Archive for the ‘fatherhood’ Category

The Hunt & Humiliate Broke Men Agency
September 24, 2007

——————————————————-

06 June 2007

Mothers to name and shame absent fathers

PDF

Single mothers will be invited to name and shame fathers who fail to support their children.

Mothers invited to name and shame absent fathers

Letters are going out to around 100 parents – almost all of them mothers – asking if they want their former partner’s name to be included on an online list of people who have dodged maintenance payments.

More complete anti-male shit from a corrupt government. All the Child Support industry is there to do is to keep the flow of money going from hard-working men to spend-happy women.

Why the fuck should us men have to pay for women’s children? After all, children do, in fact, belong to women in this society.

Women get to choose whether to abort the baby. They virtually get automatic custody. Fathers are not required officially, as single women can get IVF treatment. A ‘family’ is now a mother and her children, with a father as optional.

So, John Hutton, you odious tit, shut the fuck up about demanding men pay for ‘their’ children; they are not theirs!

It cannot be said often enough; children belong to women now. That’s the primary principle in defining a Matriarchy, which the UK now is. Hence women can damn well support ‘their’ children, not the dad – who is only referred to as such when it comes to taking responsibility – and not us taxpayers.

At the very least a man should only have any obligations to support a child if the child was born when the man was married to the kid’s mother, and the child still has his surname. Otherwise it’s mummy’s little darling and mummy’s little responsibility.

One last thing; if parents are to be named and shamed for not supporting their children, surely that would mean any and all women who apply for Child Support should be named and shamed. After all, if they’re applying for Child Support they are clearly unable or unwilling to support their child themselves and, if the same definition of a ‘deadbeat parent’ is applied to them as it is to men, then such mothers are deadbeats.

It’s a dumb scheme anyway, it won’t work. Few men with any dignity will give a shit about being ‘shamed’ by spiteful ex-wives or ex-girlfriends, or by the fucking dipshit government. After all, you can only be shamed by people whose opinion you respect, and more and more men just don’t respect women or the government’s opinions one iota.

I’d imagine the sort of thugs who many single mothers have breeded with will most certainly not care anyway. In fact they’ll probably regard it as a rather funny badge of pride. “Hey look at the CSA website guys, it’s me! I’m on teh internet! WOOOH!”

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:31 PM

(more…)

Dad’s not needed, says British government
September 23, 2007

——————————————————-

17 May 2007

New fertility laws say dads not needed to make babies

PDF

A major relaxation of IVF rules was announced by ministers today.

The changes will make it easier for single people and lesbians to receive fertility treatment on the NHS.

Well, it’s official guys, we’re now officially redundant. We’re not needed now.

Apart from, of course, working the dangerous jobs women don’t want to do, being cannon-fodder in times of war, paying the bulk of taxes to fund single mothers and the taxpayer-funded IVF treatment for them, being extorted for Child Support, building the air-conditioned offices for women to sit around in filing their nails, policing the streets to keep women free from violent criminals…anything unpleasant basically.

But having a stake in society, a role in children’s lives, a position – at the head of it or otherwise – in the family?

Forget about it.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:42 PM

(more…)

Think of the children!
September 20, 2007

——————————————————-

19 April 2007

We are constantly told that women are the ‘fairer’ sex, especially with regards to children, that women are caring and nurturing towards little ‘uns whilst us men are cruel and harsh with them.

Amongst many examples is the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) which, in all its adverts, invariably implies children being beaten by their fathers. This is despite the fact that, whilst men may be responsible for the majority of sexual abuse of children, it is women who are responsible for the majority of physical abuse of children (and boys are more likely to be physically abused.)

Whenever you hear a child screaming and being smacked in public, it’s nearly always the kids mother belting the shit out of him/her (usually it’s a him.)

Plus women are far more likely to kill their babies than men are.

Then there’s abortion. 190,000 abortions are carried out in the UK each year, and it is estimated 1-in-3 women will have had an abortion by the age of 40. Some may be for genuine health reasons, or the rapes resulting in pregnancy, but most commonly it is because the woman just can’t be fucking arsed to have and raise a child. More than half of all women agree with abortion-on-demand. A couple of recent debates online that I’ve seen have involved mostly men disgusted at abortion, many women – usually bragging of having had an abortion, and that it was usually just because “I wasn’t ready to have kids.” – all telling men to basically shut up and fuck off, that we have no right to even have an opinion on abortion (though they never see the hypocrisy of saying men should be forced to take responsibility for their kids and pay Child Support whilst women should never have to take responsibility for their kids and actually not kill them.)

(more…)

King Queer
September 19, 2007

——————————————————-

16 March 2007

pingu-orange-wall.jpg

UK Government Program Teaching Four-Year-Olds about Homosexuality

Primary schools in the United Kingdom have begun teaching children as young as four about homosexuality, in anticipation of new anti-discrimination laws coming into effect next month, the Daily Mail reported earlier today.

Homosexuality-themed story books are being used in fourteen schools to introduce the children to the homosexual lifestyle. Among the texts in use are “King and King”, a fairy-tale about a prince who rejects three princesses before falling in love with another prince, “Spacegirl Pukes”, about a little girl with two mommies, and “And Tango Makes Three,” telling the story of two male penguins who fall in love at a New York zoo.

This is why I would never ever have children in this country. Not only is it the case that, thanks to feminism and slut-culture, there are very few young women who I feel would be good mothers to our children, but our children, in addition to being assessed on gurgling skills by government “practitioners” with clip-boards, would be taught at age five that gays are perfectly normal and fine and it’s really, like, cool to have two mums or two dads.

“The purpose of the project is to support schools in meeting their requirements under the Equality Act,” said Dr. Elizabeth Atkinson, lecturer in social and educational inquiry at Sunderland University, “which will require all public institutions to meet the needs of gay and lesbian users.”

Yeah, because there are so many gay and lesbian 5-year-olds using primary schools aren’t there? You dumb fucking cunt.

Any sane society would shoot cunts like her, but instead, in Shite Britain, she is given a voice and the minds of hundreds of children for her fuckwitted social experiment.

And this is only costing us British taxpayers £600,000.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 9:13 PM

(more…)

Feminism is succeeding in parting the sexes
September 18, 2007

——————————————————-

16 March 2007

bridgetjones.jpg

Bridget Jones generation will dominate UK by 2029

PDF

The number of people living alone is predicted to soar from 6,536,000 three years ago to 10,347,000 in 2029, creating a Bridget Jones generation.

Well, marriage is too risky for us men, there are few women worth marrying, and women are seemingly incapable of shaping up or proposing to men anyway. And the government, using taxpayer’s money, has taken of the role of Father for all those single mummies out there. Plus co-habitation will go the same way as marriage now that it’s been re-branded Marriage Lite. What did the government think would happen? Dumb motherfuckers.

Gotta hand it to feminists, they did a good job. I mean, credit where it’s due, they have succeeded in their aims at driving the sexes apart and ensuring more and more women will, like hardcore fembots themselves, grow up alone and single. Rather amusingly, on the other hand, us men seem to be coping quite fine with eternal bachelorhood.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:51 PM

(more…)

Father of four? Not really.
September 16, 2007

——————————————————-

22 February 2007

The mother of all betrayals

PDF

A DOTING dad told yesterday how he brought up four kids as his own — only to find they were all fathered by his wife’s secret LOVER.

Cheated Charles Bostock, 69, spent years thinking the three cherished girls and a boy were his children.

He only discovered the shock news when his 49-year-old wife Sarah fell pregnant with a FIFTH child by married love rival Richard Mills.

What a shitty depressing story. It shows you cannot trust women. This is more common than you think. If you ever have kids, get a DNA test to ensure they’re yours. Otherwise you’re relying primarily on the word of a woman, something only a fuckwit would do. Most women would lie about what they had for breakfast if they stood to gain something.

My advice to this guy is simple, and it involves a sawn-off shotgun and a trip to his ex-wife’s house and then her lover’s.

Boom-boom.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:26 PM

(more…)

Education and the nanny state in the UK
September 12, 2007

——————————————————-

07 February 2007

An education crisis is looming, unless parents do their homework

By Simon Heffer.

My suspicions were roused, and are regularly compounded, by Gordon Brown’s fiscal and economic policies. Marriage, except when deeply unhappy or abusive, is always the best context in which to raise children. Mr Brown has, however, neutralised the tax regime as it relates to marriage. Worse, he has gone to enormous lengths to encourage the creation of what has been called “the redundant male”.

State childcare facilities of which the old Soviet bloc would have been proud are being developed and funded to ensure that single women can have children and carry on some sort of career without having to worry about whether a man is there to assist with these awesome tasks, or to provide any financial support for them.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 10:16 PM

(more…)

Paternity fraudster and adulterer has no remorse
September 6, 2007

——————————————————-

19 January 2007

bitch.jpg

No tits, no arse and no morals

I seduced my future husband to hide my love child. But I have no regrets

To sum up this dreadful tale, this woman fell pregnant at 20 and because the father was a married man, she suckered another man into marrying her by telling him that the child was his. After the wedding she naturally continued fucking her adulterous lover. Her own marriage ended and her former husband has no idea that “his” daughter is not actually his, and the daughter, now 18, only learned the truth a few years ago.

And, naturally, being a Western Woman, she has no regrets.

No regrets at all that a man out there still wrongly thinks a girl is his.

No regrets that her daughter must have had a terrible shock a few years ago finding out her “dad” wasn’t actually her dad.

She says she’s “not proud” of all this, but she’s not remorseful either, and is not ashamed to admit she liked having an affair whilst married and loved all the danger of humping her lover in the back of his BMW. She even whines that her lover still hasn’t got round to ditching his own family to live with her.

(more…)

Dead man’s consent not necessary for sperm donation
September 6, 2007

——————————————————-

19 January 2007

Victory in dead Israeli sperm row

The lawyer of an Israeli couple who won the right to use their dead son’s sperm to inseminate a woman he never met says the case is a boost for family rights.

I don’t see why this is a boost for family rights. It’s taken more rights from men away, at least in Israel (although there was a similar case in the UK a while ago whereby a widow, Diane Blood, was able to given permission to conceive two children using pre-fertilized embryos her and her late husband had had frozen.)

Irit Rosenblum told the BBC the landmark ruling meant family lines could continue even without the written consent of the male prior to death.

Fucking hell. So even in death, it seems, us men are fair game to be harvested for sperm then?

I can understand the guy’s parents wanting grandchildren, but I think it’s still wrong. Do they not consider the feelings of the child that will result from this? Fancy not only being raised without a father, but being born five-years after he died, not to mention knowing your mum and dad never even met. Or that your dad never gave express consent for you to be created.

That kid will probably spend a lot of their adolescence on a psychiatrist’s couch.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:56 PM

(more…)

Baby blues
September 5, 2007

——————————————————-

12 January 2007

A young woman at work the other day inspired surreptitious sniggering from me as she bragged that she wanted to have four children but did not want to have any until she was “at least thirty.”

Oh boy.

Women seem to be endlessly narcissistic these days, with their endless infatuation with themselves individually and as a sex. Yet they have a startling lack of knowledge about biology. Their most fertile years are between 16 and 21, and the biological clock starts ticking down by the late 20s. By the thirties not only are women less fertile – possibly as barren as the Sahara by 35 – but the risk of birth defects and miscarriages rises too.

According to Wikipedia:

Birth defects, especially those involving chromosome number and arrangement, also increase with the age of the mother. According to the March of Dimes, “At age 25, a woman has about a 1-in-1,250 chance of having a baby with Down syndrome; at age 30, a 1-in-1,000 chance; at age 35, a 1-in-400 chance; at age 40, a 1-in-100 chance; and at 45, a 1-in-30 chance.”[3]

Multiplying the conception rate times the miscarriage rate times the birth defect rates should yield a rough likelihood of a healthy birth:

30-year-olds: .91 x .85 x .999 = 77%
35-year-olds: .84 x .80 x .9975 = 67%
40-year-olds: .64 x .55 x .99 = 35%

So even at 30, there’s almost a one-in-four chance the woman will miscarry or have a spaz baby. By 40 it’s a two-in-three chance. Sure, no pregnancy is risk-free for either the mother or baby, but clearly you’re far better off trying to have children with a woman under 30; ideally under 25. Obviously us men know this instinctively, hence our tendency to go for young women instead of old flappy-titted career bints, although women – especially old flappy-titted career bints – tend to assume this is some sort of vast sexist conspiracy and go friggin’ mental.

(more…)

Father’s not necessary IVF ruling moves a step closer
August 28, 2007

——————————————————-

14 December 2006

IVF father figure clause is to go

The government is set to abolish the requirement for fertility clinics to consider the need for a father when deciding whether to offer treatment.

This has been planned for a while and the fact that no-one in authority dares publicly criticise single mothers means it’s long since been the case that fathers are regarded as unnecessary.

This just puts the final nail in the coffin for us men; we’re now officially irrelevant in the UK.

But wait…what’s this? We do have a purpose after all.

Yes, apparantly, children don’t need fathers, but by golly single mothers need men’s money.

So us men are, according the government, no more than sperm donors and walking wallets.

(more…)

Father’s Rights
August 26, 2007

——————————————————-

29 November 2006

Are we guilty of ignoring fathers’ rights?

Amongst the first comments posted are guys proving that guys are increasingly seeing how fucked up and anti-male society is becoming.

Fathers don’t have rights. Period. Society does however force responsibilities upon them. No wonder increasing numbers of men will not form stable relationships or commit to fathering children. What goes around, comes around.

The liberals who have destroyed the institution of marriage and the family unit hadn’t got the intelligence to figure out the obvious consequences.

Men and Fathers face extreme prejudice from the courts and society in general. A Man has no rights whatsoever in reproductive nor post reproduction and that is a disgrace…Not only should we have equal measure in custody but also as much right as a woman to determine the future (or lack of) of a foetus..

The situation here in America isn’t much better; fathers aren’t considered as anything more human than a walking cash machine.

I have spent what would have been more than the equivalent of the cost of my daughter’s college education just to be even somewhat relevant in her life. What a waste of futute resources.

The saddest part is that the county Domestic Relations agencies ENCOURAGE this strife as they get matched, dollar for dollar, for every penny they extort out of fathers. How sick; being extorted by my own government.

On a related note, this guy has decided to harass and annoy a judge who has stopped him from seeing his child. Good on him. It’s a small step to holding family court judges – who are the scum of the Earth, no better than feminists and child molesters – responsible for their fucked up actions.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:20 PM

(more…)

Super Nanny State
August 9, 2007

——————————————————-

21 November 2006

‘Super-nannies’ to help parents

“Super nannies” are to be brought in to try to improve parenting in 77 areas of England with high levels of anti-social behaviour, Tony Blair has said. The prime minister is to give more details of the £4m scheme later.

Why should hard-working taxpayers have to fork out four-million-quid to try and lessen the effects of shit parenting?

Or shit single-parenting. There may be a fair number of yobs and hooligans from two-parent families but they are far more likely to come from single-parent ones, stupid slags getting knocked up, failing to raise their bastards properly because they’re busy still whoring around, and their kids end up hanging out on the streets, using the local drug-dealers and thieves as role-models, the only ones they have save for a long string of “uncles.”

[Blair said] “But life isn’t normal when you’ve got 12-year-olds out every night, drinking and creating a nuisance on the street, with their parents not knowing or even caring.”

Actually, it is normal in a Matriarchy, which is what we increasingly have these days thanks to feminism.

(more…)

Selfish cunt
August 8, 2007

——————————————————-

17 November 2006

irresponsibleselfishwoman.jpg

Motherhood is my right

No, motherhood is NOT your fucking right. If you leave it too late, or your sex started a “liberation” movement like feminism that made fatherhood too risky for men, tough shit.

A growing generation of single career women are reaching their late 30s unmarried but still desperate to become mothers. Many are embarking on parenthood alone – and their quest will soon be made easier.

Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt wants the law changed to allow single women and lesbians to have fertility treatment without the need to prove there will be a father figure in the child’s life.

Here, Ruth Yahel, a 41-year-old TV production executive, explains why she decided from the outset to be a lone parent, and why – in her opinion – they should not be vilified:

Say what you want you whore, you will be vilified by all decent people.

Single mothers by choice are utterly selfish disgusting cunts. They are invariably parasites and a drain on the country. Even if they work they will use tax-subsidised child-care. Even if they do pay their way and don’t require any taxpayer support, they are still scum who are guilty of Child Abuse because they inflict illegitimacy on a child deliberately just because they want a baybeeeeh but can’t/won’t get a man.

(more…)

From the comments
August 2, 2007

——————————————————-

10 November 2006

This rant landed in the comments section of a recent post of mine, from someone called “Willie“:

You probably won’t post this. Who really cares. But this site is ridiculous. Any man knows that men still enjoy privledge. It seems you are just upset cuz you can’t go out and club a woman over her head, drag her back to your apartment and then rape her just for a quick thrill and to spread your pathetic seed. Get over yourself.

Rather than indulge in mud-slinging and insults, I think it’s worth politely pointing out and expanding my viewpoint to this chap, for what it’s worth.

For starters, if he thinks the idea of thuggish men beating women, dragging them off to rape them and impregnating them is bad, then alarmingly we actually have something in common. I have no such desire to do such a thing or to leave women open to such treatment either.

However, ironically, it is a post-feminist society that removes the restraints on women that makes this scenario more likely.

Before feminism, women were looked down upon for getting knocked up by thugs and losers, and not having the right to an abortion meant they had to be careful and only hook up with nice-guys. Divorce was frowned upon too, so women better make sure they’re hooked up with a decent chap, not some “exciting” but obnoxious criminal. Plus girls grew up with a father-figure to represent the strong-but-considerate male figure they should seek when selecting a mate. A father would also protect his daughter.

(more…)

Some of the “incalculable good” feminism has done
August 1, 2007

——————————————————-

07 November 2006

cb.jpg

The breakdown in family life that threatens us all

This recent report that British teenagers are the randiest, booziest, ASBO-receivingist delinquents in the entire Universe has lead to lots of commentary, but as many have pointed out, most commentators and certainly all politicians skirt round the primary cause of all this, namely the absence of fathers in many children’s lives which was a direct goal – and a direct result – of feminism.

This article fortunately does get closer to the problem, although still not perfectly.

Next, look at schools. Why are millions of pupils — and I mean millions — bored out of their skulls? Why do so many teachers feel stifled by diktats and a narrowly prescriptive curriculum? What is there at most schools to hold the interest of non-academic children when the staff are so focused on cramming kids for meaningless exams? And why do thousands drop out of learning, and out of society, before they are 14?

It’s more likely to be boys dropping out, because most are tired of schoolteachers who are predominantly female and often feminists. Furthermore, us guys have been told we’re not needed by women, that we’re not needed as providers anymore; so why the fuck bother working hard to be a good provider? Furthermore, most young men want to get laid; that’s the main aim in their life as teenagers. Thanks to feminism, girls are now devoid of responsibility and restraint, with it being seen as patriarchal oppression to keep them on a leash, and a many only have a single slut-bag mother as a “role model” and no father in their lives. It’s no surprise they often go after bad-boy thugs. If you’ve got a hard-working straight-A boy of 15 who is already selecting which A-Levels to take and which University to go to, and another boy who is the same age and has been expelled, doesn’t go to school, hangs out on street corners drinking cider and hassling strangers for cash and has several convictions for car theft and public disorder, who do you think is more likely to have a gaggle of girls offering to suck his dick (I’ll give you a clue; it’s the same one who is more likely to have been raised by a single mum.) What’s the point in a teenage boy knuckling down and working hard when, thanks to feminism freeing their restraints, teenage girls will snub him and go to the drop-outs and thugs (until she’s been knocked up and needs a sucker)?

(more…)

Pod-porridge reserves are running low!
July 18, 2007

——————————————————————————–

13 September 2006

spermclinic.gif

IVF donor sperm shortage revealed

Almost 70% of fertility clinics either have no access to donor sperm, or find it extremely difficult to obtain, a BBC survey suggests.

Specialists say infertile patients are becoming desperate and more resources are needed for campaigns aimed at recruiting donors.

..

Fifty of the clinics surveyed said they either had no sperm or insufficient supplies.

Many reported waiting times of at least six months for couples needing donor sperm, and some were having to turn patients away.

Good. The British government has decided to further encourage single mothers and lesbians to use sperm clinics because, according to them, father’s aren’t necessary, although in practice this has been going on for a while anyway. The government and more and more women only see them as sperm-donors, and otherwise not really necessary to a child’s life. It’s about time us men started waking up and refusing to take part in reducing us to mere sperm-donors. A lot of these single mothers by choice also not only waste a fortune of taxpayers money on getting pregnant via IVF and sperm donations but also waste more money living off of benefits. Furthermore the UK will surely join other countries where women can claim Child Support from the donor.

(more…)

Feminist single mum rattles the cage
July 11, 2007

——————————————————————————–

03 August 2006

How not to be a total git: Fatherhood

This is a laughable blog entry by a feminist, basically advising what men should do when they’re about to become a father. It can be best summed up as “Do everything for the woman, she is the centre of attention, and you have responsibility for everything, even the child’s conception, but fuck you if the women wants to assert her right to have the baby chopped up in her womb and thrown in a bin.”

It’s crammed with demands that you pay for YOUR child because it’s YOUR responsibility to SUPPORT YOUR CHILD!!

Yet:

(2) Whether or not she continues the pregnancy is HER decision. Your rights over her body are precisely ZERO and you get precisely NO say over whether she has the baby or not.

Yup, screw you father-to-be (or not-to-be, if the baby is butchered on the woman’s whim), it’s her body and you have “ZERO” rights. You’ve got skipfuls of responsibility of course, that’s what us men are apparantly here for, to be responsible for women and babies and support them, but, evidently, we can go and fuck off if we think for a moment we have any rights.

(more…)

Women? Forced to do something? Since when?
July 10, 2007

——————————————————————————–

25 July 2006

Plan to force mothers to name fathers on birth certificates

The law could be changed to make it compulsory for mothers to register the names of the fathers of their children on birth certificates, ministers have announced.

The headline of this story sounded promising, some sort of plan to acknowledge that children have two parents, not one, and perhaps counteract the drive the British government is making to ensure us men are rendered entirely irrelevent in children’s lives.

Naturally, of course, this is not the idea. How silly of me to think the government was about to run contrary to feminism and do something in men’s favour for once.

From the outline of the plan and the comments from supporters and critics, I can conclude the following:

* 1 in 5 women and girls who give birth out of wedlock do not put a father’s name on the birth certificate, and given that they surely would do if they could, given that it would give them some lovely wads of Child Support, this would imply a fifth of them haven’t a clue who the father is.

(more…)

Relevancy
July 9, 2007

——————————————————————————–

17 July 2006

The irrelevant sex? Richard Morrison

Another article by a wishy-washy guy trying to stand up for his sex but ending up denigrating it by claiming us men have to prove ourselves to be of any worth. What is it with these half-arsed pseudo-anti-feminists.

Another nail hammered into the coffin labelled “male pride”. Another brick hurled at that tottering edifice called “common sense”. It’s now official. Kids don’t need dads.

Just because the government says something – in this case, kids don’t need fathers – doesn’t make it so.

It’s extraordinary to recall that, within living memory, genius in the arts or sciences was widely regarded as overwhelmingly a male preserve.

And things are different now because…?

The ratio of females to males in British universities is now 3:2, and widening. In state schools girls are generally expected to flourish in their studies, while boys are expected to struggle.

That doesn’t mean anything. Boys aren’t just expected to struggle, they’re made to struggle. Feminists pretty much run schools and they all clearly take delight in seeing how boys fail.

(more…)

%d bloggers like this: