The Hunt & Humiliate Broke Men Agency


——————————————————-

06 June 2007

Mothers to name and shame absent fathers

PDF

Single mothers will be invited to name and shame fathers who fail to support their children.

Mothers invited to name and shame absent fathers

Letters are going out to around 100 parents – almost all of them mothers – asking if they want their former partner’s name to be included on an online list of people who have dodged maintenance payments.

More complete anti-male shit from a corrupt government. All the Child Support industry is there to do is to keep the flow of money going from hard-working men to spend-happy women.

Why the fuck should us men have to pay for women’s children? After all, children do, in fact, belong to women in this society.

Women get to choose whether to abort the baby. They virtually get automatic custody. Fathers are not required officially, as single women can get IVF treatment. A ‘family’ is now a mother and her children, with a father as optional.

So, John Hutton, you odious tit, shut the fuck up about demanding men pay for ‘their’ children; they are not theirs!

It cannot be said often enough; children belong to women now. That’s the primary principle in defining a Matriarchy, which the UK now is. Hence women can damn well support ‘their’ children, not the dad – who is only referred to as such when it comes to taking responsibility – and not us taxpayers.

At the very least a man should only have any obligations to support a child if the child was born when the man was married to the kid’s mother, and the child still has his surname. Otherwise it’s mummy’s little darling and mummy’s little responsibility.

One last thing; if parents are to be named and shamed for not supporting their children, surely that would mean any and all women who apply for Child Support should be named and shamed. After all, if they’re applying for Child Support they are clearly unable or unwilling to support their child themselves and, if the same definition of a ‘deadbeat parent’ is applied to them as it is to men, then such mothers are deadbeats.

It’s a dumb scheme anyway, it won’t work. Few men with any dignity will give a shit about being ‘shamed’ by spiteful ex-wives or ex-girlfriends, or by the fucking dipshit government. After all, you can only be shamed by people whose opinion you respect, and more and more men just don’t respect women or the government’s opinions one iota.

I’d imagine the sort of thugs who many single mothers have breeded with will most certainly not care anyway. In fact they’ll probably regard it as a rather funny badge of pride. “Hey look at the CSA website guys, it’s me! I’m on teh internet! WOOOH!”

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:31 PM

——————————————————-

At 7:46 PM, Anonymous said…

One last thing; if parents are to be named and shamed for not supporting their children, surely that would mean any and all women who apply for Child Support should be named and shamed. After all, if they’re applying for Child Support they are clearly unable or unwilling to support their child themselves and, if the same definition of a ‘deadbeat parent’ is applied to them as it is to men, then such mothers are deadbeats.

LOL. I love it. Publicly name deadbeat welfare mothers milking on the tit of the State. Add websites listing Female Sexual Predators (aka Golddiggers) to warn men in an area then we’re onto something. LOL

——————————————————-

At 9:20 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

Wouldn’t it be funny if loads of angry men all logged onto this website simultaneously and crashed the site. Ho…ho….ho.

——————————————————-

At 10:41 PM, Anonymous said…

Off topic

http://claritus.blog.co.uk/
Neither MRA or feminist. Someone who claims to see things from both sides. What do you think?

——————————————————-

At 11:15 PM, phoenix said…

Shouldn’t there be a rule that the mother know who the father is before shaming? I mean, with most of these sluts, they’re run out of space long before the single mother finished pointing fingers, but I’m sure the government didn’t consider that either.

The usual backlash effect will be in place though. There’s that, but there’s also the other thing: most single mothers are by choice, either through divorce or just for the benefits, if they shame men constantly and cause trouble for them, then even the common thug won’t have sex with women, and the women won’t be able to get pregnant, and then they won’t be able to get these benefits. That’ll piss them off real good, and a government agency’s head will roll.

——————————————————-

At 3:19 AM, Anonymous said…

If it were not for men’s crippling alimony payments and wealth and asset transfer (i.e. stealing from husband, giving to wife), the whole single-parent system would implode. It would be economically unfeasible and the utopia of the “single, independent mother” would disappear.

Kill the Socialist State. It is the Number 1 enemy of men worldwide.

——————————————————-

At 4:00 AM, Male Samizdat said…

Come on, men, you know the solution. No sex. Sorry, but that’s the only option left. No wives, no girlfriends, no sperm banks. Since there’s a high likelihood that you’ll never see your children anyway, you may as well not have any. Refuse to give women an opportunity to rape your wallet and your peace of mind, and don’t pay for some woman’s skankitude.

——————————————————-

At 4:34 AM, Anonymous said…

I raised my daughter as a single parent and never received a dime of child support from her biological dad. Shortly after our divorce, he moved to California, remarried, and disappeared from our lives. There were times I wished that I could force him to pay the court-ordered child support, but more often I was just glad to have him and his influence out of our lives. I had my family nearby to help me financially and we managed without him. I know we were lucky to have that support.

Why so many men feel it is okay to financially abandon their children is beyond me and I support any measure that punishes them for their failures. A new program in the UK aimed at forcing absentee parents to pay up includes a provision for public humiliation. In addition to deducting child support payments directly from the non-payer’s bank accounts and confiscating their passports, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission plans to publish the names of those delinquent parents on the the Child Support Agency’s website.

The parent who is caring for the child, usually the mother, may object to the naming and shaming of the deadbeat parent, in which case that parent won’t be posted on the website. Other than the deadbeat, who would object to this? Would you allow your former partner to be shamed online for non-payment of child support?

http://tinyurl.com/264hh4

——————————————————-

At 6:34 AM, Hmh said…

It’s one of the last lines that gets me: “This legislation would provide a strong framework to enable the new child maintenance body to deliver a system that puts the needs of the children who depend on it first, and ensures that families and children do not slide into poverty when parents split up.”

Families and children, as Mr Idaho so nicely points out, are about Mum and the kids. And this… I can’t even call him pathetic, because he genuinely seems to mean well… idiotic, NAIVE fool is so caught up in it all that he can’t even see it.

My own reaction: another nail in the coffin of my desire to marry and have children.

——————————————————-

At 8:09 AM, Anonymous said…

I would expect that a corresponding website naming and shaming women who do not keep custody agreements would be acceptable to this government? How about name and shame website of mothers who have inflicted Parental Alienation Syndrome onto their children?

——————————————————-

At 12:26 PM, Anonymous said…

It just goes On and ON….tags ,no passports…orange suits next? WTF !

——————————————————-

At 3:33 PM, nevo said…

JA!JA!JA!JA!………
I could not stop wetting myself when I heard of it in the news.

If ever the cps or what’s it name is, gets on my back to pay for a life long meal ticket to an unscrupulous wench, I will demand my name be put in that list with the largest font possible in red colour with a deep yellow background.
I want everybody to know of such honour.

Keep up the good wark Duncan!!!

NEVO

——————————————————-

At 3:46 PM, nevo said…

This is only a presumption made by most people in authority.
It is not the Law though.
In this country the law is equal to men and women.
It is only prejudice against men what makes the difference.

NEVO

——————————————————-

At 3:59 PM, Jerkmenistan said…

Actually, I think it would be better if women who are caught mis-spending child support money are shamed. Naturally, the government will never do so, but if an enterprising webmaster was interested in trolling through public court documents….

——————————————————-

At 5:17 PM, Anonymous said…

“After all, you can only be shamed by people whose opinion you respect, and more and more men just don’t respect women or the government’s opinions one iota.”

Exactly, I couldn’t have said it better myself. Also the government and society in general should start honoring A MANS RIGHT to choose. Men should be able to choose fatherhood in the same way women choose motherhood.

If a woman becomes pregnant there are literally hundreds of: adoption, abortion, and abandonment laws protecting her from being coerced into motherhood. Those same laws should be applied equally to men.

Although it is impossible for a man to: have an abortion or put a child up for adoption because he doesn’t physically carry the unborn child, a legal document ending the would be fathers financial and legal obligations to the unborn child during the pregnancy or 3 months after birth would serve the same purpose.

If the mother still wishes to bring the child into the world then fine, she will have to be responsible for it financially and legally. It’s her choice and her responsibilities. Implementing such a solution would end the practice of forced fatherhood.

——————————————————-

At 6:41 PM, Anonymous said…

If it were not for men’s crippling alimony payments and wealth and asset transfer (i.e. stealing from husband, giving to wife), the whole single-parent system would implode. It would be economically unfeasable and the utopia of the “single, independent mother” would disappear.

Kill the Socialist State. It is the Number 1 enemy of men worldwide.

That’s interesting. If we, as men, don’t spend a DIME on women (through our own behavior choices) then the entire rotten structure comes crashing down. Is that plausible?

——————————————————-

At 7:08 PM, Anonymous said…

Why so many men feel it is okay to financially abandon their children is beyond me…

Symptom of a collapsing patriarchy. Before feminism BOTH sexes had their duties (not just women, per the dingbat feminist liars). Enforced via social ostracism. Now it’s a free-for-all. Women are not being held to any standards so men are saying screw it as well. Sure legal remedies will be tried solely against men but what law can be enforced in the face of 100% non-compliance.

And yes, it IS going to get worse. Much worse.

Thank your social engineering feminist mothers for a job well done.

——————————————————-

At 7:16 PM, Male Rights Network said…

Anon 4:34 AM,

I am glad that your biological daughter’s father “did not pay you a dime”. It’s quite likely that the Divorce was filed by you, correct? And it’s quite likely that it is because of your selfishness, narcissism or unfaithfulness the marriage failed in the first place, yes?

And how rich was this ex-husband of yours, anyway? Just an average 9-5 factory or worker is it? Your child support demand may well be 50% or even more of his income. Did you ever think of his livelihood, and that you could be causing him to work insane hours holding down 2 jobs etc.? Once again, you show no considerations for men and just want to service your own selfish female desires.

And even if he does pay 50% of his income, why the hell should he? Because he isn’t hounded by State police and thrown in to the Gulags, sorry I meant jails? That doesn’t sound like a very genuine reason.

Why the hell should he pay when he will see his child zero hours a week, and only when you allow him to? Why should he when you ignore the visitation orders? No taxation without representation, remember?

I resent the use of the term “Deadbeat Dad” also, as it defines fatherhood only in terms of a financial contribution without any emotional or personal involvement. These are men who are not rejecting their duties as fathers, but are simply refusing to become economics slaves to the State and to females. It is worse, too, when unemployed men, men who are discriminated against through sexist “affirmative action” and poor men are labelled “deadbeats”.

Is it their fault that there’s only so many high-paying jobs in this society and they just don’t have the cash to feed and clothe themselves and pay insane “child support” contributions? Or indeed, that there are only so many jobs in this society and that 10% of men are unemployed?

But it basically comes back to this: why the fuck should they? There’s nothing honourable about being a mere tax-free paycheck in the post for some narcissistic female. There’s nothing honourable about being a State slave.

I don’t know what the Child Support laws and enforcement/extortion is like in California, but let me congratulate this man. Long may he evade you and your Feminist-Socialist State. I would recommend that no man pay any ex-wife or ex-girlfriend of his any maintenance. They do not deserve any nor will he get anything in return for doing so.

And regarding cleaning out men’s bank accounts and withholding men’s passports…

IT’S TIME FOR A FUCKING REVOLUTION

Think about the implications of the above two powers that the CSA have. Can it get any more totalitarian? I can guarantee you that absolutely no other social group but males connected to their “wives” or “co-habitees” could get such absolutely shit treatment by our mangina Socialist Governments.

Criminals, murderers, drug traffickers – the State does not have such totalitarian powers against these.. No fucking way..

It has seriously gone too far..

WHAT RIGHT DOES THE FEMINIST-SOCIALIST LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVE TO RAID YOUR PRIVATE BANK ACCOUNT?

WHAT RIGHT DOES THE FEMINIST-SOCIALIST LABOUR GOVERNMENT HAVE TO PREVENT YOUR TRAVEL AND WITHDRAW YOUR PASSPORT?

In doing both of the above the State has taken away the men’s freedom and put him into a state of Orwellian 1984.

The Communist Manifesto called for:

“The centralization of the means of transport”

When you take away someones passport, this is what you effectively do.

And

“Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.”

When you allow private bank accounts to be raided by the State at will, this is what you effectively do: Centralization or State control of credit.

GET THAT FEMINIST-SOCIALIST LABOUR PARTY OUT OF OFFICE.. AND NO MANGINA “CONSERVATIVES” EITHER

RECOGNISE THAT YOU ARE LIVING IN A MATRIARCHAL 1984 AND ARE A SLAVE TO THE STATE AND A FEMALE

——————————————————-

At 7:23 PM, Anonymous said…

A new program in the UK aimed at forcing absentee parents to pay up includes a provision for public humiliation. In addition to deducting child support payments directly from the non-payer’s bank accounts and confiscating their passports, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission plans to publish the names of those delinquent parents on the the Child Support Agency’s website.

Men ARE NOT going to care. Only gentlemen care. Gentlemen are created ONLY in a patriarchy. No more patriarchy. Feminism saw to that. Matriarchies produce citizens lacking morals and character. The men are turning into the women. LOL.

Pass all the retarded laws you want. The men are not going to care. They will do cash work (i.e., plenty of trade skills like plumbing, electricity, computer repair, and a whole host of internet jobs do not require working within the State/Female-friendly banking and legal system). Men are fine with renting and moving around. Men aren’t saddled with a nesting instinct like women and, hence, be easy to track, locate, and control. If men want to leave the country: (A) it will be for good, and (B) will simply bribe a customs official for the right paperwork (remember: in a matriarchy the standards of everyone collapses, including government officials — bribery to get around stupid rules will become the norm).

You STUPID, STUPID women supported a destructive social movement that is tearing the fabric of society apart. The chickens are coming home to roost.

——————————————————-

At 11:28 PM, Anonymous said…

Duncan, here’s a new one for you:

“A child is aborted every 25 Seconds” in Europe.

——————————————————-

At 11:30 PM, Anonymous said…

anonymous @ 1041 PM:

It is perfectly evident that they don’t see the issue from both sides, given the following facts:

a) feminism has gone beyond all that’s reasonable in limiting men’s essential rights while expanding women’s privileges; yet in spite of this,
b) that particular blog (claritus) only criticizes the presumed actions/view of MRAs, never those of feminists

One would have to be pretty delusional to read that blog and come to the conclusion that it’s even remotely unbiased. It drips with misandry and female victimology.

——————————————————-

At 3:56 AM, ChicagoMan said…

“All the stories have been told
Of kings and days of old,
But there’s no England now.

All the wars that were won and lost
Somehow don’t seem to matter very much anymore.
All the lies we were told,
All the lies of the people running round,
They’re castles have burned.”

Ahh this song sums up the state of England pretty well.

Feminism is a self-destructive movement since it requires men. And as in the movie war games, men will just choose not to play.

LOL

——————————————————-

At 6:52 AM, Hmh said…

anon 4.34am: I’ve heard variations on this story over and over. I’ve got to ask: what was his side of it? What was HIS story? I mean the one voice you never hear in these debates is from men who have done exactly what your ex-husband have done: deliberately abandoned wife and child.

——————————————————-

At 4:38 PM, Anonymous said…

Jerkmenistan said:

“Actually, I think it would be better if women who are caught mis-spending child support money are shamed.”

Why not do both? Force women to be accountable for child support – so this money goes to the CHILD, not to her.

——————————————————-

At 5:56 PM, Captain Zarmband said…

The solution to this is simple – equal parenting for both parents after divorce. In other words, the child should spend the same amount of time with dad as it does with its mother. That way no-one has to pay anything to anyone and the government can mind its own business. Oh, and while dad’s looking after his children this will permit their mother to go out to work and pay her own way instead of leeching off her ex-husband. You feminists are always banging on about “independence”…..well, here’s your chance to put your money where your mouth is.

——————————————————-

At 7:30 PM, mikeray said…

Another article about the mythical alpha females. Same old male-bashing…

However one comment stood out.

Check out this woman, another single mother by choice

I have been out with both beta and alpha males and have to say that I found myself frustrated and unfulfilled with the beta variety. I don’t think it’s an issue of money, rather than a shared vision of how you want your life to be and having the drive to bring it about. The beta men, in my experience, seemed complacent and happy to settle for a mundane existence which I found stultifying. When going out with alpha males I’ve felt completely fulfilled. I have respected them and this was what made the real difference. Unfortunately for me, none of my alpha relationships led to children which was something I really desired. Knowing that to have kids with a beta male would be total disaster I have had, in my 40’s, a child on my own using donor sperm and am really happy with my decision. I will continue to hold out for an alpha male as a life partner.

– Jh, London

If all her relationships ended in disaster, the problem is with her, not with the men.

As for her not settling with ‘beta(?)’ men, now she is left with no man and her child has no father.

This woman has achieved independence in the form of loneliness.

——————————————————-

At 9:23 PM, Hawaiian Libertarian said…

Things are just as bad, if not worse across the pond here in the good ole United States of MatriAmerica…

Here, a skank can pick a random name out of the phone book and claim the guy is the father of her bastard, and the State can enter a “default judgment” and begin to garnish your wages, even if you’ve never seen the whore in your life!

Check out my latest post, American Men: You Only Have 30 Days! for more details…

——————————————————-

At 1:43 AM, Ba1anced said…

Off topic but worth a look:
Remember Mary Winkler guys and gals? She is the woman who shot her sleeping preacher husband in the back with a shotgun and ran off with the kids. She was finally sentenced, check it out.

I’m not surprised a bit but until antiquated chivalry and the presumed higher “virtue” of women are wiped out, you will have killer wives getting out of jail on allegations that can’t be defended by a dead man.

From the article:

“At her trial Winkler testified she was physically and emotionally abused by her husband, but at her sentencing hearing Friday she said, “I think of Matthew every day, and I’ll always miss him and love him.””

If missing me and loving me so much makes you want to blow my torso through with a shotgun, I don’t need that kind of love!!!!

Ba1anced

-TEXAS

——————————————————-

At 1:51 AM, Anonymous said…

Ameriskank to be executed 6/13/2007

There she is, filthy skank, DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE!

——————————————————-

At 11:54 AM, mfsob said…

Not even worth a bucket of warm spit, the women of today.

——————————————————-

At 2:25 PM, Male Rights Network said…

The myth of the alpha female is just that: a myth.

——————————————————-

At 10:15 PM, Tainted said…

mikeray:

I’m quite surprised, Carol Sarler isn’t usually critical of men (and by critical, I mean in the typical Virginia Blackwood manner). Carol is usually quite critical of women who are excessively critical of men.

I admit I couldn’t really see misandry in the article – I just didn’t agree with her alpha/beta evaluation.

——————————————————-

At 4:30 AM, Hmh said…

Just a further comment: it’s the law here that a mother can refuse the father a DNA test which would confirm or deny his paternity. Now throw in a one-night stand and a child which might or might not even be yours and guess what… you could get done for court-decided maintenance for the next 18 years!! And told by the law that if you go within two hundred yards of YOUR kid, you go straight to jail, after she takes out an ex-parte protection order with unsupported allegations and no proof or witnesses.

The law has gone insane.

——————————————————-

At 12:17 PM, mfsob said…

Yet another reason for a vasectomy at an early age.

——————————————————-

At 4:45 PM, phoenix said…

I’m pretty sick of beta males myself. I welcome women shunning beta males, in fact, I hope they increase the intensity of the shunning until even this dim bulbs wake up, because then and only then will change occur.

——————————————————-

At 8:56 PM, Anonymous said…

My ex-wife had no money when she came into the marriage and left a short while later with over 80% of the equity of the marital (formerly mine) home.
I paid the going CSA rate and thousands of pounds to solicitors to get to see my child through contested court cases over a 3 year period.
Now she has died i get my son but not the money she took off me and certainly no child support.

Would it be OK for me to have her named and shamed on a government website for not supporting her child?

Another victory for radical feminism…. a boy is deprived of money that was given to bring him up.

——————————————————-

%d bloggers like this: