‘He earned it, but you have half anyway.’


24 May 2007

“I’m a multi-millionaire…and I didn’t have to work for a penny of it!

‘Housewife’ keeps record £48m divorce payout


A woman awarded the biggest divorce payment in British legal history was today told that she is entitled to keep the £48 million settlement that her insurance chief husband labelled “grotesque and unfair”.

John Charman, 54, took the case to the Court of Appeal after contesting his wife Beverley’s share in his fortune. The head of the Axa Insurance group argued that his £20 million offer was more than adequate and a £70 million family trust should not have been taken into account when the total assets of the marriage were assessed at £131 million.

I’ve commented on this case before, it’s fucking sick. This cunt gets £48,000,000 (almost $100,000,000) just because she happened to be supported by a hard-working husband for 28-years.

Surely she should owe him money. Think of how much more cash her ex-husband would have if he hadn’t had to support her for 28-years. The guy would have been better off hiring a maid and calling for a high-class 18-year-old escort girl every night.

This goes for non-millionaires too. Think of an average guy who has been married for more than ten-years. Think of how much more money he would have saved away, or at least have to spend on himself (without having to ask for anyone’s permission to do so) had he not had some ungrateful fucking harpy sitting on his couch spending his money and creeching for more.

This goldigging cunt spent almost three-decades not having to work but living a life of leisure (I cannot imagine she did one ounce of housework once hubby reached his first million), and the courts have decided she is entitled to half the money that he earned!

I’m not surprised the parasitic wretch believes she’s entitled to it, or that all the female commenters at various articles agree. It seems to me that, if a woman wants something, then she believes she is entitled it purely by virtue of wanting it.

The fucked up thing is, the courts in the West agree with that attitude too.

Basically, divorce law comes down to this; the less the wife earns in the marriage, the more she is entitled to when it ends, even if she ended it.

Here’s a rather sad comment at The Times article some guy left, one that will hopefully stomp out any ideas of marriage left in any men reading this:

This decision highlights the awful unfairness and injustice that ultimately is ripping our society apart at the seams. Mr Charman has been robbed, and for all her self-justification his wife has enjoyed the fruits of his talents and doesn’t deserve anything like as much of his wealth.

I was once proportionately in the same situation as Mr Charman in a divorce court although much less well off, being working class. My wife was given most of the assets, most of which I had inherited and the rest I worked for. I was permanently forced off the housing ladder, and ousted to the street by the Police. I’ve lost everything, little is left.

The Court’s decision ended my life, all pleas to allow me enough assets to maintain a roof over my head for my job were ignored in favour of my wife’s rights. I fought hard to achieve what I thought would be British Justice, but it was all over when a (lady) barrister said to me “Forget it – it may be unfair, it may be unjust, but it is the law “.

Fuck marriage and fuck co-habitation.

I would say ‘fuck the law’ but you can’t, the law has Might on it’s side, and all it cares about – at least with regards to family law – is the interests of no-one but itself and women. It’ll squish you. So just do your best to avoid its grip.

It cannot be said enough my brothers; don’t marry.

Don’t spend most of your life slaving away to support a wife, only to have her divorce you, take half (or more) of your assets, and then have her stride out of the divorce courts with a big shit-eating grin on her wrinkly old face like the woman picture above, gleeful at being richer than she ever would have been had she actually had to work for a living.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:18 PM

At 10:11 PM, Thunderchild said…


Work out the Math here. Total fortune £131 million. Trust fund for kids – £70 million. Gold digger settlement – £48 million. Residual – £13 million !! He’ll end up with less than 10% of what he worked for.


At 10:29 PM, Anonymous said…



At 10:58 PM, mfsob said…

To call this obscene is more than just an understatement – but you can hear the femihags all over planet Earth cheering for her. Absolutely insane.


At 11:43 PM, Anonymous said…

My ex wife was screwing someone else behind my back almost from the day we got married and stole 15K cash from me.

I divorced her and she walked away with the stolen 15K, another 15K settlement, a huge wardrobe of new clothes bought at my expense (about another 15k) and two new sports cars worth nearly 80K. All that for one year of marriage.

Why did she spend so much on clothes? Easy, shopping was her excuse to go screw her boyfriend every weekend. She spent on average $300 per weekend of my money so she could go fuck someone else behind my back.

To top it off she called up my father the weekend I moved out and screamed at him until he died of a massive heart attack, surrounded by his notes from the conversation.

Don’t get married, whatever you do. It isn’t worth it. No matter how nice and loving she is before you get married (and mine really laid it on thick) she will turn into a shrieking harpy the instant you sign on the dotted line.

The worst day of your single life is better than the best day of marriage. Screw that, when you get married you become one of the living dead. Unable to enjoy life and condemned to the Sisyphean and thankless task of endlessly attempting to keep some bitter cunt happy by showering her with endless amounts of your money and 100% of your time.


At 11:45 PM, Patriarchal Phoenix said…

Now, now, Duncan, let’s not play the blame game.

So what if this delicate flower wants her fair share of his assets that he spent decades of hard work building up?

Think of the emotional support she gave this poor sap! All that encouragement (Nagging) she gave him over the years, made him stronger, and a more well-rounded man!

Think of all this kind-hearted innocent little girl has done for this mere man and his life during their marriage! His couldn’t spend all that money himself, you know!

Holy God in Heaven! I’m tempted to write to my congressman and state senators and state representatives, on the subject of changing the divorce laws in the USA… but I don’t think they would ever read that kind of letter…


At 12:15 AM, Anonymous said…

Well, at least it serves as an example of why never to marry until society’s laws are reformed.

BTW, good job with the blog lately.


At 12:18 AM, Anonymous said…

There seems to be some error in space-time that selects on a basis of gender.
Women have been re-defining what they can do, who they are, and what is right for 40 years. Men have stood still. Our job is, has always been, to provide for and protect women, no matter what. Even when they hate our guts and set the cops on us.
Screw that.

Check this guy out for more good advice.


At 12:32 AM, Excelsior said…

This is legally stealing large quantities of money from someone else.

Men are financially raped with Divorce in the UK.


At 1:56 AM, dan said…

Four of my closest co-workers are manginas and they don’t even realize it – even if I told them, which I’ve hinted to them on many occasions, they won’t believe me. The wool of western society is well over their eyes. One man has an ungrateful wife, one in his mid-fifties supporting “women’s rights” because his live-in girlfriend does, one whose girlfriend tricked him into marriage with a baby on the way. The last one, my boss, is almost completely pussy-whipped by his live-in fiancee. Yet they all bash me and lure me into “hooking up” with some women at work or “at least fuck ’em and move on dude!” Trying to explain the MRA movement to them is like trying to explain quantum physics to a three-year-old! Irony so thick you can cut it with a knife: They are complete pussy-whipped slaves to their women, yet I’m the loser because I don’t have a “special someone.” I own the last laugh on that one for sure.



At 3:19 AM, Anonymous said…

Who cares if this guy is ruined? His fault for buying in to it. That is the cost of buying in to it. He didn’t get ripped off. The price sounds just about right. Buy in, and pay. Simple transaction.

As for the cunt. Look at that shit eating smirk on the whore’s fucking face.

She should be harvested for organs.

Women should not even be taught beyond the age of 8 just like in taliban Afghanistan.

That way they can just fuck, milk the cows and shut the fuck up.

Have you ever met a woman you were glad we educated? No.


At 3:47 AM, Anonymous said…

What profits a (wo)man to gain the world – and yet lose their soul?
Nothing new under the sun!
No doubt a lot of this guys’ gelt will end up in the pockets of the very people promoting such shite laws. (Media,fashion,lawyers,therapists,
big govt.etc. ie: wimmin friendly)
See link from No-maam.

Sux…big time !! 5k


At 4:26 AM, Anonymous said…

I know that you are against marriage and co-habitation, Duncan, but what about casual sex? I seems like you haven’t been in a relationship for a long-time, do you live a life of celibacy? You could at least make use of females’ few worthwhile functions even if you never form a relationship with one.


At 4:38 AM, Anonymous said…

Yes, but he’ll build himself another fortune while she’ll spend her way to ruin.


At 4:45 AM, BR said…

I’m starting to think that there really is no justice in this world. That sort of thing really slams the point home all too well.


At 5:16 AM, Anonymous said…

Depressing. I would like to scream with anger. Don’t marry.


At 6:07 AM, phoenix said…

Since this marriage happened so long ago, I can understand why and forgive the guy, but if 10 years from now the same thing is happening, you have to blame the men. It’s not like this is anything new, haven’t divorce awards been ridiculous for at least 10-15 years now?


At 7:12 AM, Christianj said…

This is great. Maybe those fucking slack bastards will finally get off their arses and do something about it and save themselves million by fighting these bitch loving courts.


At 8:12 AM, ze german said…

“It seems to me that, if a woman wants something, then she believes she is entitled it purely by virtue of wanting it. “

Simple and trivial as they sound, these words are to be put into a MRA Bible.

Relationships, workplace, sports, everything else in life works around this rule for women…

“I want it, so I am entitled to it”

If she does not get it, it is never her fault, as well as it is never just. So, like an angry child, the rampage begins.


At 10:15 AM, Mike said…

Could you please contact me at mtrump621@gmail.com (not my real address) I have a lot of info to send your way from New Zealand (a place run by the Femi-nazi’s).
Please give me an e-mail address.


At 10:29 AM, Mike said…

I can see where this is leading.
Wimmin are all just gold diggers.
I say Wimmin, because they hold no sex, they are just out for themselves and their own, men are just a thing to be used and abused and thrown on the scrap-heap.
Wake up guys, get real and get male.
All this case says is, don’t bother wasting your time and expense getting married, because if a wimmin is organising it it will cost you the bloody earth time and again!.


At 10:36 AM, Anonymous said…

Hail to you, Duncan!

Once again you told the truth. Avoid being robbed, do not marry.


At 10:41 AM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Until men learn to control their damnable SEX-DRIVE, they will continue to fall for the old scam that women have been peddling for thousands of years. Marriage should be illegal for any man under the age of thirty, so at least he has a fighting chance of dealing with women when his sex drive has cooled off. Men in their twenties, the usual age of marriage, just don’t have a chance with their hormones raging.


At 10:52 AM, Anonymous said…

mom at age 60

she was on a mission to let women know they have choices.

“It’s really basically about women and empowerment,”

Unbelievable isn’t it? it is all about empowerment at the expense of men, society and children.


At 11:09 AM, Off Centre View said…

Interesting stuff, looks like the marriage strike is becoming more and more public.

ah…I’d like to get married and have kids someday, be a proper father and husband, but the fact that you can marry someone and they take most of your hard earned money (as Thunderchild has pointed out) through divorce at any time and for any silly reason just makes the whole thing look increasingly crappy and more and more destructive for men.

Plus, there’s the whole thing about being taxed like crazy if you are a decent hardworking man, in order to pay for chav single mothers to spawn endless bastards for thugs, which means it’s even harder to earn the money to raise a family. Sometimes I wonder whether it’s worth playing by the rules.

And one other thing, it appears that the comments on that Times article have now been removed/move somewhere else (?) so that noone else can post their comments, except some woman acting as an “expert” comment (who actually seems to mention that the English court system is a mess, though doesn’t go far enough to mention it’s true misandry). Can anyone verify if the comments section has been turned off, or is it just on my PC?

Off Centre View


At 12:05 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

You will notice that all these cases involving huge divorce settlements always involve men handing over cash to women and never the other way round. I can’t think of a single case where a man has managed to secure a large divorce settlement from his ex-wife. And these women always make out that they’ve made some sort of sacrifice by being married, but somehow their husband has not. How can being kept in the lap of luxury be regarded as a sacrifice?


At 12:24 PM, Ozymandias King of Kings said…

There is one small positive note about this case. It will help to highlight how selfish modern woman has become and how willing the courts are to help women steal from men. This I hope will convince more men to avoid marriage.


At 2:54 PM, Anonymous said…

This often occurs at the terminal stage of an empire or civilization. The parasites come out of the woodwork. Help themselves to all the goodies. Plunder Party. Destroys motivation of hardworking men to work hard and get married (State robs 1/2 and woman robs the other 1/2). No more marriage, no more intact families. No more intact families, no more sons with a work ethic. Society begins final plunge downward…

BTW, this is woman’s nature. To consume, bleed dry, destroy. To counterbalance her shortsighted greed and materialistic cravings was the original role and definition of a husband (A prudent, thrifty manager. To use sparingly or economically; conserve). All women are gold diggers. Most only lack the means or opportunity. It lurks in every women’s heart.


At 3:03 PM, nevo said…

You should look at it at the bright side of it, and that is, this woman has given another mortal blow to the principles of marriage.
With Paul McCartney divorce still in the pipe line only a hermit will never know what a bunch of suckers this law has made of husbands.




At 5:40 PM, k-dog said…

Believe it or not, it can get even worse if you are a man who has started and runs a smaller business.

It isn’t all that rare for judges in divorce proceedings here in the US to order a small business liquidated during divorce proceedings so that cupcake can get “her” half of the assets. This kills the goose that lays the golden eggs, of course, if the business was profitable, not to mention ending the husband’s means of making a living.

My father knew a man who ran a busy auto shop and employed several mechanics. The man’s wife played no role in the business; she stayed at home. But when she filed for divorce on the grounds of “occupational desertion” (this was just before no-fault in the state), meaning he was spending a lot of time at the shop to keep it going, the judge ordered the business liquidated—throwing the husband and his mechanics all out of work. Sounds incredible, doesn’t it?

This was many years back, and my father lost contact with this man soon afterward. Liquidating her ex-husband’s business probably bought that housewife a lot of bon-bons to enjoy in front of the TV.

I’ve heard of other cases, usually involving sole proprietorships or very small operations. The rationale seems to be that some men will deliberately “hide” assets from the wife in a sham “business”. The problem is that such dealings are bound to be very rare, since most small businesses struggle day in and day out. There isn’t excess money to hide.

Too many feminized judges seem to have the mindset that husbands are constantly trying to pull one over on their wives—even though today the wives, not the husbands, initiate most divorces on what used to be considered patently frivolous grounds, and filing for divorce usually comes as a surprise to the husband. He wouldn’t usually have the opportunity to hide assets even if he had them in the first place. But today’s women don’t care: they just want what’s “theirs”—which was actually his, from his work and efforts.


At 5:45 PM, Manswuk said…

It is about time the British MRA movement came up with a plan of action – maybe organise a nationwide petition to get the law changed in such a way that:
1. Prenuptial agreements would become compulsory and recognised at law irrespective of the spouses’ wealth at the time of marriage.
2. Divorce includes a presumption of shared custody of the kids.
3. Spousal support would be limited to the cash required for the non-working spouse to train to re-enter the workforce.
4. Pre-marital counselling would be compulsory and would include a complete explanation of what would happen in the case of divorce.
5. For wealthier people, trusts cannot be part of a divorce settlement if the trust’s beneficiaries are minor children.
6. No awards can be made on the presumption of future earnings.
7. All married people, when one spouse stops working, must pay ‘divorce insurance’ that would pay out a sum of money to a pension fund to ensure a pension to the non-working spouse.

The above changes aren’t very ambitious and I realise that. But they would be a huge improvement on the situation that exists now and their non-extreme nature means there’s a greater chance of their being adopted and actually making a difference to people and opening the eyes of young men about to get screwed – sorry I mean married. I understand the call to stay single and not to cohabit but I’m not convinced this will be a realistic option for everybody – hence try and make marriage and divorce fairer.


At 7:42 PM, dan said…

Once again, hate to sound like a broken record, but, somebody should get a picture of her, copy it on thousands of T-shirts, with the words “Hi. I’m Beverly Charman. I screwed my hubby in divorce court and am $100,000,000 richer….how you do’in?” (Sorry my computer doesn’t have the key for the British Pound). I try really hard to convince my co-workers that their gfs are potential destroyers, but to no avail. NoMarriage.com addresses that in the FAQ column: “But my girlfriend is great.” If I had a dime for every time I heard that line or “Oh but my girl wold never do that…” only to hear sometime later “I can’t believe that bitch….how could she?” Sadly, many future MRAs will have to first learn the hard way.



At 9:13 PM, Anonymous said…

What profits a (wo)man to gain the world – and yet lose their soul?

Is it stated anywhere in the Bible that women have a soul?


At 9:19 PM, Anonymous said…

I endlessly hear women are powerful and independent.

Then women are applauded for being gold digging parasites. Screwed their way into a fortune like days of old.

Which is it?


At 9:42 PM, Anonymous said…

Whats her name?
I’m going to go marry her and try to get a few million out of the divorce…

If you have money don’t marry.


At 9:46 PM, Anonymous said…

Freedom is not something that anybody can be given. Freedom is something that people take and people are as free as they want to be.
-James Arthur Baldwin


At 10:34 PM, Anonymous said…

There’s another way to look at this: This guy paid GBP48M to rid himself of that ugly woman – he got a bargain! She could make gorilla cookies with her face…


At 12:45 AM, Anonymous said…


I have created a pro-men website and was wondering if you would consider listing it as an external link on your site. I will be happy to add a reciprocal link back to your site in return. Thank you for your consideration.



At 5:33 AM, Jolly Green Girl said…

erm I would like to point out that this is none of your business. I mean what goes on between two people is their business and obviously you don’t have the full story and do you have to go around calling people you don’t even know cunts. Obviously you are going for the shock factor… and do you know what goes into taking care of a child and being a mother; doesn’t that count for something? but from you blatant show of hatred towards women; it’s obvious you don’t.


At 6:16 AM, Anonymous said…

Hi Duncan, I humbly propose a look at Albetro Alesinas proposed Man Tax. It is not a joke.

Click to access taxgen12.pdf


Alesina is professor at Harvard.


At 6:22 AM, Anonymous said…


I try really hard to convince my co-workers that their gfs are potential destroyers, but to no avail.

Two of my friends married. Never I would try to warn them. It is just bad for you, you are called a woman hater etc.

I am pretty sure they will get problems. One is a guy who was always the best in school.
I believe he will get a great job after university.

Obviously very attractive for a woman…

He is quite nice, too.


At 6:34 AM, Anonymous said…

@ Christopher in Oregon

Until men learn to control their damnable SEX-DRIVE, they will continue to fall for the old scam that women have been peddling for thousands of years. Marriage should be illegal for any man under the age of thirty, so at least he has a fighting chance of dealing with women when his sex drive has cooled off. Men in their twenties, the usual age of marriage, just don’t have a chance with their hormones raging.

So true. Show me a beautiful woman, and I would love to marry her instantly. But that is too risky.


At 11:38 AM, Anonymous said…

Manswuk: Very good points Sir!
I have been thinking lately that it’s all very well raving and burning- as I do most days (inside) 😛 .. but ‘real policy’ is needed.
This is how ‘Nu Labour’ did it from way back.
The reason ,IMO,why feminazm has such a grip worldwide is the manipulative/acquisitive nature of nest building women(tending to the immoral on occasions) and the individualism (pride) of most men to not complain.
Men are versed in the old ways of gallantry (yes!- even today).One such being shot protecting a female security guard in UK.
It’s natural for both sexes to behave their way,but deadly for the (male) individual and society!
Who wants Sharia concepts brought back from the middle ages?
Some radical changes are due then- to the way we deal with society and any future it may have.
Good start man..I’m too busy/lazy/angry to think clearly- so you speak for me… :)) 5K


At 8:47 AM, paul parmenter said…

A bit off topic, but maybe not, seeing the general relevance to horror stories like this… AngryHarry is now well clear in the “Best Political Blog” category over at Bloggers Choice Awards. I think my vote was the 373rd, and he is now at 383.

Publicity, publicity, publicity…


At 2:01 PM, crackles said…

You are 100% right dan – a lot of men can’t comprehend that their own gf/wife could possibly be that vindictive. I was one of them.

I think it is because people make assumptions about others based on their own character. Even though I was angry about my divorce, it never crossed my mind that I should set out to ruin her life. I foolishly assumed the same from her. Actually I assumed she would be obliging since the divorce was due to her adultery.

That was over ten years ago when I was about 22 and it was such a bad experience that I have never had another relationship since. I simply cannot take the risk. I am positive that I would kill myself rather than go through it again (many men kill themselves the first time). I can’t express how painful it was to not only be betrayed in the marriage but then to have my son taken from me and be forced to pay her 18% of my gross income for 17 years – when she was the one who broke the marriage contract.

I really feel like I am serving a 17 year sentence for her crime (adultery) by missing out on my son’s life and being financially crippled.


At 8:06 PM, Gluon the Ferengi said…

The injustice is undeniably glaring and I can confidently say that the situation is not much better for American men.
Indictments of male behavior are common through all media sources and I was driven to start my own blog to address this issue among others.

I am at: http://gluontheferengi.wordpress.com/


At 3:12 AM, Anonymous said…

I think the guy said he was essentially being forced to destroy the business to pay her. I can’t say that is true, but it sure makes sense.

Anonymous age 65


At 3:13 AM, Anonymous said…

By the way, I do say “Fuck the law”.

That’s exactly why I spend most of my time in Mexico, where these laws don’t affect me.

Anonymous age 65


At 4:33 AM, Anonymous said…

Has anyone hear of ‘The Eva Principle: For A New Femininity‘ by Eva Herman, a former German TV news reporter? I wonder if it has been translated into English. It argues that feminism was a mistake and that both men and women would be happier if women returned to their traditional roles as wives and mothers. Herman also states that anti-feminism is the only way to stop Europe’s demographic debacle.


At 10:37 AM, Anonymous said…

Duncs, you might like this story:

Australian pub bars heterosexuals

First reaction, will all bars be able to ban over the top drama queen gays who bring in more havoc than business? Probably not.

But now, look at the reason:

The pub’s management said the move would stop groups of heterosexual men and women abusing gay people.

The tribunal’s president said groups of straight women found homosexual men entertaining but that such attention was dehumanising, the BBC’s Phil Mercer in Sydney says.

Managers complained raucous hen nights and stag parties created a poisonous atmosphere for its gay clientele, our correspondent says.

The article says “men and women” and “hen parties and stag nights” but, really, how many stag parties are held at a gay bar? Surely very few.

I’m straight, but every time I hear women go on about wanting a gay friend I immediately lay into them because I’ve long thought that it was dehumanising. All they want is a free fashion advisor and personal assistant. Next time you hear them mentioning wanting a gay friend, just have a go at them, they never have a real answer why they specifically want a gay guy as a friend. They can’t hit back at you for being un-PC or anything either, because you’re the one supporting minority rights or whatever.

Can you imagine if someone said they wanted a black friend to help them choose the best watermelons and chicken?


At 1:26 AM, Anonymous said…

There’s a guy here in Texas who divorced his wife and lost over half his assets. He’s dying in a cancer ward and has almost nothing left. What did the ex-wife do? Took him back to court to argue for his last bit of savings before he died.

That is what women are all about.

The political/religious systems that keep women under control are the only successful systems.


At 2:28 PM, byrdeye said…

And yet, men are still bending over backwards…begging on bended knee with a $1K shiny “blood stone” and $20K wedding for the honor of giving women half their net worth.

Who’s really to blame here?

More men simply need to start BOYCOTTING marriage! This needs to GAIN STEAM and become a NORM.

Even if you find a decent chick somewhere (God knows where), marriage should not be a normal “step” in your relationship. You should be able to enjoy a LTR for as long as you want without it.


At 3:16 PM, Anonymous said…

erm I would like to point out that this is none of your business. I mean what goes on between two people is their business and obviously you don’t have the full story

You could write the same thing about rape.

and do you have to go around calling people you don’t even know cunts.

If the label fits.

Obviously you are going for the shock factor…

Truth = shocking

and do you know what goes into taking care of a child and being a mother;

I think it’s been known for a few million years.

doesn’t that count for something?

Almost US $100,000,000 is something?

but from you blatant show of hatred towards women; it’s obvious you don’t.

The hatred is directed at the way women act.

You sound like a 5 year old.


At 10:19 PM, Jolly Green Girl said…

Hmmm… I sound like a five year old. Let’s see.. instead of doing something positive for the world. you sit on your ass in an office writing rants about something that you do not have a full disclosure on. If you were the judge or the lawyer that represented the case, maybe you have you can lay claim over the story. It’s called heresy. Then you call women cunts, can’t you be more original? Name calling to me sounds like a behavior of a five year old. Shock does not equal truth. Shock value is when someone who resorts to name calling and rants because he doesn’t have anything of value to say. Keep talking out of your arse. Seems to be working for all the mindless twits out there.


At 3:20 PM, Anonymous said…

Jolly Green Girl = Fat, environmentalist, feminist, socialist, shrew. Why don’t you give us a Hollywood ending and ride your vibrator off into the sunset? Nobody here gives two shits for your opinion.


At 7:42 PM, Jolly Green Girl said…

Well, I have never been called fat before, but I guess there’s first time for everything. and I don’t need a vibrator because I have a man who delivers and is happy not to be a bachelor. If you want to be an eternal bachelor, by all means, but I do have to say that having someone to share your life with is one of the best things about life. That’s all I have to say about that. Cheers


At 10:29 PM, playboy said…

This guy is a moron. With money like that he could have been banging a different young hot woman every year for the rest of his life. Instead he gets married and has to put up with nagging wifey for years and years until the eventual divorce. If you are RICH and too stupid to figure out that marriage is a bad deal in every sense then maybe you deserve to lose your money to the old-hag based on the Darwin theory.


At 3:51 AM, Anonymous said…

Hmmm… I sound like a five year old.

Yes. Glad we agree.

Let’s see.. instead of doing something positive for the world.

Informing men about the predatory and destructive nature of woman is quite positive.

you sit on your ass in an office writing rants about something that you do not have a full disclosure on.

This isn’t a National Security secret. No gag order placed on the case. She’s cashing out and taking him for all he’s worth. What don’t you get?

If you were the judge or the lawyer that represented the case, maybe you have you can lay claim over the story. It’s called heresy.


Heresy, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is a “theological or religious opinion or doctrine maintained in opposition, or held to be contrary, to the Roman Catholic or Orthodox doctrine of the Christian Church, or, by extension, to that of any church, creed, or religious system, considered as orthodox. By extension, heresy is an opinion or doctrine in philosophy, politics, science, art, etc., at variance with those generally accepted as authoritative.”

Hmmm… so I’m defying the Catholic Church? We’ll nail me to the Wittenberg Castle Church door! LOL

Per chance, did you mean hearsay?

If so you would still be wrong. Hearsay is only for courtrooms. We are not in one. Case Closed! LOL

Then you call women cunts,

Where did I use that term?

can’t you be more original?

If a label is accurate why is originality or creativity necessary?

Name calling to me sounds like a behavior of a five year old.

Name calling without supporting evidence or a rational argument is. Not the case here at all.

Shock does not equal truth.

I did not write that. To quote myself:

Truth = shocking

In other words, when behavior is put under a spotlight or microscope its true nature is often revealed, with often shocking consequences. That’s all we’re doing here. Dissecting the behavior of Bitchus Americanus or Bitchus Britannicus, as the case may be.

Shock value is when someone who resorts to name calling and rants because he doesn’t have anything of value to say.

Replace he with she and you would have described the female argumentation method nicely. If Princess doesn’t get her way she gets in touch with her inner Drama Queen and out come the screams, tears, threats to call the police, blah, blah, blah. All women DO is engage in emotionally manipulative behavior gauged for shock value.

Keep talking out of your arse.

You’re projecting dearie. Still waiting for intelligent and rational discourse from you.

Seems to be working for all the mindless twits out there.

Projecting again. Say cupcake why don’t you do us a favor and catalog all the things in your little abode designed, engineered, and built by MEN. Starting with your PC.

Tell us again which half of our species is largely composed of mindless, hysterical twits.

Now go play with your dolls or flip through your glamour magazines. Cheers Lovey!


At 2:41 PM, Anonymous said…

Jolly Green said:

“I do have to say that having someone to share your life with is one of the best things about life.”

If you add “if you are a woman”, I would agree. (See this woman, who has earned millions of dollars without working only by being married while his husband worked as a slave for decades).

If you add “if you are a man and you are not married nor cohabitating with your partner”, I would also agree.

For a man, being married (or cohabiting) with a woman is:

1. To let her be the master of your life. To stop doing what you want and begin doing what she wants.

2. To spend your money in things you don’t know nor want.

3. To work as a slave to support a ever-nagging woman who is always complaining and is never satisfied.

4. To have very few sex with a woman who is less and less attractive and more and more old and fat. Women get old faster than men. And it’s boring to make sex always with the same woman.

5. To give the ability to your woman to divorce you and strip half of your current and future assets. (And stop seeing your children if she want).

Woman are inmature beings that cannot live alone and want somebody to support financially and emotionally.

But, we, mature men we can live alone. Life is happier when you’re a bachelor. If you want sex, you can have some “friends with benefits” (like me) or you can go to prostitution (a prostitute is far cheaper than a wife and more honest).

Don’t get married, young man. It’s shit. It’s a trap for men.

Don’t pay attention to this woman. If she is happy being married, good for her. But we are happy being bachelors and we don’t need somebody to tell us how to live our lives (we are not his husband, after all).

That’s all I have to say about that.



At 3:00 PM, Anonymous said…

Please, anonymous 3:20 pm, don’t get into the game “jolly green” want you to enter.

When her weak arguments has been destroyed by anonymous 3:16 pm (they were so easy to destroy…), she has resort to the old female tools: shaming tactics (see this link)

She has stopped discussing the logic and has begin to use emotional arguments and insults(which have nothing to do with the history) like “Keep talking out of your arse. Seems to be working for all the mindless twits out there”.

Of course, these insults have upset you but it is sad to see lower your level to that of this woman. That is what she wants. To get the argument into emotional area. Women are good manipulating shame and guilt, and bad with logics. Reading a feminist book (been there, done that) is painful because you see the bad reasoning and the “wishful thinking”.

My experience is the best way to humiliate and infuriate a feminist woman is to get cool and with patience (like when you are explaining obvious things to 5-year-old kids) destroy her flawed arguments. It is so easy to do that and they get mad, because they cannot reply with logic.

They run out of arguments so easily and they begin insulting, like this “jolly green”. But we must reply with politeness and saying that their insults is a technique for hiding their lack of arguments. This infuriates them so much!

So please, keep polite.


At 11:39 PM, Male Samizdat said…

OK, I did some more math on this to put it in perspective.

Using today’s exchange rate, £48,000,000 = $95,588,618.87.

Now consider that he was married 28 years – that’s 10,227 days if it was 28 years exactly.

$95,588,618.87/10,227 days equals $9346.69/day it cost him to be married to this golddigging bitch. For you limeys, at today’s exchange rate that’s £4,693.46/day!



At 9:49 AM, Misogynic_Gent said…

Jolly Green Girl said…

“Let’s see.. instead of doing something positive for the world. you sit on your ass in an office writing rants about something that you do not have a full disclosure on. If you were the judge or the lawyer that represented the case, maybe you have you can lay claim over the story.”

Jolly green girl, we know enough about the case to conclude that most of the wealth rightfully belongs to John Charman. Try reading the article instead of positing some trumped-up obscurity about, “full disclosure.” You should know, “Mr. Charman created the wealth by becoming one of the leading figures in the insurance industry.” His thief of a housewife could not possibly have earned £48m in a lifetime. How many homemakers do you know achieve such wealth, let alone stay out of debt? One argument I found (from another article) coming from Beverley’s lawyers is as follows:

Her lawyers argued that the House of Lords had laid down guidelines in previous big money divorce rulings that family assets should generally be divided equally between the breadwinner and the homemaker.

However, his lawyers told the appeal judges – who also included Lord Justice Thorpe and Lord Justice Wilson – that the high court judge had been wrong in the way he divided the assets of their marriage last year.

I rest my case but for your edification, I’ll continue.

You maintain that we need full disclosure in order to conclude. Tell me, what specific information could possibly clash with our conclusions? I gather you’re accustomed to randomly spouting BS such as, “you don’t have full disclosure” and getting away with it. Are you too dense to realize full disclosure isn’t always required to arrive at correct conclusions?

Not all arguments you learn about in college or off feminist websites apply to every situation. Don’t attempt to force your preconceived round peg into the square hole, as a brainwashed feminist chimp would. Your claim that full disclosure is somehow pertinent to this case is unsubstantiated.

I often observe liberal women inventing uncertainty in extraordinarily clear-cut cases, yet they otherwise come to hasty conclusions when it suits to their shortsighted agendas. In this case, Jolly’s objective stance is a sham and nobody, save a blockhead, would be clueless enough to fall for it.

Are you aware that many of us have relatives, etc., who’ve been through similarly revolting divorces? (Less money was stolen of course.) Many of us can give detailed accounts leading to the divorce, and into to the theft and criminality that followed.

Jolly, don’t tell us what’s going on when your head is stuck in the sand.

Jolly Green Girl said…

“It’s called heresy. . .”

Jolly Green Girl also said…

“. . .instead of doing something positive for the world. you sit on your ass in an office writing rant. . .”

To you, the truth is heresy. Your statement above is “hearsay,” is it not? Do you actually know who is doing what while offline, or did you pull that out of thin air?

Besides, we are doing something positive for the Western world by writing blogs online, etc. (The world should not revolve around women you know.)

We’re spreading the truth and awakening men to the almost inevitable horrors of marriage. Consequently, many informed men will positively join the marriage strike, and hopefully they’ll enlighten other uninformed men about the corrupt, tyrannical and lopsided system. Lads also have a right to know that modern witches whimsically whore away their vows and souls more often than is thought.

Finally, stop writing off arguments you cannot confute as “rants.” If possible, why don’t you “disclose” the details I requested, jolly green ignoramus?

“Hmmm… I sound like a five year old.”

Roughly, yes. You sound like a challenged chimpanzee aspiring to force an unfitting round peg into a square hole. This familiar sound often echoing from feminists gets on my nerves after a while.


At 8:19 PM, Anonymous said…

I’m sure it’ll come up soon on the blog, but check out the following link.


At 9:42 AM, Hmh said…

Jolly Green Girl – I can’t resist weighing in on this. You state in your original comment: “This is between two people – it doesn’t affect you.”
Where have you been for the last twenty years? Yes it bloody does affect us! It even affects you and it most definitely effects your friends.
Every divorce settlement like this is another man somewhere quietly thinking to himself: it will happen to me, therefore don’t commit. YES IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE.
In New Zealand after the end of World War One we had what were called The Lost Generation. These were the young women waiting on fiancees or husbands who never made it back. Right now, according to the latest demographic research, we’ve got such a marked gender imbalance in the population that we’ve actually got higher numbers of women who cannot (ever) marry than we did after WW1. This isn’t even taking factors like the Marriage Strike into account.
Most women want to marry. I don’t expect it takes a genius to work that one out.
Jolly Green Girl: owing to the set of circumstances that we are trying to stand up against, most of your friends (whether male or female) will see their lives unfairly impacted by the actions of a bunch of rabid extremists from the sixties.
I had wanted to marry. I had wanted to be a father. I had wanted to be a good husband.
A vicious circle of hate-filled extremists and waves of money-grubbing opportunists have made these simple things in life unacceptably risky for me.
I never wanted to be regarded as disposable – I am. I never set out to be a punchbag for one shit joke after another – I am. I never thought that a hardworking, honest man could be turned into a third class citizen by his own legal system and social customs, but I have been. Women come first. Children second. Men a distant third, unless household pets get in the way.

Yes, we are angry. Some of us from waking up and seeing how unfair our society is, some of us from direct experience. I’ve had to spend a lifetime listening to shit like “All men are BASTARDS”, you take it personally when someone uses the word cunt once.

There is nothing wrong with me, or most of the other men around me, and we are worth more than being the butt of jokes and the sucker that pays the bills for everyone else’s fun.


2 Responses

  1. https://tuongnganthachcaotphcm.com/sua-chua-tran-thach-cao-tphcm/

    ‘He earned it, but you have half anyway.’ | Eternal Bachelor

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: