Thanks to feminism, there are not enough rich men to go round. Boo-fucking-hoo!


——————————————————-

02 April 2007

Post-Bridget, it’s looking even worse for the girls

PDF

It is a truth universally acknowledged that an alpha female requires an even more alpha male as a mate. But a recent report suggests today’s successful woman with her high standards and picky notions will have nobody to marry: women now make up 57% of university graduates and outnumber men in every subject in higher education (though not engineering or maths, yet).

For the post-Bridget Jones and Sex and the City generation, it’s bad news. The sobering truth is that demographics being what they are, more and more educated, eligible women are facing a choice: downgrade your notions of Mr Right, or face up to life alone.

I love articles like this, that reveal how badly women have shot themselves in the foot.

“Oh boo-hoo, we stormed into the universities and workplace, shoving men out of the way in the process, and now we’re finding we’ve inadvertantly hampered our chances of marrying Mr Right Sucker who’ll let us retire in our 30s.”

Stupid cunts.

Women are getting better degrees — more 2:1s and firsts in every subject — and two-thirds of medical students are now women, compared with 29% in the 1960s. So not much point in hoping that a handsome consultant will come along, whose Harley Street earnings will pay for the school fees and the 4×4.

Damn right you can throw those hopes away bitches. You left the home in the 1950s and demanded us men iron our own clothes and cook our own tea. Fine. We will do. Now we’re dropping out of universities and the workplace and telling women to pay their own mortgages and support themselves.

And you can forget finding a latterday Mr Darcy, too. As many trainee barristers these days — you’ve guessed it — are women as men. Bridget Jones’s saviour is a dying breed.

How women show their shallowness! They foam at the mouth with rage should a man want a young traditional woman who will stay at home and raise babies, but they’re quite happy to still want a rich traditional man who’ll provide for them. Fuck you hypocrites.

Imogen Lloyd Webber — being the daughter of Andrew, the super-rich theatre impresario — does not need someone to pick up the rent, but even she, blonde and beautiful, has found it a struggle to find a man. Just turned 30, she admits to having spent most of her twenties as a singleton and has no beau in prospect. Instead, she has decided that if one is going to be single — even permanently — one might as well enjoy it. Her book The Single Girl’s Guide, published this week by Sum-mersdale, is a wry, witty look at the predicament of the modern woman and a useful aide to surviving the single state.

“We love Bridget Jones and Carrie Bradshaw, but for them it was all focused on finding a man. What happens if he’s not there?” she asks. “No one’s ruling [marriage] out, but no one seems to be dealing with what happens to the women who don’t have a man.” In The Single Girl’s Guide, men are always referred to as “distractions” in the happy life of the singleton. In fact, two thirds of the book doesn’t mention “distractions” at all but focuses on the solo girl’s navigation of everything from the office Christmas party to the family reunion.

Don’t worry love, you’ve turned 30 so there’ll be fewer “distractions” for the rest of your life.

When a man comes along, don’t expect miracles. Until now it has been the social norm for women to marry up the socio-eco-nomic pecking order. Times are changing and our expectations will have to change too: when it comes to whom we choose as a mate, “there’s going to have to be flexibility”, says Lloyd Webber.

One of the happiest couples she knows is a successful investment banker friend who tried endless unsuccessful dates with other City high-flyers, but eventually fell in love and is blissfully happy with a waiter.

Yeah, whatever. Either that’s a serious exception or she’ll ditch the waiter the second some guy who earns more than her comes along (although she’ll probably marry the rich guy then fuck the waiter on the side.)

High-powered professional women need to learn that it is much more useful to have a husband who can pick up some of the domestic slack (stay home, say, when the kids are ill) do the shopping, or be there to take that delivery, than it is to have a similarly high-powered spouse who has no time to keep the home fires burning. Perhaps, as Lloyd Webber points out, if modern women are going to find husbands they need to change their criteria for what makes their ideal man.

Yeah, like that’s going to happen.

Better idea; get used to being fucked and chucked, and accept that the few rich alpha-male barristers and doctors willing to marry will be on the look out for pretty traditional women aged 18 to 24, not aging spinsters who are bored after a decade or two of “accidental sex.”

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:04 PM
——————————————————-

At 5:24 PM, ChicagoMan said…

why is it bad for them? There still are plenty of men around, the same amount last time I checked.

Oh wait, that’s right, women marry up and for money.

If they would stop being such selfish superficial whores they would find someone, but this isn’t the twilight zone.

——————————————————-

At 5:38 PM, ditchthebitch said…

The simple fact of the matter is that it has been proven over and over that a woman who marries ‘down’ may find the relationship novel at first, but will then quickly lose any and all respect for the husband- guaranteed. So the marriage will not work out anyway, so why even bother? Feminism has been completely f***** from it’s inception.

——————————————————-

At 6:09 PM, Field Marshall Watkins said…

The filth. It’s the norm to marry someone with more money and status.
Haha why of course it is. I mean, there I was years ago, thinking women fancied men because of their love for them. You know, for better or worse, all that bollocks.

What do these fools expect? They climb high (through positive discrimination etc) and wonder why the air is thin.

The usual. They want it all. And the truth is, they can NEVER EVER have it all.

But fuck em anyway. They’re not worth the sweat from my balls. 🙂

——————————————————-

At 6:13 PM, Outcast Superstar said…

I just love reading articles like these.

No I will not be there for you when you turn 30 looking for a sucker.

If I had to do it over again, I probably wouldn’t have put myself through college but given the fact that there is only two more months to go, I intend to finish what I started. I for one will be very happy when it’s finally over.

By rebuking these skanks a bachelor like myself can retire after 20-25 years of work.

They wanted independence, liberation where they can usurp men’s jobs, blatantly steal men’s money, and arrogantly abuse their sexual power (letting honorable men rot alone while squandering their prime years to exciting bad boys and thugs). Their choice.

I won’t be there for them when they hit 30 looking for a sucker to settle down for them. I for one will happily let them reap what they sow and will be laughing my ass off at them when they are getting desperate trying to find that sucker.

They have no idea what is in store for them. I find this to be really great!

——————————————————-

At 7:00 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

It is indeed interesting to note that most females still think they’re entitled to marry a man who earns more than they do, despite forty years (at least) of feminism. After all, men never insisted that their future wife should earn more than them during the years of the so called patriarchy.

There seems to be a stalemate in operation here where men with money are not marrying because of the dangers of female friendly divorce laws and yet women still insist on a man with loads of cash before they will consider him. The truth is the figures just don’t add up so women can look forward to a lonely life with a cat for company. Men don’t need women any more as a permanent feature. They are to be regarded as temporary distractions with the emphasis on the word temporary. Tough luck sisters you brought this on yourselves.

——————————————————-

At 7:31 PM, Christianj said…

I can hear the angst and hand wringing on this side of the planet. Maybe someone should make new man-size handkerchiefs for the poor dears.

——————————————————-

At 7:37 PM, Anonymous said…

Damn right you can throw those hopes away bitches. You left the home in the 1950s and demanded us men iron our own clothes and cook our own tea. Fine. We will do. Now we’re dropping out of universities and the workplace and telling women to pay their own mortgages and support themselves.

Indeed. The “you can have it all” idea is a female mental disease. As a guy (and being practical) I AM NOT going to work full-time AND maintain the household full-time. That is fucking insane. I would want nothing to do with a retard who believes you can do both.

——————————————————-

At 7:48 PM, Anonymous said…

Imogen Lloyd Webber — being the daughter of Andrew, the super-rich theatre impresario — does not need someone to pick up the rent, but even she, blonde and beautiful, has found it a struggle to find a man. Just turned 30, she admits to having spent most of her twenties as a singleton and has no beau in prospect.

Paris Hilton, heiress to the hotel fortune, had an opportunity to marry the heir to a Greek shipping line (billionaire level). She broke it off. She’s in her 20s and still wants to fuck every guy on the planet. Here it’s not a case of money, just a crazed slut that doesn’t want the PARTY to end. She loves all the sexualized attention she gets. It usually changes after they hit 30 and the wrinkles arrive. I don’t think she’ll be getting many marriage proposals from billionaires at 30.

——————————————————-

At 7:54 PM, Anonymous said…

Remember, it is always the women who are trying to shame us against living alone. That is exactly the thing that they are most afraid of. That and becoming a bag lady.

——————————————————-

At 7:56 PM, dirty barry said…

“Women are getting better degrees — more 2:1s and firsts in every subject”

What a load of crap!

All this propaganda about girls zooming ahead is just garbage.

Teaching methods that favour girls learning styles over boys have been promoted which in turn is responsible for boys just giving up on the system.

The teaching methods that favour girls, such as emphasis on coursework as opposed to exams (which boys used to do better at) has actually LOWERED academic standards across the board.

In turn the government covers this up by dumbing down the requirements for a passing grade so that it looks like everything is hunky dory.

But there is only so far you can go with lowering standards and it just doesn’t work when it comes to subjects that require real logic and problem solving like maths and sciences. And that’s why these subjects are dying out in this country.

Pretty soon a lot of degrees will be worthless in the private sector. The only thing they’ll be good for is getting a job like a ‘baby inspector’ or some such cooked up shite.

Once the employment in the government sector gets too top heavy, it’s just going to collapse.

——————————————————-

At 7:57 PM, wobs said…

So that’s shares in cat food manufactures going up then 🙂

——————————————————-

At 8:47 PM, Hawaiian Libertarian said…

Notice the third comment on the articles page…

One problem is that many people don’t want to grow up and take responsibility for themselves, their lives and their relationships. Men more so than women. Nowadays, it is no longer “shocking” that a woman lives by herself and earns her own money – so men don’t feel obliged to stay around for long. They get what they want (sex) and then as soon as the woman expects him to stay around and plan a future (with or without children), he disappears because “It’s too much hassle. I don’t want to have to account for my actions to anyone. I don’t want to feel obliged to do anything I don’t want to do.”

Can you tell I’m talking from experience?

I have just been reminded that I really am better off by myself. In all respects – including monetary.

Tina, Duesseldorf, Germany

Talk about clueless. I always laugh at the feminists that complain that no men want to get serious with them…

Apparently they just don’t understand simple concepts like “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?”

——————————————————-

At 9:09 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

What’s really amusing is that in the end, they need us more than we need them. Two years ago I was being pursued by a then forty year old gal. She teaches at the University level, and is an editor at a major paper here in my city. Well-preserved for her age would be putting it mildly; but she IS forty years old, despite her good looks. She has credentials coming out the wazoo; I don’t.

I have since encountered numerous desperate women thirty-five and over, and brother, I don’t care what their socio-economic level may be, the desperation is shocking, even to a jaded old fart like myself.

Fortunately, as their looks and sexuality start to wane, so does my interest. But, it is amusing to see women who wouldn’t have considered me worthy to lick the bottom of their shoes ten years ago, all of a sudden have changed their tune.

So have I, me thinks.

——————————————————-

At 9:15 PM, TJ said…

I find it quite comical to know women in their late 30’s that have delusions of grandeur. The have honestly convinced themselves that they will meet a handsome and wealthy Mr. Wonderful to come along and provide them with security, love and children.

Every aspect of their being reflects their psychosis. They dress and act just as the 20 something chicks that they are competing with. Never realizing how foolish they look.

They are convinced that the current guy that is banging them will marry them in a year…only to be disappointed in 3 months time when he moves on for another fuck & chuck.

These chicks have worked for 15 plus years and do NOT have anything saved nor any assets worth speaking of. All this and they want Mr. Wonderful to provide them with their 3/4 million dollar home and SUV so they can retire and watch OPRAH.

As a lady of leisure she would become a harping shrew, blow up like a balloon, begin her transition into menopause and make the poor saps life unbearable.

They are out of their minds!!!

Check out this gem of a video on life with a wife. It’s by an Irish Comedian Dave Allan titled Practice Makes Perfect.

Here’s another good one about Adam & Eve.

Life is great as a bachelor..Enjoy the Show!!!

——————————————————-

At 9:25 PM, Anonymous said…

I vaguely remember reading an article some time ago which described a similar situation in India (in the past?), where there was a large group of wealthy, educated women who remained single and childless because they could not find “suitable mates.” Their biological imperative is to marry up – all these mental masturbations notwithstanding – while that of men is to marry down. The current system is not in congruence with natural law and therefore bound to break down before long. In the mean time, women can slave away for their own meaningless existence. Though few of them have the humility to openly admit it, most of these “high powered professional women” (especially the smarter ones) will
spend due time privately reflecting on the hollowness of their newly gained “independence” – and what they unwittingly bargained away in order to gain it.

——————————————————-

At 9:28 PM, mikeray said…

I spent £20,000 on a new face to find a husband

Like many women of her generation, Shahnaz Khan devoted her 20s to studying and furthering her career, but as the university lecturer reached her 30s she realised she was ready for the next stage in her life.

She saw herself married to a wealthy and loving man, living in a period detached house, preferably in some leafy road with two children – naturally a boy first, followed by a little girl.

It is a dream which no doubt strikes a chord with many a single career woman, whose biological clock has started ticking loudly in her ear.

Shahnaz, is now 41 and not only is she still single, she is also still a virgin.

——————————————————-

At 10:54 PM, ColdHammer said…

This article reminds me of my friend who makes great money, has a big house, and toys such as cars, motorbikes, etc.

What’s funny is that when we go out he pretends that he’s a bum with no money and no job. He does this to play and joke around as well as test other people.

So far, all the wimmin’ stay away as soon as he says, “I live at home without a job.” The guys? Well, some of them actually do live at home or don’t have a job so most of them usually talk with my friend about videogames, sports, hobbies, etc.

Tells you a lot about women when you pretend to be not-so-well-off but yet have good qualities such as honesty, loyalty, kindness, and even being multi-faceted (in my friend’s case being a great actor!)

——————————————————-

At 12:26 AM, Al said…

Very funny! Fight back man.

——————————————————-

At 1:54 AM, phoenix said…

No doubt some mangina will come in here commenting about his “high powered wife” that makes more than him, and their happy marriage (or maybe just relationship, I don’t think they mention marriage usually). There will also be a woman posing as a man, probably using the name Bob, that will post the same thing. Both need not occur, and they are fairly interchangeable since the effect and mentality of the poster are exactly the same.

They told us to cook and clean for ourselves. Funny thing about that, as the more responsible sex, that is exactly what we did. We’re not the ones that eat out every night and travel to exotic locations, we knew we’d save money by cooking, and we learned in the process that not only is it not difficult, frankly, the food tastes so much better than what you can generally buy at a restaurant, especially if it’s a fast food place. You girls said it was oppression, but you missed something: by making cooking, sewing, cleaning and homemaking your sole domain, you prevented men from carrying out these tasks and made yourselves indispensable! As soon as you refused to do these tasks, and demanded men “share” in the tasks, you removed the social stigma of these tasks being women’s tasks! The end result is that men in droves learned these tasks for themselves! With that vital, vital bargaining chip gone, a woman only has her personality and looks to go by. Western women waste their looks by refusing to get married at a young age when they have them, and also they insist on having rotten personalities at all ages. Now great looks and a rotten personality WILL get you sex in your 20s, and you can even position yourself into marriage with some of the weaker men, but when you refuse to do even that, at 30, you have absolutely nothing left.

So ladies, you wanted your high powered career. We’re not intimidated, and frankly, even with the affirmative action programs you still wouldn’t have made the “gains” you have…the biggest reason you have all these jobs is that we don’t fucking care. We worked our asses off to provide for you and our children, so that you would not have to. But now you aren’t grateful, and the children have no respect, so why should we work ourselves into an early grave? We can cook and clean, so our expenses are fairly low without you.

Being a high earner, for a man, requires intellect, luck, personality, and above all, extreme dedication and effort. Those of us that have all the former traits will not want to engage in the latter. Not when we can coast by. Not when, if we do put the effort in, we can retire in our 30s by avoiding you. Yes, that’s right, since our salaries don’t go to shoes and dresses and expensive designer purses, we put away money every month which we can then invest. Some of my friends have actually already begun the process in their early/mid 20s, they don’t have gfs.

——————————————————-

At 1:54 AM, arnold ziffel said…

Duncan,

Your last paragraph nicely sums up the overall situation, and describes what I have seen among women of my acquaintance.

I have a question for my English colleagues – what is a 2:1 degree (mentioned in the article)? An academic honors designation? Just asking.

——————————————————-

At 2:19 AM, k-dog said…

Quote from the article, cited specifically in Duncan’s comments:

“[W]omen now make up 57% of university graduates and outnumber men in every subject in higher education (though not engineering or maths, yet).”

Engineering, science, and mathematics are dying a not-so-slow death, so you can forget them in the near future for men and women. When your industrial capabilities have departed, you really don’t need these professions any more. Instead, they go where the manufacturing is: now, China and India.

At least one commentator, Paul Craig Roberts (who was in President Ronald Reagan’s administration), is saying he expects the death of engineering as a profession soon in the US. As the US goes, the UK and other (formerly) industrialized countries can’t be far behind. The jobs situation for most of the engineering, scientific, and mathematical trades is terrible in the US, and what jobs do exist are often outsourced or filled by foreigners brought in on special jobs visas at far lower pay.

Again, if you don’t produce anything any more, you don’t need people in those fields. They will go down the same path as computer science and information technology have been doing for the last 10 years.

Of course, much of the drive to move production overseas to save money was driven by massive consumption and consumerism—and we know which sex drives those. Clue: it ain’t men.

The dirty little secret in the US, and probably increasingly true in the UK, Canada, and elsewhere, is that far too many university diplomas are awarded each year in all fields, and far too many degree holders are chasing far too few jobs requiring their education and training. This has resulted in employers requiring bachelor’s degrees for entry-level service jobs, among other distortions.

The jobs categories expected to show the greatest increases in the US over the next several years either are low-paid service positions requiring no university and little training, or blue-collar trades requiring specialized technical training: examples of the latter are plumbers and vehicle mechanics.

Women will either have to marry “down” or simply not marry. But they got what they thought they wanted. Now they shall have to live with it.

——————————————————-

At 4:03 AM, ntk said…

Boo hoo! I can barely contain my grief. LOL!

The sobbing-croc picture next post down is a good description of what we are all thinking right now, I’d venture.

——————————————————-

At 6:46 AM, Darren said…

Seems that the only time women care about men dropping out of education is when they are looking for a husband. Says it all really.

——————————————————-

At 7:59 AM, allan said…

I guess if they can’t find a man they could find a woman,which would be the ideal feminist solution. These days they can probably get maintenance as well when it falls apart.

——————————————————-

At 8:27 AM, Anonymous said…

I was wondering… why is being an ‘Eternal Spinster’ such a bad thing? Biological instincts? Societal pressure?

Go for it sisters! You can get your advanced degrees, careers, parties, boytoys, shopping sprees etc. Cats and dildos too.

——————————————————-

At 11:00 AM, Dr David Banner said…

To hell with dating a waste of time.The journos and their female clientèle don’t get it -even yet – soon men wont be in the work place my place is almost completely bereft of men now.
Truth is I having had no end of hassle with female customers and staff DONT WANT women around anytime. My friends who are married I find I dont want their wives around because we have a happier time without them around.
Note that husband material must be suited to her whims her career her needs MEMEMEMEMEEMEMEME!
1st Marriage strike then the dating strike then the GENERAL STRIKE! MEN should collapse the matriarchy by walking out on it.

——————————————————-

At 1:05 PM, Anonymous said…

I came across an old article and I found the following statement makes me very surprised.

“Yet the loss in national productivity that this trend portends is not a concern to some. Jacqueline Woods, executive director of the American Association of University Women, denies that men’s declining enrollments is a crisis or even a gender issue. She notes that those concerned about boys’ sagging educational performance are “playing a zero-sum game” and says “I refuse to play.” Columnist Ellen Goodman dismisses boy-friendly educational reformers as being motivated by the fact that “educated women have always made some people nervous.” She, Woods and writer Barbara Ehrenreich argue that the college gender gap is another example of the disadvantages faced by women! According to Ehrenreich, “men…suspect they can make a living just as well without a college education, since they still have such an advantage over women in the non-professional workforce.

I just don’t understand why they have such a stupid mentality towards this issue. I live in an Asia country and feminism is not strong as the western countries, and yet women in my country also facing this problem too. 60% to 70%
of college graduates are girls in my country too. Newspapers always highlight this problem and the government is at loss on this issue. We don’t really have these horrible stories such as women ripping their husband just because they are bored or so on. But I also
read stories about women’s infidelities too so asian women also cheat too, but the percentage is very small.

——————————————————-

At 2:06 PM, nevo said…

Men, do not be fooled by marriage.
Enjoy your new freedom from the shackles of marriage.

Nevo

——————————————————-

At 3:28 PM, Anonymous said…

The link is to the Telegraph, reporting that the woman you mentioned in the previous post (crocodile tears) has been found against in the civil case brought by her ex-partner. He was awarded 22,000 (against the 100K he wanted).

——————————————————-

At 3:39 PM, Peregrine John said…

How women show their shallowness!

Show what? “Women are considered deep – why? Because one can never discover any bottom to them. Women are not even shallow.” – Nietzsche

——————————————————-

At 4:32 PM, Anonymous said…

Have a look at the latest UK cosmopolitan magazine, there’s an article about women lying to get pregnant including several anecdotes that are pretty horrific. It pretty much sums up why there needs to be a men’s movement

——————————————————-

At 7:01 PM, Anonymous said…

Behind every strong woman is a weak man.

——————————————————-

At 8:27 PM, Anonymous said…

My looks didn’t attract the sort of wealthy, intelligent men like Michael. Instead, they were seedy or unintelligent men who thought, mistakenly, that I would be the right woman for them.”

If you do not have alot of money you are not intelligent!!

Poor deluded 40 year old!!!!

——————————————————-

At 8:38 PM, Anonymous said…

The CHO (Chief Household Officer) is off for two weeks. She had some work done and is worried of being replaced. By a younger Model. Women are a train wreck. She just does not get it. Anyway I go to the Bank today to Deposit a check. Wearing very casual clothes. I left the Mercedes 550 S in the garage.

I inform the cashier that I have a commercial account there. She does not want to cash a small check. The Branch Manager sees me and has a near heart attack. Comes over and apologizes for me having to wait in line. Scolds the Cashier. Who he then shows my account. Over $85,000,000.

I just chuckle at the absurdity of it. Thank the Branch Manager and tell him its no big deal. I don’t get out of my office enough to interact with people. And I enjoy talking to regular Folks when I do.

My COO has a fit over it. I laugh and tell him, “We are taking a payment Wednesday for over $20,000,000 who cares”? He laughs finally at it himself.

——————————————————-

At 8:52 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

Behind every strong woman is a weak man

And in front of her an even stronger man fucking her, whilst the weak man pays for the stronger man’s kids he believes to be his kids.

Sad but true.

——————————————————-

At 9:24 PM, Mark said…

Re the Paternity fraud verdict referred to by Anonymous 3:28…

This is EXCELLENT news. Of course it remains to be seen whether this judgement is overturned on appeal, but for now, the very fact that her repeated deceits have been recognised as fraud is a major step towards the victims of such deception getting at least SOME justice.

Also, Anonymous 4:32, any chance you (or someone) could post the Cosmo article you refer to? As I understand it, there is an exemption under copyright law for discussion and commentary, as long as you provide details of the source. See here.
——————————————————-

At 9:27 PM, Anonymous said…

Behind every strong woman is a weak man.

Inside every strong woman is an inadequate girl.

Overbearing women produce mentally damaged, depraved sons (e.g., Barbara Bush begat a son GWB).

——————————————————-

At 9:31 PM, Anonymous said…

I’m a guy with two university degrees in difficult subjects. Therefore I must be entitled to a super-hot chick. I’d like this one if possible:

…Well if wimmin can demand, why can’t we!?!?!?!?

——————————————————-

At 12:24 AM, Anonymous said…

“The simple fact of the matter is that it has been proven over and over that a woman who marries ‘down’ may find the relationship novel at first, but will then quickly lose any and all respect for the husband- guaranteed.”

I have seen this many times. Women who are more successful than their husbands or even women who do not work and have unsuccessful husbands, look down on their men. I have never seen a woman have genuine respect for a weak or unsuccessful man. All of these feminist women still want to marry (or at least by fucked by) their superior but are still obsessed with fairness and “equality.”

To K-Dog, writing about Paul Craig Roberts. Mr. Robert’s articles appear on the web zine VDare which addresses issues of outsourcing quite often. VDare even occasionally has an article supporting anti-feminism (it is a conservative site). If you are American, you can contact Congress with free faxes regarding outsourcing with NumbersUSA and FAIR.

www.vdare.com

www.numbersusa.com

www.fairus.org

——————————————————-

At 2:08 PM, patriarchal phoenix said…

Behind every strong woman is a weak man

And in front of her an even stronger man fucking her, whilst the weak man pays for the stronger man’s kids he believes to be his kids.

Sad but true.

And walking away from that ménage à trois of insanity, is Man Going His Own Way.

——————————————————-

At 2:49 PM, Anonymous said…

more reasons why i only visit escorts and prostitutes(legal in the U.K and Canada). that way I will remain single without repressing my urges for sex and intimacy

sephardic-male in Canada

——————————————————-

At 3:40 PM, Anonymous said…

Feminism is just Marxism in drag; these emotionally out of control imbeciles don’t see that they’re doing their part to destroy the family as we have known it. It being the brick of civilization, once it’s gone, liberty will follow as the sheep will only have one provider to look to (Big Sister, i.e. the all powerful socialist state). The dumbing down of the West is bearing bitter fruit indeed.

——————————————————-

At 4:25 PM, Anonymous said…

Fellas,

The below is a bit off topic but a must read. It will curl your hair:

http://www.womensinfidelity.com

Fellas, it’s a jungle out there. Be careful.

——————————————————-

At 10:23 PM, k-dog said…

Anonymous 12:24 am, I am quite familiar with VDare.com. That’s how I most easily keep up with Mr. Roberts’s columns. Thanks!

——————————————————-

At 3:59 PM, Anonymous said…

The female investment banker and the waiter should last together about as long as Liz Taylor and Larry Fortensky did.

——————————————————-

At 5:00 PM, Mike said…

Duncan I fucking love your blog!

That’s right after decades of Women claiming that marriage is slavery and pushing men out of the work place they can fucking suffer and work stressful 9 or 10 hour days to support their husband and any kids that come along.

Fuck ’em i’d be more then happy to marry up and sit at home on her dime. I already enjoy cooking as a hobby and cleaning only takes about 1 or 2 hours a day. Let her slave away at work while I relax all day.

——————————————————-

At 8:16 PM, Anonymous said…

Another great article, Duncan. Good grief, what rich man in his right mind would want a middle-aged feminist golddiger when he could get someone much younger and less jaded? The middle-aged-spinsters-of-tomorrow will be more likely to land a weak, cowardly, male doormat than a confident man with a decent income. Hope springs eternal, I guess. So does delusion.

——————————————————-

At 12:23 PM, phoenix said…

Mike:

I’m sorry to tell you that it doesn’t work that way. I mean even if the woman were to support you, she would inspect your work and then nag you constantly about it. That is the final step men need to take, nag women to death, so that they don’t question us at all. If you tell a woman she did something wrong she will go crazy, but meanwhile, women will make up nitpicky things if you do anything.

It’s always a good idea to look at how your mother acts, because generally that is what your wife will be like too. Now my mother would always constantly criticize my cooking and cleaning, so that I’d eventually give up doing any of that when I lived with my parents. After all, if she is going to constantly bitch about it, I might as well just not do anything and enjoy myself. After I moved out, it became apparent to me that I’m a great cook, and that my place is either really clean or that it just doesn’t need to be cleaned anyway. I never get sick, and I don’t notice anything being dirty. Meanwhile at home I did get sick, I guess she wasn’t quite as good at cleaning and cooking as she thought she was.

——————————————————-

At 4:35 AM, Anonymous said…

mikeray….”Shahnaz, is now 41 and not only is she still single, she is also still a virgin.”

Holy crap! Then again, it’ll take at least a keg for me to get the beer google effect to work on THAT!

coldhammer..

So what bike did you decide to get?

BladeMonkey

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: