11 April 2007
There was an amusing comment posted today at some very old post of mine. It’s hard to make out what the point is amidst the general rambling and abuse but it seems to be yet another woman incapable of grasping the fact that men may voluntarily spurn the idea of marriage and long-term relationships with women.
Well welcome all and one of the same to men who have obviously only ever had there own hand for company.
Fucking hell this is a grammatical nightmare, although I did at least spot the first evidence of shaming language there: “You are teh virgins and wankerz!!!1”
Its true, i am a woman…
Snigger. I’d never have guessed.
Why do women always do that? Point out “I am a woman!” That’s why you can spot women pretending to be men on blogs/forums so quickly; they point out “I am a man” within the first couple of sentences, something actual men do not find it necessary to do do.
…and I too know we whine and moan. But you “bachelors” are bein the exact same by having this blog.
Ah, so only women may complain then eh? Maybe us men should all STFU and let you women hog the airwaves with your endless (and invariably imaginary) complaints.
Yes, my child, I am listening.
…find yourself one of your “oh so many” slags and get over your sad life.
I do not have slags, just the occasional one that pops by my blog.
What are the chances that if you dislike hearing about horrid teen slutty stories..you should stop hanging out with them.
The day women have children without men will be the day you die in arse buddie.
Die in arse? That sounds a strange way to go.
Furthermore, women cannot have children without men. Did you not pay attention to sex education lessons?
Geeze what are the chances you have a coffee in one hand and your incredably samll cock in the other.
Ah, I thought it was about time we had a small cock remark.
Thats right, not only did you sink low enough to be in the sluts catagory, but you lost to them.
I am not following the logic. Oh wait, there is none.
Yours truly, some random who found your blog.
Some random what? Some random fuckwit it appears.
p.s bet your fat and fucking ugly arse hole.
Actually I’m slim and not bad looking, if I may say so myself, but thanks for the psychological projection anyway.
Now go away, silly person.
posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:23 PM
At 6:47 PM, Javier said…
What a load of grammatical vomit (and painfully hard to read at that). Actually, science is making it more and more likely women WILL be able to conceive without a man (there’s a name for it, but it escapes me at the moment). But, even so, two things immediately come to mind:
(1) What happens when this new amazonian race gives birth to male children? Kill them? Nurture them like today? What happens when they become men?
(2) If women (like this poster) believe in an all-female world, does she not realize that they will revert to prehistoric times ina matter of years without men’s labor to sustain the infrastructure? I mean, who will build/maintain the roads, buildings, etc. – women? LOL!
At 7:40 PM, K. said…
Hell, I don’t know what you look like, but if given the chance I would sooooo marry you 😛
I love how she thinks insults like “You must have a small cock” are legitimate in any form of arguement.
At 7:42 PM, Thunderchild said…
You missed a field day with the Natalie Evans/Frozen Embryos ruling !
At 7:44 PM, Anonymous said…
Thats right, not only did you sink low enough to be in the sluts catagory, but you lost to them.
She believes not to be a slut. Women today do not even know the definition of slut anymore.
The slut today believes to be a good woman!
Actually a woman needs to be qualified for marriage: she needs to be able to cook, clean, love children, be good at housekeeping.
Most women think it is oppression to do these duties, but forget that men do their traditional duties without moaning: providing for her and protecting her.
Additionally women need to be fertile, which means young. At 30 men instinctively know that a womans fertility is dramatically reduced and sometimes gone.
At 34 a woman is much too old and could be a grandma.
The perfect age for marriage is between 14 and 16 and in former times girls married at this age in Great Britain.
Then they have plenty of time to have many children.
Today instead the same girls have sex between 14 and 16, leaving them with children out of wedlock, at the pill, with STDs and loosing their precious virginity.
ARE YOU QUALIFIED?
No, sadly you are not.
At 7:59 PM, Captain Zarmband said…
Priceless Duncan! Who is it, Vicky Pollard? There is one thing to be said about one’s hand and that is that one cannot contract horrible whore infections from it. Oh and she forgot to tell you to “grow up” in the manner that most of the female shaming brigade usually do.
At 8:20 PM, Tainted said…
Duncan, if I promised to donate a penny to you every time a femtard used one of their cut-and-paste shame attacks, you wouldn’t need to work.
At 8:32 PM, Field Marshall Watkins said…
Hahaha, funny shit Duncan. 🙂
Ah they definitely don’t make them like they used to…
At 8:38 PM, Hmh said…
Probably some pathetic fat slapper who can’t handle being told anything negative. Women, if you’re reading, everything that Duncan Idaho writes about is real and happening around me every day. At least a third of the women of my generation will never be able to marry because they don’t meet the basic, minimum requirements that any sane man wants in a wife and potential mother. No, we don’t want fat slappers, skanks with three kids by three fathers, psychopathic stalkers, sociopathic manipulators, money-grabbing divorcers, or even whiney losers who are no fun to be with.
Shape up or spinster out.
At 9:03 PM, Peregrine John said…
That might score a bingo in one kind of short rant! It’s either the quintessential femmetroll or a really good parodist.
At 10:50 PM, NHY said…
Women, seeing that there game is being figured out, are resorting to all sorts of tactics to try and stay ahead of males, including this stupidly hard to read rant full of worn out shaming tactics by one which looks like a 5 year old boy could do better at!
Its NOT working, ladies. Pure and simple. By your own fault, the rights of men and children are being violated so that you can have a good time because thats all you care about, bitches!
We’re all getting increasingly impatient with being put down by your type.
So please, go away.
At 11:56 PM, mfsob said…
Oh the painnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn of being subjected to shaming language such as this! I feel, I feel … victimized!
Does this mean I can live on the dole for the rest of my life?
At 1:55 AM, Anonymous said…
Haha – what a retard!
Not only is this woman exposing her stupidity, but revealing her disrespect for the English language as well.
People who cannot grasp basic spelling and grammar need to understand that their criticisms will be consequently undermined.
Although, I am sure this slagging dolt is content to believe;
“Az long az I izz getin me point across, like!!!”
At 2:57 AM, Anonymous said…
Well I’m just going to say it, yes, females can reproduce without male sperm but they will all be “clones” (there is a lizard species that are all female). All the sistas & mothers will be identical. This is BAD for a species because A) If there is a serious disease & their blood can’t fight it, extinction B) No strength or uniqueness in the species C) Might not be able to compete. There is a reason why there is too sexes.
At 7:26 AM, Anonymous said…
Today will be the day you “die in arse”.
I am imagining a guy’s face being smothered by huge female ass cheeks, ahaaha omg! I can’t stop laughing.
At 5:48 PM, Paul Parmenter said…
Thunderchild is right.
Sorry to wander off topic, but as the subject has been raised already I can’t resist a comment. It’s damned important. I have been waiting to see how many MRA blogs picked up on the Natallie (that’s how she spells it) Evans case, but it seems to have slipped off everyone’s radar.
But wake up guys! Mark the date: 10 April 2007. It should go down in history. The day the judges of the European Court of Human Rights drew a line in the sand and stopped the march of feminism in its tracks. At least on one front. The day that the Court told women that they have no right to ignore the wishes of the man who has donated his sperm. The day that true equality between the sexes was stamped on an issue relating to reproductive rights, an issue where men have been losing ground for decades against the onslaught of selfish “I wanna, I wanna” women.
Ms Evans had spent 5 years trying to wriggle out of a binding agreement that it required both her and her ex-boyfriend to agree that the frozen embryos could be used to make a baby. 5 years trying to force a man to become a father against his will, and subjecting him to waves of emotional and moral blackmail. 5 years of waving the pussy pass at successive courts in the obvious belief that her demands and buckets of tears would be enough to get her own way. All to be ended finally by the European Court’s decision.
It is sad for the woman involved and a personal blow, but she had to be denied. Justice has been delivered; the pussy pass has met its Waterloo; and we should all be thankful for the decision.
MEN’S RIGHTS DO MATTER AFTER ALL!
Now I ask why the same principle cannot be extended to abortions…
At 6:45 PM, Anonymous said…
Any man wise enough is most likely immune to all the oh-so-predictable patterns of shaming language engaged by the Sistahood.
Shaming language – us men won’t get angry. We’ll laugh, or tell the facts, or just ignore the shrews. No other action necessary.
At 8:17 PM, VoodooJock said…
You shouldn’t be so hard on the grammar. In fact, you should all admire this woman. It’s quite a big step to go from “moo” as your only means of communication to typing on the internet.
At 9:03 AM, serendipity said…