Selfish woman wants sympathy for leaving motherhood far too late


——————————————————-

05 April 2007

Why two miscarriages and a termination has not deterred a wannabe mum

After three pregnancies, one reluctant termination and two miscarriages, Louise Janson has just embarked on her fifth cycle of IVF at the age of 41.

Louise, a writer from North London, is single. Having always longed to be a mother, she made the difficult decision to try for a baby on her own four years ago.

Why the fuck are women who choose to become Single Mothers By Choice always thought of as ‘brave’ or applauded for making a ‘difficult decision’? They’re selfish fucking bitches making selfish decisions. I hate them. Single Mothers By Choice are repulsive child abusers.

I’m undergoing medical treatment as a direct result of a social problem: I’m single. Four years ago, aged 38, I made the agonising decision – after years of reflection, research and discussion – to try to become a mother on my own.

I had six months of inseminations with donor sperm, but decided the method was so unreliable, I would have full IVF treatment, which meant registering with a fertility clinic.

I never wanted to be a ‘single mother’ and I’m sure I could describe for you in painstaking detail the shock, panic, depression and bewilderment that overwhelmed me in the years leading up to that decision – and those immediately after.

But quite frankly, there aren’t enough variations on ‘despair’ in my Thesaurus, there isn’t enough space on this page, and there’s not enough time in your lives or mine to do it justice.

And there are not enough variations on ‘selfish’ to do your actions justice.

So the stupid cunt waited until she was thirty-eight, a full decade after her biological clock started ticking, and when she was no longer attractive to most men – let alone the Mr Perfect she no doubt expects – before deciding to have children.

Dumb fuck.

I took refuge in Kleenex and Cadbury’s for six months and went back to the clinic in April 2005 for another try. To my delight and astonishment, I hit the jackpot again. It was almost too good to be true.

More crying, more chocolate, and then it was back to the clinic for a third cycle of IVF in September 2005, which yielded zilch.

Imagine having this unstable emotional fuck-up as a mother. Yikes! And with no father around to save you from her! On top of all that she’s massively in debt to pay for all this IVF shit, so any kid will be living in poverty and, on leaving school, will probably be obliged to support his/her debt-ridden aging mother.

Why was something as simple as getting pregnant proving to be such an almighty struggle for me?

Because you are forty-one-fucking-years-old you clueless crone!

Women are at the most fertile between 16 and 27. After 30, the chances of conception plummet and chances of miscarriage start to rise.

Maternal instinct is a powerful, mysterious drive, and for some people, like me, it can be overwhelming. The decision to undergo IVF has cost me, emotionally, physically, psychologically and financially – but it hasn’t eradicated my hope.

You don’t have a ‘maternal instinct’ you stupid bitch, you’re not a mother, and hopefully never ever will be. It would be despairing beyond words for a child to be raised by this aging selfish hag and with no father around.

Most of the comments are from women who are supportive of her.

Check out this comment that sums up women’s attitudes perfectly:

She was obviously waiting for the right partner to come along and as he didn´t took this decision, good luck Louise.

Oh right, so it’s obviously all men’s fault because one failed to just ‘come along’ and present himself to this aging woman with nothing to offer. If she was so desperate for the ‘right partner’ why didn’t she go out and try and find one? Then again, she’s clearly like most women; with such a princess mentality that she believes Mr Right will just fling himself at her feet.

Besides, even if she tried to get pregnant with a husband/boyfriend it would have been the same as her trying to get pregnant via sperm donors, namely miscarriages and defective fetuses. And that, of course, is why us men will always prefer young women, because they’re fertile and will have healthy children. As some commenter so wonderfully put a while ago; if Mother Nature really is female, she’s no feminist.

Women can bleat on all they like about waiting until their in their 30s or even 40s before marrying and having kids, but neither men nor biology are going to play along. Or have sympathy for those barren spinsters who figured out they left it too late when it’s…well, too late.

I hope she never conceives, for the sake of any potential child.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:34 PM
——————————————————-

At 5:51 PM, ColdHammer said…

You know with all these babies conceived via vitro, I wonder if Mother Nature is now beginning to evolve humans so that way vitro never does work in the future.

It will be like Children of Men!

Vitro and other methods become obsolete which results in wimmin’ going ape shit.

——————————————————-

At 6:06 PM, Javier said…

Sickening.

And let’s not forget the studies that show children brought up in a single-parent household, where the parent is the mother, are more likely to turn into all-around bad apples. And, when these bad apples grow up, guess who will be caring for them and their irresponsibilities? Yep, taxpayers (read: mostly men).

——————————————————-

At 6:19 PM, Anonymous said…

In the article it says she had twins but them had them killed. The people who tell these women to hold off on getting pregnant until it’s to late are the same ones who tell them to kill their baby because it may not live. Makes perfect sense right?

These so called fertility clinics really dont want women to have babys they just want them to keep coming back for treatment. If by some miracle an old chick does get pregnant then they tell her oh you have some rare problem and the kid could maybe die so you should kill it fast. First sign of any scam is urgency.

This scam works so well because the females that go there are single and childless for a reason. They are stupid and nobody wants them.

——————————————————-

At 7:10 PM, Nat said…

Just curious, I would like to know what you think about a 38 years old woman who wants a baby with her husband? Is she a “selfish bitch” because she is too old for wanting a baby? And what do you think about the husband who is willing to create a family with her?

——————————————————-

At 7:30 PM, Anonymous said…

Has she never heard of ADOPTION ?? !!

——————————————————-

At 7:50 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

Just curious, I would like to know what you think about a 38 years old woman who wants a baby with her husband? Is she a “selfish bitch” because she is too old for wanting a baby?

Of course such a woman isn’t selfish, just a bit daft for leaving it so late (assuming it’s her first go at getting preggers.)

My point is that women who spend their most fertile years on the pill and partying and then, when it’s almost too late, decide to be a single mother by choice, concluding that a child’s need for a father doesn’t matter relative to her own desire for a kid, are selfish. They are content to inflict illegitimacy on a child, and on the off-chance they figure that the situation isn’t ideal they’ll just blame men for not seeking her out and marrying her long past her marry-by-date.

——————————————————-

At 8:29 PM, Anonymous said…

When will women learn that when you are given 300 eggs you don’t wait until you are down to the last dozen to try and hatch one. Women were smart enough to know this up until about 40 years ago when the feminist movement started up and lied to them.

Priority #1 ladies: Use your youthful young looks, virginity, and charm to land a handsome, hardworking husband and start making babies while the body is in babymaking mode and you have the energy to do it. Let the others chase careers and jerks while their reproductive system deteriorates.

There is a reason that the sex appeal fades with the fertility, nature does not want single men impregnating a woman who may become too old or ill to properly raise children to self survival age by herself, this lady needs to pick up that clue.

——————————————————-

At 9:26 PM, unpleasant bitter git said…

The idiotic woman in this article was featured in the same newspaper last year.

This is the piece.

Like Dawn Eden has become the poster girl for the reformed slut, this one seems to be trying to carve herself a niche in the female sympathy market because she thought she could leave everything to the eleventh hour and cheat nature with the help of modern medical science.

All I can think of to say to this kind of woman is TOUGH SHIT STUPID!

——————————————————-

At 10:55 PM, Christopher in oregon said…

“Reluctant termination”?

That’s a ridiculous way of saying she hired a doctor to murder her own baby by abortion. Now, she decides she’s going to let this next one escape the ax. My, oh, my. I feel so sorry for the murdering beeatch.

——————————————————-

At 11:32 PM, mfsob said…

Mmmmmmmmmm, yeah, OK, just more moronic sobbing from another “liberated” womyn who thought she could plan her life down the the tiniest detail so it could be “managed.” What a crock of bullshit – You can plan your life, in general terms, sure, but to try and manage it to the degree these empowered womyn are is not only laughable, it shows how screwed up and deluded they really are.

——————————————————-

At 12:01 AM, Anonymous said…

Just curious, I would like to know what you think about a 38 years old woman who wants a baby with her husband? Is she a “selfish bitch” because she is too old for wanting a baby? And what do you think about the husband who is willing to create a family with her?

The older she gets the more likely she will have a problem pregnancy. Miscarriages (spontaneous abortions = dead kids). Birth defects (deformed or physically damaged kids). 20 fewer years her child will have a mother in their life (given her life expectancy). For the husband he should, biologically speaking, be mating with younger healthy females (i.e., women more likely to have problem-free pregnancies and give birth to live healthy children). Unfortunately, men are susceptible to the same retarded “Mating Late is Great” propaganda that women are.

——————————————————-

At 12:02 AM, R. Daneel Olivaw said…

Another Excellent post by Duncan! Seriously, what do we expect from modern women now a days?! To truly be at peace one must ignore the human scum that modern women have become and go your own way. Oh, you got a shout out on Wikipedia! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor#Further_reading

Good work son!

R. Daneel Olivaw

——————————————————-

At 12:28 AM, Anonymous said…

Its interesting that these women are willing to go it alone when pressed, but when there’s an ex-husband about, its extremely urgent to divide assets 50/50, and tap him for (USD)$1200/mo imputed income child support, enforced by the government (ie. big guys with guns).

——————————————————-

At 12:37 AM, Arnold Ziffel said…

If she had the superior insight feminists claim for all women and was as in touch with her body as women claim to be then she’d realize that her body is telling her something along the lines of “WOULD YOU STOP THIS BULLSHIT ALREADY!? THIS IS NOT GOING TO WORK! YOU WAITED TOO LONG.”

Not to mention the fact that having a child that late in life pretty much precludes saving for a comfortable retirement.

So much for a “women’s way of knowing”.

——————————————————-

At 1:21 AM, TL said…

I would like to know what you think about a 38 years old woman who wants a baby with her husband? Is she a “selfish bitch” because she is too old for wanting a baby?

YES, she is for putting off marriage and childbearing for so damn long for more selfish pursuits like endless happy hours and sleeping her way to the middle in whorporate America.

——————————————————-

At 2:49 AM, k-dog said…

Duncan, this is only peripherally related, but check this link:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17969710/

Of course, this whinefest pertains to the US, where most people get health insurance through their employer.

——————————————————-

At 2:52 AM, Anonymous said…

Its interesting that these women are willing to go it alone when pressed, but when there’s an ex-husband about, its extremely urgent to divide assets 50/50, and tap him for (USD)$1200/mo imputed income child support, enforced by the government (ie. big guys with guns).

——————————————————-

At 3:14 AM, Scottie said…

Sickening and selfish!
This kid’s life will be screwed up in the long run. This kid will wake up one day not knowing who his father is and his mother is one selfish cunt. Sometimes, I wonder when women will wise up and learn that a kid needs a father. I’m from the old school where you see a father in the household or active in his kid’s life if he’s not in the household. These days, these women are too pigheaded (and they talk about us men) to realize they cannot raise a kid by themselves without a father. If they keep going with these illogical decisions, they’d make one chauvinistic man very happy by being barefoot and pregnant.

——————————————————-

At 9:15 AM, Field Marshall Watkins said…

Duncan, watch this vid 🙂

As soon as I started reading your article, I thought of it.

Javier 6.06pm.

You’re absolutely right. It’s a proven fact that if there is going to be a single parent, it should be a man. Children have a much higher chance of developing a strong personality, understanding discipline, context, loyalty, courage, strength, honour, a good ethos and all that good stuff.

Yet women gain custody… 97% of the time! Yep, feminist maths again.

Try that link for the amazing maths skills of femcunts.

——————————————————-

At 1:09 PM, Anonymous said…

The whole idea of waiting for children till after thirty is unnatural. Is this a groundbreaking new philosophy, or just the easily escaped fucking obvious?

——————————————————-

At 1:17 PM, Anonymous said…

I hope readers of this blog go to the comment section of the original article to even out the number of posters there praising this: “brave mother”.

——————————————————-

At 1:54 PM, Anonymous said…

By the way, she looks pretty good for a 38 year old woman. Take away the glasses and put her in a fancy dress and you will have an attractive middle aged woman. If she would have looked for a man when she was around 20 she would have had many suitors. I know a lot of women who were very atractive when they were young (14-32), are now around 35 and suddenly want to marry, but are wondering why no serious suitors appear. They still manage to get a lot of dates, but only of sexual, not longterm nature, and complain that men their age are looking for 25 year old wifes.

——————————————————-

At 2:01 PM, mikeray said…

Just curious, I would like to know what you think about a 38 years old woman who wants a baby with her husband? Is she a “selfish bitch” because she is too old for wanting a baby? And what do you think about the husband who is willing to create a family with her?

The problem with single mothers by choice is that they fall prey to the feminist lie “I don’t need a man”.
And when they are in their late-30s they realize “I want a baby”.
However, “the child needs a father too.”
Such women are plain selfish for ignoring their child’s needs for their own wants.

——————————————————-

At 2:28 PM, Paul Parmenter said…

I waded my way through the nauseating Femail article (is this typical of the hogwash they publish there? OK, silly question) and then asked myself what exactly its purpose was. It did not seem to be making any point, unless it was the blindingly obvious one that it gets more and more difficult to conceive the older you get, or that repeated IVF treatment is a very unpleasant and messy alternative to Mother Nature.

But Louise Janson could have said that in one sentence. Instead she drones on and on about her self-inflicted suffering. Yet another depressingly familiar whingefest that seems to be the hallmark of modern women who think they are entitled to all of life’s goodies and take deep offence whenever they find they might actually have to earn any of them.

But of course, I then realised that was the whole point of the article: not to tell us what we already know, but to wallow in a lake of self-pity, and to invite buckets of sympathy.

And, sure as night follows day, she gets exactly what she is angling for. On come all the women gushing with sympathy, empathy and every other kind of pathy, offering her shoulders to cry on and telling her how brave and clever she is, and what a great mother she will make.

So she has what she wanted: validation from her like-minded peers. None of which will of course do anything whatsoever to improve her chances of having a baby, or help the poor little blighter if she ever gets one. But hey, she gets the second prize: elevation to victimhood.

——————————————————-

At 3:12 PM, ChicagoMan said…

I have a big problem with women waiting so long for childbearing.

For every 1 women that truly was not trying to wait (Ie she got screwed over, was not trying a career etc), there are hundreds if not thousands of selfish ones that put biology second.

I’m sorry, I may feel sorry for you for instance if you got married at 21, your husband went away to war and then died when you are 23 and then you were so in love that you didn’t start dating again till 30. But honestly how often does that happen?

Fertility clinics are meant for those honest couples that just have problems conceiving a child into a loving home, but can’t.

Is it cheating biology? Well yes it is. But so are Vaccinations and sanitation.

However, single mothers or women at 38 wanting children is potential child abuse.

Raising a child is hard enough for TWO (2) people. Single mothers that want IVF are just selfish morons who want that special handbag to show their other single girlfriends for 18 years.

If they really cared about children, then they would adopt or volunteer at an orphanage.

This is like Angelina Jolie adopting foreign babies, what the fuck are the US orphans not good enough?

Bunch of selfish women today.

——————————————————-

At 5:08 PM, Kumogakure said…

At some point, it becomes glaringly obvious…

Women don’t care about anything other than themselves.

No amount of reason or logic is going to change this immutable law of nature.

Until the vast majority of men, especially those in power recognize this, I hold no hope for our societies.

It’s over.

——————————————————-

At 5:35 PM, Anonymous said…

Women are good for marriage starting at 14.
If they do not marry they risk alot.

I will not marry an old woman who could be a grandmother, I will marry a 16 year old – knowing that at this age she will make great mother and be a grandma at 40.

——————————————————-

At 8:10 PM, Javier said…

Anonymous @5:35 raises a good point. I recall a professor in college telling us that the human body was originally built to last for 4-45 years old, but due mainly to medicinal break-throughs in history, we have been able to prolong death. Interesting how women are trying to become pregnant just at this same age.

——————————————————-

At 10:26 PM, Anonymous said…

How much you want to make a bet this cunt was like this one right here.

Nothing like a video to illustrate what kind of cunts there are out there that can’t find a good enough man for them.

——————————————————-

At 12:56 PM, Anonymous said…

To Javier:
I remember reading a medicine book which stated that the first strong signs of aging appear on women at around 35 and in men at around 43.
Most modern diseases like Alzheimer, arthrosis or artheresclorosis are not really diseases, but simply part of the aging process, and can be therefore not be healed, but only be treated.

——————————————————-

At 6:00 PM, Outcast Superstar said…

Thankyou Anon 10:26

I have just added the video clip you have provided as my latest blog entry.

——————————————————-

At 3:32 AM, k-dog said…

Here’s something no one has noticed yet: the woman in this article is a writer. That term, like “artist” or “musician”, menas 90+% of the time that the person has little or no income, as it is hard to make a living in those fields. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that use of one of those three words as your occupation means you have made a deliberate choice not to work and are sponging off others or the taxpayer.

And this in turn has probably scared off men she’s seen in the past, as she just might have been looking for them to subsidize her “writing” “career” and the debts she undoubtedly has. And she probably was very obvious about that desire. Men are wiser to this woo-woo “writer”/”artist” crap than women are.

Unfortunately, an unwise welfare and medical system in Britain is trying to allow her to become a parent, and it’s a certainty that as a “writer” she will be on the dole should she successfully conceive and give birth—if she isn’t already.

——————————————————-

At 4:23 AM, Anonymous said…

What is it with writers/artists/musicians of dubious talents must also lacking in common sense? In her late thirties and wanting a kid? She’ll be lucky to get one “normal”. I live in the U.S., near Seattle, some of the magazines aimed at mid thirties to late fourties women all extolled the virtues of “having it all”. One had this lady who’s a news anchor for one of the Big Three network on the cover. It was a glowing coverage of this fourtysomething lady, who just had twins, and an awesome husband to boot! When you read it (I managed to do it without puking) she had to have IVF and fertility treatment, but can’t carry the baby, so she did a “womb rental”.

Get it? Be rich enough to get IVF and fertility treatment because you waited too long, and get someone else to carry the baby for 9 months, after the other person gave birth to “your” bab(ies), gush and coo to some similarly dim reporter and get called “brave” and “empowered”.

Sounds about right for an addled, brainwashed, feminist chunk spewer.

BladeMonkey

——————————————————-

At 8:58 AM, Paul Parmenter said…

Thanks k-dog, your comment ties in with my earlier post.

It is now clear that the point of this rambling poor-little-me article was not to inform the readership of anything of interest, but to give this dismal woman a further “writing” opportunity. I wonder how much the Mail paid her for her piece of drivel? If they pay by the word, that would explain why the article never seems to end.

——————————————————-

At 5:18 PM, Anonymous said…

blademonkey, you are right and that is why, my wife (if I ever marry) will be 16 and fertile beyond the horizon.

——————————————————-

At 5:21 PM, Anonymous said…

It is disgusting to know that you have been in the womb of someone else than your mother.

And something is even stranger: is not the “rental” of a foreign womb extremely patriarchal?
Feminists have always told us, that you do not use women, and here it is exactly what they do.

I cannot imagine, that the husband is happy.

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: