27 February 2007
If you go through a modern divorce in the West, the sacrifices your wife made during the marriage is key to how much she’ll be given of your wealth, and with some blubbing, some twisting of facts, some feminist double-think and plenty of lies, the sacrifices she made will be blown out of all proportion.
Naturally, any sacrifices you make will be regarded as irrelevant. In fact they’ll be twisted round to be seen as benefits you obtained on the back of your wife. Earning £100,000 a year at the end of your marriage? That’s half thanks to your wife and she’s entitled to half of that from now on. Nevermind if you only earned that amount through slogging your guts out and half-dying of stress, or if you barely got to spend any of that without asking your wife’s permission, or if you only crawled your way up the career ladder to keep up with her ever inflating material demands. Doesn’t matter. Pay her £50,000 a year after the divorce until she marries some other sucker. Get a pay-raise? So does she. Pay up. Or else, motherfucker.
Take careers. Now a woman will talk about “sacrificing – sob – my career”, which is clearly bollocks, given that they marry to quit their hated jobs (why else do they never marry guys beneath them status-wise, and thus unable to support them?) Claiming they sacrifice their careers is just a way of establishing victim-status before the divorce courts.
However, even if we accept the laughable notion that a woman quitting working 40-hours a week in a dreary office to stay at home and be provided for by a man counts as a sacrifice, so what? Why should she be compensated in any way? The man has made a sacrifice by providing for both himself and her, and possibly kids too, in that he has given up the choice of working the minimum necessary to support only himself. He’s sacrificed a stress-free life of responsible for no-one but himself, and possibly plenty of weekends out with the lads that he now spends them doing overtime.
Yet this is irrelevant to many women and certainly to the divorce courts. A man doesn’t make “sacrifices”, he merely does his duty, and damn him if he doesn’t. No matter that a man has sacrificed anything, all that they take into account is what the woman has given up, and thus she ought to be compensated. Most ludicrous of all is the insane belief that working is actually fun, when in fact it’s rubbish and, for most men, a means to an end. The opposite notion is put forth in divorce courts. A wife who gave up her job has made a tremendous sacrifice and requires compensation. The husband who, after marriage and after his wife quit her job, had to go from working 35-hours a week to working twice that has somehow benefited! Having all that fun virtually living at the office whilst his poor wikkle wife drags herself to lunch at Starbucks with her fellow ladies of leisure. Therefore she should be compensated by being allowed to keep
their her home and half of her husband’s future income to compensate her. What bollocks.
This is reversed when the genders are switched, naturally. In the rare instances that a man quits his job after marriage whilst his wife works harder to support them both and their kids, then he’s a lazy slacker who, should it come to divorce, will be tossed out of
their her home and told to be grateful his wife supported him by slaving away at work all those years.
This is why you are badly fucked if you are dumb enough to get married in the Matriarchy. Everything your new wife gives up that she liked (and the stuff she disliked, but later claims to have liked) and everything she has to do that she disliked (and the stuff she liked, but later claims to have disliked) during the marriage is your fault and she will get compensation if/when the divorce comes.
It doesn’t matter if she nagged and manipulated you into marriage. All she has to do in make out how much she had to give up – her job, her freedom, her youth, fucking whatever – after “he pressed me into marriage” and the judge in the divorce court will almost be wiping a tear from his – or, God forbid, her – eye before seeing to it that she receives just compensation for all this “hardship and sacrifice” in the form of lots of assets and cash from you.
Don’t even bother pointing out any sacrifices you made, or that you didn’t actually like – nor benefited from – working extra hard after your wife quit her job. That doesn’t matter. You’re a man, and in the eyes of divorce courts, that means you don’t matter.
Women are virtually immune from accountability and responsibility in the Matriarchal divorce process. It doesn’t matter if she filed for divorce (60% to 90% of divorces are filed by women in the West) for little or no reason. It doesn’t matter if she fought tooth and nail to get custody of the kids, even making up false allegations of abuse to ensure she takes them away from you. The fact is that she’s now a divorcee and single mother, and the judge will declare it was obviously your fault for being a bad husband and making her leave you and lumbering her with raising two children on her own, and the full force of law will be bought home to ensure you don’t shirk your duty and responsibilities to support your (voluntarily ex-)wife and your children (who you have little or no right to see again.)
Marriage is slavery for women, remember? That’s the feminist line, and the feminist line rules in family courts these days. Nothing else. Justice? That went out with the Patriarchy.
In the view of the feminist nazis of divorce courts in the West, by marrying your wife you will have enslaved her and made her give up her precious freedom and career, and you will pay for all of this. You will pay, for a long time.
Stay single. Obviously.
posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:17 PM
At 7:31 PM, Christopher in oregon said…
It’s quite insane how women and the courts have twisted a woman’s desire to sit at home on her fat ass watching Oprah as being a “sacrifice”. Give me a fucking break.
What’s even more insane is that millions of men continue to march down the aisle to their doom.
At 9:55 PM, Anonymous said…
Wouldn’t it be cheaper to have her killed?
Maybe that could be the first service of the new MALE MAFIA.
Divorced bitches mysteriously whacked while you are overseas on holiday. What a tragedy. One of two things will happen. Women will stop divorcing or women will stop trying to take men to the cleaners.
All is fair in love and war. And women have definitely declared war on men…
At 10:43 PM, Javier said…
There was a segment on CBS News “The Early Show” this morning that had a woman promoting her book “The 51% Minority: How Women Still Are Not Equal and What You Can Do About It“. Here is an excerpt from the show:
[The author] stressed and expalined(sic) why women need to be aware of their legal rights in every aspect of their lives, from employment to age discrimination, domestic abuse cases, divorce, etc.
Yeah, lets not tell anyone how badly men get screwed in divorces, and don’t go into the REAL research that shows DV occurs more times with MEN being the victims.
At 1:52 AM, mfsob said…
Women have made a career out of becoming professional victims. I mean, why not? The pay is great, the benefits are outstanding and the amount of effort required is almost nil.
It’s a beautiful scam. Kind of wish I had a pussy – then I’d never have to pay for anything for the rest of my life!
At 8:45 AM, Anonymous said…
Duncan’s advice with regards to men not to get married these days, has never been more correct.
Everyday,in most Western countries, some poor man is probably getting financially and/or emotionally ruined in the divorce/family courts by some bitch of an ex wife.
Today, marriage for men has become nothing more than a game of “Russian Roulette”, except this time the gun has only two chambers, and one has the live bullet (given the fact that the divorce rate in many Western nations is around 50%).
Sydney, NSW, Australia
At 8:52 AM, Anonymous said…
Very true. Very very true.
Women do not abandon careers, because most jobs are not careers. When women say so, you clearly see that they have no concept of work, they believe it is fun.
Even if they abandoned something, the man, too, abandoned his freedom and got the responsibility to work for his wife.
Duncan write a book, you write very well.
At 5:56 PM, Anonymous said…
Yep…marriage to one of these clits is akin to a realtime computer virus, ON or OFF the computer. You’ll never shake this virus, no matter how many new comps you purchase or recovery discs you run. ‘Tain’t happenin’. You will be clubbed continuously from all sides with a trojan you’ll end up wishing you’d either sacrifice hers or your own life to be rid of.
…and unfortunately, just may do..
Don’t go there.
At 12:04 AM, Panzer said…
“Wouldn’t it be cheaper to have her killed?”
No, actually it would be cheaper to tell her “Sorry sister, go find someone else”.
At 7:21 AM, dumpyourwifenow.com said…
If you stay at home and do the housework, you’re a pansy.
If you work too hard, there never is time for her. If you don’t work enough, you’re a good for nothing bum.
If she has a boring repetitive job with low pay, it’s exploitation. If you have a boring repetitive job with low pay, you should get off your rear and find something better.
If you get a promotion ahead of her, it’s favoritism. If she gets a job ahead of you, it’s equal opportunity.
At 12:26 PM, Anonymous said…
There was an article last week in the Cannock Express and Star to do with the falling marriage levels.
Surprise surprise….a ‘lady’ columnist berated men for being ‘commitment-phobes’. There didn’t seem to be any article from a male point of view….another surprise.
I thought about writing in, but didn’t bother. Silly woman wouldn’t be able to understand and couldn’t be bothered to waste my time.
Men being ‘commitment-phobes’….no my love, just avoiding marriage because it ‘oppresses women’. No need to thank us.
At 12:59 AM, Anonymous said…
I agree with most of what you say. Why are you so angry though? What happened?
You should check out www.nomarriage.com . Good site also.