The Marriage Strike Strikes


——————————————————-

10 April 2007

bj.jpg

Under British law, all articles about single women must
have a picture of this fucking woman

One us three women is still single at the age of 35

PDF

One in three women is unmarried at 35, official figures show. In 2000, only a quarter were not married. And in 1990, just one in ten was in this position.

Marriage began to experience a decline in the 1980s, but in the last decade its popularity has fallen more sharply.

Keep it up my brothers.

The marriage strike is biting, and we all know the usual claims that women don’t need men and are happy to enter middle-age single and without a man are a load of bollocks.

With regards to the comments, there are the usual women insisting that they don’t want to marry as it means having to cook, clean, iron, etc, forgetting that for men, marriage means breadwinning, protecting the family, DIY, etc. Most women forget that in traditional marriages, both partners have obligations to take care of the other – and the kids – but they forget the traditional obligations of us men and whine about their own. Besides, how many women can cook and run a home anyway these days? A far less proportion than the number of us men who are able to still protect and provide (were there any incentive to do so anyway.)

One woman even comments that “I may be 34, but I’m sure my time will come.” She’s 34? And she reckons an eligible man will come to marry her in the future? Now that’s blind optimism!

I’ll leave you with a couple of comments from two guys that sum up things rather well:

It does not surprise me at all. If you want to spend your life with an idle, self centred harridan who professes to hate men, then get married. If you want companionship, loyalty and someone who doesn’t empty your bank accounts, get a dog. This may be a sweeping statement but I have experienced it all and have watched good friends go through much worse. A man does not need to get married.

Well, part of the reason might be that, as a man, it’s not quite as great being married to women as women seem think it is!

Women can be total spoil sports, very emotionally self-centred, overly expectant and demanding and pretty boring to boot! Top tip: never watch soap operas in front of a man if you want to bag a future husband.

I’ve been divorced for 9 years and am happily single. I enjoy all my freedoms – I go out when I like, get home when I like, have my own friends, lovers and no responsibility to anyone else. I love to be in love but when you see how many women sap the individuality and fun from a man its no surprise we’d rather go it alone. Right, I’m off for a pint!

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:22 PM

——————————————————-

At 9:38 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

Marriage has declined directly in parallel with female friendly divorce laws. The more these laws rob men of our assets and dignity the more men have shunned marriage. Single females are left to whore their way through their twenties and thirties and become so second-hand that no man in his right mind would ever want them. Who created this? Feminists and their weakling flunkies in the big government. Tough shit girls we no longer need you. If you don’t like it buy a cat.

——————————————————-

At 11:23 PM, Anonymous said…

I WISH I WAS BORN AT ANY OTHER TIME THAN NOW.

THERE IS NOTHING ELSE TO FUCKIN SAY.

You want to have a son? Think about this, 50% of him will be made of the modern woman.

I’d rather slide spread eagled down a 300 meter razor blade and land in a pit of serpents than EVER return to a state of brainwashed “respect” for ANY WOMAN.

3 seconds a day of orgasm at best. And YEARS of your life.

——————————————————-

At 11:29 PM, Patriarchal Phoenix said…

I think a quote from Eric Cartman from “South Park” is appropriate here:

(From the episode “Tsst”, episode 1007)

“You’re sterile is that it? Naw that’s too convenient of an excuse, the truth is nobody ever wanted to have babies with you isn’t that it? Always the mom’s maid and never the mom, must be hard on you, knowing that the years are ticking away, you’re friends all getting married and all the while you’re uterus slowly shriveling away, drying up, becoming totally worthless.”

——————————————————-

At 11:30 PM, Kumogakure said…

Ahh!

Progress.

The internet has leveled the playing field.

Men who otherwise may have never stumbled across a Men’s Rights type blog, will at least see the comments of striking men and know they are not alone in the struggle.

The powers that be, feminists and others, have fatally miscalculated.

No marriage = no babies = no future workers to sustain the Fiat Economies of the west.

Too bad… so sad!

Kumo, formerly known as Mamo.

——————————————————-

At 2:01 AM, Laughing Away said…

Let’s Laugh at all the lonely females!

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

——————————————————-

At 3:50 AM, k-dog said…

Please don’t wish feminists on cats, Captain. That’s cruel to the cats. At least my Siamese says so. 🙂

——————————————————-

At 6:02 AM, Anonymous said…

here’s an interesting article for you to take apart. Cheers!

Are You Raising Another Man’s Child?

More than a million American men are investing their love, time, and money in a child who isn’t their own. But the worst part about this betrayal? How many people may be in on it

By: Oliver Broudy

Patrick Connaro, a 42-year-old robotics engineer living in Colorado Springs, was sitting in the bleachers one warm Saturday afternoon in 2003, watching his son’s Little League game, when the ground opened beneath him.

“My little boy was there, he was up at bat, and I started yelling for him, ‘Go Matthew [not his real name]! Knock it out of the park!’ And another man started screaming for Matthew. Louder than me. I looked over, and I looked at him, and I was like, Who is this guy? And I looked at my son, and I looked at him . . . and they were identical.”

——————————————————-

At 10:08 AM, Anonymous said…

Anybody got an explanation other than “you lack self confidence” for having problems with a woman with a high number of sex partners in the past, even if she will be loyal for this relationship?

——————————————————-

At 10:35 AM, Anonymous said…

captain zarmband said:

Marriage has declined directly in parallel with female friendly divorce laws. The more these laws rob men of our assets and dignity the more men have shunned marriage. Single females are left to whore their way through their twenties and thirties and become so second-hand that no man in his right mind would ever want them. Who created this? Feminists and their weakling flunkies in the big government. Tough shit girls we no longer need you. If you don’t like it buy a cat.

Well said!!!, what’s even more pathetic about these aging spinsters, is that they always come out with that tired old line:
“where are all the good men?”. There are lots of good,kind,loyal,nice men, it’s just that you stupid whores have deliberately, and consciously
rejected the good men in your prime,in favour of the bad boys,thugs and players. Once you have been f.ucked and chucked by every thug on planet earth, you then expect some rich$$$$ “captain save a ho” to rescue you from your self inflicted mediocrity.

“Ladies” (I use the term ladies loosely here), if you want to know what’s it’s like to rot all alone, we are now giving you a taste of the bitter medicine you made us nice guys taste.

——————————————————-

At 3:29 PM, Anonymous said…

Marriage has declined directly in parallel with female friendly divorce laws. The more these laws rob men of our assets and dignity the more men have shunned marriage.

Actually a woman needs to be qualified for marriage: she needs to be able to cook, clean, love children, be good at housekeeping.
Most women think it is oppression to do these duties, but forget that men do their traditional duties without moaning: providing for her and protecting her.

Additionally women need to be fertile, which means young. At 30 men instinctively know that a womans fertility is dramatically reduced and sometimes gone.
At 34 a woman is much too old and could be a grandma.

The perfect age for marriage is between 14 and 16 and in former times girls married at this age in Great Britain.
Then they have plenty of time to have many children.

Today instead the same girls have sex between 14 and 16, leaving them with children out of wedlock, at the pill, with STDs and loosing their precious virginity.

——————————————————-

At 6:59 PM, byrdeye said…

Marriage is a tool to oppress men. Fawk it.

If women want to be sloots…then we can fvck & chuck them like sloots.

——————————————————-

At 9:01 PM, Jim said…

“Feminists and their weakling flunkies in the big government”

Or the other way around – Daddy’s Little Girls and their patriarchal enablers. How much of women’s progress in the last century was due to actual struggle and how much was granted them by the “patriarchal power structure”?

——————————————————-

At 3:25 AM, Anonymous said…

Anonymous said…
Anybody got an explanation other than “you lack self confidence” for having problems with a woman with a high number of sex partners in the past, even if she will be loyal for this relationship?

10:08 AM

To the fuckwit mangina CUNT who graced us with above comment, here is your fuckin response you cunt…

Even if she will be loyal? Oh please used up slut, please let me have your used up theme park of a cunt to fuck, please let my first born son come out of a cum receptacle, please, I can deal with it, because I have “confidence” Im so confident that I look my wife in her face that has spog on it from umpteen men say that I “confidently” dont mind, and as long a shes faithful it doesn’t matter that across the eastern seaboard on the average poker night dozens of men may be recounting sexual memories over a beer with their buddies, and dozens of men at a dozen separate poker tables, are recounting memories of that oh so special loving experience I covet so dearly with my wife, and because im so confident I dont mind how many other hard cocks have made the skin of her flaps wiggle as a cock slid in and out of the BIRTH CANAL OF THE VERY BONE OF MY BONE. You fucking emasculated cunt, take your “confidence” and go and eat my and everyone else here’s semen out of your wifes cunt! Enjoy kissing your wife goodnight on that mouth of hers, enjoy deluding yourself as you wake up for another day of paying her bills, enjoy sleeping in that bed she fucked everyone in, thats four feet away from your first born son’s crib you pathetic MANGINA CUNT.

You’re already dead pal. Donate your cornea motherfucker because you are not using your fucking eyes.

——————————————————-

At 5:36 AM, k-dog said…

While on this topic, Duncan, that reminds me. Did those proposed laws making cohabitation in Britain almost as bad for the male as getting married pass Parliament and go into effect?

For those coming in late, new laws proposed last year in Britain would treat couples cohabiting without marriage who then break up as though they had divorced, and divide property and so forth similarly. The man and woman would have to live together a certain period of time for these laws to be effective. Australia and New Zealand already have similar laws.

In some aspects these proposed British laws are similar to the “common-law marriage” rules that some US states had, but which have mostly been overturned. Those states’ rules essentially said that a man and woman who lived together and behaved as though they were married in fact would become married in a legal sense, so one could not just leave the other but actually had to file for divorce.

There is much folklore about time periods and the like about common-law marriages in the US, but only a few states actually enforced them, most of those no longer do so, and when they were enforced, there was no necessary minimum time period for living together if a couple presented themselves to others as husband and wife, had joint bank accounts, etc.

Back to the topic at hand, is no news about the rules cohabitation laws good news, or are they now in effect in Britain?

——————————————————-

At 6:15 AM, Anonymous said…

To anonymous 10:08 AM,

Yeah, I’ve got an answer for you. MEN ONLY WANT TO FUCK WHORES, NOT DATE THEM! Get it, sweety? A well-used woman is good only for a drunken bang, nothing more. Any more obvious questions? Oh, Wait. That was just another pathetic attempt at shaming, wasn’t it? Not a serious question at all. OK, I’m terribly ashamed of not wanting a relationship with a whore…yeah, riiiiiiight.

——————————————————-

At 7:11 AM, Misogynic_Gent said…

Anybody got an explanation other than “you lack self confidence” for having problems with a woman with a high number of sex partners in the past, even if she will be loyal for this relationship?

There are numerous reasons why chaste, self-confident men detest women who fornicate with a plethora of partners.

But before I explain, you should muse the truism, “Self-respect is the fruit of discipline; the sense of dignity grows with the ability to say no to oneself.” If women hope to find a decent man, they should say no to their slutty impulses early on.

The absolute opposite of what you’ve alleged is true. It is actually self-confidence that helps guide refined men away from promiscuous women; while indiscriminately selecting a mate indicates desperation and lowered expectations. Why would a chaste man with confidence reduce himself by courting a woman with a history and rep of being loose? Accepting a strumpet would show acceptance for her depraved lifestyle and hence undermine his core principles.

Moreover, a woman who has spent years sleeping around isn’t likely to be as loyal as a lady who has trudged up enough character to abstain until marriage. A lady who has expended energy in being virtuous is generally going to be much more trustworthy than a sexually unrestrained product of filthy society.

It’s been said, “I won’t say women have no character; rather, they have a new one every day.” Let’s assume that your straw woman slut does a 180 and professes to be loyal and principled. Any thinking man will instinctively ask, why after years of slutting around did her values suddenly change? To any informed man comes the answer, so she can dupe a fool into marriage with the prospect of getting divorced. The type of woman you mentioned is regarded (by hard working honest men) as bottom of the barrel or perhaps something beneath. .

You may read on MSN or Yahoo that a woman’s sexual history doesn’t matter, but it indubitably matters as far as virtuous men are concerned. Why would any self-respecting gentleman of high moral standing settle for such a low-grade, possibly STD ridden harlot who is unlikely to remain loyal after marriage? Let’s not also ignore the fact that gals who sleep around are obviously more likely to have STDs than self-respecting good girls who don’t.

Again, chumps who foolishly welcome women with immoral sexual histories exhibit lack of self-confidence and reckless desperation. Ultimately I have enough self-respect and confidence to know that (if I were looking) I could get much better than a soulless skank zombie. You should examine closely what guys mean by the phrase, used up.

The marriage strike will continue indefinitely; Irrespective of when the strike ends, defiled former goddesses will always be juggled almost exclusively amongst low caliber degenerate players.

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: