Topless teach


——————————————————-

28 February 2007

(Note: not a very work-safe link)

PE Miss in bust-up for losing her kit

toplessteach.jpg

PARENTS are furious a PE mistress is being allowed to carry on teaching their kids despite posing topless on the internet.

Former England netball player Louise Crolla, 26, exposes her enhanced 32DD boobs and offers to do ‘fetish’ work on the modelling agency website.

Ah, what a fine role-model (no pun intended) for kids. At least she’s showing girls that they can do all sorts of shit and not be punished.

But her headmaster will not sack her from her £30,000 supply job.

Thirty-grand a year for being a supply-teacher? Fuckin’ hell, that’s way above the average national wage. And they get over three-months holiday a year. Tits out or otherwise, that’s a fucking disgrace teachers are getting that amount, bearing in mind what a poor job they’re doing these days, with an increasing number of kids coming out of over a decade of full-time education illiterate and innumerate.

She admitted: “I only thought about what the students and the school would think afterwards.

“I thought, ‘Oh dear, what am I doing?’ But then I thought, ‘No, I want to give modelling a go.'”

Right, she figured it might be wrong but, hey, she wanted to do it. And like an empowered grrl, she did it without regards to the consequences.

There seems to be a slight contradiction there too. In one sentence she claimed not to have considered the consequences until “afterwards”, then in the next she’s saying she figured consequences be damned before she did it. Daft bint can’t keep her story straight.

And this brainless, gormless goit with the sense of responsibility and maturity of a 12-year-old is actually in charge of teaching kids? Holy fuck.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:04 PM

——————————————————-

At 8:23 AM, Anonymous said…

What is the problem, Duncan? Those kids who are not old enough dont care and the rest is happy to see a beautiful woman. She is really a beauty.

——————————————————-

At 10:22 AM, zok said…

Ah, British single moms again.

——————————————————-

At 11:04 AM, The 2nd Nin said…

I don’t often disagree with you Duncan but in this case I have to, the school is right to stand by her, the topless modelling does nothing to affect her teaching credentials. Secondly if she wants to do it then do we realistically care?

On the point of teachers yes they get a long holiday but that’s primarily due to the children rather than the teachers. Also their starting wage is no where near £30,000 (£19,000 afaik right now with 1 year guaranteed teaching as a probationary year, not guaranteed a job the next year). Supply work is a lot more difficult than regular teaching in someways because you are going into a random class with no prior information on them, and at least in certain areas we have a distinct lack of supply teachers to cover illness / stress (those lovely kids can be a real handful…) so supply and demand means they get a good wage.

——————————————————-

At 11:59 AM, feminist_scum said…

Wish I had a teacher like that when growing up.

——————————————————-

At 1:03 PM, a feminist’s nightmare said…

you’d be surprised how many teachers out there shouldn’t be teachers, ever!

——————————————————-

At 1:15 PM, 7001 said…

What is exactly wrong with teachers posing in nude magazines?

It’s the third millennium now, for Crom’s sake!

——————————————————-

At 4:56 PM, Anonymous said…

Ugly as a mule, but nice tits. She’d make a profitable whore.

——————————————————-

At 7:32 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

What’s wrong with posing in the nude? Hmm. A little old thing called morality. Or decency. You know; the things women know nothing about……

——————————————————-

At 9:07 PM, Anonymous said…

I wonder if I can start a debate here to do with jobs. Have you noticed that as recruitment becomes more feminised, the process of getting a job becomes ever harder? Employers have a long list of demands that nobody can ever adhere to (“What, you only have 3 yrs 9 months experience in version 3 of this application? We need someone with 3 years 10 months experience, dammit!”), spend months looking for someone and then finally settle for a complete retard. Then the employers moan “There’s a labour shortage!” With so many women in HR, and women behaving in the same way in their relationships (Ignoring nice guys with bullshit reasons, then sleeping with bad-boys and moaning there’s a shortage of men), I wonder if this is why the process of getting work has become so bureaucratic and annoying over the past 15 or so years?

——————————————————-

At 1:44 AM, Anonymous said…

Great blog brother.

Here in Chicago today A male teacher was sentenced to 32 years for sleeping with two underage girls.

Now I see that some slut in South Carolina is being charged for sleeping with 5 boys! I’m curious to see what sentence she gets, LOL.

——————————————————-

At 11:17 PM, Lisa said…

Anon @ 1:44, definitely can’t wait to hear what happens in that case in S. Carolina.

Anon @ 9:07, I hear you on the employment process. What drives me nuts now is the endless parade of assessments and personality profiles used for hiring. You can have great skills, but if you profile as an Owl when they are looking for a Rabbit, God help you.

——————————————————-

At 7:18 PM, Peregrine John said…

The link’s pointing to something else now. I can’t find it on the site, but a follow up to it is here which makes mention of it.

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: