21 April 2007
This rather grisly comment was made at an article in The Times I pointed out earlier this week. It’s not pleasant reading, but does show the horror of one of the favourite hobbies of feminists; abortions.
As a trainee doctor I had to watch a late abortion. The girl, we were told, was pregnant through no fault of her own. Possibly she didn’t know that sex was all about making babies. The operation was full of euphemisms. At no point was the victim identified as a baby and only once as a foetus. Reference was made to ‘stopping the heart’ as if the heart didn’t belong to anyone. At no point was it mentioned that the baby was being killed or was dead. In fact the dismemberment was carried out with the heart still beating because it took too long to stop. The ‘contents of the uterus’ were extracted – arms, legs, torso and a head like a cracked egg dripping white brains. The ‘products of conception’ were then checked and the procedure deemed successful. This is not what I signed up for. I want to help heal, not kill. Instead of talking about abortion it would be more honest to say ‘killing unborn babies’ because that is what happens.
And that procedure, of course, is what feminists applaud and celebrate, and they get all pissed off should any of us men dare to condemn it, or even have an opinion on the subject.
Feminists are the ones who should be dismembered alive.
posted by Duncan Idaho @ 12:54 PM
At 1:06 PM, Martin said…
This is such a tough one.
If there’s a heart that beats, then it’s a fucking human.
That post really made me sad to some extent.
At 1:09 PM, Martin said…
Thanks mum for letting me live..the ULTIMATE motherly act. My mom gave me up for adoption when she was 16 despite the fact that her mother , my grandmother , is pro abortion. It was the 70’s and she hid her pregnancy till the 6 or 7th month , so thank God they let me live. Well, I’ve been married for 10 years and have children I love dearly.
Of Course, ms. Moran wrote an article trying to promote her position on murder. She murdered her own flesh and blood. Why can’t ladies give up 9 months of their life for another?
Pope John Paul II was right , we do live in a culture of death.
A comment from the site. It says a lot, does’nt it?
At 1:53 PM, Captain Zarmband said…
This is truly horrific but not as shocking as witnessing late abortions. In reality the baby is chopped up into small pieces to facilitate its removal from the mother. This is done with a tool that resembles a pair of shears. The little baby has its legs, arms and head chopped way and each part, together with the torso, can then be removed. The idea that this baby is just a collection of cells soon becomes obviously wrong when the dismembered baby is revealed.
Since abortion was first legalised in Britain, there has been pressure to carry out later and later abortions to a point that now it is quite common to carry out terminations in the manner described above.
And, what’s all that tosh about the woman being pregnant through no fault of her own? What happened to her – did the baby fairy come and visit her in the night?
The fact is that many young women are totally reckless about contraception and their own health. They will regularly have totally unprotected sex in the knowledge that they can flush away their mistakes courtesy of an abortion paid for by the British taxpayer. They have little respect for themselves or the life of their unborn child. Feminism has taught these women and young girls that all that matters is their choices and their own selfish indulgence.
At 2:01 PM, Anonymous said…
Jesus thats sick how can anyone support that
At 2:15 PM, Anonymous said…
Feminists are evil.
At 3:49 PM, Anonymous said…
………………. .. … /´ /)
……………….. ..,../¯ ..//
……………….. …./… ./ /
……………….. ..,/¯ ..//
……………….. ./… ./ /
………./’/…/… ./… …./¨¯\
……..(‘(…´(… ……. ,~/’…’)
………\………. ….. ..\/…./
……….”…\…. ….. . _.•´
…………\……. ….. ..(
…………..\….. ….. …\
At 4:00 PM, Anonymous said…
WHETHER ABORTION SHOULD BE LEGAL OR NOT IS BESIDE THE POINT,
THE POINT IS, THE FEMALE BODY IS THE INCUBATOR OF GENERATION FOR ALL HUMANITY, YET A YOUNG WOMAN IS SCHOOLED ON HOW TO BECOME A SLUT IN A MILLION TIMES MORE DETAIL THAN ANY MEAGER EDUCATION SHE MIGHT GET ON HOW SACRED THE LEGACY OF HER BODY IS AND HOW SERIOUS A MATTER IT IS TO ACCEPT A LOAD OF SPERM INTO YOUR BODY.
IT STANDS TO THE PATHETIC NATURE OF MOST PEOPLE THAT THE DEBATE IS SIMPLY ABOUT CHOICE, THE DEBATE SHOULD BE WHY DONT I HAVE THE CHOICE TO LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE EVERY MIND INSIDE A FEMALE BODY IS NOT HARD WIRED TO APPLY MYRIAD ULTRA ATTRACTION TECHNIQUES, EXPLOITATION OF SEX APPEAL, GENERAL HEDONISTIC IMPERATIVES, AND A NONCHALANT ATTITUDE TOWARDS ACCEPTING DOZENS OF PENISES IN THEIR YOUTH? WHERE IS MY CHOICE? AS A DESCENDANT OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF CIVILIZATION WHY IS MY MODEL INCUBATOR A PANTYLESS STRETCHED CUNT FLASHING TO PAPPARAZI AS IT GETS OUT OF A LIMO WITH PARIS HILTON, AFTER SHAVING THE SAID CUNT TO RESEMBLE A CHILD, A CRUEL DECEIT INDEED AS IMPURITY CANNOT BE MASKED BY A RAZOR, AND A HEAD SHAVED TOO, WITH A MOUTHFUL OF PAXIL? THIS IS THE STOCK WE HAVE AND WE EVEN GIVE A FUCK ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING? EVEN WITH A JURASSIC ERA OZONE LAYER TO ENJOY, THE HUMAN FILTH SLIDING AROUND THIS PLANET WOULD STILL CAUSE MASS EXTINCTION WITHIN A COUPLE OF CENTURIES. WHY CAN’T I KILL A WOMAN WHO WRONGS ME? WHEN A WOMAN CAN KILL HER BABY JUST BECAUSE SHE’S “DEPRESSED”? WHY LET BARBARIANISM INTO SOME FACETS OF LIFE AND NOT OTHERS? WHY CAN’T I KILL A COP? I SURE FUCKING WANT TO.
At 4:29 PM, Caransebes said…
“Feminists are the ones who should be dismembered alive.”
At 9:55 PM, Anonymous said…
I despise abortion, but if we must have them legal because of the rampant promiscuity of todays youth at least have the decency to not allow it to go late term.
I for one cannot imagine having sex with a woman knowing she had voluntarily used her life giving womb as a killing chamber and had dismembered baby parts pulled out of her vagina. Bye Bye erection, hello nightmares.
At 9:58 PM, Anonymous said…
Captain, you are on point. Women such as the author of the article act as if the baby magically spontaneously arrived in her womb. Meanwhile she spends 2 hours a day spackleing her face in order to make it easier to seduce men. Thats all these women do. Seduce men. Trick them. Get the to do what they want. And women congratulate each other on it. Then, when the obvious repercussions of this behavior come about, just vacuum the little bastard out of your uterus. Problem solved. better yet, ITS THE MORAL THING TO DO.
At 10:39 PM, the sad geek said…
Oh man, I’m gone be sick.
Once more, reality eclipses the vilest horror movie.
Women preparing for a late abortion should be forced to watch one before going through with it. You know, informed consent.
At 11:30 PM, Anonymous said…
furthermore… the baby is viewed as an ‘accident’. As if the PURPOSE IS NOT PROCREATION BUT SEXUAL TEMPTATION. Pregnancy is an unfortunate side effect of this service rendered for payment. This has long been the source of power for bitchy women all the way back to Jezebel and Semiramis.
At 11:31 PM, Anonymous said…
they can start by watching this:
At 11:43 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…
This is why I have preached for so long that women are heartless beasts. I can think of nothing more evil than a woman willing to kill her own child.
I’m not a Christian, but surely there must be a hell for a woman that could commit such a crime, or for the women who support it.
At 1:19 AM, Anonymous said…
Captain Zarmband and Anon 4:00 – you are spot on! The late comic Bill Hicks, in his famous Chicago Meltdown performance (while yelling at a drunk female heckler), put it best: “….I got a cunt and I’m drunk – I can do anything I want….I don’t have a cock….that gives me Carte Blanche……(to the woman) I want you to go find a fucking soul!!” and doesn’t society pretty much teach women that? “pregnant through no fault of her own.” Also, I don’t know about the UK, but in America, the press has done away with the term “pro-life.” Now all they say is anti-abortion protesters. Hmmmmmm afraid they might awaken their concious I guess. years ago, I slept with a girl who later told me she had an abortion a few months before we met. I couldn’t eat or sleep for days – what disturbed me most was how Casual she said it. Indeed, these women need to go find a soul!
At 2:56 AM, Anonymous said…
“Feminists are the ones who should be dismembered alive.”
Amen, Duncan. Not only do we need to overthrow feminism, we should bring back public executions for these sick fucks. The United States stands alone among developed Western countries in using the death penalty (which we use quite a bit); we can’t Britain bring it back?
At 5:21 AM, Anonymous said…
At 10:20 AM, Anonymous said…
So our government will take a stand against stem cell research for idealogical reasons, but, for murder, it will side with the feminists? What a worthless, spineless group of leaders we have elected. I’ve half a mind to elect an all female congress and a female president, just to see if they’d at least take some sort of stand. Our male politicians obviously don’t cut it.
At 10:38 AM, DanielleB said…
God this article really was horrific, how can women do this?
As a woman myself the only time I would have an abortion is if the child I was carrying had some horrible disease that would affect his/her life and then you can’t always believe what doctors say. I knew someone who had a late abortion, she couldn’t make her mind up whether to keep the baby or not and waited til 20 weeks. I was angry with her and am now even more angry knowing what happened to her unborn child, thats just sick.
To me a baby is alive the minute the sperm fertilises the egg, not when the heart starts beating.
Women who have unprotected sex piss me off, why should taxpayers pay for their stupidity. I can’t believe the morning-after-pill is now available over the counter, is that not saying “go out and have unprotected sex because now you don’t have to go through the embarrassment of your doctor knowing you’re a slut who gives it away”
I am truly ashamed to be a woman sometimes!
At 12:59 PM, Anonymous said…
Yep, another boneheaded comment by some dumb twit. Killing a baby ain’t the right thing to do. This “my body, my business” argument needs to be dumped, because it shows how ig’nant someof these wimmin are. It ain’t her body if the baby parts have different DNA code, it ain’t a parasite because parasites are of different species than you.
This is just another slogan, invoke only when you no longer able to make a logical argument.
Danielleb @ 10:38am…..
Even when multitudes of regular contraceptive methods (Plan A), many women still want the “morning after” pill, aka “Plan B”, to be available. Apparently some of the “fairer sex” are just too dumb to use Plan A. Hell, just seeing anybody with a bumper sticker urging a boycott of anyone who ain’t carrying “Plan B” drugs pretty much confirm my suspicion about their intelligence and whether or not their parents are closer than first cousins.
At 1:40 PM, Field Marshall Watkins said…
There’s a phrase to describe women who have had abortions as a lifestyle choice.
Feminists are working hard to dehumanize the act of murdering babies and men. Which, of course, is what they want.
As to feminists. Nothing is more important that what a women wants, and when she wants it. NOTHING. Life, death, society, humanity. The entire civilization and everything in it only matters if feminist’s say it does.
Fucking cult of death.
At 2:38 PM, Anonymous said…
DanielleB said… she would kill her baby if it was a retard. So its ok to kill retards before they cross the Rubicon through your cunt flaps? Why not kill seven year old retards? Whats wrong with that? As usual you have no fucking idea where you stand you are too bamboozled by the power of your sex organs, you women of today are not smart enough to even own a set of ovaries.
I personally advocate, survival of the fucking fittest.
At 6:27 PM, Anonymous said…
People who want to kill retarded kids are themselves retarded by their own selfishness.
At 7:08 PM, Danielleb said…
anonymous said “DanielleB said… she would kill her baby if it was a retard. So its ok to kill retards before they cross the Rubicon through your cunt flaps? Why not kill seven year old retards? Whats wrong with that? As usual you have no fucking idea where you stand you are too bamboozled by the power of your sex organs, you women of today are not smart enough to even own a set of ovaries.”
I said some horrible disease, I didn’t mention retarded. I wouldn’t want to bring a child in the world who is going to suffer so much pain and who could possibly die at a very young age. Is it so wrong for me to believe that?
I know where I stand and what I believe in, my sex organs do not run my life. I have never slept around, nor have I had an abortion or needed the morning-after-pill.
Each to their own I say, you have your opinion and I have mine. At least have the decency to put a name on your post instead of anonymous.
At 9:19 PM, Anonymous said…
Dont know if any of you men have heard about this cunt, Mary the “crown princess of Denmark” anyway she’s in the news because she decided not to kill her latest baby and she shat out some slut progeny and future taxpayer funded lurk today.
Read the fucking article…
Anyway she’s all over the fucking news in australia cause she hails from ashtraylia.
This is her story,
She slutted her fucking way around until 28 or 29 when she heard some royals were drinking at a local sydney pub during the olympics, and guess the kicker, here it is, the pub is called the “Slip Inn” no fucking joke, the SLIP INN!!!! hahahahha the crone fucking opened her silky impure box to some fucking privileged son and now she’s princess diana? Fucking hell, I sure hope she meets the same fate as Diana too. The slip inn? Can you fucking get over that? Amazing. Slip this bitch!
At 11:02 PM, Anonymous said…
I’m American Roman Catholic. As one previous poster stated: “JP II had it right. We live in a culture of death.” Don’t mean to be a “bible thumper” but the following passages in the context of abortion are compelling:
1. Isaiah 44:2 (CEV) “I am your Creator. You were in my care before you were born.”
2. Jer 1:5 (CEV).
3. Job 10: 8-12 (CEV).
4. PS 139: 15-16 (CEV).
All the best.
At 4:00 AM, Christopher in oregon said…
Even DanielleB advocates abortion sometimes. It’s virtually impossible to find any woman anywhere who feels that life is sacred, and abortion is murder.
As I’ve always said, women are killers to the core- every damn one of them.
At 2:56 PM, Anonymous said…
“DanielleB said… she would kill her baby if it was a retard. So its ok to kill retards before they cross the rubicon through your cunt flaps? Why not kill seven year old retards?”
Why not? They’re a fucking drain on society and are polluting our gene pool.
At 3:07 PM, Anonymous said…
If feminists consider abortion as such a wonderful thing, allowing women to have control of their bodies and sexual freedom, why don’t they rally against all the women who go for counseling after an abortion, or even the counselors themselves for daring to suggest that these women need help? Why is post- abortion counseling necessary for some women? Obviously they are traumatized by what they just did, but if it was a perfectly normal procedure and a healthy way to control their sexuality, why should they be traumatized? It isn’t about logic or morality to feminists. It is about being inconsistent, and going on your FEELINGS.
At 3:27 PM, Anonymous said…
Working in the medical field, with some OB/GYN training, I have come in contact with several women who have been unable to conceive after their first or second or third abortion. It is well known to be a procedure with potentially damaging effects. It is NOT a viable form of birth control. Individual responsibility is. Keep your legs closed and have some self respect.
Also, let’s stop trying to make ourselves feel better by using euphemisms like “products of conception”. The correct medical term is “fetus”. It has arms and legs and a head and internal organs. It feels pain and can react to its environment. It is ALIVE. Ripping its arms and legs off and beheading it WHILE KNOWING THAT IT IS ALIVE is an act of violence of the worst kind. Using pretty words and dancing around what you are actually doing does not make it any better.
At 3:31 PM, Anonymous said…
I heartily concur with The Sad Geek. “Informed consent” indeed.
At 8:46 PM, Anonymous said…
“DanielleB said… she would kill her baby if it was a retard. So its ok to kill retards before they cross the Rubicon through your cunt flaps? Why not kill seven year old retards?”
“Why not? They’re a fucking drain on society and are polluting our gene pool.”
I personally support eugenics (lightly & not for racial purity), I’m also an anti-feminist.
At 11:23 PM, Ald said…
Life is sacred
Guess what — every second you, your immune system kills a number of all sorts of germs. Germs breathe, reproduce, support homeostasis — they are alive.
You eat every day. Regardless of whether or not you are a vegetarian, a number of plants and animals — all alive — had to be killed to bring the food to the table.
Even if you change your statement to ‘human life is sacred’, again you will run in all sorts of problems. There is an enormous amount of answers to the question ‘who is a human’. So how can you claim that the difference between you and someone else that defines ‘human’ differently is nothing short of conceptual?
Blaming an apex predator for being a murderer is ridiculous. And what is wrong with killing retards? Were I given power, the entire human population would go down to around one billion in the next fifty years.
At 1:59 AM, Jane said…
Christopher in Oregon, not ALL women are killers.
I am a Catholic woman who does not believe in abortion, no matter what the circumstances.
And their are others too. My own dear mother for one.
Eight years ago when I fell pregnant with my second child, it was discovered (by ultra sound at 16 weeks) that my child had a neural tube defect. Anencepally to be precise!
The doctor told me that my daughter would die at birth or very soon after..
My husband did, at the time reluctantly suggest having an abortion, to spare me any pain and trauma.
But the decision was not mine to make.
God gives life, and only he can take it away.
Of course it wasn’t easy, I was beside myself, wondering how I would cope. So I prayed for strength to cope,as I am really a very weak person.
At 26 weeks my waters broke, and dear little Mary Rose was stillborn.. They dressed her up with a little bonnet on her head.
She had the bluest eyes that I have ever seen..
God certainly gave me the strength to endure this ordeal.
And even though it was extremely hard for me (and my husband who felt so helpless) I was at peace.
Knowing too that our little baby was in heaven, was also comforting.
We had a private funeral, just me and hubby, who composed a little prayer to the daughter we would never get to know on this earth.
Pope John Paul also said.
Any country that kills it’s own children, has no future!
At 7:28 AM, julie said…
My mother found out that she had TB and that our youngest sister was to be born with the side effects. (I hope you know these)
Doctors told her the best solution was to abort the baby yet she came home and ask us 5 children. We argued over whether it should be a girl or boy as we had 2 boys and 3 girls already. My sister was born fine and my mother was a strong Catholic.
I personally kept both my children against the fathers offering to pay for an abortion becuase I am pro life. But I said and stood by the fact he was not responsible.
Now however, he is glad .. but … he was not the nice guy that many of these men are. How sad, women don’t learn from a young age what sort of guy is a good guy.
At 8:51 AM, Anonymous said…
To the stillborn bitch,’
Touching story, and it makes me wonder what the fuck people like you are doing reading this blog, but nonetheless, I think it’s important that you die too, considering you produce genetic crap, and considering you are heavily religious, we don’t need people like you taking up space. I spit on your dead child’s grave!
At 12:58 PM, Caransebes said…
Jane quoted Pope John Paul:
“Any country that kills it’s own children, has no future!”
Amen. We’re seeing that now; the very few nations that have not legalized infanticide must look at those who have, and fight this darkest of evils. Non-spontaneous “abortion” is always evil, like it or not.
“And what is wrong with killing retards? Were I given power, the entire human population would go down to around one billion in the next fifty years.”
If you were given power, the human population would indeed go down, by at least one. My .270 guarantees it.
At 1:22 PM, k-dog said…
Warning: long commentary.
The lack of comment here on the recent US Supreme Court decision upholding a federal ban on what pro-life advocates call “partial-birth abortion” is a little surprising. The medical profession calls the procedure something else, but as Duncan’s article notes, doctors have a way of using technical euphemisms to describe appalling conditions and nasty procedures—such as “products of conception” for fetus. Or unborn baby; see the next paragraph.
The procedure involves partially delivering a baby late in term, stopping midway, sucking its brains out while the head is still inside the mother, then delivering the now stillborn baby. Note that I use the word baby and not fetus. At this stage it’s a baby in my book, and killing it is infanticide. The fetus has long been viable (can survive outside the mother with medical help) by this point.
No one has been able to state a real medical reason for terminating a pregnancy this late in this fashion, except for the vague “health or life of the mother” blather. But she can partially deliver it to enable killing it, then proceed with the rest of the birth? What medical condition could the mother possibly have that would necessitate this?
Bill O’Reilly and other political commentators opposed to this procedure note that even a “headache” is considered sufficient “medical reason” to enable a partial-birth abortion. And don’t forget the ever popular mental health excuses too. But with so many Western women on psychotropic meds, using that as a reason for baby killing shouldn’t really be surprising.
What came out a few years ago in the US, the main country that had allowed this procedure, was that the typical female getting partial-birth abortions would be the spoiled daughter of a wealthy family. A local bad boy/thug gets her pregnant, and her family does not want her to have said thug’s product of conception after she waits till she is obviously pregnant to tell her parents. By the time a female starts to show, as a rough rule of thumb, it’s too late for normal, legal early-term abortions, but that’s where the partial-birth procedure rears its ugly head. Family pays for the procedure, and voila! No more product of conception!
There are hard cases and good reasons for some early-term abortions. No genuine rape victim should be forced to carry her rapist’s child to term. But waiting way past the point of fetal viability to abort is unnecessary, barring some unusual calamity such as gross deformities that the doctors didn’t catch before. Otherwise, put the child up for adoption after birth if you decided to wait that long and realized you don’t want it.
Unfortunately, the fembots have also messed up adoption here in the US with such asinine concepts as “open adoptions” and allowing the birth mother to reclaim the child even years after giving it up, which is the reason so many American couples adopt from overseas—but that’s a topic for another rant at another time.
The tragedy here is that abortion deeply repulses most Americans—and, I would suspect, most Brits, Australians, et al. Few want a real ban (and I don’t either), but in polls most want the federal and state governments to make abortions harder to get, especially to prevent their use as just another form of birth control.
The untrue statement often heard during the Cold War years that the average Russian woman has six abortions was a blatant attempt by certain Presidential administrations to inflame public opinion against the Soviet Union, and with some Americans it did work. The statement played on Americans’ general repulsion at the idea of abortion as simple birth control. Indeed it was in the USSR, but the numbers cited in the US never made sense. The loss of fertility Anonymous 3:27 pm mentions that often happens after a woman has just a couple of abortions makes the statement broadly untrue. The “average” Russian woman having six? Get real.
Yet despite most Americans’ antipathy, the fembots have assured that abortion on demand will remain in place regardless of what frivolous reason someone might have for ending the pregnancy. The Supreme Court ruling simply limits one particularly disgusting procedure that by all accounts was used purely for convenience. It does not represent any likely “slippery slope” to ban all abortions despite the fears of pro-abortion groups.
I suspect that most of us posting here wish those groups had more reason to fear.
At 5:48 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…
Actually, the average American MAN opposes abortion; the average American woman supports it completely. This has been verified by many surveys over the years since the infamous Roe-vs. Wade decision that has led to the slaughter of tens of millions of children.
Again, I’m no Christian, but I can think of no issue that infuriates me and causes me to hate women with a vengeance like abortion. There is no lower crime that can be committed by anyone.
As to the comments by Jane, I’m sorry, but I don’t believe your story. In my 46 years, I have learned that ALL women are liars, and when push comes to shove, ALL women will murder their children. Your religion may have influenced you to some degree, but if not for that, you would be no less a murderer than any other women.
This is the price women must pay. Supposedly “nice” women will suffer for the “sins” of the rest. You are all guilty; you are all murderers.
May you women all rot in hell- every one of you.
At 5:08 AM, k-dog said…
Christopher in Oregon, your response to my comments is broadly true. (An irony is that some of those most vehemently opposed to abortion include a small number of vociferous women, to their credit.) I was just speaking to generalities as expressed in many of the polls that have appeared on the subject. You’re right that when the results are broken down by gender, men oppose and women favor.
Roe v. Wade opened Pandora’s box, and we suffer from the consequences today. According to my limited research on the history on abortion in America, the procedure was just becoming legal under strict rules in some US states when the US Supreme Court issued the Roe ruling in 1973 and forced everyone to accept liberalized abortion, like it or not. Without that ruling, the issue would have remained with the states. And as with no-fault divorce, there seems to have been little or no public demand or lobbying then for that kind of change in the rules.
If you wonder why people increasingly advocate, e.g., euthanasia for the elderly, retarded (as we’ve seen in posts above), and the incurably sick, allowing fetuses to be disposable on the mother’s whim began the change in thinking. Where the Netherlands is now is where most Western countries will be in 10 years or so, and it all began with liberalized abortion on demand.
Fortunately, Duncan’s post reminds us that abortion is still not particularly pleasant for anyone exposed to it, no matter what kind of soothing words are used to describe the procedure. Maybe this will lead one day to positive change. We can hope.
At 5:50 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…
The Christians were accurate when they said that abortion was only the first step. The government will ultimately add a number of “undesirables” to the list as time goes on. Hmm. I do believe Hitler had the same philosophy….
As to The Netherlands, I am aware of their laws on euthanasia. Scary. My brother moved there several years ago to escape his insane ex-wife, and claims he will never come back to the U.S. But, that’s another story for another time.
I rather doubt we will see any positive change with abortion. I think that would require a change of heart for women in general, and you can’t change what you don’t have in the first place.
At 11:46 AM, Jane said…
This about sums it all up for me!
This from Adoro te Devote.
Believe what you will Chris. But firmly entrenched in my soul is an inviolable feeling for the sacredness of human life.
Thank you Duncan for airing my opinions. I agree with much of what you have posted.
I am against abortion.
I am against using men(or women) as a meal ticket.
I think men have been hard done by in the family law courts.Where a woman can bleed a man dry…And break his spirit..
Someone here mentioned, why I have bothered to post on a mens blog.
And I will honestly answer it.
Truth is I felt very sorry for many of you.. I don’t feel that you are at all happy.. But everyone deserves a chance at happiness… And I guess I believed that in my naivety I could give you some hope.
That all women are not bad.. That there is someone for everyone to love.. in this world.
I truly believe this with all my heart..
And to the poor man who said he spits on my unborn childs grave..
I am not in the least offended(though I am sure that was your intention).
I just wish you peace, and hope one day like myself, that you will be truly happy.
At 10:56 PM, Anonymous said…
As a man i had nothing to say about when one of my ex girlfriend decided to make an late abortion. She was pregnant in her 22 weeks of condition, and the state of Sweden had no reason howsoever to talk sense to her. She is pregnant, she wants to make an abort, well thats god enough for us, even thou the fact that her man standing beside her is pleading for his unborn child’s life. Comment later by the doctor, which i overheard. -Two !!healthy!! dead twin girls to be sent to the lab at the pathology, nurse!
At 9:07 PM, k-dog said…
Straight from the doctor’s mouth! This letter appeared in response to syndicated columnist Ellen Goodman’s criticisms of the US Supreme Court decision allowing a ban on partial-birth abortion. He broadly confirms my comments above in this thread about whether the procedure is ever “medically necessary” for the mother.
Richmond Times-Dispatch [Virginia], “Letters to the Editor”, 7 May 2007, p. A10:
Partial-Birth Abortion Never Protects Mother
“Columnist Ellen Goodman uses a broad brush of excuses to argue for partial-birth abortion for the good of a mother’s health.
“As a practicing physician, I know that there are several serious health problems that women can have in late pregnancy. These include severe high blood pressure, brain edema, and seizures—and are best treated by delivering the baby as quickly as possible.
“There are two ways to deliver the baby quickly: vaginal delivery and Caesarian section.
“To deliver the baby vaginally, the physician must pull it all the way out head-first. To help the mother, a physician cannot take the added time to twist the baby in the uterus so that it is delivered breech, pull its feet and body out first (while fighting to keep the head still inside the mother), and then stab the back of the baby’s head and suck its brains out before pulling the baby out the last five inches.
“Such a procedure increases the chances of injuring the mother by not getting the baby out quickly enough.
“To help the mother with a Caesarian birth, the physician would take the baby out as quickly as the uterus is opened. One would not delay by keeping the baby in the mother and sucking the baby’s brains out of its head while it is still in the mother’s womb. This would add a significant amount of time to a procedure when time is of the essence.
“There is absolutely no ‘health of the mother’ reason for partial-birth abortion. It is a specious argument to attempt to make excuses to allow the killing a full-term infant for someone else’s convenience.
“The Supreme Court made a wise decision.”
—A. John Kuta, M.D.
At 4:17 AM, C said…
I’m sick of seeing little babies killed and mutilated.
I think they should just abort the women. Two birds with one stone.