummy wants to play at career gal.

Feminists hate children just as much as they hate men. Never forget that.

——————————————————-

At 5:44 PM, Anonymous said…

She should get a life sentence. The most heinous crime is that her husband did not have a child on his own, because she made him believe he had one.
of course she is a thief, too.
Why is no one prosecuting this woman?
She admits having robbed a man.

——————————————————-

At 9:38 PM, ??? said…

Muslims in many countries keep their women under house arrest and chop off the pleasure centers of their genitals. Way too extreme, I know, but why would they be motivated to come up with those policies?

Nobody chops off their pleasure centers, you are brainwashed by feminist propaganda. Female circumsition helps ward of disease, and that is all it does.

——————————————————-

At 10:46 PM, Schpengle Carrot-Tripe said…

WOT THE FUCK!!!!

“Nobody chops off their pleasure centers, you are brainwashed by feminist propaganda. ”

“Female circumsition helps ward of disease, and that is all it does.”

I may dislike the feminazi bastards, but, I aint stupid.

If you told me that you wanted to chop my dick off to stop me getting ghonnorea, I would stuff your balls in a vice……..
and squeeze.

just which diseases does it, er, prevent?/cure?

and which branch of propaganda do you adhere too?
jesus!

——————————————————-

At 7:07 PM, Panzer said…

Thats a woman? It looks like a man in drag. All the booze in Kentucky couldnt get me to nail that.

Panzer

——————————————————-

At 12:19 AM, Schpengle Carrot-Tripe said…

hahah!
But, Panzer, I thought you were an ex vet?
😀
hee hee
hi and bye mate.

——————————————————-

At 6:25 PM, Viking said…

The baby didn’t do anything wrong, and shouldn’t pay for the crimes of his or her mother.

Your right, the baby shouldn’t have to pay for its mother’s crime but then that is why what the mother did is so evil. I agree with Duncan she should be sent packing but she and the child should go to the closest male relative. The child should become the ward of its maternal Grandfather if he is still alive and the fate of the mother, his daughter, should be his decision. Completely. Of course she probably comes from a fatherless home herself. This is what happens when societies strip fathers of their authority and role as sole leader of the household.

——————————————————-

At 8:42 PM, khankrumthebulgar said…

So long as this type of behavior is subsidized you will get more of the same. Women in Russia cope without Child Support. There 75% of Divorces are initiated by the Menfolk. Funny how when the Shoe is on the other Foot the Women really are screwed.

My opposition is to removal of the restraints to behavior by either gender. Restore accountability and we will see changes.

——————————————————-

At 4:43 AM, thirtyplus said…

Rather, women simply do “what feels good” AT THE TIME….”in the moment”….

which leads them to do some horrendously immoral things. Like this post. Like accusing a guy of rape because she didn’t want to bear responsibility for the pregnancy. Etc.

——————————————————-

At 12:38 AM, Panzer said…

“But, Panzer, I thought you were an ex vet?”

I am, and when I was in Germany I would go to the Red Light District and get some Quality action. An American Soldier seeks the good stuff, not something that probably at one time loaded your howizter. Carrot-Tripe, you are my kind of weird, thanks man.

Panzer (laughing my ass off)

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: