Archive for the ‘mangina’ Category

Funny stuff
September 23, 2007

——————————————————-

17 May 2007

My recent entry, “Feminists angry because mother who abandoned baby is judged and criticised“, appears to annoyed quite a few fembots.

Check out this wonderful selection of shaming language and insults from the comments:

You sick fuck, Duncan. What ever happened to you to make you such a sad little women-hating psycho? Did the girls at school make fun of you because of how you look? Did your mummy run off with the milkman? Whatever it was do yourself a favour and get some therapy..quick. You need help.

It’s interesting how feminists and mangina automatically assume anyone who is critical of feminists must have had a traumatic background or a terrible mother. The stupid femibumwipes can’t comprehend or even consider the fact that I actually had a jolly nice childhood and a wonderful mother, because to do so would mean these raving lunatics may have to face the fact that – like so many men of my mindset (and there are many) – I actually came to be so pissed off at feminists simply through exposure to them.

Feminists themselves inspire the well deserved hatred they are getting from more and more men.

You and this blog is without doubt just for little knob tools!

And you’re all wasteing oxygen.

Gee, a small-dick accusation, I didn’t see that coming. Try and be original.

And I don’t waste oxygen, I recycle it and turn it into lovely, healthy carbon dioxide. Which trees eat.

It is pointless to write any serious comments in response to your hate-filled diatribe.

I will say this though… what the HELL happened to you to make you into such a disturbed individual.

In fact, your blog is SO ridiculous that I can’t help but think it is perhaps satire…

What the hell happened to me? I was exposed to feminism. See above.

It’s sickening to see this kind of vicious tripe being published.

Please believe me when I say that plenty of women do understand that the presence and involvement of the father is important to the children.

It’s sickening for me to see hate-filled rants from feminists published too, but at least my stuff is only on a blog; feminist crap gets into national newspapers and on college curriculums.

Funny these feminists and manginas will always accuse anti-feminists like me of being full of hate, even though these are the same mental little lot who proceed to scurry away and write hate-filled diatribes about men.

I probably shouldn’t give these arse-biscuits the attention, but on the other hand, I know how we all like to laugh at the predictable and unimaginative accusations from these angry men-hating hairy fembots.

In fact, I think I’m getting close to getting Fembot Bingo!

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 5:18 PM

(more…)

The spy who came in from the cold…to make the school-run
September 23, 2007

——————————————————-

14 May 2007

MI6 woos ‘Jane Bonds’ with offers of family-friendly employment

James Bond would surely raise an eyebrow. MI6 has decided that, if it wants to recruit more female spies, it must move with the times.

..

MI6, like its domestic counterpart MI5, is desperate for more women officers so part-time spying, childcare vouchers and “generous maternity pay” are on offer.

And women who are single when they join up are promised they will not have to leave should they marry, and have children.

“Part-time spying”?

Oh, fucking great, now we’re really up shit-creek.

So we’re going to have female spies and agents carrying out surveillance on a suspected terrorist cell, or deep undercover at Finsbury Mosque, except they go home at three, don’t work weekends and take a year off occasionally for maternity leave? Yeah, that’ll work.

And “childcare vouchers”? Hey, Miss Jane Bonds, how about letting hubby stay at home and take care of the children instead of insisting on dumping them on strangers? At taxpayer’s expense.

Why do we need more female spies anyway? It says 38% of applicants are female. It’s not as if that’s a teeny tiny minority. And if the only way to get more female recruits is to just offer them whopping amounts of (paid) time off for maternity leave and the choice of working part-time, then what’s the point? In any case, like soldiers, many female agents would only get knocked up if they sense they are about to be posted somewhere dangerous.

Then again, women would make fairly good undercover agents I suppose; they’re experts at faking attributes and even entire personalities to get what they want.

Oh well, the James Bond movies have long since turned into a pile of politically correct mangina hogwash, the real MI6 might as well go the same way. Life imitating art and all that.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:27 PM

(more…)

Musical interlude
September 23, 2007

——————————————————-

12 May 2007

Ten-years on and this is still one of my favourite songs, and one of my favourite videos. Check out his amusingly callous indifference to the bitch whose car he stomps over two-minutes into the vid.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 10:47 PM

(more…)

Oedipus Schmoedipus
September 23, 2007

——————————————————-

11 May 2007

One thing we often hear burbling from the incessently flapping gobs of women is that us men want a wife who’ll basically be like our mothers, that us “silly stupid little men” just want a mummy rather than a wife. That old hag, whatsername, Maureen Dowd, specifically said as much during one of the regular anti-male tirades she indulges in to push all the blame for her own spinsterhood onto us men.

This, of course, is a load of bollocks.

If us men wanted to marry a woman who would basically replace our mother, who would essentially be more of a mum than a wife, then surely we would be going after middle-aged women. But we don’t. We go after young women. Perky 16-22-year-old women. Always have, always will.

Perhaps emasculated young men seek a mother-figure in a wife/girlfriend, but proper normal men – certainly those raised by a healthy father and not just a single mother – want a young woman who’ll be a wife/girlfriend.

Admittedly, when seeking a wife, us men will look out for maternal skills and characteristics – such as a caring nature and fondness and patience towards children – but that’s not for our benefit, that’s for our future children’s benefit. After all, us men don’t want an uncaring ball-busting harpy being the mother of our kids…nor, indeed, do we want to put up with such a woman as a wife.

(more…)

Cuntville
September 20, 2007

——————————————————-

28 April 2007

chinaflag.jpg

“Women’s town” to put men in their place

Chinese tourism authorities are seeking investment to build a novel concept attraction — the world’s first “women’s town,” where men get punished for disobedience, an official said Thursday.

The motto of the new town would be “women never make mistakes, and men can never refuse women’s requests,” Chinese media have reported.

When tour groups enter the town, female tourists would play the dominant role when shopping or choosing a place to stay, and a disobedient man would be punished by “kneeling on an uneven board” or washing dishes in restaurant, media reports said.

Why bother with such a gimmick?

It sounds a lot like what Western Society – or what’s left of it – has become, but just on a smaller scale.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 10:44 AM

(more…)

Septic Septuagenarian Skank Spouts Off
September 19, 2007

——————————————————-

22 March 2007

mfrench.jpg

Still a burning issue

Marilyn French, the author of The Women’s Room, tells why she is still full of fury that the world remains a place messed up by men.

Short answer; she’s angry because she’s a Western Women, who are nearly always pissed off and moaning about fucking something, and she believes it is all men’s fault because she’s a Western Woman and a feminist to boot, and thus unable to accept any blame for her own misery.

The long answer…well, let’s read the article and sneer at the fucking bitch.

The girl at the Bobbi Brown make-up counter at Barneys wants to know what I’m doing in New York. I tell her that I’m interviewing Marilyn French, who wrote a book in the Seventies called The Women’s Room, bought by 20 million people and read by many more: dog-eared copies passed around neighbourhoods, hidden from husbands, read in secret at kitchen tables when the kids had gone to school. Hailed as the first feminist novel, it was devoured by desperate housewives around the world for its dramatisation of their feelings of rage and frustration, its offer of freedom through sisterhood and radical politics.

And now women have that wonderful freedom to be old and single and angry, not to mention slaving away at soul-crushing jobs. Brave girls.

“Wow!” breathes the girl, a blonde American beauty with flawless skin. “Yeah, wow!” says her colleague, who has a mane of dark hair and scarlet lips, “that’s so cool.” The blonde girl had done a semester of women’s studies at college and was getting married soon: she wanted to keep her career but also to have babies and make a nice home.

Typical dumb greedy bitch; she wants it all – to be a career woman, a housewife and a mother – but can’t comprehend the idea that she can’t. No-one can.

(more…)

Women are great, yadda yadda
September 18, 2007

——————————————————-

12 March 2007

We’ve never had it so good

PDF

They outperform boys at school, university, and work. They’re the twentysomething Generation Y women – educated, ambitious, successful. But is life really as good as it looks? Louise Carpenter reports

Indeed, another pile of triumphant nonsense about how women are so brilliant and outperforming men, the sort that regularly crops up from feminists, often lying side-by-side with articles that, paradoxically, bang on about how women are held back by the Patriarchy, under-represented on boards of directors, and glass-ceiling this, wage-gape that, blah-buggering-blah.

Still, to be fair, the writer does acknowledge her study isn’t scientific (well duh, like we couldn’t work that out for herself) and she also points out (but without condemnation) the shocking sense of entitlement of young women.

At the end of each day of interviews with the girls, I’d emerge from my study punch-drunk from their undiluted self-confidence; the absolute cast-iron belief in the power of their own will.

Really? After a day with them, I’d have come out disgusted by the infinite arrogance, stupidity and narcissism shown by these entitlement princesses. I’d have probably punched them too.

Amongst the things that stand out are these:

All of them bore out the theory that girls are easier to educate than boys. Many grew up being told by parents and teachers they were the best, certainly better than boys – which, for some, had caused its own problems.

Indeed, girls are easier to educate. Did I say educate? I mean indoctrinate. They sit still, shut up and do anything to please, and tell them something will empower them – like working in a soul-crushing office job for 45-years – and they’ll often do it. Boys will think for themselves and rebel against things that aren’t in their own interest; unless, of course, they have been successfully emasculated by feminist teachers and therapists and their truck-loads of Ritalin.

(more…)

Mangina Services Network praises women again
September 17, 2007

——————————————————-

08 March 2007

Why women wear the money trousers

A staggeringly moronic “article” by a monumentally obtuse spazzed-out fuck-brained nutjob that doesn’t really deserve any comment, except for derisive sniggering and hoots of laughter.

Women have achieved financial independence and are better at saving indeed. Pffft!

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:38 PM

(more…)

Women better at being friends than us men, claims twat
September 17, 2007

——————————————————-

07 March 2007

scrap.jpg

This never, ever happens apparently.

Women ‘better at friendships’

PDF

Women form deep and lasting friendships while men make fickle friends over a pint, according to research published today.

Snigger, chuckle.

Females make “deeper and more moral” pals than their male counterparts, who are “calculating” in who they choose to call their mates, according to a new study by the University of Manchester.

Ho-ho-ho.

The four-year investigation concluded that friendships between men are “fickle” and based on what what “they can get out of it”.

Giggle, guffaw!

Dr Gindo Tampubolon, from the university’s Research Centre for Socio-Cultural Change, said men based their friendships on boozing in the pub.

He said: “Friendship between women seems to be fundamentally different to friendship between men.

“It’s much deeper and more moral: it’s about the relationship itself rather than what they can get out of it.

“Women tend to keep their friends through thick and thin across geography and social mobility.

Bwhahahahaha!

Holy shit, what planet are these fuck-witted arse biscuits on?

(more…)

“It’s time for us women to start complaining!”
September 17, 2007

——————————————————-

05 March 2007

moran.jpg

Haggard sisters, let’s end our silence. It’s time to bitch

PDF

This piece of wretched whining is from Caitlin Moran, a whining harpy who, last year, wrote an article supporting abortion for sex-selection reasons because most people would abort baby girls, meaning that females would become rare and, in turn, would apparantly mean females would be worth more and men would fight over them more (in other words, she thinks encouraging women to kill their daughters in the womb is a great idea because it should apparantly help young women get a fucking husband. How sick is that?)

Today the blithering self-important sack of arrogance is urging women to start complaining.

Start complaining?

They haven’t stopped! Since 1960!

All this stoic ‘I can handle it. I can have a job and look after the kids and run the house’ business will not change anything.

Hah! Stoic? When have young modern women ever been stoic? Does she even know the meaning of the word?

Maybe in the past, when they had loads of kids, got on with things and didn’t shriek and whine constantly, women were stoic. But these days? Shit, most women are about as stoic as a guest on Jerry Springer.

Feminism, it turns out, has been completely wasted on young women. Chicks of all ages spent the first half of the 20th century piling into marches against sexism, pornography, political disenfranchisement and pro-life legislation, and yet the young, single, modern woman who followed appears to have frittered the whole lot away in exchange for a “Trainee Porn Star” T-shirt and Heat magazine.

This is merely the natural result of feminism. The Patriarchy encouraged women to remain virtuous, keep their legs shut until marriage and introduced the concept of only children being born in wedlock as ‘legitimate’. Feminism urged women to become liberated by tossing aside virtue and chastity, encouraged them to sleep around, and declared that marriage was bullshit and illegitimate bastards were ‘legitimate’. Hence the progression to slut-culture. Feminism encouraged women to flood society with easily accessible female sexuality – no more tying the knot to get your leg-over – so of course women have become sex-objects. They have to blatantly offer sex because they have no other talents to offer, and they have objectify themselves further to compete against other sluts.

Feminism wasn’t wasted on young women, feminism just wasted young women.

(more…)

Fembots browbeat Wimbledon
September 16, 2007

——————————————————-

22 February 2007

tennis.jpg

A female tennis player. Allegedly.

Wimbledon pays equal prize money

Equal pay for non-equal work basically.

As is pointed out in the article, women only have to play best-of-three sets whilst men play best-of-five. So the women have far less work to do as the men but will now get just as much of a reward.

Just like in the workplace in general I suppose.

Peter Fleming, with whom McEnroe won four Wimbledon doubles titles and three US Opens, said equal pay “was just a matter of time”.

“It’s almost a non-issue in my eyes,” he told Five Live.

“The difference last year was so small – it was a symbolic gesture for the last couple of years – but finally the club have realised it’s not worth the effort to maintain it. It’s equal pay and off we go to bigger and better things.”

So what this mangina is saying is that basically it wasn’t worth the effort of keeping things fair because women were whining and bitching so much that they wanted to be paid as much as men but without having to put in as much effort (under the misnomer of ‘equality’) that they just had to give in.

That’s how feminism works; whine, whine and fucking whine until some manginas cave in, instead of bitch-slapping the miserable dykes – literally or otherwise – and telling them to shut the fuck up.

Fleming said he hoped that any male players angry at the decision would see the light eventually. “They’ll grow up at some point,” he said.

Peter Fleming, for your pitiful employment of shaming language, I hereby declare you to be Mangina Of The Month.

Cocksucker.

If female tennis players want to earn as much as the men, let them play best-of-five sets. If women continue to complain about how they are paid less than men in sports in general, then let them compete with men in things like running, football, boxing, etc.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 6:29 PM

(more…)

Feminism ruins society, men blamed
September 16, 2007

——————————————————-

16 February 2007

gun.jpg

Cameron blames fathers for ‘broken’ society (PDF)

Fathers should be compelled to look after their children in an effort to tackle the breakdown of family life and discipline in society David Cameron, the Conservative leader, said today.

Father’s children”? I didn’t realise fathers had children these days, they belong to women. Women can abort kids, get full custody, get pregnant via a sperm donor (willing or otherwise) with no intention of the father having any input at all…whatever they want.

Hang on a minute though, it looks like some blame has to be placed for children’s misery, and that means – ta-daah! – suddenly children belong to father’s again! What a shocking surprise.

He said the shooting of three teenage boys in south London in the last fortnight had shown that British society was “badly broken”.

Issues like teenage gun crime, Mr Cameron said, could not be dealt with by better policing or tighter gun controls alone when the problem – and the solution – lay within families and communities.

Indeed it does lie in families and communities. Not in more laws and government interference, which is usually proposed as a solution, as Cameron pretty much proceeds to do.

“Every working parent knows that you can’t have it all.

Not really. Plenty of women still labour under this assumption.

“There is a natural conflict between hours worked, money earned and the time you spend at home. I believe that businesses have an overriding corporate responsibility to help lessen this conflict, and make it easier for parents to find the proper balance for their lives,” he said.

No, businesses don’t have to make it easier for parents. Businesses are there to make money. All this forcing of businesses to ensure people (primarily women) get their work/life balance in order is fucking the economy up, not to mention causing increasing resentment.

(more…)

Freed from prison for being unhappy. And having a vagina.
September 13, 2007

——————————————————-

14 February 2007

humberbridge.jpg

Bridge Jump Mother Freed

A woman who was jailed for trying to kill herself and her child by jumping 100ft from the Humber Bridge has been freed “as an act of mercy”.

Well, she does have a vagina, and it would be an act of merciless Patriarchal Oppression to actually keep her in prison, even if she did try to kill her baby daughter.

Said Judge Mangina:

“We have asked ourselves, is it really necessary, or was it really necessary to send this unhappy woman to prison to punish her for the momentary aberration which led her to try and take her own and her child’s life?

“Momentary aberration”? She did specifically drive all the way to the bridge, that can’t have taken a mere moment. Clearly it was premeditated. And she was unhappy? Oh boo-hoo! Maybe if I ever end up in prison I could tell the judge at the appeal court that I was little bit unhappy at the time of the offence, and thus obtain early release. Hurrah!

Oh wait, I don’t have a vagina. Silly me. I therefore wouldn’t be eligible.

witch.jpg

“Could I be any more evil looking? Bwhahaha!”

He said she had then kept her child afloat “for some 45 minutes”, saving the lives “she had tried to end”.

The only reason her child’s life needed saving was because this demented fruitcake had jumped into a big bastard river whilst holding the crying child. She put the baby’s life in danger and only saved her life, and her own, after changing her mind about the whole murder-suicide thing (it’s a woman’s prerogative after all.) Yet they just about want to give her a bravery award.

Stake + firewood + match = proper justice

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 8:51 PM

(more…)

Psycho divorcee imprisoned kids for seven-years
September 13, 2007

——————————————————-

12 February 2007

Daughters Struggling After Mom Locked Them Away for 7 Years

Three girls who were imprisoned by their mother in a house of indescribable filth for seven years may never recover from the ordeal, experts said last night.

The girls were shut away from the outside world, existing in almost complete darkness, playing only with mice and communicating in their own language.

When they were discovered, their home in a smart, upper middle-class suburb had no running water and was filled with waste and excrement a meter high. The floor was corroded by mice urine.

What a bitch.

The girls’ ordeal was apparently sparked by their parents’ divorce, after which their mother, a 53-year-old lawyer, suffered a breakdown. But she won custody of the girls — then aged 7, 11 and 13 — and withdrew them from school, claiming that she would give them private tuition at home.

Her husband, a local judge in Linz, Upper Austria, named only as Andreas M, was not allowed to see them once, despite his claims for access reaching court nine times.

Welcome to the West; Mangina Central. The bitch suffered a mental breakdown but she still won custody of the kids and her husband’s demands to see his children completely ignored.

The mother is now being held in a special remand prison branch for the mentally unstable. She will appear in court in a few weeks on charges of grievous bodily harm and torture, and is facing between five months and five years in prison.

Ah yes, off to a special cozy psychiatric branch of a prison because she simply must be mentally ill or have a personality disorder like any woman who gone and done bad.

And the most she’ll get is five-years? Possibly less than half-a-year? Her daughters spent seven-years locked up.

I think, oh let’s say, seventy-years would be a more appropriate punishment. Or good old fashioned burning at the stake.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:00 PM

(more…)

A trio of articles
September 12, 2007

——————————————————-

05 February 2007

I put “divorce” and “men” into Google’s news search engine and found a trio of articles:

Marriage: The decision of women alone? (PDF)

The opinions of normal men were excluded entirely. Thus, we learn nothing about marital relationships as they are symbiotic in nature. The truth can never be known regarding marriage if one only analyzes the opinions of one sex.

Finally, an article pointing out how absurd it is the way women are the only ones consulted about the declining marriage rate, and questioning the obviously ridiculous claim that women are somehow overjoyed that more and more of them are hitting middle-age single and childless.

This article, on a similar subject, namely women’s increasing singlehood, was clearly written by a complete mangina given that he implores us men to improve or we’ll remain bachelors. Oh no, mercy, not bachelorhood, a man’s worst nightmare! Snigger.

These words are for men only (PDF)

If I may humbly suggest, guys, we need to proceed in a businesslike way. We have a very good product to sell – adorable, cute-as-buttons men – and all we need to do is to market our gender more successfully. It’s no good just indulging in a spiteful show of flatulence and snorting noises while wondering how in the world women would not find men irresistible.

Shove it up your arse. Women are the ones who have to sell themselves to us; us men don’t need them. We can defend ourselves, support ourselves and do our own ironing too. By delaying marriage until their looks have gone, by whelping illegitimate bastards, by slutting around, by being so obnoxious and self-centered, not to mention successfully demanded outrageous anti-male bias in the divorce courts, women are the ones who have chased men away from marriage. If women really are happy being old, single, childless and slaving away at their “careers”, then fine, but if not – and I doubt many are – they’ve got a lot of work to do before us men find them in anyway tolerable, let alone irresistible.

(more…)

MSN “relationship” advice
September 6, 2007

——————————————————-

17 January 2007

Why are you still single?

git.jpg

It may seem like every guy except you has a committed, caring relationship with a woman who loves, trusts and respects him.

Actually, it doesn’t seem like that at all. It actually seems like most guys like me are free and single, a lot of others are shackled to a wife or live-in girlfriend who treats them like shit, spend their money, badmouths them and takes them for granted, whilst just a small number (often amongst the older generation) are married to women who love, trust and respect them.

What a brainless mangina. Look at him. Just look at him. Twat.

There then follows a stupid “quiz” which is not even worth reading through.

With this kind of attitude, it’s easy to see why single men occasionally wonder why they’re still single, howling the question at an uncaring sky.

Admittedly this guy is just writing a match.com advert disguised as an article, but still, it’s an insult to the intelligence for some twat in a hat to assume us single men are miserable at being free and single.

Why am I still single? Because I want to be, because it makes me happy, because its better than being shackled to a wife/live-in-girlfriend who’ll spend my money, nag me, and potentially ditch me yet leave me obliged to support her. This is what manginas and women – especially spinsters – need to accept; a lot of us men enjoy being single. Increasingly, we like not being married or co-habiting, as often even any form of relationship – save, perhaps, for sport-fucking – with women is a major hassle.

posted by Duncan Idaho @ 7:49 PM

(more…)

Abandon the Mangina Ship!
September 5, 2007

——————————————————-

09 January 2007

Tory peers defect to UK Independence Party

Two former Conservative peers will defect to the United Kingdom Independence Party today, giving the Eurosceptic group its first foothold in Parliament.

Lord Pearson of Rannoch and Lord Willoughby de Broke will create a UKIP group in the House of Lords, promising to recruit other members and to persuade leading Conservative donors to switch allegiance.

Whilst I’m not all that partisan and generally think the worst of politicians by default, and I certainly wouldn’t be so arrogant as to try and influence who I think any British readers should vote for, nonetheless, in my humblest of humble opinions the UKIP at least seem to be the nearest thing to a decent party in Britain.

They are mainly standing for the rather good idea that we should pull what’s left of our country out of the shitty wretched Socialist Superstate of the European Union, but also for smaller government and lower taxes, urging independence amongst people rather than reliance on the State. Whether they would do this on the off-chance they got in power would remain to be seen; after all, no-one ever sought power with the intention of then reducing it once they had it.

(more…)

Predictions for luuurve in 2007
September 5, 2007

——————————————————-

06 January 2007

yikes1.jpg

April Masini; relationship expert, advice columnist,
and probably allergic to sunlight and garlic too

This “article” and its contents of the blithering of various women and a few token guys (mostly manginas) is not to be taken seriously, even less so than your average article from women about relationships. It’s just a load of silly self-professed relationship experts, authors and advice columnists trying to market their books and websites. But they try their best to be sincere so I’ll take them as being sincere and laugh at them.

“2007 will continue to be an era of ‘convenience-dating’ – online dating, speed dating, and for the younger generation, getting dates via social networking sites,” predicts Hilary Black. “More than ever, single people — especially in urban areas — are far less anxious to settle down and get married.”

Hmmmm. Strange how we’re always being told the people – including women, no doubt – are “less anxious to settle down and marry.” Maybe young women who can easily go and get another boyfriend to replace the current one think like that, but I don’t ever seem to see women past the age of 28 or thereabouts who are keen on ‘convenience-dating’. At that age, convenience dating tends to mean just getting sport-fucked. Assuming any guys pay attention to them.

(more…)

Father’s not necessary IVF ruling moves a step closer
August 28, 2007

——————————————————-

14 December 2006

IVF father figure clause is to go

The government is set to abolish the requirement for fertility clinics to consider the need for a father when deciding whether to offer treatment.

This has been planned for a while and the fact that no-one in authority dares publicly criticise single mothers means it’s long since been the case that fathers are regarded as unnecessary.

This just puts the final nail in the coffin for us men; we’re now officially irrelevant in the UK.

But wait…what’s this? We do have a purpose after all.

Yes, apparantly, children don’t need fathers, but by golly single mothers need men’s money.

So us men are, according the government, no more than sperm donors and walking wallets.

(more…)

“Name and shame” those who don’t/can’t pay for women’s bastards
August 28, 2007

——————————————————-

10 December 2006

Website to ‘shame’ absent parents

Ministers are planning to publish the names of absent parents who refuse to pay maintenance for their children.

Or, to put it another way;

Women-firster manginas in charge of the Matriarchy are going to illegally publish the names of non-custodial fathers who have escaped the Matriarchy’s enforcement agency, the CSA, in the hope of shaming them into paying up for kids they never see.

I hate the way society declares that “non-custodial parents” (i.e. fathers) should pay to support “their” children.

Britain is now a Matriarchy. Children belong to their mothers and no-one else according to the law. In the UK, women can have unborn children chopped up and dumped in a bin if she can’t be bothered to raise him/her, and in divorces, the mother invariably gets custody.

(more…)

%d bloggers like this: